Most Popular This Week
- Not to Worry, Rape Victims Who Want An Abortion: We Won't Charge You With Felony Tampering With Evidence, Just Your Doctor
- The Non Zero-Sum Society: How the Rich Are Destroying the US Economy
- Obama Administration Compromise Would Implement No-Cost Birth Control
- The Right of the People, Even At the Airport
- To End Extreme Poverty, Let’s Try Ending Extreme Wealth
- The Non Zero-Sum Society: How the Rich Are Destroying the US Economy
- Don’t Put a Fork in It: On the Perils of Genetically Engineered Salmon
- Five Possibilities for the Next Great Progressive Push
- To End Extreme Poverty, Let’s Try Ending Extreme Wealth
- An Economic Alternative to Exploitative Free Market Capitalism
Popular content
Today's Top News
Romney, Gingrich Continue Battle for GOP Party Nomination
Romney Gives In -- Will Release Two Years of Tax Records
The latest installment in the battle for the Republican party presidential nomination saw Newt Gingrich take 40.4% of the vote while Romney took just 27.8% in the South Carolina primary.
The Guardian reports on the race:
The Republican presidential candidates were gearing up on Sunday for a gruelling and expensive battle for the party nomination, after Newt Gingrich's sensational victory in the South Carolina primary threw the race wide open.
As the candidates headed to Florida for the next contest on 31 January, Gingrich's team sent out an email to grassroots supporters calling for donations to counter rival Mitt Romney's massive spending power and deliver a "knock-out punch".
Strapped for cash, Gingrich made a "moneybomb" appeal to grassroots supporters to contribute funds over the internet in the next 48 hours.
His campaign team, in spite of talk of a "knock-out" in Florida, are anticipating what they describe as a war of attrition that will go on for months. The final contest is not until Utah on 26 June.
The South Carolina victory, which saw Gingrich take 40.4% of the vote against Romney's 27.8%, shook Romney's status as favourite to win the Republican nomination to take on Barack Obama for the White House in November. Romney has a lead of 24% over Gingrich in the latest poll in Florida but, such is the volatility of the race, that could easily evaporate.
Gingrich secured another triumph when Romney bowed to pressure to release details of his tax returns, one of the big issues of the South Carolina campaign.
But as ThinkProgress notes, he only agreed to two years of records "because of the Internet":
Fox’s Chris Wallace pressed Romney on why he would only release two years of returns when his father released twelve during his run for President. Romney said he wouldn’t release as many tax returns as his father did because that was “before the internet.”
TPM reports:
Previously, Romney had merely said that he would release his 2011 returns when they were completed in April. By then, Romney could already be the presumptive Republican nominee, thus putting the issue beyond the reach of primary voters. In addition, the 2011 returns might not be as revealing as past year returns since Romney was already a full-time candidate for president, and could have taken steps to minimize any politically damaging tax avoidance measures.
The Hill reports that a lot more money will be spent as the primary race moves to Florida.
Florida is an expensive state to campaign in, with 10 dispersed media markets and more expensive advertising rates than any of the earlier campaigns. That could provide a particular challenge to Santorum, who has always lagged behind the other GOP candidates in terms of fundraising and is used to campaigning on a shoestring budget. If conservative elites begin to pressure Santorum — much as they did earlier this week with Rick Perry — it's plausible that he could exit the race.
Where do Romney and Gingrich stand on some key issues? The Guardian breaks it down:
Mitt and Newt: where they stand
Abortion
Gingrich supports federal ban or constitutional amendment banning abortion
Romney says the issue should be left to individual states
Economy
Gingrich says he would balance the budget within five years with deep spending cuts
Romney says he would cut corporate tax rates and focus on job growth
Health care
Gingrich would starve Obama's healthcare law of cash so it cannot be implemented
Romney would issue an order giving back authority for healthcare to states
Gay rights
Gingrich against gay marriage, but says same-sex couples should have legal protections
Romney opposes letting gay people marry, serve in the military or any government recognition of their relationships
National security
Gingrich says greatest danger is rise of radical Islam inside the US
Romney wants increase in US's already substantial military budget
Poverty
Gingrich proposes that children should be put to work to learn the work ethic
Romney says cash handouts to the poor trap them in poverty
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

26 Comments so far
Show All'Avoid divisive people'. Gingrich gives me a visceral feeling of doom. Gingrich is an ego-maniacal sociopath. Ask not what your country can do for you. Ask what you can do for Newt and his bleached Cruellista. It's Newt or nobody for the (R)s. No nomination and Newt will burn down the GOP house. Be warned (R)s. Newt is scorched earth. Obama is to Romney as Gingrich is to Gen. Sherman. Newt, 'Don't make me burn Atlanta.'
Yes, and let Ron Paul throw the occasional hand grenade into the fighting pit.
As many issues as I have with Obama and the Democrats, I still love seeing Republicans tear each others' throats out.
After having bashed Paul for months now, I am assuming progressives would prefer Romney and Obama to debate this fall, and Obama to go on to win the general. What happened to liberals that they would prefer a warmongering totalitarian (Obama or Romney) to an anti-war, pro-Constitution candidate? I can't understand why, unless it's just pure tribalism: "We'd rather have a warmongering Democrat than an anti-war Republican!"