Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Arab Spring Galvanizers, WikiLeaks Among Nobel Contenders
Twitter was abuzz Thursday with the death of Apple visionary Steve Jobs but another topic was gathering steam as the day progressed. Who will win this year's coveted Nobel Peace Prize?
Julian Assange, founder of the website WikiLeaks, is one of the nominations for this year's Nobel Peace Prize. (Getty) Not Jobs, though many among his huge global following posted messages that he should. The Nobel is never awarded posthumously and that rule also eliminates Mohamed Bouazizi, the unemployed college graduate whose self-immolation in Tunisia sparked a popular uprising that led to the fall of Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali's government. The Tunisian revolt began this year's so-called Arab Spring.
Some years, there are clear frontrunners -- Martin Luther King, Jr., Mother Teresa, Nelson Mandela, Aung San Suu Kyi.
This year, it's anyone's guess with a record number of nominations -- 241 -- received by the Nobel committee. Of those, 53 are organizations, including WikiLeaks -- the website founded by Julian Assange that facilitates the publication of classified information and made headlines for leaking documents and videos related to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. It also released thousands of U.S. diplomatic cables.
"Liu Xiabao was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize last year for his struggle for human rights, democracy and freedom of speech in China," blogged Norwegian lawmaker Snorre Valen of the Socialist Left Party, who nominated WikiLeaks. "Likewise: WikiLeaks have contributed to the struggle for those very values globally, by exposing (among many other things) corruption, war crimes and torture -- some times even conducted by allies of Norway."
Liu's win upset the Chinese and set off a diplomatic squabble. The year before, the world gasped collectively at Barack Obama's win, a shocker that the U.S. president had won even before he had completed his first year in office.
Despite the controversy that has swirled around perhaps the world's most prestigious prize, some experts say this year is a no-brainer, given the seismic events that have gripped the Arab world.
Kristian Berg Harpviken, director of Norway's Peace Research Institute Oslo shortlisted men and women who did their share in fomenting peaceful revolts against repressive regimes.
Harpviken's top choice is Israa Abdel Fattah, who helped organize Egypt's online April 6 Youth Movement in 2008.
She was arrested by Egyptian security that year and soon became a symbol of defiance against Hosni Mubarak's government. She has earned the monikers "cyber dissident" and "Facebook girl" and was named one of Arabian Business Magazine's 100 most powerful women in 2011.
The peace research institute's website said that Fattah is a good choice because the Nobel committee "has emphasized its wish to be relevant, to speak to dominant themes of the present, and to see the prize giving leverage in unfolding processes. Secondly, Harpviken believes that the prize is likely to be awarded to a female leader or activist who has been an innovator of new tools for bringing about peace."
Another potential winner is Wael Ghonim, the former Google executive who used social media to jump-start social change in Egypt. Ghonim fired off a steady stream of messages on Twitter and Facebook and worked behind the scenes to galvanize thousands to march on the streets to demand change.
Tunisian blogger Lina Ben Mhenni is also on many top lists. Censored in her own country, she criticized the regime long before the uprisings began, dispersing information to the outside world.
"A prize to Mhenni would be a prize to independent reporting, in the form of social media, as well as recognition of the peaceful protests of the Tunisian people at large," the peace institute website said.
Some experts think that Gene Sharp, an American scholar who founded the Albert Einstein Institution in Boston, could be recognized for his work on the principles of non-violence, including "From Dictatorship to Democracy." The downloadable writings in many languages have proved a source of inspiration around the world, including the uprisings in the Middle East and North Africa.
Harpviken also named Memorial, a Russian civil rights group known for its fight for to protect refugees and victims of political persecution and human rights violations in war zones.
Natalya Estemirova, Memorial's lead researcher in the Chechen republic, was abducted and killed in July 2009. Human Rights Watch said it "appeared to be clearly connected to her work uncovering human rights violations in Chechnya. "
Bookmakers Paddy Power listed Sima Samar, head of the Afghan Independent Human Rights Commission, as a favorite at 5/4 odds.
A physician and trailblazer for women's rights, Samar was named deputy premier after the toppling of the Taliban in 2001, the first woman to win such a high government post.
She has been threatened with death and harassed for questioning conservative Islamic laws and practices, including the burqua, the head-to-toe garment Afghan women have been forced to wear.
Paddy Power picked the right winner last year. That bodes well for Samar. Other names on global shortlists include:
-- Aung San Suu Kyi, the Burmese pro-democracy leader who was released from house arrest last year. Suu Kyi is already a Nobel laureate -- she was awarded the peace price in 1991. No individual has won it twice, though two organizations -- the International Committee of the Red Cross and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees -- are repeat winners.
-- German Chancellor Helmut Kohl
-- Cuban dissident Oswaldo Payas Sardinas
-- Ghazi bin Muhammad, a Jordanian advocate of interfaith dialogue
The winner will be announced Friday. Until then, the speculation continues to heat up.
Twitter user Alu Abunimah (@avinunu) offered one last candidate for consideration to his more than 16,000 followers.
"Maybe the Nobel Peace Prize will go to The Markets, to help Calm them and make them Feel Better," he said. "Also they need the money."
The Nobel Peace prize laureate will win about $1.5 million.
CNN's Joe Sterling contributed to this report.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


13 Comments so far
Show AllIt is interesting to consider the language here associated with the "peace prize"; "dominant themes" and the emergence of consciousness of emergence itself that fosters the idea that media 'seriously' "covets" and is incapable of embracing something other than 'domination' perspectives.
The "coveted" Nobel Peace Prize? You mean there are people who actually want to join the same group of "winners" as Barrack Obama?
If Assange is wise (another somewhat questionable supposition) he'll decline the nomination.
Or he could accept the well deserved nomination and use the million bucks plus to do some good.
After mistakenly giving it to Obama with the assumption that he was better than Bush, the Nobel Committee owes the world. Why not a shared peace prize with Assange and the Arab Spring sharing?
Bradley Manning has also been nominated, according to the Guardian. But perhaps he's not the kind of person who would make it to the short list; after all, he made our Beautiful Black Nobel-Peace-Prize-winning President unhappy. Same reason Assange doesn't stand a chance, too, by the way, although I suppose the Nobel folks want us to think they're seriously considering him -- makes them look good.
Not to put too fine a point on it, but: who cares?Perhaps at earlier stages of its checkered history, it could be charitably argued that the Nobel Committee ought to be given the benefit of the doubt.But bestowing it upon Obama was so egregiously and indefensibly bogus that, to borrow a phrase from the lexicon of jurisprudence, it ought to have "shocked the conscience" of any reasonable observer and utterly impeached whatever credibility, honor, and distinction the institution still possessed.The award's only claim to international importance and prestige is a weak and circular self-promoting reliance upon "grand tradition".Even by that criterion, the Nobel Peace Prize is on a par with Time Magazine's "Person of the Year" or first prize in the Miss America pageant-- a phony diversion for dull, conventional-minded Normals.Frankly, it seems kind of dumb to maintain respectful interest and attention, as if this time around it might redeem itself by making a more inspired choice.As far as I'm concerned, the best course for this discredited extravaganza is to simply stop paying attention to it until it falls into well-deserved obscurity and the dustbin of history.
I've got to admit that Abu Abunimah seems to know just how the Nobel Committee thinks . . .
There are clearly coward plots to undermine Bradley Manning & Julian Assange LIVES & SACRIFICE, one tortured behind bars for SEEKING the truth the other with microchips around on his body, an invisible prison for TELLING it, the TRUTH,
While the CLAN is cowardly working in the HOUSE OF LIES on sending them to the torture chamber & execution in MEDIAEVAL USA.
If at any stage of its existence, that prize meant anything considering some of its controversial history to say the least, NOW is the time. If served with COURAGE that prize could have a MORAL, ETHICAL, & above all HUMAN, (literally) liberating effect & message for the two concerned & the people of the world as a whole, (SCREAMING HIGHT & LOUD), LIFE, HUMANS, CITIZENS TRUTH, COME WAY BEFORE FLAG.
THEY ARE BOTH RELAY-MARATHON RUNNERS FOR PEACE WHO HANDED THE BATON OF PEACE TO THE REST OF US. If WE don't STAND HERE&THERE our HANDS open READY to take IT from them, than their SACRIFICE is diminished. They are our true HEROES not baseball players or football, golf, cricket, boxing faces, at best they are good people with a relatively healthy life style that Corporations use to sell junk food, product placement OBESITY & ILLUSION, glorifying the very entities at the root of all suffering.
Cairo, Athens, Tunis, New York, Chicago, Barcelona, Every minute (NOW) as we SPEAK, we are watching people risking their lives self included & proud, being beaten as if they were CATTLE, a "HERD" that REFUSE to MOVE a certain direction but its OWN only to emerge as a MOVEMENT not just for change but CONSCIOUS EVOLUTIONARY TRANSFORMATION
No terror no torture just truth
Assange nominated?. I guess the super minority occasionally need to throw a bone to the perpetually witless, clueless herd.
Ah! They don't award the Nobel Peace Prize posthumously. I didn't know that. So that's why they haven't awarded it to Hitler (for his work at Munich in 1938).
[/sarcasm off]
Not a bone, but full ACCOUNTABILITY, an other world is unavailing as WE SPEAK as for the bone time we start digging for the Iraqis slaughtered in war crimes & the scores of DEFORMED BABY ANGELS OF FALUJA IRAQ, it appear that there is a trail of bone & blood wherever the empire goes, while we're there let us strip corporation of its so called humanity the masturbation of person hood we have become the joke of the universe.
No terror no torture Just truth.
Hobson's choice, if you ask me . . .