EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- 'The Gilded Age' Statistics Corporations Don't Want Workers, or Anyone, to See
- As Death Toll Rises Beyond 500, Garment Factory Disaster 'Worst in World History'
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Report: Toxic Chemicals Found in Thousands of Children's Products
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Report: Toxic Chemicals Found in Thousands of Children's Products
- Move Over, Koch Brothers: A Bigger, Darker Rightwing Funder Is Out to Destroy Public Education
- After Boston, Eyes-Wide Open Hope?
- 'The Gilded Age' Statistics Corporations Don't Want Workers, or Anyone, to See
- Time for Big Green to Go Fossil Free
Popular content
Today's Top News
WikiLeaks: Iraqi Children in U.S. Raid Shot in Head, U.N. Says
A U.S. diplomatic cable made public by WikiLeaks provides evidence that U.S. troops executed at least 10 Iraqi civilians, including a woman in her 70s and a 5-month-old infant, then called in an airstrike to destroy the evidence, during a controversial 2006 incident in the central Iraqi town of Ishaqi.
This cell phone photo was shot by a resident of Ishaqi on March 15, 2006, of bodies Iraqi police said were of children executed by U.S. troops after a night raid there. A State Department cable obtained by WikiLeaks quotes the U.N. investigator of extrajudicial killings as saying an autopsy showed the residents of the house had been handcuffed and shot in the head, including children under the age of 5. McClatchy obtained the photo from a resident when the incident occurred. |
The unclassified cable, which was posted on WikiLeaks' website last week, contained questions from a United Nations investigator about the incident, which had angered local Iraqi officials, who demanded some kind of action from their government. U.S. officials denied at the time that anything inappropriate had occurred.
But Philip Alston, the U.N.'s special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, said in a communication to American officials dated 12 days after the March 15, 2006, incident that autopsies performed in the Iraqi city of Tikrit showed that all the dead had been handcuffed and shot in the head. Among the dead were four women and five children. The children were all 5 years old or younger.
Reached by email Wednesday, Alston said that as of 2010 — the most recent data he had — U.S. officials hadn't responded to his request for information and that Iraq's government also hadn't been forthcoming. He said the lack of response from the United States "was the case with most of the letters to the U.S. in the 2006-2007 period," when fighting in Iraq peaked.
Alston said he could provide no further information on the incident. "The tragedy," he said, "is that this elaborate system of communications is in place but the (U.N.) Human Rights Council does nothing to follow up when states ignore issues raised with them."
The Pentagon didn't respond to a request for comment. At the time, American military officials in Iraq said the accounts of townspeople who witnessed the events were highly unlikely to be true, and they later said the incident didn't warrant further investigation. Military officials also refused to reveal which units might have been involved in the incident.
Iraq was fast descending into chaos in early 2006. An explosion that ripped through the Golden Dome Mosque that February had set off an orgy of violence between rival Sunni and Shiite Muslims, and Sunni insurgents, many aligned with al Qaida in Iraq, controlled large tracts of the countryside.
Ishaqi, about 80 miles northwest of Baghdad, not far from Saddam Hussein's hometown, Tikrit, was considered so dangerous at the time that U.S. military officials had classified all roads in the area as "black," meaning they were likely to be booby-trapped with roadside bombs.
The Ishaqi incident was unusual because it was brought to the world's attention by the Joint Coordination Center in Tikrit, a regional security center set up with American military assistance and staffed by U.S.-trained Iraqi police officers.
The original incident report was signed by an Iraqi police colonel and made even more noteworthy because U.S.-trained Iraqi police, including Brig. Gen. Issa al Juboori, who led the coordination center, were willing to speak about the investigation on the record even though it was critical of American forces.
Throughout the early investigation, U.S. military spokesmen said that an al Qaida in Iraq suspect had been seized from a first-floor room after a fierce fight that had left the house he was hiding in a pile of rubble.
But the diplomatic cable provides a different sequence of events and lends credence to townspeople's claims that American forces destroyed the house after its residents had been shot.
Alston initially posed his questions to the U.S. Embassy in Geneva, which passed them to Washington in the cable.
According to Alston's version of events, American troops approached a house in Ishaqi, which Alston refers to as "Al-Iss Haqi," that belonged to Faiz Harrat Al-Majma'ee, whom Alston identified as a farmer. The U.S. troops were met with gunfire, Alston said, that lasted about 25 minutes.
After the firefight ended, Alston wrote, the "troops entered the house, handcuffed all residents and executed all of them. After the initial MNF intervention, a U.S. air raid ensued that destroyed the house." The initials refer to the official name of the military coalition, the Multi-National Force.
Alston said "Iraqi TV stations broadcast from the scene and showed bodies of the victims (i.e. five children and four women) in the morgue of Tikrit. Autopsies carries (sic) out at the Tikrit Hospital's morgue revealed that all corpses were shot in the head and handcuffed."
The cable makes no mention any of the alleged shooting suspects being found or arrested at or near the house.
The cable closely tracks what neighbors told reporters for Knight Ridder at the time. (McClatchy purchased Knight Ridder in spring 2006.) Those neighbors said the U.S. troops had approached the house at 2:30 a.m. and a firefight ensued. In addition to exchanging gunfire with someone in the house, the American troops were supported by helicopter gunships, which fired on the house.
The cable also backs the original report from the Joint Coordination Center, which said U.S. forces entered the house while it was still standing. That first report noted: "The American forces gathered the family members in one room and executed 11 persons, including five children, four women and two men. Then they bombed the house, burned three vehicles and killed their animals."
The report was signed by Col. Fadhil Muhammed Khalaf, who was described in the document as the assistant chief of the Joint Coordination Center.
The cable also backs up the claims of the doctor who performed the autopsies, who told Knight Ridder "that all the victims had bullet shots in the head and all bodies were handcuffed."
The cable notes that "at least 10 persons, namely Mr. Faiz Hratt Khalaf, (aged 28), his wife Sumay'ya Abdul Razzaq Khuther (aged 24), their three children Hawra'a (aged 5) Aisha (aged 3) and Husam (5 months old), Faiz's mother Ms. Turkiya Majeed Ali (aged 74), Faiz's sister (name unknown), Faiz's nieces Asma'a Yousif Ma'arouf (aged 5 years old), and Usama Yousif Ma'arouf (aged 3 years), and a visiting relative Ms. Iqtisad Hameed Mehdi (aged 23) were killed during the raid."
(Schofield, an editorial writer at The Kansas City Star, was Berlin bureau chief and was on temporary assignment in Iraq at the time of the Ishaqi incident.)
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

102 Comments so far
Show AllAmerican exceptional-ism in action.
We are indeed number one.
This war is nothing like Vietnam.........Is it????
I remember the apologists at the time saying this was nothing like Vietnam because, errr, umm - that was in the jungle and this is the desert.
Dorks.
Sick. Depraved. Cowardly.
And yet Cheney, Bush, Rumsfeld, Rice et al still walk free.
.
Don't forget the grown men, the "brave warriors", who shot handcuffed little children in the head, execution style in this crime!
It isn't only the Cheney's and Bush's and Rumsfeld's that must face justice.
It is also many -perhaps thousands- of "ordinary soldiers" who committed unspeakable crimes such as this and then came home, the objects of forced-reverence and expected love.
why would you shoot a 5 month old?
surely, one of these brave, strong heros would have just stomped on her head. thats what a real hero would do.
Sarcasm on/
A comment like that isn't supporting the troops, you know...
Sarcasm off\
Damn right. Save a bullet.
Wow.....which of the fine attributes of Time Magazine's "New Greatest Generation" does this demonstrate?
But if you read your American history text book, you would know that Americans don't commit atrocities.
Absolutely, horrifically disgusting. Support the troops, indeed. What, precisely, is the difference between U.S.'s military and any alleged "terrorist" group? Other than that the U.S. has a much larger budget? None. Except the U.S. military can kill far more people with ease and impunity than any terrorist organization ever dreamed of.
God damn the United States of America.
The word "terrorism" is generally used to refer to violent action to achieve political goals, if it's committed by relatively weak, underground (unofficial) organisations. It's terrorism and not warfare because it's mostly about individual or small group action and can not achieve typical military goals (like occupying an area or extracting resources etc) but can only achieve its effects through psychological shock. My impression is that officially "terrorism" has to refer to in most cases (but not always) to last-ditch violent actions committed by the weak and cornered (hence the retarded and infuriating fake "moral outrage" about suicide bombers - as if killing people without any personal involvement, eg through drones, was morally less reprehensible - what a disgusting and fucked up morality.) From this point of view, militarism in service of imperial power is simply always more evil than this kind terrorism.
And really, it's not really about the US. Europe (and later Japan of course) were no better (to say the least). Americans sure as fuck can't compete with Europe in this, definitely not on a per capita basis :-/ I mean, just take a look at this:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/e/e5/2007_Belgium_1250_Euro_Leopold_II_front.JPG/160px-2007_Belgium_1250_Euro_Leopold_II_front.JPG
I mean, wtf. It's a 2007 commemorative Euro coin of a fucking mass murderer. Fucked up evil hypocrisy in the US can't even dream of coming close to that of Europe.
The point is not a competition between mass murderers of Europe, Asia, and the U.S.
The point is that OUR country, using OUR taxes, has, since 1943 (when FDR okayed bombing of German and Japanese cities) committed acts of terrorism on a mass scale, including Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Korea, Vietnam, Central and South America, Afghanistan, and Iraq, while claiming it stands for freedom and democracy and human rights.
Since 1945, the U.S. has, directly or indirectly (Iran, Indonesia, Southeast Asia, Africa, Central & South America) murdered millions of people. Millions.
That is our history and our legacy.
Hehe sorry, I was just reacting to the "God damn the United States of America" thing, I just wanted to point out that you're not alone and not the original source for this kind of stuff.
good points also, and thank you Atomsk.
It started long before 1943 as Native Americans and the peoples of the Philippines can tell you.
GwNorth,
So true. People cannot escape their history.
thank you, very well said.
try starting from day one of this piece of shit country,genociding 10million or more natives/offering citizens 50 bucks for any native scalp,while at the same time murdering&rape of black african slaves!!!!!the most vile,evil corrupt nation ever!!!!!!
To be fair, those nations were England and Spain... The US hadn't even been conceived by the time smallpox and genocide had devastated most of the native populations. Historians today generally agree that European and African diseases wiped out around 7/10s of 'America's' population before whites ever even laid eyes on the natives. By the time contact occurred, native cultures had already been deeply affected by the heavy losses of life, especially as the diseases were most deadly to the elders who passed down tribes' spiritual traditions orally. Before the genocides even began, natives were wondering what they had done to anger the gods and incur such world changing scourges.
Certainly, much fault can be placed at the feet of those who actually called themselves Americans, but the sad truth is more complex, more widespread, and deserves to be told accurately, if only to keep the record straight.
Or, as Peter Ustinov succinctly put it, "Terrorism is the war of the poor, and war is the terrorism of the rich."
In general, the people called terrorists in the US of A, whatever their methods, are fighting to defend the sovereignty of their formally or informally occupied homelands--or, alternatively, they may be running an informational service or a Muslim charity.
These murderers now live among us, right down the street. But we don't know their names because our government has covered everything up.
People who support war do so because they believe they or their side will benefit. Using that same logic, these people would kill our children if they perceived a benefit they could get away with. That means all of the republicans who supported W in his wars and the democrats who support Obama in his wars, all gladly would kill your kids if they thought they could get away with it. They would deny it, even to themselves they would deny it, but it is only a short step from long distance proxy killing to close up real life killing.
Next time you go to a ball game and everyone stands up teary eyed at the heroic exploits of our heroes in action, remember these baby killers. Because all soldiers in all times in all armies are baby killers. It is in the job description.
TomCarberry THANK YOU. FINALLY SOMEONE GETS IT ! This might be the best quote of the day on the Internet. "... Because all soldiers in all times in all armies are baby killers. It is in the job description. .."
they sign on to kill - every one of them.
a drop in the bucket of blood. this is only one of many, many such take-no-prisoner-show-no-mercy cover-ups by US armed forces and mercenaries...helps to explain the high rate of suicide among the troops.
"A U.S. diplomatic cable made public by WikiLeaks provides evidence that U.S. troops executed at least 10 Iraqi civilians, including a woman in her 70s and a 5-month-old infant, then called in an airstrike to destroy the evidence, during a controversial 2006 incident in the central Iraqi town of Ishaqi."
Controversial; Definition: Debatable. So I guess that means that some people think murdering old woman and infants is perfectly acceptable... (Dick Cheney anyone.)
No doubt he watches the video of it over and over again with glee.
The recent hero worshipping article in Time suggests that our troops coming home from Iraq and Afghanistan will be able to excel in civilian life because of what they learned over there.
Hope not.
Who are we?
"Who are we?" Here's a better question: What happened to us?
There is a new patriotism rising in the land, protective of America and protective of other people beyond our shores. The WAY TO PEACE is back through 9/11.
Please look at what happened on 9/11: www.ae911truth.org. Look at the evidence, and add your voice to the rising call for justice.
9/11 is too important to overlook or to deny. Please look at the evidence for yourself and take appropriate action.
We did such things long before 911. My Lai comes to mind. The Moros in the Phillipines. The Native Americans. Much more. We have a deeper sickness than you acknowledge.
Or as Frank Zappa put it, "questions, questions, questions, facing the youth of today. Where can I go to get my poodle clipped in Burbank. Where can I go to get my jeans embroidered. Where can I go ... "
Apologies to Frank for any misquotes, but that is from old memories.
The answer is obvious jclientelle, "we" are monsters bent on destroying innocent Muslim children in the most horrific ways. But WE can turn a blind eye because WE hire mercenaries to do OUR killing for us. This is a proud American tradition going back to the Revolutionary War, a war fought mostly by the poor in a society where the rich could screw the poor just as royally as they do today. We have become what we fear, terrorists bent on killing innocents. A nation of mass murderers.
Add in our traditional comfort with dominating, robbing, using and killing brown-skinned people, and there it is. Our "leaders" use us poor (often white) people to do this, while the wealthy abscond with all the benefits.
Gotta love America and its unwavering "Support of the Troops". Even the professional left is a one note tune on this: Love 'em, love 'em, LOVE them heroes serving so bravely for our "prosperity" here in the "Homeland'! To speak otherwise would be yet again social suicide (like so many things here in FREE America).
"Heroism on command, senseless violence, and all the loathsome nonsense that goes by the name of patriotism — how passionately I hate them!"
—Albert Einstein
"Conceit, arrogance, and egotism are the essentials of patriotism. ... Patriotism assumes that our globe is divided into little spots, each one surrounded by an iron gate. Those who have had the fortune of being born on some particular spot, consider themselves better, nobler, grander, more intelligent than the living beings inhabiting any other spot. It is, therefore, the duty of everyone living on that chosen spot to fight, kill, and die in the attempt to impose his superiority upon all the others."
—Emma Goldman
One of my favorite Einstein quotes.
Hue sir seem to be a person of eminent reason, and appreciation of ideas close to my own heart. Cheers and let's not let up the heat on these murderous bastards!
Specialness: The Ultimate Mental Error
"at least 10 persons, namely Mr. Faiz Hratt Khalaf, (aged 28), his wife Sumay'ya Abdul Razzaq Khuther (aged 24), their three children Hawra'a (aged 5) Aisha (aged 3) and Husam (5 months old), Faiz's mother Ms. Turkiya Majeed Ali (aged 74), Faiz's sister (name unknown), Faiz's nieces Asma'a Yousif Ma'arouf (aged 5 years old), and Usama Yousif Ma'arouf (aged 3 years), and a visiting relative Ms. Iqtisad Hameed Mehdi (aged 23) were killed during the raid."
This is just the tip of the iceberg. Every time I read about (or hear first-hand accounts of) one of these incidents, all I can do is imagine the horror and fear that those innocent people - especially the children - must have felt right before they died. Imagine what it must have been like for them to sit there, handcuffed, and watch their loved ones - their mother, father, sister, cousins, aunt, neices, grandmother - get executed, one by one, by a group of scary looking strangers.
America!! FUCK YEAH!!!
Handcuffing and shooting babies in the motherf*cking head, yeah!!!
Seriously, handcuffing and shooting babies in the head...
Handcuffing and shooting babies in the head...
Handcuffing and shooting babies in the head...
Handcuffing and shooting babies in the head...
Yeah! Beacon of freedom and democracy! Envy of the world! Shining City on the Hill! The Good Guys! God's blessed nation! Hell yeah!
Which babies would Jesus handcuff and shoot in the head?
Happy are they that dash thy little ones upon the stones!
--Psalm 137:9.
Words fail me.
Well, thanks to the likely uproar over this, it's possible some low level underlings will be branded "bad apples" and prosecuted.
Meanwhile, drones are doing the same thing today, sans handcuffs.
The people in charge, the ones who ordered the 2006 massacre in Ishaqi and authorized the drone program/strikes remain untouchable.
I am not watching any US based news lately (nor for that matter Canadian as I am on a vacation) but is any of this on the MSM such as CNN?
In the next 24 hours, will any major mainstream publication pick up this story? I don't know, but I would bet not.
I think handcuffing the children before shooting them in the head must be part of standard American military training because it is not the only incident. Here is one of shooting 10 boys in the head after handcuffing them (in mitigation, none of them were under 5, the youngest 11 and the oldest 17):
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article24290.htm
These murderers, too, live among us, hopefully in your neighborhood and not mine. Actually a lot of them live about an hour from me in Colorado Springs, a city with a huge murder, violence, and rape problem created by its returning heroes. See Lethal Warriors by David Philipps.
In answer to your first sentence, it is likely the ever friendly to Washington insiders, NPR, or PBS News Hour, will interview whichever liar for hire that the Pentagon, or the White House sends up. NPR, and PBS, can ALWAYS be counted on, to give their bloody centrist veneer of credibility to the liars, hucksters, and psycho killers, that comprise the upper echelon of US governance.
An NPR host today cut off a caller who was telling the truth about libertarians and tax cuts for the rich so as not to offend her libertarian guest. Public radio is a corporate joke.
So true. I was listening to Diane Rehm on NPR this morning. She had her standard shill for the CATO institute on. A caller stated to call out the legitimacy of CATO as a information source and Rehm cut him right off. Then made some chuckling comment to the CATO shill about the caller.
No questioning the source on NPR, especially if it is on the far, far right.
I can't listen to that show now. While never that good, I noticed a few years back, after the GOP kerfuffle about NPR/PBS being bastions of the Left, her show started to be even more right-wing.
Still better than "Talk of the Nation," though. At least Rehm can interview authors tolerably well (authors of fiction, not political books).