Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
South Africa – Where Climate Change May Trigger a Toxic Timebomb
Johannesburg's mining industry has been a mainstay of the city for decades, but its vast waste dumps are a huge threat – and Mariette Lieferink is leading the charge for a clear-up
We meet Mariette Lieferink in a McDonalds near Gauteng, on the edge of Johannesburg, buying a dozen sickly sweet drinks. She's no one's idea of a leading environmental activist. She wears a tight-fitting, scarlet, embroidered Chinese dress, high heels, and make-up. She is nearly 60, a mother of four, grandmother of two and she used to be a preacher. Now she is head of the Federation for a Sustainable Environment, and works flat out to clean up the massively polluted mining areas of Johannesburg.
Environmental activist Mariette Lieferink near Krugersdorp, where water contamination levels hugely exceed safety standards. (Photograph: Thys Dullaart/Oxfam) Climate change, she says, is a potential disaster for Johannesburg and South Africa, liable to trigger the toxic timebomb left by 120 years of mining.
The city has been the centre of the giant South African mining industry since gold was found there in 1880, and it is surrounded by more than 400 sq m of waste dumps, tailing dams, toxic lakes, radiological hotspots, leaking pipelines, spillages, and gaping holes in the ground. More than 40,000 tonnes of gold has been mined from the Witwatersrand Basin in 120 years, as well as cadmium, uranium, cobalt, copper, zinc, manganese, titanium and other heavy metals.
Lieferink's "toxic tour" starts on the main A28 road. The land we stand on is bright yellow and white, a deep crust of toxic waste from an old copper mine. In front of us is a brickworks making radioactive building blocks from the waste of another mine. In the distance are giant waste heaps from gold mines and below us run the shafts and tunnels of more than 120 deep mines, mostly brim full of millions of litres of some of the most toxic and hazardous waste in the world.
Climate change, she says, increases the volume of rainwater, allowing the mines to flood more frequently, and the water courses and rivers to become even more polluted. "The poorest [people] – who are confined to live near the dumps – are in the frontline. They are exposed to high concentrations of cobalt, zinc, arsenic, and cadmium, all known carcinogens, as well as high levels of radioactive uranium. In some cases, government-built houses are being erected next to radioactive dumps."
Terrifying levels of air, ground and water pollution have been recorded, and while it's impossible to pin cancers, mutations or respiratory diseases on individual mine companies, it is common to find children playing in the dust, ingesting poisons.
"The companies have left gaping holes in the ground and gaping holes in the social communities. They have had no regard for people, there has been no enforcement of law," Lieferink says.
This African Erin Brokovich divides her time between the shanty towns and informal settlements near the waste dumps, and the boardrooms of the companies who are still operating. She sits on South Africa's nuclear regulation board and is paid by two of the companies to warn local communities of the dangers of pollution. She swears it does not stop her condemning them vociferously, in public, every week.
"I got involved through Shell," she says. "They wanted to build two petrol stations opposite my home. It was narrow self-interest that prompted me. People became tired opposing them, which left me to battle alone against them. They offered to bribe me, but eventually they gave up. It showed me what one old woman could beat a huge company."
She then started to investigate the pollution caused by the mines, specifically what is known as "acid mine waste", which she now believes is, along with climate change, the most dangerous issue facing South Africa.
"I am not a greenie, I just want to see justice done. I want to see the areas cleaned up."
We head for Tudor street informal settlement, a collection of shacks built on a radioactive dump. Thirty five houses were moved from here a few years ago after Lieferink found they were on a uranium dump. The land is still highly polluted.
"When it rains here the earth becomes a yellow river. It dissolves. The children play in it. How can we deal with climate change if we cannot even manage waste like this?" she asks. "Climate change will lead here to more intense and heavier rains, so the run off will be worse. Communities are in huge danger and don't even know,"
"The soil here is really bad. We all have health problems," says Patience, a woman who lives there.
Despite the pressure put on her, Lieferink has no inclination to give up what she does. "My activism was at great cost, personal and financial. Industry and government have tried to discredit me. They have tried to sue me, they lambast me if I make mistakes. I am sure my emails are monitored but I am not suspicious. I am just obnoxious."
And with that she waves goodbye to the children in the shanty town and says she will be back with a chicken for Christmas.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

22 Comments so far
Show AllGood luck to her with her mission. Unfortunately the industrial world have these ticking time bombs all over the world, called by many 'sinks' which is the end place where all the refuge eventually ends up. Think of the mess all the coal fired power planets are adding to this problem with the coal ash disposal system that will come back to haunt the humans. One thing that can be counted on is that the 'elite' communities will be safe from such poisoning of the environment but even that won't keep them from being affected by this 'unfettered' pollution in the 'unfettered global market world'. Truly a situation that only a psychopathic infected industrial world would be responsible for because they don't have the conscience to worry themselves about it all the time.
"More than 40,000 tonnes of gold has been mined from the Witwatersrand Basin in 120 years"
This figure can't possibly be correct.
Much more likely to be weight of tailings. Now is that 400 sq mile or 400 sq metre? Yet another journalist with number and units problems. No wonder they have trouble communicating about global warming.
Ore mining produces a lot of tailings. Miners and corporations generally heap it up in the most convenient place. Anything else would reduce their profits. The environmental and health costs are paid by all current and future generations. Being largely foreign owned companies who avoid both taxes and paying the locals, having valuable ore assets can be a curse.
How about gold ore, that would make the number more credible .
40,000 tons would be far, far too small a number if it were referring to gold ore or the tailings over 120 years of production. A single middling sized West Virginia coal mine produces about that much coal waste (shale and slurry) every 5-8 days.
40,000 tons of gold would cover a football field about a foot and a half (45 cm) deep. This is perfectly believable number for 120 years of production in the richest gold mining district in the world. The US Treasury Department alone holds about 13,000 tons of gold bullion at Ft. Knox and at the Fed Reserve Bank of NY.
That is pretty much correct ~PJD 412~,, see my prior posted comment below here from yesterday... It would not surprise me if the actual or true amount mined is not revealed either... For several financial reasons
Then too; gold is not weighed the same as other things.. A ton of cotton weighs 500 pounds more than a ton of gold., or a quarter ton. .. 1 lb of cotton is 16 ounces Avoirdupois... 1 lb of gold is 12 ounces Troy weight.
So 40,000 tons of gold is actually 30,000 tons if we weighed it the way we weigh other things.
Helen of Troy started that after she was kidnapped.. That was so her ramsom fee would be less... Instead it started a war. Howz that for shooting the bull?
Yes, except the spelled it "tonnes" - meaning metric tons - 1000 kg or 2204 pounds.
Looks like the one side found a way to continue apartheid...kinda like the lines drawn in Detroit...but much more hazardous. I love her attitude. Sounds like she could use a little fundraising to go with her hellraising.
Ecocide
Exactly
"Never doubt that a thoughtful, committed citizen can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has."
- Margaret Mead
From the late 1800s to 1970 the South African mines produced more than 40% of all the gold that had ever been mined… In 1970 South African gold production was 1,000 tons, then more than 70% of the output of the non-Communist world.
The ~Freegold~ mine was the world's most productive gold mine at 115 tons a year.
Based upon that, figure an average of 100 tons a year for 120 years from each of just two of South African more productive mines, would be 44,000 tons.
I really do admire ~Mariette Lieferink~.. Sorta nullifies dumb blond jokes too.
The “Golden Rule”…. 'Them who has the glld,,, makes the rules."
Lieferink is truly amazing - thankyou John Vidal for bringing her to our attention.
She is an inspiring figure not only for her staunch dedication to a much needed social cause, but also for her forthright honesty in claiming - "It was narrow self-interest that prompted"her to begin her work.
Her statement "How can we deal with climate change if we cannot even manage waste like this?"is something to ruminate on while looking back on the many ecological disasters of late. Stopping corporate's usurping of gov't. to implant industrial/profit priorities into deregulatory environmental "laws" must become a priority for all who care about a future.
Can a person eat gold?
That's the helluvit, isn't it? All this waste, wasted on something that's not even a necessity of life.
I know gold is consumed and has been for years. As I was once a bartender, I poured many of a shot of goldschlager(sp) schnapps that has gold flakes in it. But eating or consuming it for nutrition? Useless.
http://www.cockeyed.com/inside/goldschlager/goldschlager.html
Gold is is used for a lot more than just jewelery and bling. The great majority of it is used in electronics, dentistry and medical devices.
Yes, apparently a person CAN eat gold! Looks like you haven't heard of the "thousand-dollar sundae with edible 23-karat gold leaf."
http://rt.com/usa/news/usa-growing-food-crisis/
“Gold doesn’t really have a flavor but it has a really cool texture,” explained the chef.
I wouldn't have a problem diagnosing someone who'd relish a thousand-dollar sundae. The kind of psychological energy that would be concentrated by such a thing is pretty unhealthy.
Really a dumb question to think about it. I should have asked 'can a person eat gold to maintain their nutritional requirements'? NO
"Terrifying levels of air, ground and water pollution have been recorded, and while it's impossible to pin cancers, mutations or respiratory diseases on individual mine companies"
Why is it impossible? It should be a matter of record which companies operated where and when. There should be records of past and current health concern incidence in the areas impacted by the mines. It's like saying you can't blame the tobacco companies for the resulting health issues from smoking.