Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
- This Is Cardboard. Also Entirely Recycled, Water and Fireproof, and Dirt Cheap.
- Sen. Sanders: Wall Street CEOs are the 'Faces of Class Warfare'
- Change Is Coming: Factory Farms' Days May Be Numbered
- The Rise of the Sharing Communities
- Sec. of State Hopeful Susan Rice Reportedly Holds 600k Stake in Keystone XL Decision
Popular content
Today's Top News
Unions to Democrats: Don't Take Us for Granted
The country's largest labor federation warned the Obama administration and congressional Democrats not to take their support for granted and said they would work against any elected leader who supports pending free trade agreements.
AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka speaks at a rally for nurses outside of Alta Bates Medical Center in Berkeley, Calif., Thursday, Sept. 22, 2011. Nurses began picketing Thursday morning outside dozens of Northern and Central California hospitals as part of a one-day strike over benefit cuts and other concessions sought by hospital management. (AP Photo/Jeff Chiu) "Every elected leader will be held accountable," AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka told reporters, as anti-Wall Street protests spread across the United States.
"Working families will be demanding action to promote a real job creation agenda. They are not going to go away," he said.
Unions have started joining protesters angry about home foreclosures, high unemployment, executive compensation and the 2008 financial services bailout. The demonstrations, which started in New York a few weeks ago, have since spread to Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Florida, Chicago and other cities.
The AFL-CIO is pushing for a tax on financial speculation, that it said will provide revenue to invest in jobs, schools and roads. The tax is not likely to gain wide support in the current Congress.
The federation is also fighting the administration and Congress on pending free-trade deals with South Korea, Colombia and Panama that are expected to boost U.S. exports by about $13 billion.
"All three free-trade agreements will cost jobs to American workers," Trumka said. "We brought in hundreds of people from around the country ... to let them know the American public says this is bad."
Although Trumka said his federation would continue to help the administration pass its $447 billion job-creation package, he took a hard line with the proposed free trade deals and suggested the AFL-CIO would use its considerable clout to fight certain lawmakers.
"We will oppose them and it will be one of the major issues when we evaluate who are our friends and who aren't our friends of working people," he said.
Democrats have traditionally relied on support from labor groups. Union contributions topped $64 million in 2010, with 93 percent going to Democrats, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.
The federation has had some success holding Democratic lawmakers accountable. During the 2010 mid-term congressional elections, the AFL-CIO tried to unseat then-Democratic Senator Blanche Lincoln and threw resources behind her challenger, Bill Halter.
In the end, Lincoln won the primary but lost to a Republican in November elections. But the federation got its point across. "We are going to support demonstrated friends of working people," Trumka said.
(Editing by Todd Eastham)
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


16 Comments so far
Show AllInstead of leading and building a movement to unionize places like WalMart, Trumka is fighting three trade bills 'that are expected to boost U.S. exports by about $13 billion'.... What's wrong with this picture? Why is this man's strategy simply one of lobbying Democratic Party politicians instead of actually building new unions in new places where they have not existed before?
'Unions to Democrats: Don't Take Us for Granted'
They will if the unions don't do anything other than lobby...
You hit the nail on the G-ddamn head my friend. I've been saying this for years (and trying to get local unions near me like Allied Pilots Association and Caterpillar which operates of HW-183 near where I live in Texas) why not build trade unions across company lines (Starbucks working with McDonalds working with Chili's and so on...) like they do in Europe? Answer, those jobs are for poor people and blacks and pot heads and criminals SO SCREW 'EM. Ok, well why not Wal-Mart? If you pull in the average Wal-Mart employee you would gain almost THREE MILLION NEW MEMBERS (!). Answer: Too many people in the movement would be unmanagable. Oh, sorry, guess that would happen. Then unions complain endlessly that "no one supports us". Really? No! Why?
Your ignorance is abysmal. There already are unions for those industries. The problem is getting (conservative) government out of the way. Their is a retail workers union (used to be the Retail Clerks Union, of which I was once a member), and the others would be the SEIU. Get the Card Check bill passed and it will happen.
And how do you get the Card Check bill passed, Smallbear? If you think that it is by supporting Democrats in government against Republicans, as you imply that it is, then you are simply advocating the decades long failed strategy of the dullard union bureaucrats such as Trumka.
And who are you to call somebody else ignorant when you talk as if the service industries have already been unionized by the infinitesimally tiny Retail Clerks Union no less? Your comments left me aghast by the absolute head in the mud mindset you have, seemingly copied from the AFL-CIO crowd of paid office hacks.
If you are a union member you need to demand that your union leadership stop sending money to the Democratic Party and redirect that money to help the OWS participants around the nation get through the coming winter.
Support the change agents, not politicians who gun for corporations and ignore working folks.
I have no doubt my ignorence is indeed grand, however if unions are actually trying to get new unions made and solidify the movement it surely must be the best kept secret in this country. I noticed you simply assert that there are unions which assist retail workers. I would agree. That was, however, not my point.
OH please. They said the same thing about NAFTA, and we all saw what that did to our jobs and manufacturing base. Maybe if you clap really hard, a trade deal with Never Never Land will result in Tinkerbell placing an order for exports from the US.
We are the ONLY country that refuses to protect iits workers or industries in its trade deals. We are the ONLY country that refuses to enforce trade rules against cheats like China. We are the ONLY country that doesn't use tariffs to our benefit. You can spend all the money you want on "job creation", but if you don't plug the drain, you'll never fill up the hole. China is refusing to allow GM to sell the VOLT made in China as a Chinese car qualifying for its 40% subsidy - UNLESS GM gives them the battery technology that US taxpayers subsidized. You flat earthers are a trip. You give away our jobs, and then you demand we spend money to retrain displaced workers for jobs that don't exist - except in India and China.
Do any of you realize that we're entering "free trade" agreements in countries where union organizers are routinely MURDERED?
http://www.ituc-csi.org/guatemalan-trade-union-leader.html?lang=en
http://www.icem.org/en/78-ICEM-InBrief/3848-Home-to-Half-of-World-s-Union-Murders-Colombia-Excluded-from-ILO-s-Sanctions-List
On top of this of course the US provides military aid to the countries doing the killing.
Oh, sure, we realize it. And we're utterly unsurprised.
These trade deals are a disaster for the US ecdonomy. The only US exports these trade deals will boost is more jobs to foreign countries. Instead of promoting trade deals, the administration should be enforcing tariffs that will force American ex-pat manufacturers to move back home. The only reason they are over their is because of the trade advantage. Cheap foreign labor would be offset by import costs, and home based companies would be able to compete fairly.
Mr Trumka:
Dump the Dims.
Team up with the Greens.
Let's get the People Power show on the road.
AFL-CIO members:
Dump Trumka. He and his ilk are the ones nailing your limbs to a political party that wants only your money -- and your silence.
AMEN!!!!
TRUMKA, YOU SIR ARE A CHUMP-KA! Read the wsws.org for an honest take on union collaboration with the powers that be, if you can stomach it.
Doesn't anyone remember that giant sucking sound from the south; aka. NAFTA? That was the just the start!
You are 35 years too late Richard!