Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Growing Support for Global Robin Hood Tax; Obama, UK Obstacles
Growing support across Europe this week for a new “Robin Hood tax” -- a Financial Transaction Tax-- has given hope to those who have been pushing for US President Obama to support the new tax. But the UK government and President Obama will need to get on board for a new global financial transaction tax to succeed.
National Nurses United and the California Nurses Association march for a Financial Transaction Tax/Robin Hood Tax. Los Angeles, CA. November 3, 2011 Boosted by the Occupy Wall Street movement, two Democrats in the House and Senate -- Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA) and Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.) -- introduced a Financial Transaction Tax bill in Congress in November that would easily raise $350 billion over 10 years. DeFazio has said the big threat that the Wall Street apologists have always used to oppose a Financial Transaction Tax is, 'My God, all of our firms will move to Europe.' "Occupy Wall Street has just reminded a large majority of the American people that our economy was destroyed by gambling on Wall Street. And that the people who destroyed our economy have been amply rewarded and not prosecuted," said DeFazio.
Last week, conservative President of France Nicolas Sarkozy announced he'd take the lead in promoting a Financial Transaction Tax. Now, Italian and Germany's Chancellor Angela Merkel have come on board.
Wall Street apologists have always used to oppose a Financial Transaction Tax is, 'My God, all of our firms will move to Europe.'Britain Prime Minister David Cameron said last week that Britain will veto any attempt to introduce an EU-wide financial transaction tax and has said the UK could only agree to the tax if it were accepted globally.
* * *
Jeff Cohen, writing for Common Dreams earlier this week:
With U.S. media obsessing on the fight here at home among conservatives vying to become president, most of them missed some big news about France, which already has a conservative president. This week, French President Nicolas Sarkozy announced that he would take the lead – even go it alone within Europe, if need be – in introducing and pushing a Financial Transaction Tax in his country.
That’s right – the conservative president of France wants to tax the financial traders and speculators.
Referring to the tax as a “moral issue” and blaming deregulation and speculation for the global economic meltdown, Sarkozy has said that traders must “repay for the damage they have caused.”
What does it tell us about U.S. politics that the conservative president of France – on this issue and others – is way to the left of President Obama? The U.S. president has not publicly promoted a Wall Street transaction tax (even though US financial institutions, not the French, were largely responsible for the global financial crisis).[...]
A Wall Street transaction tax is backed by National Nurses United and other unions. It’s popular with the U.S. public, and would be even more popular if Obama were to campaign for it in 2012. RootsAction.org has gained 50,000 signatures in support of the tax.
You can add your name here to those pushing Obama to (re)embrace the Wall Street tax.
On Wednesday, November 2, 2011, Robin Hood Tax supporters descended on the Houses of Parliament to send off David Cameron to the G20, backed by the 80,000 people who had emailed the Prime Minister asking him to support a Financial Transaction Tax in Cannes. [Picture by: Robin Hood Tax campaign] Dow Jones Newswire reports today:
Germany's Chancellor Angela Merkel Saturday found backing from her party to introduce a financial transaction tax within the euro zone if it is impossible to launch it in the European Union as a whole.
The plan was agreed to at a meeting of her conservative Christian Democratic Union here in northern Germany.
"We will aim for a quick introduction of a financial transaction tax," said the so-called Kiel Declaration, which outlines the party's road map for the rest of the year. "The tax should be shaped in a way that the interest of Germany's financial centers will be maintained."
The introduction in the euro zone alone should be a first step to be followed by efforts to get the EU as a whole and also the U.S. later on board, the declaration said.
The Inter Press Service reports today:
While France’s financial sector remains resistant to the idea, non-governmental organizations point out that the financial sector is continuing to make profits despite the global economic crisis. And some of the profit-making is causing additional hardships to the world’s poor, they say.
A report published by Friends of the Earth Europe states that "European banks, pension funds and insurance companies are increasing global hunger and poverty by speculating on food prices and financing land grabs in poorer countries."
The report examines the activities of 29 European banks, pension funds and insurance companies, including Deutsche Bank, Barclays, RBS, Allianz, BNP Paribas, AXA, HSBC, Generali, Allianz, Unicredit and Credit Agricole. It suggests that there is "significant involvement of these financial institutions in food speculation, and the direct or indirect financing of land grabbing."
Friends of the Earth Europe and other organizations are calling for strict regulation to rein in these activities, and they believe that a tax on financial transactions would also help to decrease speculative trading in commodities.
"Food speculation, with billions of euros flooding in and out of financial products based on foodstuffs, causes price volatility," the group said in a statement this week. "These rapid and unpredictable price swings hit the most vulnerable hardest, threatening their right to food, and making it more difficult for farmers to maintain an income – creating instability, hunger and poverty."
On Thursday, the Associated Press reported:
BERLIN — Italian Prime Minister Mario Monti on Wednesday threw his support behind a new tax on financial transactions, backing a push by Germany and France, but said he would prefer to have it apply across the whole European Union.[...]
The European Commission has estimated that the tax could raise as much as 57 billion euros ($77 billion) a year in Europe.
The tax would be a tiny percentage of the value of a trade — the French government proposed 0.1 percent on bonds and shares and 0.01 percent on more complex derivatives. Although some countries already have a minimal duty on share trading, the new proposal would not only increase the scope and size of the tax but also siphon off some revenue to Brussels.
There is no final decision yet, however, on what financial instruments would be taxed and whether currency trades — which make up a large slice of worldwide transactions — would be targeted as well.
Mr. Monti studied at Yale with the economist James Tobin, who first proposed the levy.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

26 Comments so far
Show AllMaybe the time to ask Obama for a Robin Hood tax is after he gets elected and needs no more WS bribes
I'm hoping Obama won't be elected. I'm voting 3rd party.
Instead of voting a straight third party ticket, I'm voting out conservative Democrat-Republicans in disguise, voting for liberal and progressive Democrats where I can, and for third party progressives where it is safe. I want to vote out all conservatives and keep the fascists from taking over or it will mean certain war with Iran, nukes, civil war, theocracy and environmental damage that won't be possible to undo.
"voting for liberal and progressive Democrats where I can"
Where can one?!
Well, here in Minnesota. While Franken and Klobachar are not uber leftists, they are good, liberal people. I am blessed.
And do you expect your third party to be elected, or are you just giving America to the one percent.
After/if Obama gets reelected what he'll do is become even more conservative and Bankster enthralled.......
The Oilybomber will no longer give a rats ass about We The People - he'll be only concerned with his post presidency $250,000 half hour speeches....
It's beyond naive to believe the Oilybomber will suddenly change his spots........
Gee, the 0.1% get a 0.01% tax on their speculations. And they are still bitching!
Hell, we pay almost 10% sales tax on a bunch of radishes or a cabbage, and the same for just about everything else we buy.
I'd love to see the 0.1% pay 10% on their speculations. Maybe some of that would get back to us, repair a few roads, perhaps help with medical care, feed some poor kids.
Naaah!
Agreed! This is total chump change. The taxes on these things should be astronomical because they are not in any way productive or sustaining to society. Actually, an outright ban on non-hedging speculation by financial (not market) players would be best inasmuch as that sort of speculation is socially destructive and does not have a place in an intelligently organized and run economy. A tax is a great idea, but why doesn't someone give it some real teeth, ie, tax at 70-90 percent range at the very least. I am talking a real tax, like the old taxes on other unproductive wealth circa the 50s.
A tax is a great idea, but why doesn't someone give it some real teeth, ie, tax at 70-90 percent range at the very least. I am talking a real tax, like the old taxes on other unproductive wealth circa the 50s.
Because in the 50's We the People still had some input into our government. We still had a Constitution and Bill of Rights.
The only people that have input into our "government" now, are the very ones that should be, but don't ever intend to be, taxed. The above mentioned documents are looked upon as quaint and out of date.
Don't forget that these vampires get to speculate on Margin. Meaning they only have to put up 5 to 10% of the actual cost.
Then add in the fact that they use OUR retirement funds and 401k's as the cash and they're doubly screwing us.
They're using our own money against us - and still bitch and moan about how hard their live is and how they're doing 'god's work'
As if what the people want meant anything.
keynes suggested the financial transaction tax in 1930s..............................
are there not any young people out there who have the drive and desire to understand economics and will put in the effort to master the knowledge in "The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money" by John Maynard Keynes---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
the science of economics is real
The problem is that Keynesianism has been perverted and thus effectively destroyed.
Right now when they talk about stimulus being a positive for economy they used a different model than the model in use today.
During the FDR admin Harry Hopkins hired over 3 million people for prevailing wages - 97% of the cost went straight to either materials or wages. The 3% was admin costs.
Now we have system where the $ is bid out to private firms that in turn sub it out over and over again -
For ex - during the Katrina cleanup work was bid out at 150+ per hour, then subbed out multiple times - at each step a politically connected firm took their cut til the actual guy who did the work was paid about $10 per hour.
So we get 10% of the money actually working in a Keynesian manner while the rest of it is spent according to the business model of Organized Crime.
So they steal the cash And destroy Keynesian at the same time.
Savvy businessmen and deserving of their salaries and bonuses as the Obomber likes to say.
Now *this* is a good idea!!!
A transaction tax is problematic. It sends the message that speculation/gambling is ok, if we can have our slice of the pie.
Instead of sending that message, why not send the message that speculation/gambling is wrong? It is wrong because it creates absolutely no value. Instead, it creates unnecessary turmoil, and actually devalues the output of the real economy.
The way to send the message that speculation/gambling is wrong is to deny the speculators/gamblers your business. How? By cultivating your enthusiasm for local trade, doing business with people you know, and reducing the amount of business you do with far-flung strangers. Reduce that business to near-zero and you have reached economic nirvana. What I mean is, in that singular policy, you've done almost everything the individual needs to do to help terminate elite influence/rule.
Notice how the liberals will not echo this fact that is most relevant to the issue of class. Probe the liberals to find out why they refuse to support localism.
rtdrury, basically I must disagree. First off, when I was a kid, my friends taught me how to play poker. I lost my best toys. I learned. While I never play the lottery or take part in any type of formal gambling, I and we gamble on many things most every day. Certainly, many actually live to gamble. It is a part of human nature and society might as well attempt to control it to a degree and to benefit from it financially. You are also wrong in thinking that this activity is of no value. Quite often it is of great value. Sometimes a business that is floundering along is better off with new ownership. Speculation helps alleviate shortages by creating an incentive to produce or create. With speculation, for instance, if there is a food shortage, but no speculation was allowed, farmers would have no reason to spend extra time and money to grow a larger crop. More would likely starve to death. Also, if food remained cheap in a time of shortage, then waste would increase.
It is completely not surprising that the Anglo-Saxon financial axis of Wall Street & The City, each of whom have their respective host governments in their thrall, are fighting this transaction tax tooth and nail. One reason as to why this is, and which often goes unmentioned, is that both the U.K. and the USA are popular tax havens for the elite of the rest of the world. A financial transaction tax would put a big kibosh on this business, as tax payments would serve as proof of monies being moved. The last thing an uber-rich douche bag wants is outside proof of where his or her money has moved.
I can't think of a worse name to give this tax than "Robin Hood", which plays right into the hands of the right. ROBBING from the rich to GIVE to the poor - that's a method of describing things stright out of Fox News. This is simply a "sales tax."
It's harder to argue against, "Hey, there's a SALES TAX on your purchase of a washing machine, why not on $300,000 worth of stock?"
The answer seems pretty simple, we do have a long history and thanks to a good public educational back ground we have a perfect record of our past. Why can't we look at our history and use it for an example, what were the tax rates when America worked the best? It's obvious.
Maybe not so obvious. We want these transactions to be made using US dollars because a highly valued dollar means low interest rates on treasuries to fund the national debt. If transactions were made in some other currency--Chinese yuan, for example--everyone would sell their dollars for that currency. No transactions tax means a strong dollar.
Oh, c'mon, drosera, this tiny percentage tax means NOTHING when it comes to currency values or a strong dollar. Put brain in gear before typing.
"the Wall Street apologists have always used to oppose a Financial Transaction Tax is, 'My God, all of our firms will move to Europe.'
What a coincidence, the ones against it in Europe say exactly the same thing about how all of their firms will move to America.
What this article points out is the absolute degenerate and selfish nature of the financial elite.......
If these were normal living and breathing people with a fraction of empathy they would recognize the disaster they've caused and welcome the tax as it would help offset austerity and would increase consumer demand for products and services they sell themselves.
Hell it would be good for business -
But the problem is these financial elites own the damn place and they are SOCIOPATHS.
They will destroy the world economy for an extra nickel of profit.
They'll gladly let some child go without adequate amounts of food for that extra nickle.
They'll let the citizenry die a horrible painful death from cancer etc in order to grab that nickle.
These people are a danger to the very existence of the human species - they'll push faulty nuke power plants and use the worst pollutants for fracking injection liquids for that extra nickle.
We should set the tax at 10% and watch them whine and bitch and moan -
Oh no they might threaten to leave? GOOD we'd be a hell of a lot better off without these sociopaths.
These scumbags got off on their last crimes and are now so emboldened even a 1/10 of 1% tax is seen as Way Too Much - all the while the very same vampires are pushing Austerity for the rest of us.
These vampires understand one thing only - violence.
One day We The People will finally learn that and return to the answers our grandfathers applied to this problem.
http://www.custermen.com/ItalyWW2/ILDUCE/Mussolini.htm