EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- As Death Toll Rises Beyond 500, Garment Factory Disaster 'Worst in World History'
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Pregnant Anti-War Soldier Sent to Prison
- Move Over, Koch Brothers: A Bigger, Darker Rightwing Funder Is Out to Destroy Public Education
- Move Over, Koch Brothers: A Bigger, Darker Rightwing Funder Is Out to Destroy Public Education
- Time for Big Green to Go Fossil Free
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
Popular content
Today's Top News
Anti-Choice Bullying in Congress Threatens Planned Parenthood Cancer Programs
Relentless bullying by anti-choice members of a Congress have now helped sabotage the relationship between the nation's large beast cancer funder, Susan G Komen for the Cure, and one of the largest providers of women's health services, Planned Parenthood.
Cecile Richards, president Planned Parenthood Federation of America, had this to say in response to the news:
We are alarmed and saddened that the Susan G. Komen for the Cure Foundation appears to have succumbed to political pressure. Our greatest desire is for Komen to reconsider this policy and recommit to the partnership on which so many women count.
And, she added, though the news was "deeply disturbing":
We want to assure women who rely on Planned Parenthood for breast care that we’re still here for them, and we always will be. The new fund we’re launching to support these services will ensure that the Komen Foundation’s decision doesn’t jeopardize women’s health.
The Associated Press reports:
The change will mean a cut-off of hundreds of thousands of dollars in grants, mainly for breast exams.
Planned Parenthood says the move results from Komen bowing to pressure from anti-abortion activists in the US. Komen says the key reason is that Planned Parenthood is under investigation in Congress – an investigation launched by a conservative Republican who was urged to act by anti-abortion groups.
The rupture, which has not been publicly announced as it unfolded, is wrenching for some of those who've learned about it and admire both organizations.
"We're kind of reeling," said Patrick Hurd, who is CEO of Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Virginia – recipient of a 2010 grant from Komen – and whose wife, Betsi, is a veteran of several Komen fundraising races and is currently battling breast cancer.
"It sounds almost trite, going through this with Betsi, but cancer doesn't care if you're pro-choice, anti-choice, progressive, conservative," Hurd said. "Victims of cancer could care less about people's politics."
And the Los Angeles Times adds:
In September, Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-Fla.) launched an inquiry to determine whether Planned Parenthood uses public money to fund abortions. Planned Parenthood receives federal money but cannot use it to provide abortions.
"It's hard to understand how an organization with whom we share a mission of saving women's lives could have bowed to this kind of bullying. It's really hurtful."
-- Cecile RichardsKomen has a long history of providing funding to various Planned Parenthood affiliates for such services as manual breast exams and referrals for mammograms and biopsies to check suspicious lumps for cancer. Although that money is not used for abortions, the Komen Foundation may have yielded to demands from antiabortion groups to sever its ties to Planned Parenthood.
"We had the sense this was coming and that they were under pressure," said Sue Dunlap, chief executive of Planned Parenthood Los Angeles. "I find this really disappointing. I think when women's health is more of a political conversation than a conversation about healthcare and taking care of people, then we've gone too far."
Cecile Richards, president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, in an interview with AP, indicated Stearns' investigation was politically motivated and was dismayed that it had contributed to Komen's decision to halt the grants to PPFA affiliates.
"It's hard to understand how an organization with whom we share a mission of saving women's lives could have bowed to this kind of bullying," Richards told the Associated Press. "It's really hurtful."
Planned Parenthood has been a perennial target of protests, boycotts and funding cut-offs because of its role as the largest provider of abortions in the United States. Its nearly 800 health centers nationwide provide an array of other services, including birth control, testing for sexually transmitted diseases, and cancer screening.
According to Planned Parenthood, its centers performed more than 4m breast exams over the past five years, including nearly 170,000 as a result of Komen grants.
###
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

36 Comments so far
Show AllTrylon
I respectfully disagree. In fact, I will go further, and say that this is a total load.
In brief, the following relationships were obtained from twenty-one primitive cultures where coded anthropological information was available on abortion and other behaviors: 55% of cultures that punish abortion practice slavery while 92% of cultures that permit abortion prohibit slavery. 73% of cultures that punish abortion also torture, mutilate, and kill enemy captured in warfare while 80% of cultures that permit abortion do not torture, mutilate, and kill enemy captured in warfare. 78% of cultures that punish abortion punish premarital coitus while 67% of cultures that permit abortion permit premarital coitus. 88% of cultures that punish abortion punish extramarital coitus while 67% of cultures that permit abortion permit extramarital coitus. 70% of cultures that punish abortion exploit children while 78% of cultures that permit abortion do not exploit children.
1. 71% valid relationship between anti-choice beliefs and support of capital punishment and its converse relationship. 2. 72% valid relationship between anti-choice beliefs and support of the Vietnam War and its converse relationship. 3. 65% valid relationship between anti-choice beliefs and support of the "no-knock" law and its converse relationship. 4. 71% valid relationship between anti-choice beliefs and and opposition to handgun control and the converse relationship.
Part of the problem here is that the pro-choice movement allows themselves to be put on the defensive with these folks. The present Health Secretary is a good example of that - sharing her "personal views" on abortion while stating out of the other side fo her face that she supports pro choice legislation. Well we see how weak her administration has been now, don't we, even apart from this current development?
In a sane society, all health care is a fundamental right that is only between the physician and patient (and whoever else the patient wishes to involve). Available as needed with strong public health education and prevention programs. Pregnant teenagers have a privacy right, too, that outweighs any parental right to know, since they are the ones who would be responsible for raising a child. Sorry parents, but if you didn't do your job well enough for your teenager to communicate with you about a pregnancy, it's your problem, at that point. Which I guess is a big issue for many anti-choice parents. Their children are afraid to tell them these things.
I'll suggest that Planned Parenthood branch out more ITO of women's health issues. For example, fibroid treatment paths that put hysterectomies as last resort or only for cases of cancer. This creates a whole other community of stakeholders that could support their work in other avenues as well. There is a tremendous need in women's health care for progressive "one stop shopping" so to speak - the various myomectomies (including hysteroscopic), embolization, burning or icing out uterine walls, IUD and hormone options. And without having to search far and wide, battling a system that is fundamentally sexist and flawed in its thinking about women's bodies and value throughout their lives. And without there being a financial interest dictating the route the women takes - so that her medical decisions are based on sound medical and personal judgement, not who's laughing their way to to the bank after they've unnecessarily chopped out the part of your body that disturbs them so much.
I think more accountablity has to fall on the shoulders of doctors, too. After all, the doctor killed by that lunatic - wouldn't have been in that position to begin with, if doctors were more openly united in their opposition to this kind of bullying. From all walks of medicine. If they don't stand together, it will fall.
If you chose to enter a profession like medicine, I personally believe that you have a responsibility to stand up for a single payer system, or nationalized as they have in the U.K. - and a responsibility to openly state your views on reproductive rights. I think the doctors have a lot of clout as a wealthier, educated segment of our society. And that people go too easy of them in all of this. More of the "beggars can't be choosers" mentality that is going around. "Please please." Or apologetics to religious factions.
This is very simply, crap. And more people have to treat ti that way. That's all.
What we need is Occupy Hospitals. All sane 21st century medicine available on demand in a modern, industrialized society that is still the wealthiest country on the planet. But some are too interested in creating another "campaign" rather than simply making something happen now. Once something is turned into a campaign, you have a problem seeing it succeed.