EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
US Reins in Drones Over Diplomatic Concerns: Report
The US spy agency has quietly tightened its rules on drone strikes in Pakistan over concerns about their impact on tense relations with Islamabad, the Wall Street Journal reported.
The US spy agency has quietly tightened its rules on drone strikes in Pakistan over concerns about their impact on tense relations with Islamabad, the Wall Street Journal reported (AFP) The Journal, citing senior officials, said the new rules resulted from a behind-the-scenes battle between an aggressive Central Intelligence Agency and US military and diplomatic officials concerned about relations with Pakistan.
A high-level review reaffirmed support for the drone program -- which has killed hundreds of militants, including top commanders, in recent years -- but established new rules to minimize the diplomatic blowback, the Journal said.
The changes reportedly include granting the State Department greater sway in strike decisions, giving Pakistani leaders advance warning of more operations and suspending operations when Pakistani officials visit the United States.
"It's not like they took the car keys away from the CIA," the Journal quoted a senior official as saying. "There are just more people in the car."
The Journal said the debate was sparked by a particularly deadly drone strike on March 17 that took place just one day after Pakistan agreed to release a CIA contractor who had killed two Pakistanis.
Tensions between the two allies escalated throughout the spring, climaxing in May with the killing of Al-Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden in Pakistan in a secret US commando raid carried out without Islamabad's knowledge.
At issue in the debate over drones were so-called "signature strikes," in which unmanned drones fire on groups of suspected militants without necessarily knowing all their identities, and which make up the bulk of operations.
Such strikes are seen as more controversial than "personality" strikes, which target alleged top militants, the Journal said.
US officials do not publicly discuss the drone program, but claim to have substantially weakened Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan and Pakistan in recent months by taking out top leaders.
Pakistan has criticized the program, however, saying it inflames anti-American sentiment and extremism by killing scores of civilians.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

6 Comments so far
Show AllDrones are the mechanical mercenaries of the 21st century and their use is wrong-headed on many levels. History has shown mercenaries to be costly in peacetime and unreliable when it really matters. Mercenaries have no allegiance other than compensation. Drones are a cash cow for the MIC and cost more than the value of their service. Over-reliance on the drone program by DOD is short sighted. Drones are very effective against enemies that are technologically inferior but, a real adversary may be able to hack and disable drones making them ineffective just one time too many. Drones should have a cockpit option with manual overrides. Drones are arrogant. Sun Tzu would not build a defense based on vulnerable networked devices. Drones expose US to surprise harm and further deplete our treasury.
Not to mention, there's no honor in this battle. The very use of drones allow an enemy to develop and use the same in our country; I'm just wondering how soon that may come to pass....how long can these countries allow us to kill their people without consequence? And just because they're inferior does not mean their allies are.....just saying.
The other day I heard a commentator on NPR say that if the Iranians had completed a plan to kill the Saudi ambassador on US soil, it would be an act of war. The implication was that the US would then be forced to retaliate. I immediately turned this around in my mind, thinking "In how many countries have we killed people with drone strikes?" Seems to me that what's good for the goose....
It is time to take the joy sticks and the whips and chains out of the hands of the CIA and send them back in time to their original mission, gathering and analyzing intelligence! Give the joy sticks back to the Navy and the Air Force, and the whips and chains back to Madam Hillary and Susan Rice!
They removed them over diplomatic concerns. Not moral concerns.
In other words they were not concerned about all the civilians they were murdering. They were not concerned over how many children were having their limbs blown off.
They were concerned for Diplomatic reasons. The PR was bad. The advertising execs could not come up with a campaign to "sell it".It akin to a pedophile as politician who stops having sex with children because the PR would be bad and he might not win the next election.
What an immoral murderous group of thugs.
And it is all done in OUR name.