Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Alan Moore – Meet the Man Behind the Protest Mask
From Wall St to Athens and Occupy sit-ins worldwide, protesters are wearing masks inspired by V for Vendetta. Here, its author discusses why his avenging hero has such potency today
The comic-book writer Alan Moore is not usually surprised when his creations find a life for themselves away from the printed page. Strips he penned in the 1980s and 90s have been fed through the Hollywood patty-maker, never to his great satisfaction, resulting in both critical hits and terrible flops; fads for T-shirts, badges and shouted slogans have emerged from characters and conceits he has dreamed up for titles such as Watchmen and From Hell. "I suppose I've gotten used to the fact," says the 58-year-old, "that some of my fictions percolate out into the material world."
A protester wearing a 'V for Vendetta' mask at Occupy Madrid on 15 October. (Photograph: Action Press/Rex Features) But Moore has been caught off-guard in recent years, and particularly in 2011, by the inescapable presence of a certain mask being worn at protests around the world. A sallow, smirking likeness of Guy Fawkes – created by Moore and the artist David Lloyd for their 1982 series V for Vendetta. It has a confused lineage, this mask: the plastic replica that thousands of demonstrators have been wearing is actually a bit of tie-in merchandise from the film version of V for Vendetta, a Joel Silver production made (quite badly) in 2006. Nevertheless, at the disparate Occupy sit-ins this year – in New York, Moscow, Rio, Rome and elsewhere – as well as the repeated anti-government actions in Athens and the gatherings outside G20 and G8 conferences in London and L'Aquila in 2009, the V for Vendetta mask has been a fixture. Julian Assange recently stepped out wearing one, and last week there was a sort of official embalmment of the mask as a symbol of popular feeling when Shepard Fairey altered his famous "Hope" image of Barack Obama to portray a protester wearing one.
It all comes back to Moore – a private man with knotty greying hair and a magnificent beard, who prefers to live without an internet connection and who has not had a working telly for months "on an obscure point of principle" about the digital signal in his hometown of Northampton. He has never yet properly commented on the Vendetta mask phenomenon, and speaking on the phone from his home, Moore seems variously baffled, tickled, roused and quite pleased that his creation has become such a prominent emblem of modern activism.
"I suppose when I was writing V for Vendetta I would in my secret heart of hearts have thought: wouldn't it be great if these ideas actually made an impact? So when you start to see that idle fantasy intrude on the regular world… It's peculiar. It feels like a character I created 30 years ago has somehow escaped the realm of fiction."
V for Vendetta tells of a future Britain (actually 1997, nearly two decades into the future when Moore wrote it) under the heel of a dictatorship. The population are depressed and doing little to help themselves. Enter Evey, an orphan, and V, a costumed vigilante who takes an interest in her. Over 38 chapters, each titled with a word beginning with "V", we follow the brutal, loquacious antihero and his apprentice as they torment the ruling powers with acts of violent resistance. Throughout, V wears a mask that he never removes: bleached skin and rosy cheeks, pencil beard, eyes half shut above an inscrutable grin. You've probably come to know it well.
"That smile is so haunting," says Moore. "I tried to use the cryptic nature of it to dramatic effect. We could show a picture of the character just standing there, silently, with an expression that could have been pleasant, breezy or more sinister." As well as the mask, Occupy protesters have taken up as a marrying slogan "We are the 99%"; a reference, originally, to American dissatisfaction with the richest 1% of the US population having such vast control over the country. "And when you've got a sea of V masks, I suppose it makes the protesters appear to be almost a single organism – this "99%" we hear so much about. That in itself is formidable. I can see why the protesters have taken to it."
Moore first noticed the masks being worn by members of the Anonymous group, "bothering Scientologists halfway down Tottenham Court Road" in 2008. It was a demonstration by the online collective against alleged attempts to censor a YouTube video. "I could see the sense of wearing a mask when you were going up against a notoriously litigious outfit like the Church of Scientology."
But with the mask's growing popularity, Moore has come to see its appeal as about something more than identity-shielding. "It turns protests into performances. The mask is very operatic; it creates a sense of romance and drama. I mean, protesting, protest marches, they can be very demanding, very gruelling. They can be quite dismal. They're things that have to be done, but that doesn't necessarily mean that they're tremendously enjoyable – whereas actually, they should be."
At one point in V for Vendetta, V lectures Evey about the importance of melodrama in a resistance effort. Says Moore: "I think it's appropriate that this generation of protesters have made their rebellion into something the public at large can engage with more readily than with half-hearted chants, with that traditional, downtrodden sort of British protest. These people look like they're having a good time. And that sends out a tremendous message."
It is an irony noted with relish by critics of the protests – one also glumly acknowledged by many of the protesters – that the purchase of so many Vendetta masks has become a lucrative little side-earner for Time Warner, the media company that owns the rights to Moore's creation. Efforts have been made to avoid feeding the conglomerate more cash, the Anonymous group reportedly starting to import masks direct from factories in China to circumvent corporate pockets; last year, demonstrators at a "Free Julian Assange" event in Madrid wore cardboard replicas, apparently self-made. But more than 100,000 of the £4-£7 masks sell every year, according to the manufacturers, with a cut always going to Time Warner. Does that irk Moore?
"I find it comical, watching Time Warner try to walk this precarious tightrope." Through contacts in the comics industry, he explains, he has heard that boosted sales of the masks have become a troubling issue for the company. "It's a bit embarrassing to be a corporation that seems to be profiting from an anti-corporate protest. It's not really anything that they want to be associated with. And yet they really don't like turning down money – it goes against all of their instincts." Moore chuckles. "I find it more funny than irksome."
He has a tricky relationship with Time Warner, umbrella company to both DC Comics, which published V for Vendetta in its graphic novel form, and Warner Brothers, the studio behind the big-screen version. Like many of us, Moore thought the 2003 film made out of his late 90s comic strip The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen a great failure, and by the time V for Vendetta had been adapted for the screen, in 2006, he wanted his name removed from the credits; perhaps even from future editions of the graphic novel too. At the time an interviewer asked Moore if he might be "throwing out the baby with the bathwater", and he gave the sort of strolling, storyteller's response that ought to be laminated and distributed to any artist uncertain about giving over their creations to Hollywood. "Well, I don't own the baby any more," said Moore. "During a drunken night it turned out that I'd sold it to the Gypsies and they had turned my baby to a life of prostitution. Occasionally they would send me glossy pictures of my child as she now was, and they would very, very kindly send me a cut of the earnings…"
Today, when we speak, there is still for Moore "a cloud of bitterness" that surrounds V for Vendetta. But with its revival in the context of contemporary protest he has been able to return to the story, drawing cautious pleasure from it for the first time in years. "I don't have a copy of the book around the place, but with the mask everywhere it's made me think back to the work itself, try to figure out why this has lodged in the public imagination."
He sees parallels between the dystopia predicted in the story and the world today. The book foretold the prevalence of CCTV cameras on city streets, for instance; and Moore takes a particular satisfaction in a strand of the plot that seemed to anticipate the sort of internet-based dissent that has made groups such as Anonymous and Assange's WikiLeaks such major agents of protest. "The reason V's fictional crusade against the state is ultimately successful is that the state, in V for Vendetta, relies upon a centralised computer network which he has been able to hack. Not an obvious idea in 1981, but it struck me as the sort of thing that might be down the line." Moore is not computer-literate. "This was just something I made up because I thought it would make an interesting adventure story. Thirty years go by and you find yourself living it."
He is careful to point out that "I have no particular connection or claim to what [the protesters] are doing, nor am I suggesting that these people are fans of mine, or of V for Vendetta." Ultimately, use of the mask may be down to the simple fact that "it's cool-looking. I'm not trying to make a proprietorial statement."
He is also aware of how badly things can go wrong when a fiction of his spreads too far from source. Last year, an unhinged man in Florida went on a shooting spree in a school, spray-painting a "V" symbol on the wall (matching a symbol that appears in the comic and film incarnations of V for Vendetta) before killing himself. "A horrible, pointless episode," says Moore. "So there's always... Now I didn't feel responsible, but..." He does not finish the thought, but trusts the V mask will remain an essentially peaceful tool of protest. "At the moment, the demonstrators seem to me to be making clearly moral moves, protesting against the ridiculous state that our banks and corporations and political leaders have brought us to."
David Lloyd, V for Vendetta's co-creator, has admitted going along to a demo in New York to see the masks in use. The extent of Moore's own activism has been "a good moan in the local pub"; he does not see himself donning a mask ("Be a bit weird, wouldn't it?"). But his sympathies are with the protesters, and there is a clear sense of pride for him that so many people – if not "the 99%" then a great, unignorable bloc – have caused such a stir. "It would be probably be better if the authorities accepted this is a new situation, that this is history happening. History is a thing that happens in waves. Generally it is best to go with these waves, not try to make them turn back – the Canute option. I'm hoping that the world's leaders will realise this."
Back in the early 80s, approaching the end of Vendetta's epic 38-part cycle, Moore was struggling to think of another "V" word with which to title a closing chapter. He'd already used Victims, Vaudeville and Vengeance; the Villain, the Voice, the Vanishing; even Vicissitude and Verwirrung (the German word for confusion). "I was getting pretty desperate," he says.
He eventually settled on Vox populi. "Voice of the people. And I think that if the mask stands for anything, in the current context, that is what it stands for. This is the people. That mysterious entity that is evoked so often – this is the people."



35 Comments so far
Show AllFor another thing, the movie's momentum comes to a complete halt with the scenes of Evey imprisoned and forced to live the life of a woman long dead.
That woman's story could have been left out. The movie would then have continued forward and not taken an extended side-trip into the past.
Stephen Rea was very good in it, I thought.
Still, the graphic novel is so much better and richer, the movie comes out bad in relation to it. That's the "bad" of the movie. Although it's difficult to see how the movie could've been much better inside its limited time-scope.
"anonymous" in disguise.
he failed.
I wondered that as well. I used to see British "Guy Fawkes Day", Nov 5th, on certain calendars years ago, and wonder just what the hell it was all about. Apparently, the Empire held Fawkes up as an example of what happens if you ever oppose The One Percent. In real life, Guy Fawkes was discovered with tons of powder kegs that he never got a chance to light off under parliament, so he was first tortured and then publicly executed and the Empire annually re-enacted his death to keep the population scared, if my guess of history is correct.
But instead of scaring everyone, it backfired. It reminded them instead, that citizens (even just one person) can make a difference if their desire for freedom and liberty over tyranny is strong enough and they have the courage to risk it all. Instead of burning Guy Fawkes in effigy, the public was soon burning masked scarecrows that looked like members of the Empire or of the church, recently burning Margaret Thatcher in effigy.
This is stuff they would never teach in government-run history class!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guy_fawkes
TJ
Good post and I agree with most of it. But I don't subscribe to the distinction you've drawn between Religion and Politics. Religion, imho, is a political tool wielded deftly all the time by the One Percent. Any time you're pretending to talk to God, as priests and some conservative presidents do, you are engaging in a bid for power over the masses. The Pope was one of the richest men in the world in some years as were the Monarchs of England and the House of Lords, so, they definitely were, in fact, part of The One Percent who controlled 90 percent of the wealth of the world. The Pope's English Jesuits were an extension of his influence in Rome just as his priests (Spain's) were in the 1500s in St. Augistine, Florida and throughout the world. The "Gunpowder Plot of 1605" that you refer to was most assuredly carried out by minority provincial Catholics who were tired of tyrannical One Percent Religious Intolerance. The One Percent (House of Lords and King James) forbade Catholic worship in England despite having promised previously to permit it, from the minority POV.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gunpowder_PlotSo maybe, one man's "terrorist" is another man's "freedom fighter". The founding fathers of the USA were all branded "terrorists" by the Crown in 1775. I think the moral of the story here, really, is that when the One Percent renege on the Social Compact they made with the people, like reneging on religious tolerance in 1605 England, or reneging on the Englishman's Bill of Rights in 1770's North America, the people have the right to correct the abuse.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_declaration_of_rightsReligous and Class struggle are just part of human nature, regardless of time. To pretend that the OWS motivations today for liberty and prosperity are somehow any different than they were in 1605 England or 1773 at the Boston Tea Party is to not be a sophisticated student of history. This is a global economy now, and most people around the world are awaking to the very real fact that their own Central Bank and it's push for "Austerity" measures and the unfair commodities speculation that it endorses, are the source of all their problems. Wall Street Banksters are the new Kings and Priests in the new money-changing-temple which is run by the intolerant "One Percent".
But there's no need to mix Apples and Oranges here. Osama Bin Laden was a member of the One Percent: a billionaire, whereas, Guy Fawkes was, like 99 percent of Englishmen were, just a common citizen. OBL, on the other hand, was a mercenary from a foreign country brought in by the CIA's Operation Cyclone to get rid of the Soviets in Afghanistan. In Charlie Wilson's war it's clear that OBL at that time was considered a "Freedom Fighter" for the Afgan people by both the CIA and the Congress. That operation was extremely successful, resulting in part of defeat and disintegration of the USSR. It was after we split the scene and left them holding the bag in Kabul that hard feelings arose and Osama turned on us (which so often happens with our covert "assets" around the world like General Noriega in Panama, and Sadam Hussien in Iraq, just to name two famous examples.)
Do I shed a tear for these thugs in their bloody struggles? No. The hell with them.
But to pretend that these are strictly religious motivators for violence is not revealing enough for me. The Bin Laden Family were the biggest Oil construction company in the Middle East and they built all the big Mosques for the King. Osama's brother Salem was a financial partner with GWB in Arbusto Oil (means Bush in Spanish), later Harken Energy. The Carlyle Group chaired by GWB's father had hundreds of financial transactions with the Bin Laden Brothers for Contracting and Industry, (later the Bin Laden Group) before and after 911. So maybe these struggles aren't strictly religious terrorism as you assert; I submit they are financial maneuvers carried out by Wall Street to fleece the taxpayer. Maybe billions in missing Pakistani ISI money from our US treasury was the real motivator, for all parties concerned.
I am not defending terrorists at all. I advocate non-violence for change. The question posed was "Why Guy Fawkes?, he failed" and I speculate that both the Author of the Comic Strip V for Vendetta and OWS use the animated Guy Fawkes mask because it struck a cord with the British Pubic where the story was set. As so often happens over time, the meaning and symbolism of a Guys Fawkes Day or a fictitious V for Vindetta character are morphed and change to fit the whims of the new generation or author.
You may not "buy" the fact that wealth has been transfered to a scheming "One Percent" via unsavory bank bailout practices, but the evidence of obscene bonuses for bank executives after those bailouts occurred is there for everyone else to see.
Enjoyed the banter,
TJ
Any relationship with das korporation is tricky. The more powerful das korporation, the more tricky the relationship. Because for das korporation, trickery is the name of the game.
The success of das korporation depends on the people ignoring such highly relevant facts. You have to admit that if Merkans had treated das korporation with a high degree of suspicion over the past several decades we would not have the problems we have today. We've observed for a long time that any talent advanced by das korporation is kompromised fundamentally. And so little surprise that the far left philosophy envisions the growth of the local, independent art/music scene, along with all the other local, independent craftsman guilds and cottage industries. Remember Napster? The intrusion of digital file sharing/copying on "intellectual property rights" highlighted the thuggery of das korporation (and similarly korrupt kapitalist entities such as trade organizations and the thuggish litigation industry) abusing the law and the legal system to further its diabolical ambition.
The far left philosophy naturally, holistically includes a solution for the arts: Artists can exchange their services in the local market via live performance in a healthy, face-to-face exchange, and give away their recordings for free. If you look into it, you will see that such an arrangement cuts das korporation out of the loop. Out of our way, Ehh?
Cultivate a sense of equitable power relations and you can recognize every criminal racket no matter which shape they morph into next.
What could have happened was some comparison and contrast between Guy Fawkes, the character V in both versions and OWS. But this article didn't go into any decent examination of V and barely even mentioned Guy Fawkes.
Both Fawkes and V saw the only solution was violence. OWS is non violent. V and OWS wanted to give power back to the people. Fawkes wanted to overthrow the beginnings of the power of the people in 17th Century England and establish a more totalitarian Catholic regime. (In the early 17th Century it was only Protestants who were fiddling around with some kind of democratic forms, albeit ones very limited to the bourgeois, while Catholics were still enamored with absolute monarchy.) V was a disciple of Fawkes methods but had quite different goals. But it is ironic that a movement that eschews violence would find the V inspired wearing of a Guy Fawkes mask appropriate? The only real commonality is all three shared a deep disgust of the existing system. Or maybe the point of the Fawkes mask is that even though OWS is non violent by wearing the mask a message is being sent to the system that OWS is as dangerous as V and the Gun Powder Plot.
Of course, that still leaves someone to set the explosives and take the bullets on their behalf ... I guess your point stands.