EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- As Death Toll Rises Beyond 500, Garment Factory Disaster 'Worst in World History'
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Pregnant Anti-War Soldier Sent to Prison
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Move Over, Koch Brothers: A Bigger, Darker Rightwing Funder Is Out to Destroy Public Education
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Time for Big Green to Go Fossil Free
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
Popular content
Today's Top News
Wikileaks: US Dept. of Homeland Security Kept File on Occupy Wall Street
If there was any doubt among Occupy movement activists that the federal government was keeping close tabs on the development of their growing street protests and public encampments, a newly released Department of Homeland Security document will put those doubts to rest.
Occupy protestors during a demonstration at the UC Davis campus in November. (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)
The DHS report is part of a trove of documents Wikileaks began publishing earlier this week under the banner, "The Global Intelligence Files". The release includes over 5 million e-mails and documents culled from the US-based private intelligence firm Stratfor, the Global Intelligence Company described by Barons as the Shadow CIA. Wikileaks has shared certain emails and documents with 25 separate media outlets from around the world. The DHS report on Occupy Wall Street was released to Rolling Stone journalist Michael Hastings for advanced review, but is also available on its website and is viewable below.
Michael Hastings, author of the recently published book The Operators: The Wild and Terrifying Inside Story of America's War in Afghanistan, is best know for his damning report of former US commander in Afghanistan, General Stanley McChrystal, who was forced to resign his position after Hastings reporting appeared in the magazine.
His assessment of the DHS report on the Occupy Wall Street follows:
As Occupy Wall Street spread across the nation last fall, sparking protests in more than 70 cities, the Department of Homeland Security began keeping tabs on the movement. An internal DHS report entitled “SPECIAL COVERAGE: Occupy Wall Street," dated October of last year, opens with the observation that "mass gatherings associated with public protest movements can have disruptive effects on transportation, commercial, and government services, especially when staged in major metropolitan areas." While acknowledging the overwhelmingly peaceful nature of OWS, the report notes darkly that "large scale demonstrations also carry the potential for violence, presenting a significant challenge for law enforcement."
The five-page report – contained in 5 million newly leaked documents examined by Rolling Stone in an investigative partnership with WikiLeaks – goes on to sum up the history of Occupy Wall Street and assess its "impact" on everything from financial services to government facilities. Many of the observations are benign, and appear to have been culled from publicly available sources. The report notes, for instance, that in Chicago "five women were arrested after dumping garbage taken from a foreclosed home owned by Bank of America in the lobby one of the bank's branches," and that "OWS in New York staged a 'Millionaires March,' from Zucotti Park to demonstrate outside the homes of some of the city’s richest residents."
But the DHS also appears to have scoured OWS-related Twitter feeds for much of their information. The report includes a special feature on what it calls Occupy's "social media and IT usage," and provides an interactive map of protests and gatherings nationwide – borrowed, improbably enough, from the lefty blog Daily Kos. "Social media and the organic emergence of online communities," the report notes, "have driven the rapid expansion of the OWS movement."
The most ominous aspect of the report, however, comes in its final paragraph:
"The growing support for the OWS movement has expanded the protests’ impact and increased the potential for violence. While the peaceful nature of the protests has served so far to mitigate their impact, larger numbers and support from groups such as Anonymous substantially increase the risk for potential incidents and enhance the potential security risk to critical infrastructure (CI). The continued expansion of these protests also places an increasingly heavy burden on law enforcement and movement organizers to control protesters. As the primary target of the demonstrations, financial services stands the sector most impacted by the OWS protests. Due to the location of the protests in major metropolitan areas, heightened and continuous situational awareness for security personnel across all CI sectors is encouraged."
It’s never a good thing to see a government agency talk in secret about the need to “control protestors” – especially when that agency is charged with protecting the homeland against terrorists, not nonviolent demonstrators exercising their First Amendment rights to peaceable dissent. From the notorious Cointelpro operations of the 1960s to the NYPD’s recent surveillance of Muslim Americans, the government has a long and disturbing history of justifying the curtailing of civil liberties under the cover of perceived, and often manufactured, threats ("the potential security risk to critical infrastructure). What’s more, there have been reports that Homeland Security played an active role in coordinating the nationwide crackdown on the Occupy movement last November – putting the federal government in the position of targeting its own citizens in the name of national security. There is not much of a bureaucratic leap, if history is any guide, between a seemingly benign call for "continuous situational awareness" and the onset of a covert and illegal campaign of domestic surveillance.
Here's the full 5 page report:
###
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

38 Comments so far
Show AllStop trying to 'change' the system.
It's time to END this system.
Pull every single cent form the banks. Turn off the TV and rip the cable out of the wall. Smash the satellite dish. Ditch the cellphone. Walk away from that mind-killing McJob. Cripple and corrupt the Government databases and files. Burn the mortgage contracts.
General strike with no end date and demands that will not be negotiated away.
Drag the Elite into the street and make them watch as their wealth and possessions are redistributed to those who actually need them.
I'm sure many of you have ideas and feelings along the same lines.
What I think people in Western countries need to do (sorry about giving advice from the sidelines) is to actually take power back and establish proper democracies. Passivity for Westerners is not a solution - there are enough substitutes in all areas of human activity all over the world that'll take our places and be happy about it. Westerners, especially the western working class, needs to claim power and use it, and what's even more difficult, it must not use power for narrow national economic interests but must use it with an international point of view. Sometimes that will have to go against national economic interests. My personal opinion is that life in general could actually be a lot better with lower material consumption and less waste, but I'm pretty sure this is not the majority opinion. Although on the other hand, maybe people don't really care for working twelve hours in shit jobs and could take some lower levels of consumption and some physical work for overall more free time.
Basically, capitalism in itself is a totalitarian system in that it is simply impossible for any other type of organisation of production to coexist with it in the long run. The reason for this is that capitalism (through profit and rent) keeps up a constant concentration of wealth and puts its hands on the control of production and use of surplus. Workers get less and less, and the lower limit is the amount the working class *as a whole* needs to reproduce its necessary working capacity which, when there is oversupply of labour, can be much *less* than what's necessary for social reproduction (iow, workers, like young women in factories, can (and do) just die off young (much younger than otherwise) because there's always replacement for them). Capitalists get to own more and more and owning stuff is power and that power will inevitably be used to expand capitalism into other areas. Which is exactly what's happening right now.
You ain't doin squat sitting here worrying about some numbnut reading your email or taking your picture at a rally.
OCCUPY AWAY HARDY SOULS>....they really can't put you ALL in jail...and they will eventually be hardpressed to prosecute the rabble.
WAKE UP AND SHAKE IT UP. Fear is an emotion you do not need.
We are wasting precious time and effort worrying about their surveillance bull shit; they want to keep your ego sidetracked so you won't look at their crimes, their corrupted Congressional bottom dwelling....Grow a pair, suck it up, be brave, be a real American revolutionary.
Jeesus, that's what you took from my comment. No wonder this country is in such a dire morass.
Canadian actress and activist Sarah Polley attended a demonstration in Toronto, Ontario some years ago. When the TPD Horse Unit showed up, she was unable to move, and the officer DELIBERATELY used his 2000lb horse to step on and crush her foot. And then he smiled at her.
White House Wants All Agencies to Have Option of Setting Own Personnel Policies By Christopher Lee
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, January 27, 2005; Page A01 "The Bush administration unveiled a new personnel system for the Department of Homeland Security yesterday that will dramatically change the way workers are paid, promoted, deployed and disciplined -- and soon the White House will ask Congress to grant all federal agencies similar authority to rewrite civil service rules governing their employees." So, it is important to remember, whatever your take on the events of 9/11/01, that an event which killed about 3000 Americans was the catalyst not only for the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq and the GWOT, but also the catalyst for an attack on workers rights within the government itself. As many Americans are finding out, economic attack is far more likely to effect them than "terrorism" is ever going to. Hence, the creation of the Dept. Homeland Security actually did more to foster insecurity amongst the average person than any protection it was supposed to offer.
BECAUSE...it is quite obvious that is what they fear from us, violence, that we will be angry and stupid like them. If we are screaming loud and signing big, then our non-violence will make them raving mad...and isn't that the point?
friendspeaceteams.org
michiganpeaceteam.org
www.mettacenter.org
www.trainingforchange.org
veterans for peace
It is to use intercepted iphone pictures and vocalizations, security cameras, etc. Anybody who seems to have or expresses "Resentment toward Government." will be identified and put on a potential terrorist list, to be tracked along with their friends, contacts, etc.
Boy, I'm glad we don't live in a police state where that sort of thing could happen! Aren't you?
Oh say can you see?
Das korporations = first klass citizens
We the people = second class citizens
Department of Homeland Security = security, subsidy for das korporations!
Now the people are changing this scenario by taking matters into our own hands!
"While the peaceful nature of the protests has served so far to mitigate their impact...."
Most Americans slumber on, never having heard of OWS. Still think OWS represents the 99%? Jus' sayin'!
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
translation: occupy created revolutionary consciousness that literally threatened the physical infrastructure of urban america. the consciousness was beginning to evolve into open rebellion (and subsequent destruction of property), therefore it was shut down and will not be allowed to exist in the future. the nature of the great inequity of wealth in america coupled w/ our dire economic forecast is problematic. the last thing the elites need is an educated angry mob - not going to happen (that's our job folks - to make that happen).
the question is how are they going to suppress the organizational leadership (although occupy is non hierarchical, there are people who invested a lot of energy into occupy). it's time to be paying attention to the canaries in the coal mine. hopefully our progressive newswires and journalists (dem now, real news, alex cockburn, glenn greenwald) will be able to alert us when old school tactics (cointelpro) are fused w/ the new found liberties of the secret police (authorized indefinite detention, assassination, public campaigns to discredit individuals) authorized in the patriot act and in the ndaa of 2012.
large demonstrations that build upon themselves, w/ no holds barred. that is what they are scared shitless of. new york, LA, chicago shut down for days. there is a threshold the elites can't cross w/out suffering irreparable repercussions (kent state). if they actually kill an activist (on video), which almost happened in california, there will be hell to pay. simultaneously - the state has to destroy the movements by force of arms (and manipulation of the media) - to state clear boundaries (acceptable speech) and to protect their property. it's a conundrum for them, in the sense that they also realize once the threshold is crossed there will be no turning back for many. also, once the novelty of shooting unarmed protesters wears off - it will become more commonplace. as we descend further into a full blown police state, we shouldn't be too surprised that the authorities will begin to shoot into crowds w/ live ammo. unfortunately, i can't think of an authoritarian country that hasn't eventually followed this path.
...peace..
DHS Clerks: Please file this as general social complaint No. 101,100,000,000. File under waste, fraud and abuse.
These guys are putting bodyscanners in airports with other public places not far behind, they are equipping Wal-Marts with TVs running paranoid "See Something, Say Something" messages 24/7, they are deploying an army of 30,000 unmanned aerial drones (i.e., flying robots) into our skies over the next decade, they are developing biometric facial recognition technology, tracking our Internet activity, monitoring social media, etc., etc., etc. All of this coming out of a bureaucracy, which if you remember, was established ten years ago on the stated basis of trying to facilitate communication between the FBI, CIA, and NSA in order to prevent another 9/11 from happening.
And here we are, a decade later, and you don't even hear them trying to pretend that their mission has anything to do with al-Qaeda anymore. We are seeing the chickens coming home to roost, and the true purpose of the national security state revealing itself: to establish a totalitarian system of control over the American people. And of course, their apologists will justify this repression with arguments like yours -- that they are simply trying to identify "potential" terrorists, if you don't have anything to hide, you shouldn't mind them monitoring you, yada yada yada. We all just need to walk around with big smiles plastered on our faces, muttering "I love Big Brother, I love Big Brother," and we should be all right.
I know I should resist, but this line from the report surely wins the Black Bloc incitement prize:
"The growing support for the OWS movement has expanded the protests' impact and increased the potential for violence. While the peaceful nature of the protests has served so far to mitigate their impact..."