EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- One American Who Isn't For Sale
- Transcript: Today's Live Q&A With NSA Leaker, Edward Snowden
- Remembering Satyajit Ray’s Hirok Rajar Deshe: On Edward Snowden, Resistance and Inverted Totalitarianism
- Obama Cans Regulator Who Crossed Wall Street
- Pentagon Bracing for Public Dissent Over Climate and Energy Shocks
Popular content
Today's Top News
Who is the 99 Percent?
NEW YORK/OAKLAND - Barely a month after the first group of protesters set up its encampment in Zuccotti Park in New York City, the phrase "We are the 99 percent" has already become legendary.
Used throughout the U.S., the expression has come to reference people who share what is left of global wealth after corporate CEOs and the "richest one percent" have pocketed the bulk of global output.
But in a country still highly segregated along race, colour and class lines, the words "99 percent" continue to be points of contention for minorities involved in the movement.
According to a new report released earlier this week by the Center for Social Inclusion (CSI), "Jim Crow still exists today in the (U.S.) job market," with more black and Latino workers relegated to the realm of "second-class workers, over-represented in low-skill, low-wage occupations with limited chances to move up the ladder of opportunity".
The report says that people of colour and immigrants are systematically excluded from the job market as a result of underfunded public schools in their neighbourhoods, which in turn prevents many young minorities from obtaining a college degree.
"People of color cannot get to job centers far from their homes due to inadequate public transportation services. Blacks, Latinos, Native Americans, and particular populations of Asians, live where employers don't locate, where local and county governments have failed to build public transit, and where the tax base is too small to properly fund schools," the report said.
Disparities in the 99 percent
On Tuesday evening, a group gathered in Battery Park, just a few blocks away from Occupy Wall Street, to participate in a conversation about power and privilege.
The discussion was organised by the people of colour working group (POC WG) for Occupy Wall Street, which has fought hard to insert a discourse of structural inequalities into the movement.
"A month ago a group of people from South Asians for Justice went down to the General Assembly at Wall Street in time to hear the reading aloud of what would have become the first official document to be released publically, called 'the declaration of the occupation of New York City'," Thanu Y, an organiser with the POC WG, told IPS.
"We were all immediately struck by the second paragraph of that document, which read: 'We the occupiers, formerly divided by the colour of our skin, gender, sexual orientation (etc)…are one race, the human race.'"
"We felt that language erased histories of communities of colour and immigrants in the U.S. and assumed we were all starting from the same point, economically and politically, when we came to protest this economic crisis – something we all felt was incorrect," Thanu Y said.
"Personally, I believe a discussion of those inequalities really needs to be at the forefront of this movement here in the U.S., and even globally, where realities of class and caste just cannot be ignored. The ways in which we are divided is part of the reason there's an economic crisis in the first place," she added.
So the group decided to block the declaration from passing and stayed at the park till close to midnight, amending the declaration to better reflect the diversity of experience and privilege within the movement.
Since then, the POC WG has been a major organising force in OWS, facilitating teach-ins, running a blog dedicated to "critical voices in the 99 percent" and linking up with groups like the Movement for Justice in El Barrio and Occupy the Hood to embrace and encourage minorities' participation in the movement.
Black participation in a majority white movement
Despite a brutal shutdown of the Occupy Oakland encampment on Tuesday, organising efforts are continuing in earnest in California, with increasing numbers of African Americans stepping up to continue the city's legacy of struggle.
The Black Panther Party was born in Oakland on Oct. 15, 1966. The city was also home to a strong black-led anti-apartheid movement and boasted the largest, strongest Rainbow Coalition chapter in the country.
Today, over four decades later, Occupy Oakland has support from individual black Oaklanders, but hasn't yet garnered unqualified support from two key constituencies: black ministers and black elected officials.
To a great extent, there's limited black participation because it's a white-led movement, according to African American attorney and civil rights veteran Walter Riley.
"Any time there's a movement in this country that is primarily initiated by white people, there is a tendency for there to not be a large number of black people," he said.
"That does not mean that black people do not support it," he continued, pointing out that the heart of the Occupy Movement – condemnation of the banks – is central to grievances within the African American community, namely, the lack of capital investment in black neighbourhoods and communities of colour.
"Banks are getting away with stealing our money," Riley said. "The government has given money to them and has not insisted that they give loans. They have not invested in our communities."
Oakland, too, represents the disparity within the 99 percent. The differences between white, black and brown joblessness is stark: in 2010, white unemployment was seven percent, while black and Latino unemployment was 19.6 percent and 15.2 percent, respectively.
Riley said elected officials – including elected officials of colour - - should be in the forefront of Occupy Oakland, focusing on community needs.
"I would like to see the City of Oakland expressly say, 'let's make [Occupy Oakland] work. Let's keep it going," he stressed.
Alameda County Supervisor Keith Carson, also an African American, supports the anti-corporate message of the movement but called the leaderless structure "unsettling". He said with other organisations, you know where to go to get information or who to talk to. That's not the case with Occupy Oakland.
And Carson said occupiers were sending the wrong message by camping in front of City Hall, when the real targets ought to be the banks. "Local government is under siege," he said, underscoring that local government builds roads and provides for the health and safety of people in the city.
Lack of strong black participation might be also understood in the shift in demographics.
In the 1980s, 46 percent of Oaklanders were African American. Today, just 27 percent of Oakland's population is black, while 25 percent is white, just slightly more than the Hispanic population.
As Reverend Daniel Buford pointed out, now that the more affluent white community is hurt by unemployment and foreclosure, they have become leaders in the movement to fight the corporations and banks. The black church, he said, continues to do what it's been doing all along – organising around bread and butter issues, particularly education that leads to good jobs.
"We as clergy have a role to play, not just a role of protest, but of vision," Buford said, adding that he supports concrete demands, such as the proposal in San Francisco to open a municipal bank.
Buford said he helped organise an interfaith march on Monday in solidarity with Occupy San Francisco, where one group of marchers carried a golden calf to illustrate a biblical verse condemning "fiscal idolatry".
Clarence Thomas, executive board member of the International Longshore and Warehouse Union in San Francisco and a former Black Panther, stressed the need for the 99 percent to come together.
He pointed out that one of the strengths of the Panther movement was its ability to develop coalitions with white allies, who were referred to at the time as "white radicals of the mother country." He said he thinks this can happen in the Occupy Movement.
"It's a mistake to say, 'this is a white youth-led movement; there is not room for people of colour," he said, pointing to movements like Occupy the Hood in Chicago.
"It is a matter of us getting involved in the process," he said. "That doesn't mean there won't be bumps in the road, but anything worth fighting for is worth the sacrifice of struggle to work it out. The ruling class is depending on us not being able to come together," he added.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



18 Comments so far
Show All"Personally, I believe a discussion of those inequalities really needs to be at the forefront of this movement here in the U.S."
NO NO NO !!! The OCCUPY MOVEMENT has it right ! The movement's efforts are INCLUSIVE. Inclusiveness promotes UNITY. Avoid these SEPARATIST movements like the plague. They either don't get it, or they are a politically motivated effort to DIVIDE the Occupy Movement. The proper way to influence the movement is to PARTICIPATE IN THE MOVEMENT. If you are unwilling to do that then you only have yourselves to blame.
There are only two directions OWS can go...1) be unified and succeed, or 2) be exclusive and fail. It IS that simple. The 99% is in such bad shape as a result of divide and conquer strategy applied by corporations (and the politicians they own) for decades.
Minorities need to understand that whites have also suffered growing income inequality and that racism is a subset of income inequality. As income inequality continues to grow, racism will worsen. Reversing income inequality across the entire social order is the only way to end racism.
You got that right! I stopped reading right there. The OWS General Assembly declares unity and solidarity amongst the "enslaved" (by debt, race, gender, whatever) class and it immediately is degenerated into identity politics by the "field slaves" over who is more enslaved, they, or the "house slaves".
This is the self-inflicted wound of the "liberal" class: identity politics that divides us from us and feeds right into the hands of them! It was started by them to divide the white indentured from the black chattel 400 yrs ago and it's been working like a charm ever since.
This is about the disempowered and disenfranchised of any stripe, coming together in unity over our common exploitation, not about which slave is treated worse by the masters.
Here's the gist Stone...UNITED WE (THE 99%) STAND.............divided...we collapse into utter chaos and oblivion as the world of the rich roll right over the top of all of us.
If these occupiers, one and all, cannot suck up their respective egos and prejudices and work together...we just go back to the drawing board and plan for total annilation of our society.
It is disturbing that people are still so narrow minded and uneducated as to what is going on and who is doing what to who. They (the 1%) WIN if we don't get this stupid junior high crap off our plates.
If you were dying in a month of cancer, and you met a Tea party person, or some other person to your distaste, and they said they had a month also to live. Would you embrace that individual and ride the tide to the end? If you are a decent human being, you would. Well, boys and berries, The cancer is the 1% and we are all struggling to survive it, as well as their planned health problems so we'd spend gazillions on cancer research, just another ruse of astronomical proportions. That one brought to you by the pharm and food industry, supported by our USDA, FDA, WHO, and EPA. Sick bastards.
"Today, over four decades later, Occupy Oakland has support from individual black Oaklanders, but hasn't yet garnered unqualified support from two key constituencies: black ministers and black elected officials."
as far as elected "officials" go, i notice much confusion regardless of skin colour. the establishment so wants to get the message out "trust us! we are still on top of the situation! we're taking care of you!" those who consider themselves as leaders and policy makers are reluctant to speak honestly and admit that we do not know all the answers to every problem. we need each other, we don't need nannies. partly because of the nature of the beast, politics, where public image trumps truth. we the people are expected to look with unwavering faith to the clergy, business leaders and elected "officials" as persons of superior morality and world knowledge. one great thing from herman cain's nonsensical, "if you don't support wall street, you don't support america" slogan is to see that the greed flaw isn't exclusively a euro-anomaly. ego-centric sociopathic disdain for other humans can affect any of us.
i think many light-skinned people just don't want to acknowlege the immorality of this "beacon-to-the-world" nation in the genocide of native americans, slavery, (and worse) of blacks, chinese, hispanics and a long history sexist laws. after all, self-identifying with our "leader of the free world" image hides a great inferiority complex and many sins against man and Nature. too many americans cannot yet empathise with people of different cultures, because we're to busy "good-guy" bragging and have been urged and seduced to mistrust differences as threatening. most never leave the comfort zone of people who look, think and dress just like me. if we, the 99% wish to make the world a better place, there's no better way than to meet one another face to face, smile and make eye-contact and know, "we are family!"
i am troy davis!
i am scott olsen!
The 99% are those who are forced to pay the bills for the 1%'s criminal plunder wars - at gun point if necessary. Can we secede now?
If we SUCCEED, maybe we won't have to SECEDE.
Comment moved to the appropriate thread.
I happen to think this is a very good question..Who are (is) the 99%? Where do I stand relative to this 99%? These are the questions I have been struggling with for weeks now. I support the occupations but exactly what am I supporting?
This is Saturday and I am many miles away from home. I am completing a report that I started many days ago.....A report bought and paid for by the 1%...
I wish life could be simpler..Questions...Always questions...
Take care everyone
Thomas Gilbert-
I think that answer is simple. What is your net worth, how did you make it, and what are you doing with it? If you're making over $250,000/yr and just feathering your own nest with it, I think we know what side of the line you are on.
Phineas,
Thank you for your response to my posting regarding a person's standing relative to the 99%. (I earn less than 250,000 a year)
What I was attempting to point out is that we are all connected (some more directly than others) to those considered to be in the top 1%.
Although you think the answer is simple I can assure you it is not.
Thank You and Take Care
Thomas Gilbert-
It's really not that complicated. Our lives can still be inexorably linked to the 1% in ways you allude to, while dictating to the 1% more terms relative to that linkage, as per, regulation of their wealth and power.
Hue,
Forgive my soul searching here at Cd. (honest soul searching) What I was attempting to to do was to think out loud.....recognizing my own participation in a system that is totally corrupted....
Just thoughts that ran through my mind after reading the cd article...BTW..I been a supporter of any public policies that would impose strict limits on the accumulation of excessive wealth and power for years..I understand that simple part..very well..... Thank You HueThomas Gilbert-
Thomas, if your conscience is bothering you about working for the 1%, I suggest you consider the life and actions of the Marine that was hit in the head with a tear gas canister at an Occupy Oakland event last week, and is now in the hospital with a fractured skull. He too works for the 1% by day. He also spent his evenings and "free" time by joining Occupy Oakland and standing with the 99%. Like you, he has no choice in terms of having to make a living within the current system. He too knows that the system is corrupt and is destroying the people of the world. But we all know that the system is what it is and isn't going to change unless we individually stand up with and for the 99% that are trying to change the existing system. Your conscience will be put at ease if you follow your heart. Good luck.
If you make more than $2 a day, then you are already among the richest 1/2 of people on this planet. Meaning there is no reason why 50% of the earth's population shouldn't be angry with YOU.
Beware of being too self-righteous. Humility is a virtue.
This is quite true and something many do not realize. There are some qualifications however, like variant costs of living. While the average pay scale in Kenya may be a dollar a day, they don't have to pay $600.00 a month for an apartment and a similar amount for food (depending on family size). In the U.S. 1/3 of all workers make less than 9 dollars an hour which converts to take home pay of a little over $300.00 / week. Two weeks working for rent and two weeks working for food leaves little at the end of the month for other necessities, like clothing, utilities, automobile, etc. Many people in this income bracket, like my daughter who has been a single parent for 7 years, show a lot of courage and resilience in making ends meet and seldom have any extra for unseen needs. When her car or washing machine quits working for example, she occasionally needs help from us or another family member. It' all relative and can't be understood in a meaningful way based solely on the numbers. Working all day and taking care of her son at night leaves time for little else. In a materialistic culture, people are often isolated and continually "billed" for the necessities of existence. More meaningful activities like social engagement or purely aesthetic pursuits of are often compromised or severely limited. Comparative income alone is an inadequate indicator of quality of life.
I am a minority and I feel as if I am part of the 99%. The divide and conquer strategy is in full force. DONT FALL FOR IT. I have been to Wall street and there are plenty of minorities out there and they are all united fighting together. Careful with moveon I am suspicious of that group and they are also in full force out there.