Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Study: Gingrich Tax Plan Would Give Lion's Share to the Rich
DES MOINES, Iowa — Newt Gingrich's proposed overhaul of the tax code would cut taxes for all American taxpayers, particularly the wealthy, according to an analysis released Monday by the non-partisan Tax Policy Center.
Republican presidential candidate, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich speaks during a campaign stop at Insight Technology in Londonderry, N.H. Monday, Dec. 12, 2012. (AP Photo/Elise Amendola) Gingrich's plan would provide small tax cuts to those at the bottom of the income ladder, giving those making less than $10,000 an average cut of $222 under one scenario, the analysis found. The Tax Policy Center is a joint project of the Brookings Institution and the Urban Institute, two respected think tanks in Washington.
Gingrich's plan would be most generous to those making more than $1 million a year, delivering an average tax cut of almost $614,000 a year. At the same time, it would give them with a lower overall federal tax rate — 11.9 percent — than most people making less money, that is, everyone making between $40,000 and $1 million.
With Gingrich leading the field in polls for the 2012 Republican presidential nomination, his tax proposal sets up a stark contrast in a potential showdown with Democratic President Barack Obama, who wants to raise taxes on wealthier Americans, not cut them.
"Gingrich's option would be a win for most households," concluded Howard Gleckman, editor of the Tax Policy Center's blog, TaxVox.
But the delivery of the largest tax cuts to wealthier Americans while potentially adding to the deficit and debt — it would deliver $850 billion less in revenue to the treasury in 2015 than current policy would — might make it harder to sell as a political winner to all voters.
"A plan such as this seems tailor-made for anti-tax Republican primary voters," Gleckman wrote. "But if Gingrich wins the nomination, he may not have such an easy sell to independents, who may wonder why adding a $1 trillion a year to the deficit is a good idea, especially when so much of the tax cut goes to a handful of very rich households."
Gingrich's campaign did not comment on the analysis Monday. In a Republican debate Saturday in Iowa, Gingrich said his tax plan would immediately boost the economy, draw investment from overseas and "begin to dramatically create jobs."
Gingrich proposes to give Americans a choice between the current tax system and an optional flat tax.
His alternative system would apply a 15 percent flat income tax to all income after a family subtracted $12,000 for each person, the interest they paid on their home mortgage and contributions to charity. They also would get the child tax credit and earned income tax credit already in law.
He would not tax long-term capital gains, qualified dividends or interest income. He proposes to repeal the estate tax on large estates. He also would slash corporate income tax rates from 35 percent to 12.5 percent.
Assuming that Gingrich gets his way and extends the Bush-era tax cuts permanently, his plan would cut taxes for all taxpayers:
_ For those making less than $10,000, an average cut of $222;
_ For $10,000 to $20,000, an average cut of $247;
_ For $20,000 to $30,000, an average cut of $488;
_ For $30,000 to $40,000, an average cut of $751;
_ For $40,000 to $50,000, an average cut of $985;
_ For $50,000 to $75,000, an average cut of $1,847;
_ For $75,000 to $100,000, an average cut of $3,050;
_ For $100,000 to $200,000, an average cut of $5,799;
_ For $200,000 to $500,000, an average cut of $20,745;
_ For $500,000 to $1 million, an average cut of $76,995;
_ For $1 million and above, an average cut of $613,689.
Some of the escalation in cuts reflects the fact that wealthier Americans pay a higher percentage of their incomes under the country's current progressive tax code. Thus, a flatter tax saves more for those at the top.
Also, Gingrich proposes to eliminate the estate tax, which hits only the very wealthy. And he would eliminate taxes on capital gains, which are largely paid by higher income people.
The overall effect: The Gingrich plan would cut federal taxes for those making less than $10,000 by 0.6 percent. It would cut federal taxes for those making more than $1 million by 19.7 percent.



11 Comments so far
Show AllFor some reason our leaders think that's a good idea.
And with psychopaths like Gingrich on the republican side no matter how far to the right Obama 2 steps people will still think he's a progressive.
Such is the folly of the Lesser of 2 Evils strategy.
Call me crazy if you want, but, I will be voting for Obama again. Here's the way I see it, regardless if you put someone new in the White House, it will be no different than any other non-GOP in the White House. Look back at every non-GOP president, for instance, Clinton, Carter and see how things worked out. Until people start from the local government and work their way up, it won't make a difference when the state governors, mayors, SCOTUS and all the other offices are filled by GOP.
What pisses me off if the new candidates always tarnish the other person's image/conduct/accomplishments in order to get into office and then once they get the vote, we mean nothing to them. Yes, it is sweet having the 1% at our mercy at the beginning, but then things change. For instance, look at the teas, they pretended to be on people's side and now they have abandoned them. I was in the car with my hubby one night, and we were listening to KABC talk radio, and a tea party candidate was saying once they got into power (pre-2010 elections) they were going to cut 1 million government jobs...Congressman Darrell Issa did the same thing in Califas, talked really bad about our former Gov. Gray Davis - saying he wasn't running the state right, he was incompetent...he used his fortune (Viper Car Alarms) and recalled our governor - Arnold Schwarzenegger got the job, and this state is worse than when Pete Wilson ran it in the ground. This is the same governor (Arnold) who got his housekeeper pregnant and was able to hide the 'lovechild' until he was out of office.
Now there's talk about Rocky Anderson! I won't vote for him as he is a conservative - he even ran a group the 'Conservative Revolutionary Party.' (He reminds me of Richard Lamm who was a conservative but ran as a Dem - they will all do this in order to get on a ticket). He is one of the 1%, billionaires.forbes.com/topic/Rocky_Anderson/articles - then I saw him on television, and he said he would not run as a Green Party or Independent because too many Dems and Progressives, and that he wanted everyone to join his Justice Party...what raised my eyebrows was when he talked about the uprising in Egypt and said something to the effect that we will do that here with his party - I stopped and said, "okay! I don't think so." See one thing about it, no one wants to have the military taking over this country as we have seen with Libya and Egypt. I already know they got the so-called FEMA camps here, and we definitely have the security here (as seen with OWS) and OathKeepers just may be on their side - not ours, there is no way I would every get involved with this guy or his party - because I listen to all talk radio (meaning I listen to conservative, progressive...I've known for a while the conservatives are just waiting for people to act out, example, Glenn Beck), they've already collected all of the weapons from minority communities under the 'gun buyback - gift card' schemes, National Socialist Movement (NSM) have been having anti-immigrant rallies saying, "2012 is coming for you..." Nativist groups in states like Arizona have been saying they wanted to use violence to secure 'a White America...' As far as voting, I will vote as I do in every election. I never stay home.