Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
World Pays Ecuador Not to Extract Oil from Rainforest
Governments and film stars join alliance that raises £75m to compensate Ecuador for lost revenue from 900m barrels
An alliance of European local authorities, national governments, US film stars, Japanese shops, soft drink companies and Russian foundations have stepped in to prevent oil companies exploiting 900m barrels of crude oil from one of the world's most biologically rich tracts of land.
Supporters of the Yasuní 'crowdfunding' initiative say it could change the way important places are protected. (Photograph: Prisma Bildagentur AG / Alamy/Alamy) According to the UN, the "crowdfunding" initiative had last night raised $116m (£75m), enough to temporarily halt the exploitation of the 722 square miles of "core" Amazonian rainforest known as Yasuní national park in Ecuador.
The park, which is home to two tribes of uncontacted Indians, is thought to have more mammal, bird, amphibian and plant species than any other spot on earth. Development of the oilfield, which was planned to take place immediately if the money had not been raised, would have inevitably led to ecological devastation and the eventual release of over 400m tonnes of CO2.
Ecuador agreed to halt plans to mine the oilfield if it could raise 50% of the $7.6bn revenue being lost by not mining the oil. While the world's leading conservation groups pledged nothing, regional governments in France and Belgium offered millions of dollars – with $2m alone from the Belgian region of Wallonia. A New York investment banker donated her annual salary and Bo Derek, Leonardo DiCaprio, Edward Norton and Al Gore all contributed.
The idea of asking people to pay for something not to take place was widely dismissed by national treasuries as holding the world to ransom. The German development minister, Dirk Niebel, said that the principle of paying for the oil not to be exploited "would be setting a precedent with unforeseeable referrals". However, Germany has now contributed $48m in "technical assistance". The former Italian prime minister Silvio Berlusconi was widely criticised after he wrote off $51m of Ecuador's $10bn external debt as Italy's contribution.
Other governments pledging support were Chile, Colombia, Georgia and Turkey ($100,000 each), Peru ($300,000), Australia ($500,000) and Spain ($1.4m).
Supporters of the scheme argued that it could be a model for change in the way the world pays to protect important places. The money raised is guaranteed to be used only for nature protection and renewable energy projects. Nigeria, Cameroon, Gabon and other countries with oil reserves, have investigated the possibility of setting up similar schemes as an alternative to traditional aid.
The biological richness of Yasuní has astonished scientists. One 6sq km patch of the park was found to have 47 amphibian and reptile species, 550 bird, 200 mammal and more species of bats and insects than anywhere in the western hemisphere. According to Ecuadorean scientists, it would take in the region of 400 years to record Yasuní's 100,000 or more insect and 2,000 fish species.
Of the 63.4% of Ecuadoreans polled last month who knew of the Yasuní initiative, 83.4% supported it.



18 Comments so far
Show AllThe other day I emptied the ash dump from my pellet stove. I need to do this every week or so. People with wood stoves do the same thing and in many parts of the world this is an everyday event. There's one hell of a lot of waste ash out there.
Where do the ashes go? I spread them on my lawn - not knowing for sure but thinking the nutrients might be good for it.
What are those nutrients? I don't really know but I suspect they are mostly carbon.
What happens to that carbon? it probably breaks down into greenhouse gases, mostly CO2.
OK, that's a lot of conjecture - that's why I need help. But someone out there knows someone who knows someone who can say whether my conjectures are true - I really suspect they are.
What is the alternative? It wouldn't take much for towns where ash creation like this is commonplace to dig a deep pit and make it easy for people to bury their waste ash - sequestering it for many years if not for eternity. I seriously doubt that this simple change in what we do will solve the problem of global warming but it could be a cheap and easy way to help out.
No doubt there is considerable variation in the carbon content of ash with more carbon left when combustion is less complete.
Lots of Noise - Where's the Signal?
Nothing like accepting your responsibility - for a price.
Make's me sick!
Manysummits in Calgary
=======Years ago they used to burn trees just for the ash, since potassium hydroxide could be leached out and used for various industrial purposes, such as making soap. One of the reasons that Vermont (where I live) was logged off in the 1700's and early 1800's was to ship barge loads of "potash" (wood ashes) to Montreal, where it was used or transshipped.
So, do spread your ashes on the lawn, or anywhere else that they will contribute to plant growth, but you won't be sequestering any carbon unless you see to it that the plant material that you grow is either dug into the soil or is locked up in trees that are not cut down and burned.
Doesn't it seem like a better idea to stop the criminals than to pay the ransom? If we pay this time they will snatch the child next door; if we pay the ransom on her they will move down the block... Even though we're not directly paying the criminals (as far as I can tell), this sounds like a perfect way to encourage fake development plans in order to extort free money from countries like Ecuador (or states, or cities, or...???) All the corporations have to do is say they're going to do something terrible (and the worse the thing is the more they'll be paid to not do it, so it encourages them to have a room full of monkeys typing up the worst ideas imaginable---or even unimaginable).
There is not enough money in the world to stop all the world-destroying things already in motion, let alone all the terrible things planned, let alone all the terrible terrible things the worst among us can dream up just to get paid not to do them. This idea is INSANE!
Here are some alternatives: Stop driving and flying, so you're not paying the oil companies to destroy the world. Solarize, winderate and efficientify all aspects of your life so you're not paying coal, gas, tar sand and nuclear companies to do the same. Grow as much of your food as you can so you're not paying Monsanto, ADM, Bayer and other evil corporations to destroy the soil, the water, and the diversity of life. VOTE FOR SOMEONE WHO WILL ACTUALLY DO SOMETHING, that is, somebody not on either wing of the duopoly. Vote Green.If you don't like the party the way it is, join it and help make it better. Get out in the streets and refuse to leave until the destruction stops.
(A Senate filibuster used to be one or a few Senators standing up and talking without stop long enough for the Senate to give up and recess. Now the bunch of toads has caved (cave toads? Is that a new species?) and they don't make that happen anymore--they don't hold out and actually make anybody filibuster. So anyone who just says they'll filibuster can stop anything that doesn't already have 60 votes for what is called cloture, since that's what it takes to stop "debate".(laughably-so-called debate) This payment plan not to do things is the same. Caving to a corrupt system is agreeing to let it get away with everything but what is meaningless or so horrific NO ONE thinks it's acceptable. Is there anything--anything at all in that category any more? If destruction of civilization and extinction of all life on Earth doesn't qualify, what does?
What does?