Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
- A Culture That Condones The Killing Of Children And Teaches Children To Kill
- Slaughter in Connecticut: 20 Children, 6 Adults Dead in Kindergarten Massacre
- Wealthiest Kissed, Weakest Kicked: Obama's Ugly 'New Deal' Offers to Cut Social Security
- How the Mighty (Mississippi) Has Fallen: Historic Drought Plagues US
- Gun Lobby Speaks: We Need More Guns, Especially in Schools
- A Culture That Condones The Killing Of Children And Teaches Children To Kill
- Wealthiest Kissed, Weakest Kicked: Obama's Ugly 'New Deal' Offers to Cut Social Security
- Remember All the Children, Mr. President
- Save the Children: Tears and Tragedy in Connecticut
- Thinking the Unthinkable: On Mental Health, My Son, and Gun Violence
Popular content
Today's Top News
#OWS: Not Just a Protest, But a Little Utopia
NEW YORK - The Occupy Wall Street (OWS) movement has withstood political pressure, bad weather, police violence, and over a thousand arrests, and is continuing to grow in New York City a month in.
The four-page Occupied Wall Street Journal is just one of the collaborative efforts produced by OWS members. (Credit:Sam Lewis/IPS) It has spread to over 100 cities in the U.S. and many more worldwide, and is linking up with popular movements in Europe and the Arab World, and connecting itself to long-existing community organisations.
By now OWS has been featured on the news all around the world, and there is no shortage of analysis regarding its potential political impact. But the internal organisation, structure and functioning of the occupations are at least as noteworthy.
The story here is centred on the original Liberty Plaza, a.k.a. Zucotti Park, occupation, but there are many commonalities between this and other occupations, and most of them have similar structure. Still, each occupation is autonomous and run uniquely based on its own area, issues, demographics and situation.
OWS is open, both literally and figuratively, and voluntary. People come and stay either because they believe in the message - that the economic system of the U.S. is fundamentally flawed and in need of radical change - or because they are victims of that system who are less able to live elsewhere, but either way the sense of community felt at Liberty Plaza is palpable.
|
"The way OWS is structured is really open, anyone can come in and take part," Uruj Sheik, who has been organising with the occupation since its beginning, told IPS.
"The way you become part of the occupation is by showing up and taking on a role – you can join any committee or come up with an idea of your own and organise people around that," she said.
A cash-free economy
And it's free. This might seem obvious or unimportant, but possibly at the heart of many activists' critique of the current system is the ubiquity of money. Money is necessary for virtually every transaction that makes life possible and enjoyable – from food and medical care, to living space and relaxing space, to communication tools, education, and entertainment.
At OWS there is no money, other than donations. You can stay, eat, drink, relax, listen to music, read, talk politics, hang out, sleep or get a band-aid without having to worry about the monetary cost. To OWS activists, egalitarianism isn't about everyone having the same amount of money, it's about not needing money in the first place.
Lily White, an emergency medical technician, founded the medical committee. "I started the medical tent on the second day when we had just a few people and a trash bag full of random supplies," White told IPS.
"Now we have doctors and nurses and two tents full of quality medical gear capable of treating people on the level of a clinic or an ER where patients are seen and treated quickly and for free," she said, adding, "Most of what we treat is police brutality wounds from batons and pepper spray, but we also treat other illness and injury, and now that its cold we try to prevent hypothermia."
Organizational structure and decision-making in OWS are also constructed along egalitarian lines – so that everyone gets a say, no one's voice is left out and everyone participates.
Building a cooperative democracy
The central structure to the occupation is the general assembly (GA). The GA is run at least once daily, and is an open gathering, discussion and the main decision-making body.
But most of what goes on at OWS gets done in committees. Anyone can form a committee, and anyone can join a committee – their meeting times and places are posted publicly every morning.
"At first, OWS can seem overwhelming because there are so many people, but you soon realize there are systems at work," Shlomo Roth, originally from Toronto, told IPS. "It's disconcerting growing up in a world where we are used to being given orders to come to something so participatory – it's liberating!"
"I was traveling with family and sort of walked into OWS, agreed with it, and asked what needed to be done," Roth said. "They asked what my skill sets were and handed a bunch of potential jobs at me. It's very open and anyone can participate."
Examples of internal committees are food, which collects, purchases, stores and distributes food; sanitation, which takes on cleaning and hygiene; medical, which collects medical supplies, recruits professionals to give physical and mental care, and trains others to do the same; comfort, which organizes and distributes donated clothing, blankets, sleeping bags, pillows and the like; security, which ensures a safe environment for everyone; and facilitation, which gathers and trains people to be facilitators and stack-takers in GAs.
Of these the food and medical committees are particularly salient, as they not only allow people to literally live at OWS, but because they provide services to the public that U.S. society at large does not, highlighting the way an alternative society could be geared.
"This is an example of the type of healthcare our country could be providing to people, and we've organised it on the street in less than a month," explained White.
There are also external committees for organising actions, creating media and contacting media sources, internet outreach, coordination with community and labour groups, and so on. Then there are informal groups that make art and music, meditate, do street theatre, teach yoga, and all kinds of other fun things that contribute to a holistic life.
More than a month old, OWS feels like a town of its own, one governed intentionally by institutions and actions based on empathetic, egalitarian principles. As a protest, the occupation tactic is successful because of its constant presence and as a base for organising actions.
But at least as important to participants is the opportunity the occupied space provides to organise a microcosm of the society they want to live in. As the movement continues to grow, it is clear that this new society resonates with many people disaffected with the failures of society at large.
"We're dismantling capitalism and building something better right here," said Sheik.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

19 Comments so far
Show AllAmerica has suffered a lack of sufficient idealism. OWS is the cure.
The present economic system of profiteering and exploitation has failed. We need a new economic paradigm and the OWS movement gives one hope for a new economic model. I love you people!
OWS (and it's co-occupiers) are todays Diggers and Luddites.
And that's a damn good thing.
This is worth listening to: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XWzzvnPOyTM&list=FL7LOY-JK2W8xc7BOGT6nruw&index=35
Enjoy.
Here's the lyrics:
In 1649
To St. George’s Hill,
A ragged band they called the Diggers
Came to show the people’s will
They defied the landlords
They defied the laws
They were the dispossessed reclaiming what was theirs
We come in peace they said
To dig and sow
We come to work the lands in common
And to make the waste ground grow
This earth divided
We will make whole
So it will be
A common treasury for all
The sin of property
We do disdain
No man has any right to buy and sell
The earth for private gain
By theft and murder
They took the land
Now everywhere the walls
Spring up at their command
They make the laws
To chain us well
The clergy dazzle us with heaven
Or they damn us into hell
We will not worship
The God they serve
The God of greed who feed the rich
While poor folk starve
We work we eat together
We need no swords
We will not bow to the masters
Or pay rent to the lords
Still we are free
Though we are poor
You Diggers all stand up for glory
Stand up now
From the men of property
The orders came
They sent the hired men and troopers
To wipe out the Diggers’ claim
Tear down their cottages
Destroy their corn
They were dispersed
But still the vision lingers on
You poor take courage
You rich take care
This earth was made a common treasury
For everyone to share
All things in common
All people one
We come in peace
The orders came to cut them down
Good article.
Possibly even more important than the actual external demands, the Occupation Encampments are rich productive laboratories of alternate participatory politics and economics.
I strongly encourage everyone who has not yet been to their nearest encampment to spend some time visiting one - stroll around. I find ours to be moving experience.
The OWS "free" economy has been around for decades each summer at the Rainbow Gathering. I've had a lot of experience with this dynamic and it is personally liberating.
Still, the interanl dynamics of OWS are much less important than the effect that it has on the struggle against capitalist imperialism. To think otherwise strikes me as wishful thinking in the extreme. This type of communalism has had little political effect in the past and seems unlikely to chnage the big picture in the near future.
There's much that is admirable about the OWS communalism, but I don't think it's going to change the world.
I'm a supporter of OWS, and maybe one day, with enough will and effort, this type of communalism they embrace could change the world. I fear not yet though. There are far too many hurdles to clear before any such potentiality could come into view. A start has to be made somewhere though.
I'm hoping the protesters (or most of them) are looking at the situation with some kind of plan in mind - otherwise they could end up as an inward-looking community, eventually camped out somewhere in the near wilderness .
That'd be great for them if that's what they need - but it wouldn't change a thing that's wrong.
This movement could likely learn from the civil rights and ant Vietnam War movements.
I've got word from that at least from one person who's been going to this that these decisions are getting made only on a unanimous or virtually unanimous basis which makes for eventually nothiong getting done. That isn't the way the civil rights movement or the anti war movement of the Vietnam War periold worked. Also all this stress on skill sets isn't really needed along with all the credentialism which goes right along with hierarchal brain washing. Let people do whatever they can do. Whatever contributon anyone can make is good.
Some of this consensus is OK up to a point. But decsions have to be made, and they shouldn't all have be made uinanimously. A simple up or down vote or even at times not voting at all should be OK. It should be about all for one and all for one.
As to the money, that's the problem. Oh, and leveling it out is a damn good idea. Le't stop pretending anyone really should get more of the pie than others. In truly egalatarian and traditional modern human existence going back to 100 if not 200 millennia ago and only stopping a half dozen to a dozen millennia ago that's just the way it was and it worked great.
But I'm all for utopia.
This movement is struggling and surely has my support along with likely hundreeds of millions of others.
This article is about the internal organization of OWS, but isn't about why they are there. There is far more going on than camp maintenance. It is a protest of Wall street greed and corporate control of our country (lives), and is evolving as other groups join in protest marches. Their days aren't spent sitting around listening to drums and navel gazing.
The point is the movement needs to grow and the internal structure makes that possible.
I actually found the article very interesting. Details of day-to-day life within the OWS and how well they are organizing. These are the Doers who are desperately needed for the OWS to survive the coming winter. I really hope they'll acquire adequate cold weather gear asap, including outfitter tents, none of those POS 3-season walmart special and tarps that will collapse under the first snow fall. Passion and fervor will only carry a person so far once they're cold wet and miserable outside.
The purpose of the Occupy Wall Street Movement is to put the spotlight on the root cause of evil in this world, Wall St and the 1% of the population that control over 40% of the wealth. In order to come up both a more complete analysis and solutions in a more democratic and empowered way, while simultaneously maintaining nonviolent discipline in the affinity groups the "spokes" and wheels structures of "leaderful" not leaderless groups is the result. This is truly revolutionary and not "Robert's Rules of Order". The means and the ends are the same. Creating the "change we'd like to see in the world, by creating it in our selves." Think of it as not just a protest or occupation, but a public, live in encounter group or consciousness raising session, 24-7. I have had some interesting discussions and debates with total strangers over the OWS.
The means and the ends are NOT the same.
This is a fundamental error made by wooly thinking "consciousness" types who have little actual knowledge of how revolutions have occurred.
Yes there is. Hundreds of people are camped in front of City Hall, that iconic art deco tower that was emblematic of Los Angeles throughout most of the 20th century. The occupation has the support of the LA city council and the mayor.
The idea of requiring a supermajority to make decisions is a bad one. While it might seem at the heady, emotional start of a movement a means of avoiding the tyrrany of the majority, it actually sets the organization up for the eventual tyrrany of the minority. Only 10% of the voters can block any action, even the adoption of an agenda.
I used to serve on the State Coordinating committee of the Green Party of California. Their bylaws require 100% consensus for any decision, including the adoption of an agenda for the annual meeting. For three years running I traveled, at considerable expense, to the annual meetings. The Green Party was never able to reach consensus on the adoption of an agenda, so there was never any business transacted. I am not making this up. After three years of that I changed my voter registration to Democrat and am now chair of our local county Democratic central committee.
Look at the California legislature. It has been paralysed by the requirement for a 2/3rds majority to pass tax legislation for decades because of that requirement emposed by Prop 13 in 1978. Look at the U.S. Senate. No decent progressive legislation has been able to get through the Senate because of the fillibuster rule, which requires a 60% super majority to pass legislation.
The OWS movement is making a HUGE mistake in hamstringing its decison making process by requiring a 90% supermajority for decisons. There is nothing inherently wrong or anti democratic with majority rule. It makes sense and is an efficient way to run an organization. OWS needs to make an intelligent decison and allow simple 50% plus one majority rule. Most decisons may get consensus, but at some point requiring a 90% majority to pass anything is going to result in the kind of paralysis we experienced in the California Green Party.
Thanks for your cautionary observations, I've supported OWS from the beginning, but I think this article is more than a little fatuous.
The occupiers are admirable folks, but let's not extrapolate their accomplishments to the point of absurdity by calling OWS a "utopia". Yes, OWS provides medical care, food, etc. But they've produced little or nothing of what they distribute, nor can they possibly do so while encamped on Wall Street. Instead, they're an outpost dependent upon our support. We have to evaluate the results of their experiments in light of experiences such as you (Heavyrunner) describe.
For similar reasons, the rest of us don't have to be bound by the rules OWS has adopted for itself. For its own reasons, OWS wants to remain somewhat amorphous. But their decision needn't keep the rest of us from organizing to work for specific changes among the many excellent ones identified in OWS's signs.
The history teaches us that utopia had never worked and idealism often led to most horrible crimes against humanity.
I am wandering how many of the protesters are voting in elections to make sure that their representatives are caring and intelligent.... We all know what wer are against (corruption, rigging system to increase differences between rich and poor etc. ,,,but what are fhey for and do they get themselves properly informed so that they can make right decisions in their lives and drive the Wall Street guys out of business??
While I'm sure many if not most of the OWS'ers vote, I hope that they, and you, are not under the impression that voting alone will displace the Wall St oligarchs from the top of the financial pyramid.
Firstly, voting is an incredibly rigged affair and electronic voting has been used to throw statewide elections since the mid nineties. Researching "Victor Baird" is a good way into that house of mirrors. IMO, Bush Jr owes both elections to electronic voting fraud - research "Michael Louis Connell," republcan computer expert and campaign consultant who died in a small plane crash shortly before he was scheduled to be deposed regarding a lawsuit that alleged widespread electronic voting fraud in Ohio in 2008.
.
Secondly, unless some faction of the plutocracy is supporting you, you will not be elected President under the current US electoral system.
.
Yeah go ahead and vote, but don't pat yourself too hard on the back about it.