Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Obama Administration Clears Way for Wave of Industrial Offshore Oil Drilling in Arctic
Groups Appeal One Arctic Drilling Permit as EPA Issues Another
SAN FRANCISCO - On Monday, The Center for Biological Diversity and allies appealed the Environmental Protection Agency’s decision to issue Clean Air Act permits allowing Shell to drill for oil in the Arctic. The corporation’s Discoverer drillship plans to sink exploration wells in the Beaufort and Chukchi seas, off Alaska’s north coast, beginning in July 2012. The permits appealed would authorize indefinite drilling operations and cover the Discoverer and a fleet of support vessels, including two icebreakers, an oil-spill response fleet and a supply ship. These large-scale industrial operations emit tons of pollutants into the air and water and pose grave dangers to the pristine Arctic. The appeal asks the Environmental Appeals Board to prohibit unlawful air pollution from Shell’s drilling — pollution that will potentially endanger human health and dirty the clean air of the Chukchi and Beaufort seas.
Monday’s appeal was filed before the Environmental Appeals Board by the Center for Biological Diversity, Native Village of Point Hope, Resisting Environmental Destruction on Indigenous Lands (REDOIL), Alaska Wilderness League, Natural Resources Defense Council, Northern Alaska Environmental Center, Ocean Conservancy, Oceana, Pacific Environment, the Sierra Club and the Wilderness Society. The organizations are being represented by Earthjustice. “These permits mark the start of full-scale industrial oil exploitation of the extremely sensitive Arctic. Oil drilling in the Arctic Ocean comes with unacceptable risks of spills that could have catastrophic impacts on Arctic wildlife and the communities that rely on the Arctic environment,” said Center attorney Vera Pardee. “We witnessed devastating damage from the Gulf of Mexico oil spill; the turbulent, icy, dark and remote conditions of the Arctic would make cleanup there even harder — next to impossible. Drilling in Arctic waters is an extremely bad idea.”
This is the second time the EPA has issued Clean Air Act permits for the Discoverer. The Center and allies successfully appealed the first set of permits, issued in 2010, and the Environmental Appeals Board found them unlawful and remanded them to the EPA for revision. “But the new permits violate the Clean Air Act once again, allowing Shell to emit harmful pollutants beyond legal limits,” said Pardee. “They authorize the company to discharge large amounts of nitrogen dioxide that can cause serious illness — impaired lung function and respiratory disease.”
The appeal comes on the heels of the EPA issuing air permits for yet another Shell drillship, the Kulluk, on Oct. 21. The Kullukand its own fleet of support vessels would emit 30 tons of particulate matter, 240 tons of nitrogen oxides and 80,000 tons of carbon dioxide. This amount of greenhouse gases would double the global warming pollution produced by roughly all of the North Slope Borough households.
“The Arctic is already under huge stress from climate change, and Shell’s industrial activities will significantly increase global warming pollution in this critical region, which is warming twice as fast as the rest of the world,” said Pardee. “Scientists predict summer sea ice could be gone in a few decades, directly threatening the existence of species like polar bears, seals and walruses; the last thing they need is oil drilling in their habitat.”
Monday’s appeal was filed before the Environmental Appeals Board by the Center for Biological Diversity, Native Village of Point Hope, Resisting Environmental Destruction on Indigenous Lands (REDOIL), Alaska Wilderness League, Natural Resources Defense Council, Northern Alaska Environmental Center, Ocean Conservancy, Oceana, Pacific Environment, the Sierra Club and the Wilderness Society. The organizations are being represented by Earthjustice.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

13 Comments so far
Show AllHi V.P. I viewed that Democracy Now yesterday as well and made a similar comment here. In fact, i pointed out that this is the agenda (as far as they are concerned and professing to the world), of OWS. And who knows.......................That could be what it all comes down to. Let the co-optation begin!
I refuse to vote for Obama, based on principle, period. If we get a Republican in the White House, blame Obama, not those who refuse to vote for someone arguably to the right of George W. Bush.
"Can you imagine how much worse it would be if we had a Republican (shudder) in the White House?"
We'd have a right-winger who talks like a right-winger in the White House (eg, George W. Bush) instead of the right-winger who talks like a left-winger that we have now?
PS I assume your comment is tongue in cheek, but ya never can tell on this site.
Two corrupt right wing parties with different stylistic and cultural values does not make for a very democratic country. Obama's foreign policy is dominated by democratic neocons and his domestic policy has been all about payback to his big corporate donors but for some reason many liberals refuse to acknowledge this obvious fact and many of them are too blind to see how corrupt their party is.
The ethics of the EPA are melting away ever faster, just like the Arctic ice.
A Macondo-style blowout in Arctic conditions could be cataclysmic for northern species and people. An uncontrolled undersea gusher could go on for months or years, with no way to stop it under the ice.
This prefigures Obama's impending decision to desecrate the Earth with the tarsands pipeline. Environmentally, Obama is the worst president in history.
In a related development:
President Obama’s reelection campaign has hired a former lobbyist for the controversial Keystone XL oil pipeline as a top adviser. The campaign said that Broderick Johnson, founder and former principal of the communications firm the Collins Johnson Group, would serve as a senior adviser for the campaign.
An Obama campaign official said that in his new role Johnson would “serve as a national surrogate for the campaign and our representative in meetings with key leaders, communities and organizations. Broderick will be an ear to the ground for the campaign’s political and constituency operations, helping to ensure that there is constant, open communication between the campaign and our supporters around the country.”
Obama Campaign Hires Former Keystone Pipeline Lobbyist
Be sure to bite the hand that feeds us.
It's worth pointing out that Government agencies do not exist to protect and defend the common people OR the common good.
The vast majority, even the EPA, are there to agree to industry supplied minimum standards, and to provide a legislative bulwark against which the public throws itself when a scandal or disaster occurs. The People wear themselves out wading though the miles of red tape to meet the obligations of proving their point that the relevant regulations have been violated, expending their savings fighting court battles against the very system that is designed from the ground up to protect itself.
In truth, the EPA is utterly IRRELEVANT!
The fight literally needs to be taken not to Government or the regulators, but the INDIVIDUAL decision makers, the Corporate thugs and their political lackeys, who create these disasters deliberately in the blind pursuit of profit at any cost.
And I'm not talking about some 'begging-on-your-knees, oh-please-stop' placard carry protest where you go home after your latte gets cold.
I'm talking they devastate an ecosystem, they watch their corporate headquarters get handed over as social housing. If their (knowing defective) product kills someone, the person who made the decision to release that product gets a last cigarette and marches to the wall. Get the idea?
It sounds like your solution is to shoot the bastards, to not put too fine a point on it. Were I to agree this is a practical course of action because the murderous plutocrats deserve it or because it's a nice day for a firing squad, I would remain mystified as to how you plan to implement your solution.
Manson-style McMansion invasions? Abductions from plutocrat watering holes? Armed revolution?
On the other hand, were your solution a mere joke, I would remain mystified as to what's funny about joke solutions like this. Real solutions are certainly hard to come by, but joke solutions don't get us any closer.
What can a nature loving,tree hugging dirt worshipper do on an individual basis?
Probably nothing, on an individual basis. People are now exploring how to get some traction on a collective basis. The occupy and indignant movements are reflections of a thirst for constructive anarchy young people in the streets are turning to, all the sudden. Could work. There's always revolt.
It may not be totally necessary to eviscerate all the corporate malefactors. Give me time to think it over...
Okay, you talked me into it.
@ Mike: Organize. Pick up Sun Tzu's The Art of War and take notes.