Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Study: Gingrich Tax Plan Would Give Lion's Share to the Rich
DES MOINES, Iowa — Newt Gingrich's proposed overhaul of the tax code would cut taxes for all American taxpayers, particularly the wealthy, according to an analysis released Monday by the non-partisan Tax Policy Center.
Republican presidential candidate, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich speaks during a campaign stop at Insight Technology in Londonderry, N.H. Monday, Dec. 12, 2012. (AP Photo/Elise Amendola) Gingrich's plan would provide small tax cuts to those at the bottom of the income ladder, giving those making less than $10,000 an average cut of $222 under one scenario, the analysis found. The Tax Policy Center is a joint project of the Brookings Institution and the Urban Institute, two respected think tanks in Washington.
Gingrich's plan would be most generous to those making more than $1 million a year, delivering an average tax cut of almost $614,000 a year. At the same time, it would give them with a lower overall federal tax rate — 11.9 percent — than most people making less money, that is, everyone making between $40,000 and $1 million.
With Gingrich leading the field in polls for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination, his tax proposal sets up a stark contrast in a potential showdown with Democratic President Barack Obama, who wants to raise taxes on wealthier Americans, not cut them.
"Gingrich's option would be a win for most households," concluded Howard Gleckman, editor of the Tax Policy Center's blog, TaxVox.
But the delivery of the largest tax cuts to wealthier Americans while potentially adding to the deficit and debt — it would deliver $850 billion less in revenue to the treasury in 2015 than current policy would — might make it harder to sell as a political winner to all voters.
"A plan such as this seems tailor-made for anti-tax Republican primary voters," Gleckman wrote. "But if Gingrich wins the nomination, he may not have such an easy sell to independents, who may wonder why adding a $1 trillion a year to the deficit is a good idea, especially when so much of the tax cut goes to a handful of very rich households."
Gingrich's campaign did not comment on the analysis Monday. In a Republican debate Saturday in Iowa, Gingrich said his tax plan would immediately boost the economy, draw investment from overseas and "begin to dramatically create jobs."
Gingrich proposes to give Americans a choice between the current tax system and an optional flat tax.
His alternative system would apply a 15 percent flat income tax to all income after a family subtracted $12,000 for each person, the interest they paid on their home mortgage and contributions to charity. They also would get the child tax credit and earned income tax credit already in law.
He would not tax long-term capital gains, qualified dividends or interest income. He proposes to repeal the estate tax on large estates. He also would slash corporate income tax rates from 35 percent to 12.5 percent.
Assuming that Gingrich gets his way and extends the Bush-era tax cuts permanently, his plan would cut taxes for all taxpayers:
_ For those making less than $10,000, an average cut of $222;
_ For $10,000 to $20,000, an average cut of $247;
_ For $20,000 to $30,000, an average cut of $488;
_ For $30,000 to $40,000, an average cut of $751;
_ For $40,000 to $50,000, an average cut of $985;
_ For $50,000 to $75,000, an average cut of $1,847;
_ For $75,000 to $100,000, an average cut of $3,050;
_ For $100,000 to $200,000, an average cut of $5,799;
_ For $200,000 to $500,000, an average cut of $20,745;
_ For $500,000 to $1 million, an average cut of $76,995;
_ For $1 million and above, an average cut of $613,689.
Some of the escalation in cuts reflects the fact that wealthier Americans pay a higher percentage of their incomes under the country's current progressive tax code. Thus, a flatter tax saves more for those at the top.
Also, Gingrich proposes to eliminate the estate tax, which hits only the very wealthy. And he would eliminate taxes on capital gains, which are largely paid by higher income people.
The overall effect: The Gingrich plan would cut federal taxes for those making less than $10,000 by 0.6 percent. It would cut federal taxes for those making more than $1 million by 19.7 percent.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

11 Comments so far
Show AllGingrich- I hate to use labels, but his tax plan is divorced from all reality except one- protecting the short term interests of the oligarchy at the expense of the poor and middle class. His plan smacks of fascism and should be labeled as such. It is another form of disenfranchisement for the poor and working classes. It will have no economic benefit as it fails to address structural issues related to debt and environmental collapse. In fact it will do little more than accelerate the collapse of the system he so adores, but spits at when he proposes non-solutions like this. Pure fantasy.
The overall effect would the rapid 3rd worldization of American plain and simple.
For some reason our leaders think that's a good idea.
And with psychopaths like Gingrich on the republican side no matter how far to the right Obama 2 steps people will still think he's a progressive.
Such is the folly of the Lesser of 2 Evils strategy.
No one could have benefitted the top 1% more than Obama did last year. Poor folks got a thirteen month extension, the rich got to keep their inheritances and an indefinite stay on their tax liabilities. Gingrich wants to build on this...not a big surprise. They're both 1%ers. In fact is anyone running that's not at least part of the top 10%?
All hail the "jobless recovery". How's it working for you? DOWs at 12 everything should be rosie. Got a job, a home, can you afford to fill your gas tank? Economy is in a recorvery must be your fault you're not getting ahead. You're just not smart enough, educated enough or skilled as much as Chinese workers, soon you'll have to measure your worth against Colombians, Panamanians and Koreans. Trade is great, trade is grand!
Noriega back in the news isn"t he? Twenty years after a war and he's now just released to Panama after the signing of a trade treaty. Makes one wonder which comes first the war or the trade treaty. I am thinking wars lead to trade treaties. But I know wars are fought solely to make multinational corporate trade viable and profitable. Who pays for the wars not the corporations that profit. Taxpayers pay. And they sacrafice their national identities while doing so., Ask Ireland, Greece, Spain and others how well it's worked for them. Money is all that matters.
"He would not tax long-term capital gains, qualified dividends or interest income. He proposes to repeal the estate tax on large estates. He also would slash corporate income tax rates from 35 percent to 12.5 percent."
Not surprising this is how the 01% makes their money they don't work. Did you catch that: "He proposes to repeal the estate tax on large estates" I am guessing those of us will small estates will still pay through the nose.
How exactly is he proposing to offset the lack of revenue when he cuts the corporate rate? Doesn't he have to offset that? Aren't we always ask to offset every tax cut? What austerity cuts is he proposing?
Not that I think Obama has done anything since he's been office. All he's done has been to protect Goldman Sach's bottomline.
"Some of the escalation in cuts reflects the fact that wealthier Americans pay a higher percentage of their incomes under the country's current progressive tax code. Thus, a flatter tax saves more for those at the top."
No they don't they may pay their tax attorneys more, but they in fact do not pay more of their incomes in taxes. How can they be paying more on something they are trying so hard to deny they make in the first place? That's just bull!
What else would we expect from this guy, protect the top one percent and the big corporations, now known as people, at all costs, make Obama a one term president and get rid of any health care for those ridiculous working people and lazy poor people.
_ For $500,000 to $1 million, an average cut of $76,995; .........
_ For $1 million and above, an average cut of $613,689.
..........My goodness - what a jump in savings for the super-wealthy! There's no question that Newt falls in the last category; and there's no question that Newt will do whatever necessary to protect those at the very top.
............Newt is also in favor of bills that would destroy the Bill of Rights as in the legislation he introduced back in the early 1990s which was similar to a new bill now floating around: "In a vote, 93-7 the Senate this month approved a military appropriations bill empowering the government to designate any U.S. citizen within the country as a terrorist and to have the military hold him indefinitely without trial and without the right to habeas corpus, the right to be brought before a court for a judgment on the legality of one's imprisonment." You can find a write-up on it at: http://www.gata.org/node/10766.
............Obama said he would veto the bill. We'll have to see what takes place with this one. Both Republicans and Democrats seem to be working in unison to destroy "The Peoples" rights and the very foundation upon which this country was built.
Obama wants to increase taxes on the wealthy. Gingrich want to cut them. That should tell us something. Of course we can pretend it's all a game and there is no difference. The republicans have the House. It appears the republicans have the edge for the coming Senate elections. Vote 3rd party or stay home. Guarantee lower taxes for the rich and a possible death spiral for all we hold dear.
Greg R.,
You haven't seen nothing yet! Wait until you see the case headed for court, Reichle vs. Howards - this is about a man who allegedly tried to arrest Dick Cheney, and this is a case that is alleged to give law enforcement immunity...
Call me crazy if you want, but, I will be voting for Obama again. Here's the way I see it, regardless if you put someone new in the White House, it will be no different than any other non-GOP in the White House. Look back at every non-GOP president, for instance, Clinton, Carter and see how things worked out. Until people start from the local government and work their way up, it won't make a difference when the state governors, mayors, SCOTUS and all the other offices are filled by GOP.
What pisses me off if the new candidates always tarnish the other person's image/conduct/accomplishments in order to get into office and then once they get the vote, we mean nothing to them. Yes, it is sweet having the 1% at our mercy at the beginning, but then things change. For instance, look at the teas, they pretended to be on people's side and now they have abandoned them. I was in the car with my hubby one night, and we were listening to KABC talk radio, and a tea party candidate was saying once they got into power (pre-2010 elections) they were going to cut 1 million government jobs...Congressman Darrell Issa did the same thing in Califas, talked really bad about our former Gov. Gray Davis - saying he wasn't running the state right, he was incompetent...he used his fortune (Viper Car Alarms) and recalled our governor - Arnold Schwarzenegger got the job, and this state is worse than when Pete Wilson ran it in the ground. This is the same governor (Arnold) who got his housekeeper pregnant and was able to hide the 'lovechild' until he was out of office.
Now there's talk about Rocky Anderson! I won't vote for him as he is a conservative - he even ran a group the 'Conservative Revolutionary Party.' (He reminds me of Richard Lamm who was a conservative but ran as a Dem - they will all do this in order to get on a ticket). He is one of the 1%, billionaires.forbes.com/topic/Rocky_Anderson/articles - then I saw him on television, and he said he would not run as a Green Party or Independent because too many Dems and Progressives, and that he wanted everyone to join his Justice Party...what raised my eyebrows was when he talked about the uprising in Egypt and said something to the effect that we will do that here with his party - I stopped and said, "okay! I don't think so." See one thing about it, no one wants to have the military taking over this country as we have seen with Libya and Egypt. I already know they got the so-called FEMA camps here, and we definitely have the security here (as seen with OWS) and OathKeepers just may be on their side - not ours, there is no way I would every get involved with this guy or his party - because I listen to all talk radio (meaning I listen to conservative, progressive...I've known for a while the conservatives are just waiting for people to act out, example, Glenn Beck), they've already collected all of the weapons from minority communities under the 'gun buyback - gift card' schemes, National Socialist Movement (NSM) have been having anti-immigrant rallies saying, "2012 is coming for you..." Nativist groups in states like Arizona have been saying they wanted to use violence to secure 'a White America...' As far as voting, I will vote as I do in every election. I never stay home.
Tax Policy Center's analysis points out that this plan would lower taxes on the richest 1/10 of 1% to barely over 10% tax. Pretend that republicans actually care about deficits. They quite simply want to destroy welfare and anything that involves the government in social programs and entitlements. Certainly we're all angered by democrats, but doing things that allow republicans to destroy our nation is disgusting, to put it most mildly.
These reaganists are saying if our loop holes are taken away or I cannot have free inside trading and my lobby, I will take my business out of the US. Simple extractionizm. Greedy Bastards! Real Americans?
Where would Newt Gin-GRINCH send the US? That much further down the toilet with the disproven neo-con trickle down BS story.