EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- 'The Gilded Age' Statistics Corporations Don't Want Workers, or Anyone, to See
- As Death Toll Rises Beyond 500, Garment Factory Disaster 'Worst in World History'
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Report: Toxic Chemicals Found in Thousands of Children's Products
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Report: Toxic Chemicals Found in Thousands of Children's Products
- Move Over, Koch Brothers: A Bigger, Darker Rightwing Funder Is Out to Destroy Public Education
- After Boston, Eyes-Wide Open Hope?
- 'The Gilded Age' Statistics Corporations Don't Want Workers, or Anyone, to See
- Time for Big Green to Go Fossil Free
Popular content
Today's Top News
Oil Exploration Under Arctic Ice Could Cause 'Uncontrollable' Natural Disaster
Any serious oil spill in the ice of the Arctic, the "new frontier" for oil exploration, is likely to be an uncontrollable environmental disaster despoiling vast areas of the world's most untouched ecosystem, one of the world's leading polar scientists has told The Independent.
Oil from an undersea leak will not only be very hard to deal with in Arctic conditions, it will interact with the surface sea ice and become absorbed in it, and will be transported by it for as much as 1,000 miles across the ocean, according to Peter Wadhams, Professor of ocean physics at the University of Cambridge.
The interaction, discovered in large-scale experiments 30 years ago, means that the Arctic oil rush, which was given a huge boost last week with a $3.2 billion (£1.9bn) investment from Exxon Mobil, is likely to be the riskiest form of oil exploration ever undertaken, said Professor Wadhams, who is a former director of Cambridge's Scott Polar Research Institute.
"If there is serious oil spill under ice in the Arctic it will be very hard, if not impossible to stop it becoming an environmental catastrophe," he said. "It will be very much harder to deal with than a major spill in open water."
The world's oil companies are now turning to the Far North as supplies elsewhere across the globe start to run out or become harder to extract, and both the potential profits from Arctic oil, and the fears about the damage that extracting it may do, are enormous.
The area north of the Arctic Circle is thought to contain as much as 160 billion barrels of oil, more than a quarter of the world's undiscovered reserves. Some of it is under land, as in Alaska's North Slope field, but large amounts of it are known to lie under the seabeds of the Arctic Ocean and Baffin Bay off Greenland, which are ice-covered for all or part of the year, depending on the region.
It is this offshore oil which is now the focus of a new exploration rush, with Royal Dutch Shell and Exxon among the strongest contenders, focusing on the Arctic Ocean itself, while the first wells in the sea off Greenland are already being drilled by Edinburgh-based Cairn Energy.
However, many observers are seriously alarmed about the spill risks in the extreme conditions, especially in the wake of BP's calamitous leak at the Deepwater Horizon platform in the Gulf of Mexico last year, which could not be controlled for three months, released as much as five million barrels of crude, and came close to wrecking the company.
"A spill in the Arctic would essentially make dealing with something like Deepwater Horizon look almost straightforward," said Ben Ayliffe, polar campaigner for Greenpeace.
"There are problems with ice encroachment, the remoteness of the Arctic, darkness, extreme weather, deep water, high seas, freezing conditions and icebergs. Basically it would mean that responding to a Gulf of Mexico-style spill off somewhere like Greenland would be impossible."
Yet Professor Wadhams, who was the first civilian scientist to travel under the Arctic ice in a submarine, in 1971, and who has made five more under-ice trips, is spotlighting an even greater level of concern with his knowledge of how oil and ice interact – with potentially calamitous consequences.
It stems from large-scale experiments he took part in off the coast of Canada in the 1970s, in which substantial quantities of oil were deliberately released into the frozen sea, to see how it behaved. "What we found, and one of the great difficulties, is that spilled oil becomes encapsulated in the ice and is then transported around the Arctic by it," he said.
"The oil is caught underneath the ice, so you can't get at immediately to clean it up or burn it off. You don't know exactly where it is, and then it gets encapsulated in the new ice which grows underneath, so you then have a kind of oil sandwich inside the pack ice.
"And that's being transported around the Arctic and isn't released until spring, when it may be several hundred or even a thousand miles from the source of the spill, so you can have a huge area of the Arctic becoming polluted by oil without initially it being clear where that oil is."
He added: "Once it is released in springtime, it's very toxic, because the encapsulation in the ice preserves the oil from weathering, so that instead of the lighter fraction evaporating and the heavier fraction becoming just tar balls, you have fresh oil being released exactly where the ice is melting, usually round the edge of the pack ice where you've got a lot of migratory birds.
"Not great for the environment. In fact, I think the appropriate word would be 'terrible'."
Professor Wadhams is so concerned that he is helping to organize a high-level scientific workshop on the subject of oil spills in sea ice, in Italy later this month.
While companies such as Cairn Energy stress that they will be drilling exploratory wells only in the summer months, in areas of sea which are ice-free, it is likely that once oil production actually begins, it will be a year-round business and continue through the winter when production facilities are ice-bound. "We would need to produce all year round, in order to make the whole thing worthwhile," a spokesman for Shell said at the weekend.
The oil companies insist that they are aware of the risks and have prepared detailed oil spill response plans, but Professor Wadhams, who has read several of them, said they did not amount to comprehensive plans for dealing with oil in ice.
The expert
* Professor Peter Wadhams, of Cambridge University, is an oceanographer and glaciologist and one of the world's leading experts on polar ice. He is celebrated for submarine voyages beneath it.
His concern about how sea ice will interact with oil from a spill as the Arctic is opened up for drilling is so great that he has helped to convene an international high-level academic seminar to discuss Oil Spills in Sea Ice – and Future at Italy's Polar Geographical Institute in Fermo, Italy, from 20-23 September.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

23 Comments so far
Show AllI think the Oil industry looks at the arctic ice as the ultimate rug that it can sweep any spills under. I can see BP saying; "What oil spill? Look all the pristine snow and ice out there. All I see is pure white snow. What are you going to believe, your eyes, or my lying mouth?"
There are hardly words for the hellish damage capitalism has wrought, and will wreak before we're toast.
Wow, look how long it took to cap a deepwater breach in the warm waters of the Gulf of Mexico. Can you even begin to imagine the nightmare of trying to plug that breach under ice, and in Arctic storms? I doubt that even better oversight of drilling operations would prevent a disaster, and chances are, the regulatory oversight will be lax.
We are too stupid to be trusted to do things like this.
Exactly right about the contrast between all the problems we had repairing a blow-out in the warm environment of the Gulf, versus what will happen in the Arctic ice.
Given the universal constant of all machinery (it’s not if it breaks, it’s when), fixing an Arctic blow-out may be as difficult and dangerous as walking on the moon.
if there were a spill in the Arctic, the Coast Guard would have far fewer witnesses to threaten, or shoot, along the coastline...
mostly indigenous peoples...
or would Canada's government do the witness shooting?
Russia's?
a spill is guaranteed to occur...
The next time you hear about this, the news will be accompanied by an oil soaked polar bear. Voices the oil corporations and governments of the world (in so far as there is a difference) will tell us, in somber voices, that "no one could have foreseen this problem, and of course, "Now is not the time to assign blame."
I wish their strategy would change. Just so it would be more interesting. But they have perfected the art of keeping everyone complacent. After all, Oceania has always been at war with East Asia.
Does someone want to draw Oily the Bear? He'll have four black feet, an oil-soaked head and a few splotches on his white body. Alternatively he is 100% oil soaked.
If he's 100% oil-soaked it won't just be his feet that are blackened. You can bet Al Gore won't be making a film about his plight.
Theme song, to the tune of a "Smokey the Bear" ad from the 1960s:
"Oily, the Bear, Oily, the Bear
Oily fur all matted and a sniffing the air
He'll shut down a well before it starts to flame
That's why they call him Oily cause that's how he got his name."
Oily needs a yellow hardhat and a picket sign in his paws: "Only you can prevent Arctic oil well blowouts". He can stand and be anthropomorphic like Smokey was.
How about a polar bear wearing a woolen cap saying "Remember, only YOU can prevent oil spills".
It would be very interesting to see a video of anyone trying to clean up an oil soaked polar bear... America's funniest home videos,,,, but not really very funny.
The BP well blowout in the Gulf is already an uncontrollable disaster. Today is September 6, 2011 and it's an uncontrollable disaster right now, not just in the past. Big oil slicks are leaking out of the "capped" well, nobody knows exactly from where, and the oil is identical to the oil leaking in the middle of the blowout. BP is whistling in the dark. Our government is whistling in the dark. They're both waiting for ordinary citizens to be the government's watchdog, if that ever happens.
If you're vacationing on the Gulf coast, happy tarballs! If you're a business on the Gulf coast, you need to get your Congressperson's attention right now with a bullhorn or you'll go bankrupt.
They are banking on the fact that most of us can't afford over $4.00 a gallon gas, and by the time a well spews it's crap in the arctic if it's even reported, we'll have forgotten about the "Deepwater Horizon". We'll be too busy fighting radiation poisoning from Japan.
How many still remember the Exxon Valdez? And that was just one tanker with a drunken skipper.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exxon_Valdez_oil_spill
Imagine the gulf spill in the arctic? I can. But I guess our president and his cabinet can't.
I think they are counting on $4.00+++/gal gas. Most of the easy oil has already been taken. More and more expense and risk will be necesary to attempt maintaining present production levels and it won't be enough. Palin and Bachman are quite the pretty fools! We are already wrecking Alberta, and the Colorado basin is next.
BPs gusher in the Gulf of Mexico was predicted to very possibly occur before the well was ever drilled, they gambled and lost anyway.
The reaosn it was a very dangeous place to drill was because of the huge amount of Ch4, (methane gas) present in that location.
The same situation will be present in the Arctic Ocean floor, only there is far, far much more Ch4 present beneath the Arctic sea floor... There is no comparrison... The oil corporations' are fully aware of that present danger and they are going to gamble again..."Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead". Un-huh!
And actually BP didn't lose, they will receive tax breaks and will earn billions due to their gross negligance and utter stupidity...The citizens of the planet and our ocean life are the losers... There is no stopping them. It is true... "The (love) of money is the root of all evil.
I always end up thinking/feeling that these people know darn well that pieces of paper will mean nothing when the planet is ....fill in the blank. The money thing always sounds very old testament to me. I think money isn't the end game any more. It is an F-U to nature itself which includes human beings, of course.
My two cents.
Shouldn't the title be: "Oil Exploration Under Arctic Ice Could Cause 'Uncontrollable' UNNatural Disaster?"
Just witnessed a massive wildfire from a distance yesterday in a place where these things are rare. It scared the hell out of me. Maybe all those apocalyptic religious nutbags are right. Only, it isn't a wrathful god bringing about an end, but man. Maybe that's what they want.
Never forget that man created God in his (small-h!) own image.
One thing that is strange in a way, strange because we don't hear about it, is in India they have developed an enginge for automobiles that uses NO gasoline, NO diesel or natural gas fuel.. It is not an electric powered vehicle, with a $7,000 dollar battery, which give a 35/40 mile range before needing recharging for ten hours at a cost of $3.50.
The two cycle four cylander engine uses (compressed air) to drive the pistons. There is (zero) Co2 emitted. There is one quart of any cooking oil in the engine oil tank, which has to be replaced every 30,000 miles... Noise produced by the engine is almost zero.
The five passenger car is air conditioned by the very cold engine exhaust air. Heat and defrosters are with electric power, supplied by an engine driven generator... The vehicle has all of the modern fun toys.
The mid sized car has an unrefuelled range of 280 miles and the air tank can be recharged in three minutes for three buck$,,, which would be about equivelant to getting 320/350 miles per gallon with a similar size gasoline powered vehicle.
What do we hear about that engine and vehicle in the United States? __ Not very much... With such vehicles we would eventually not need any gasoline or diesel fuel and would not be horribly polluting the atmosphere with use of vehicles.
A four cylander (two cycle) engine is equivelant in power to an eight clyander (four cycle) engine. So larger compressed air emgines could be developed for larger luxury vehicles, suvs, trucks and buses with larger air tanks for a much longer miles range.
Personally, I find it to be very interesting. No more oil wells or Tar Sands required. That type of engine could be used in boats, street cars, portable generators, tractors, three whelled motorcylces, etc... Two whelled motorcycles?__ Never,,, no noise.
Compressed air cars. It is as clean as we could get. I have been going on about this for a while until everyone got sick of me.
A recharge is fast, if you have stations for long journeys. And for short journeys, solar power is the perfect way to charge.
Compressed air is a great energy storage for the power grid too. Disused mines can be used to store the compressed air. The power is stored when there is wind and solar.
The power is used when there is none.
Dont let anyone tell you that these solutions are not possible. If there is a will, then we can do it. Sadly, the will to do it is where it all falls down.
It is all so technically possible, and so politically impossible.
Why would anyone take a chance at destroying this wondrous cathedral of nature?
Read on.
THE FARELESS URBAN MASS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM (FUMTS) AND THE WORLD OIL DEPLETION CRISIS By John M. Bachar, Jr.
It's no secret that the world is fast running out of petroleum, that every urban region in the USA (indeed, on Earth) is choking in 24/7 transportation gridlock, and that the transportation sector uses the overwhelming majority of petroleum. Read the analysis about how to massively reduce the vast amount of petroleum used by the transportation sector and, at the same time, about how to solve the gridlock situation for hundreds of millions of drivers and passengers by means of FUMTS. Financing this system literally involves no cost to 99% of the citizens. It will save hundreds of millions of hours that are wasted by people crawling along at a snail’s pace in continual gridlock conditions as well as saving hundreds of billions of dollars in costs for the enormous population of motorists and passengers who daily need transportation.
For full details, click on:
http://www.absentlinks.com/uploads/6/6/4/2/6642350/the_fareless_urban_mass_transportation_system_and_the_world_oil_depletion_crisis.pdf
Once the human race is extinct...what do we need oil for?