Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Chicago Teachers Battle Mayor 1%
Rahm Emanuel, whom Occupy Chicago has dubbed Mayor 1%, fired another shot at the city’s public schools December 1. He proposed seven school closings and phase-outs, 10 “turnarounds” in which all the teachers and staff get fired, and six “co-locations,” where private charter school operators grab portions of existing public schools.
Rahm Emanuel, whom Occupy Chicago has dubbed Mayor 1%, fired another shot at the city’s public schools this month. He's proposed to close schools, fire teachers and staff, and hand over space to private charter school operators. Photo: Chicago Teachers Union. (Labor Notes) Two days later, the Chicago Teachers Union and community groups responded with a teach-in that brought 500 to a high school in South Chicago. CTU and allies pledged to fight through grassroots organizing, street mobilization, maybe even occupying schools.
Chicago communities have fought school closings for years, sometimes successfully, sometimes not. About 100 public schools have been shuttered since 2004, when the city’s Commercial Club unveiled its Renaissance 2010 school privatization plan.
In their place are 85 publicly funded, privately operated charter schools, which practice selective enrollment and often reject kids who have special needs or struggle academically. A recent report indicates that Chicago charters are doing no better than traditional public schools on standardized tests.
Still, former Chicago schools chief Arne Duncan, now U.S. secretary of education, hails Renaissance 2010 as a miracle. It is now the national model.
Chicago’s school closures have been “train wrecks” in the neighborhoods, said community organizer Jitu Brown, who noted that many schools now targeted for closure because of poor test scores were destabilized when they started receiving students ousted from other closing schools.
All 23 targeted schools are in Chicago’s predominantly Black and Latino South and West sides. The transition from open-access neighborhood schools to selective-enrollment charters is tied to the goals of real estate developers, who seek to displace low-income communities of color to sell condos to more affluent, predominantly white buyers.
CTU President Karen Lewis observed that Chicago is entering an “era of educational apartheid.”
Powerful Movement
The teach-in speakers and audience nevertheless exuded power and confidence. Angela Surney, who helped fight off the shuttering of her eight-year-old son’s Marconi Elementary, got a standing ovation when she explained how to be a “victOR” rather than a “victIM.”
The prominent role of parents and community members gave the teach-in unusual depth.
Labor events designed to help save members’ jobs often bring community allies to the podium. But here CTU is part of an authentic partnership. The union has built a community board where teachers map joint strategies with neighborhood partners. It was this board that organized the teach-in.
Professor and education activist Rico Gutstein noted a second factor: Teachers not directly threatened are getting involved. “We’re beginning to understand that it might not be you today, but it might be you tomorrow,” he said. CTU says 90 schools were represented at the teach-in.
At a closing session, CTU organizer Norine Gutekanst asked for reports: “We’re bringing a busload to the school board vigil.” “We’re planning a meeting next week with parents.” “I have been through four—count them, four—closings and turnarounds. And I want you to know that I have beat them each and every time.”
A representative from the Brighton Park Neighborhood Council pledged her group’s turnout at school board actions, and offered Brighton Park’s community schools—which stay open late providing a range of services—as a positive example. (One of the teach-in’s topics was genuine, community-based school transformation.)
A retired school paraprofessional, 84 years old, led the chant: “I’m fired up!”
A Changing Union
This enhanced unity—between union and community, and between teachers across the city—owes much to the union’s transformation. For years, neighborhood groups fought school closures on their own and one at a time.
CTU leaders opposed closures at school board meetings, but did little else to resist—even while membership dwindled from 40,000 to 30,000 amidst the rise of non-union charters.
A new course began when the Caucus of Rank-and-File Educators was formed. Snubbed by CTU officials, CORE members struck out on their own in 2008, getting teachers to join with community organizations leading the anti-privatization fight.
The CORE slate swept CTU elections last year. Three of the new leaders were teachers who’d cut their organizing teeth fighting closures.
The December teach-in was no flash in the pan. Two days later, the “Midway Network” met, 60 teachers and community members from 16 schools across a swath of South Chicago. Their goal was to save Marquette Elementary, a 1,400-student K-8 school.
They planned a Martin Luther King Day march. CTU is scheduling more such network meetings around the city.
For perhaps the first time, teachers and community are working on a regional level to save their schools.
Chicago-based writer and organizer, Howard Ryan is writing an organizing book for teachers.

18 Comments so far
Show All"About 100 public schools have been shuttered since 2004, when the city’s Commercial Club unveiled its Renaissance 2010 school privatization plan.
In their place are 85 publicly funded, privately operated charter schools, which practice selective enrollment and often reject kids who have special needs or struggle academically. A recent report indicates that Chicago charters are doing no better than traditional public schools on standardized tests."
So 100 public schools were closed so that 85 private charters could have the funding. How does that make any sense? Do the math.
Reminds me of how California got stuck with Enron through deregulation. We shut down public infrastructure or sold it for peanuts to private industry. They were supposed to provide lower costs and better services. What we got were skyrocketing costs and multiple power shortages. When our governor ask for help from Washington and regulators, he got recalled and the citizens of California were told they were on their own. Do we want to play that game with our kid's educations?
Am curious whether the new charters are operating in schools formerly run as traditional public schools. Bonds were passed to build the buildings in the first place and voters might not have approved paying for structures that would be given over to the charters. Were the buildings sold at a reasonable price to the charters? Were they leased for a dollar?
It costs a lot of money to build a school. Charters may be taking advantage of the Chicago Public Schools by getting buildings for nearly nothing. Would like to know more about this issue.
Another question that needs to be asked: Why did these people who are now complaining vote for Rahm? Rahm is the same sleazy Rahm he has always been.
he's been doing the trope-a-hope jig.
I award the "Compared to What" prize in loving memory of the incomparable Les McCann and Eddie Harris:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MzvlivbptXk
Vote for Ron Paul and get rid of all these socialistic government schools. Government-provided vouchers are socialism too, and Ron Paul believes they should be abolished too.
Vote for Ron Paul and move to Canada. Wait, maybe Canada is too close. BTW, on top of all of Ron Paul's other 'virtues' you can now add Zionist-ass kisser too. Ha'aretz had a big spread praising him today because he denies being an anti-semite(tm). I've always been torn with the guy but that article defined my viewpoint on him.
Privatization = Profit
It allows someone somewhere to take money intended for education, health care, infrastructure or whatever and put it in their pocket.
We've been TOLD that this will save money, make things more efficient, or produce some beneficial desired result. By now we know that's all BS and that the desired result is for somebody's political crony to take home public cash.
How many of these (rightfully) indignant teachers and union members will turn around and vote for the politicians who are making this happen?
STOP supporting all of the corporate-controlled, lying democrats. They are owned by Wall Street, just like the republicans, AND
they will ignore or try to suppress real progress because they believe in money and power before civil rights.
The whole government of the state of Illinois is under democrat control and ALL of the public schools and unions are under attack. The difference between Illinois and Wisconsin is that the democrats SAY that they really don't want to do exactly what they are doing.
If you vote for Obama and the dems, you are voting for the republican agenda.
Rahm is doing nothing more than accelerating the hand over of public schools and public funds to his criminal hedge fund buddies who are posing as not-for profit education miracle workers.
These charters are hiding behind a board of directors pretending to be not-for-profit while billions of dollars are being made by management, outsourced tests and building leases.
These CHARLATANS need to be run out of the city as quickly as possible before the entire public education system is destroyed.
Astute statement. It is just another money laundering scheme for the rich.
And as to those that elected Rahm, what the hell were you thinking?
First we got him as COS, then Obama gave Duncan the School thing.
The article quoted below mine is a must read.
Thanks for reposting it.
Cashing In On Kids.
http://www.miamiherald.com/charterschools/
Rahm sabotaged the democratic party with his blue-dogs.
Rahm sabotaged Obama by blocking the public option.
Now Rahm is sabotaging Chicago.
Mayor 1% rewards banksters and back-stabs the 99%.
Who are the F'in Retards now? How could any sane person vote for him?
Thank you teachers for teaching to think outside the box.
Battering Ram or Rahm (it down your throat) E-mannual once again contributing to a corrupt model. Below a piece on one school management company making hand-over-'fist (another apt image):
"Academica’s achievements have been profitable. The South Miami company receives more than $9 million a year in management fees just from its South Florida charter schools — fees that ultimately come from public tax dollars..."
"But the Zuluetas’ greatest financial success is largely unseen: Through more than two dozen other companies, the Zuluetas control more than $115 million in South Florida real estate — all exempt from property taxes as public schools — and act as landlords for many of Academica’s signature schools, records show."
Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/12/13/2545377/academica-florida-richest-charter.html#storylink=cpy
The people of Chicago must have known what they were voting for
when they elected this Israeli thug.
Whuuut? Is Chicago having buyer's remorse over their Chosen One? Oh, please, say it ain't so.
When this joker was elected, I remember the comments on the NYT article. Chicago commenters were jumping with joy. I remember remarking that I hoped for their sake that he didn't turn Wisconsin into an illegal Israeli settlement. Of course, he's letting Walker do the bidding in that state but he's neither different nor better than his dictatorial neighbor. Good riddance, another set of idiots who get exactly what they voted for. And this should also be a perfect example of why people should quit voting altogether instead of of voting for the lesser evil so as not to waste a vote (as if they all weren't wasted).
Quit voting altogether? So just "move to the back of the bus and shut up" is your solution? Our votes are our voice. If we don't use them we're allowing someone else to speak for us and tell us what to do. Hasn't that happenned for way too long? Only a small portion of the qualified voters vote anyway, you want even fewer to exercise one of the few remaining constitutional rights citizens still retain. That makes excellent marketing sense to the elite that want things to go their way. The elite will vote.
Politicians do whatever they have to so they can keep their job. Yes they usually do what the moneyed interests want them to do, except when enough pressure from there constituents forces them to do the right thing. Good job on taking the Union elections, it doesn't sound like they really cared much, now maybe you can make a stand against the oligarchy.