EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Warren Not Set to Announce a Run, But She’s Ready for a Fight
BOSTON - Elizabeth Warren has been in full live-wire mode for 45 minutes, joking about her grandchildren, pounding the table as she dissects the mortgage crisis, insisting she will not temper her two-fisted style if she runs for US Senate.
Elizabeth Warren is seen as the biggest name among possible rivals to Scott Brown. (John Tlumacki/Globe Staff) Repeatedly, she declares that middle-class families don’t have a lobbyist in Washington, while the bankers have enough of them to pack a senator’s waiting room. It sounds like the beginnings of her stump speech.
And when she’s asked how she’ll handle the chief knock against her, that she’s a Harvard elitist - an image that Republicans are already trying to tag her with - her answer is direct.
“There’s nothing to handle. It is what it is. I’m also 5 foot 8,’’ she said, holding her gaze on the questioner. “Yeah, I’m a Harvard professor. But I wasn’t born at Harvard. I came up scrappy. I came up the hard way.’’
“I scratched it out,’’ she added, leaking just a hint of her Oklahoma accent. “I took care of myself. I took care of my family.’’
Warren is the would-be Senate candidate who has yet to declare her intentions, but has made enough moves in the race that nearly everyone who is watching closely sees her as the biggest name in a Democratic field attempting to defeat Republican Scott Brown next year.
In an interview yesterday, the Harvard Law School professor did nothing to dispel the assumption that she plans to run, answering detailed questions about the economic issues she would emphasize in her campaign and the patchwork details of her personal story.
Warren, 62, has returned to Massachusetts after a stint in Washington where she led a panel that monitored the banking bailout and then established the new federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau at President Obama’s behest. Both jobs put her at odds with Republicans who said she was too hostile toward business to effectively lead the agency and ultimately, Obama declined to nominate her.
She now talks as someone who has been to Washington, seen its dysfunction firsthand, and come away wanting to reform it. While Brown emphasizes crossing the aisle to find compromise, she talks about fighting. And she does it without apology.
“There are some things worth fighting for and right now it’s about fighting for the middle class,’’ she said more than once.
“It’s about being willing to take a good idea and fight for it,’’ she said later. “It’s being willing to throw your body in front of a bus to block bad ideas.’’
Democratic leaders in Massachusetts and Washington are convinced the Oklahoma native is the best chance the party has to recapture Edward M. Kennedy’s Senate seat. She has spent the last month speaking with small invitation-only groups of Democrats, generating excitement within the party’s rank-and-file.
But she has yet to face any voters outside that circle, including the independents and conservative Democrats who helped elect Brown in last year’s special election. Her success, if she runs, will depend in great part on her ability to blunt the GOP attacks on her Harvard and Washington ties and to sell herself as a populist fighting for their interests.
To do that, she’ll have to convince voters that her personal story is as much a part of her character as her Ivy-League credentials.
In an hourlong interview, she spoke often of the now-familiar story of her humble roots in Oklahoma. Her parents struggled financially, almost losing their home after her father had a heart attack. But it was also a time, she said, when the government made it possible for a woman who married at 19 and dropped out of college to get an education that led her to the Harvard Law School faculty in 1992.
“I came out of a hard-working middle class family,’’ she said. “I lived in a America that created opportunities for kids like me.’’
“I now see an America in which our government works for those who already have money and already have power,’’ she said.
Warren staked out traditional liberal Democratic positions on several big issues: She supports abortion rights, gun control, and gay marriage, but she opposes casinos, even as her political consultant is a lobbyist, Doug Rubin, working on behalf of a major gambling enterprise. She defended her hiring of Rubin, saying it was a practical decision because of his history of managing successful campaigns, most notably his work for Deval Patrick.
But she declined to offer specifics on where she differs with Brown or Obama. Nor would she say when she will decide whether she will run, only saying she will make up her mind after Labor Day. She has committed to teaching two classes at Harvard for the fall semester.
Warren made it clear that any campaign she launches will focus primarily on economic issues, particularly the theme that America has shifted from policies designed to promote and nurture middle class families to ones that promote the interests of the powerful and rich. It is a drumbeat Warren has sounded for more than a decade, in her writing and in her public appearances.
She talked with pride yesterday of how she walked the halls of Congress, knocking on lawmakers’ doors trying to sell them on the idea of creating a powerful consumer credit agency that would toughen the laws regulating the country’s financial institution. “I would walk out of a senator’s office and the office would be completely jammed with lobbyists who were there to explain why the consumer agency was bad,’’ she said. “There was not enough room for them to sit down.’’
In the end she won passage. With Obama’s support and Brown’s critical vote, the agency was created as part of the Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform Bill.
As Warren now focuses her energy on whether to run, she looks toward a crowded Democratic field.
Already in the race are: Setti Warren, the mayor of Newton; Alan Khazei, cofounder of City Year; state Representative Thomas P. Conroy; Bob Massie, the 1994 nominee for lieutenant governor; Herb Robinson, a Newton engineer; and Marisa DeFranco, a North Shore attorney.
Warren, though, has her sights on Brown. She said she has only met the senator once, while in Washington. It was a chance encounter when they were both invited to a dinner at a private home this spring. By her account, it wasn’t a very remarkable meeting. She said she and Brown spent little time chatting.
“It was a cast of thousands,’’ she said. “It was hello.’’
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

28 Comments so far
Show AllMaybe SHE is our next "FDR"?
FDR endd the Great Depression and built the largest middle class in the history of the world -
FDR welcomed the hatred of the Economic Royalists and their dumb foot soldiers - just as I do.
Rightwingers never let something as inconsequential as the TRUTH get in the way of their failed ideology.
It all depends on just who your "we" IS. We the people will not make it without another "FDR". It's true the unlawful owner/rulers of EMPIRE cannot afford another "FDR". He'll be their final undoing.
Well said, Inb. In fact, what We The People require is a leader *even more dedicated* and willing to take the hard road than FDR. FDR got Americans back to work building the US infrastructure, but he did it within the framework approved in large part by the banksters who controlled the Federal Reserve — adding even more to the national debt owed to private financial interests... Yes he did institute some major reforms, but even they didn't quite go far enough in exposing the nefariousness of the of the 'lemon socialist' arrangement our country has with its 'laissez fair' promoting ruling class (as if this system were at all laissez faire in the first place — it's not, it's completely rigged to ensure the money *flows upward*, and only trickles drip by drip to the rest of us).
Too bad Warren's intentions aren't to give a challenge to the president himselft instead of only potentially looking to take a Senate seat. We need someone more like her in the head office, not just in the relatively powerless Senate. I know, dreaming again.
I agree. FDR sort of sets a "minimum required standard". He's also a well-received figure, in the people's hearts. It's important for the leader to not get TOO far ahead of his followers; that's how a leader gets "ambushed" by the enemy.
Speaking of dreams: o-man resigns this week. Biden appoints Warren his veep (ala Ford). Biden resigns. President Warren leads the nation & the world out of Great Depression II. She also picks your" ideal" leader for veep.
I guess I'd nominate Nader (or Bernie Sanders, but I know he won't run) for the spot... As much as I used to think Nader wasn't 'presidential' enough, I've come now to repent of my earlier attitudes and realize he's the only one who has consistently spoken real truth to power in the last few years.
Warren in one of the few politicians out there who does not invite immediate scorn and derision. I suspect that our present kleptocratic autocracy would not be too happy with such a principled person in high office.
Tony Vodvarka
She is over-qualified for Congress... if she runs as a Dem, she loses some credibility.
Methinks that Elizabeth Warren is an informed progressive thinker that believes in the public good over private advantage; if this proscribes her as a classical liberal, so be it. Any state would be fortunate to have her represent its citizens in the U.S. Senate; for my part I would like to see her nominated for Vice President in 2012 in place of Biden, a position where her abilities could be much better put to the task of dealing with needed economic reforms across the entire government.
It is absolutely true that I in no way seriously suggested imagining "this to be a real possibility"; that is a product of your own imagination employed, evidently, to provide yourself with an opportunity to regurgitate your 'talking points' du jour. I don't have a problem with your constructing of imaginary 'straw horse' scenarios as a means of having conversations with yourself, but your choice to intentionally dissemble my comment seems to take this sort of mental masturbation past any point of purely personal satisfaction into some sociopathic realm of behavior; this, of course, should not be excused. Neither should the good name of professor Noam Chomsky be used to bolster your pretensions to credibility; much like his peer Elizabeth Warren, his contribution is far too important to be sullied by any such coarse association.
I wrote to her new agency and asked why "usury" was not a word I heard uttered by that agency supposedly fighting for the people. NO RESPONSE.
If she runs as a Democrat, she is a fraud.
If you've ever owed the Federal Government money on your tax returns and had to set up a payment plan, you would find out very quickly why the term "usury" is never uttered.
Why of course we have to keep fighting for all the votes we can get in the House and Senate, we also need to wake up and realize we shouldn't have to fight this hard to get Americans voices heard, and REPRESENTED. We need to realize how our system was originally designed to function, and how becasue of population growth and bad laws, it no longer can. There are major changes our nation needs to undertake to its structure if we are to ever have something like democracy in this country again.
http://voltairez.hubpages.com/hub/Stop-Diluting-Democracy
Why of course we have to keep fighting for all the votes we can get in the House and Senate, we also need to wake up and realize we shouldn't have to fight this hard to get Americans voices heard, and REPRESENTED. We need to realize how our system was originally designed to function, and how becasue of population growth and bad laws, it no longer can. There are major changes our nation needs to undertake to its structure if we are to ever have something like democracy in this country again.
http://voltairez.hubpages.com/hub/Stop-Diluting-Democracy
Repeatedly, "middle class," "middle class," "middle class"...
Then there was this, "She has spent the last month speaking with small invitation-only groups of democrats,..."
As much as I may want to believe that Elizabeth Warren will fight against the status quo, Elizabeth Warren keeps finding ways to make me suspect that she is being consumed by the status quo.
Does she have any way to relate to the plight of the homeless, the poor, those imprisoned because of mental disabilities, or even those of us who are repulsed by the corporate corruption of the small-minded, invitation-only parties?
I have yet to find proof that she is able to step outside of her comfort zone.
huh...
now, she's in red, and looks like she's gotten some sun...
her hair's softer...
candidate grooming...
ineffective grooming...Congress is still corrupt...
“Don’t hate the media: Become the media!”
- Jello Biafra
Alright folks, READ ALL ABOUT IT! -- Low Power FM (LPFM) radio station license applications for non-profit organizations in medium and large-sized cities to commence summer of 2012. This is the first time that’s been done by the FCC in thirty (30) years. Get’em while they’re hot!
This the idea I've been pushing on CD for five years now. This opportunity won't come again. Non-profit progressive groups (including labor interest groups) need to get those licenses while they're hot.
Enough of these stations blanketing a medium-sized or large city with contiguous broadcast ranges could potentially mimic the audience market penetration of large commercial FM stations—ONLY WITHOUT CORPORATE CENSORSHIP.
These stations could become part of a nationwide, populist progressive information cooperative network that airs local programming most of the time but cooperates to concentrate on regional and national issues of importance, averting or responding to crises, and covering independent progressive candidates during election cycles.
The other good idea to get around the Establishment right now is Americanselect.org. Check it out. Via this online idea, anyone can become a citizen delegate and nominate whomever they want and, so the site operators say, get on the ballot in all 50 States. This would circumvent the Dem/GOP/Federal Election Commission lock on the nomination process.
If we had both these ideas, low power FM and citizen delegate nominations in all 50 States—independent of corporate media and the Dem/GOP/FEC nomination Machine, respectively, then we could use the LPFM stations to educate the masses about OUR CANDIDATES and get OUR IDEAS out without having to go through corporate "mainstream" media filters.
CARPE DIEM! Start talking these ideas up in your family, church, community resilience circle, or other progressive group and research what it takes to get these stations up and running. This is a once in a generation-and-a-half opportunity and if we don’t seize it, sooner or later the right-wing will.
So, get off your fat carbo-potato monkey butt and sweat your old agitator mind and body for a change! You progressive retirees who still have your health: There’s no excuse not to. Let me tell you, I’ve worked in radio before and it’s a hell of a lot of fun. It will be even more fun to use radio to help build local community resilience and resistance and stick it to all those creeps who’ve been screwing us locally and nationally since Reagan. And we can use our own media voices that can’t be silenced by corporate media to help locally and nationally organize our own politics to go around theirs!!
"V" for peace and victory over our true oppressors!
Thank you, Metal. Keep posting this news.
The only thing that comes to mind recently is her silence about the Sneiderman-Obama conflict about Wall Street getting away with the Big Scam...
I thought for sure that we would get some inside info from her about this most important issue,,,How about it Elizabeth, are you for real??? We all know that you could help Sneiderman with your savvy and overwhelming knowledge...
Metal: Thanks for the info on the FM licences...This is VERY important news and an opportunity that should not be left by the wayside...
I want to see Elizabeth Warren run. I want to hear her talk to America, and I want to send her campaign money. Hurry up, Ms. Warren, lets get started.
I can't donate any money at this time but I have already told the committee that's trying to get her to run that I would volunteer my time.
"textynn"
If Elizabeth Warren runs as a democrat, it means that the bankers bought her a seat in their clubhouse.
You will not need to send her money because the bankers are already taking it out of your pocket to pay her off, just like they do for every other democrat and republican.
I can fully understand how cynical we have become about Obama and the Democratic Party. Is Elizabeth Warren another Wall Street Trojan horse like Obama? This is a justified question that needs to be answered. Fool me once, shame on them, fool me twice, shame on me.
BUT, at this stage, it is hard to deny that Obama's background was absolutely nothing compared to Elizabeth Warren's outright opposition to the greed of bankers.
Every pissed off Democrat should vote the Socialist ticket in 2012 in order to send a message to the bankers. But with one exception, Vermonters to vote for Bernie Saunders, and the people of Massachusetts to vote for Elizabeth Warren.
as a liberal voter who resides in MA, I think Ms Warren is starting to hurt, rather then help, with her delaying tactics.
Basically, her "listening" has sort of put the fight against the GOP opponent, Sen Brown, on hold; the longer she takes to make a decision, the longer it takes me, and other Brown opponents to get organized and fight.
If she doesn't make a decision next week, I would not vote for her, because I think her dilly dallying would have been excessive.
I mean, what is this BS listening tour stuff anyway ?
Ya got the fire in your belly, you fight (see Caro's biog LBJ, LBJs early campaing vs the widow)
This has got to be one of the most absurd political analogies that has ever been rendered, let alone printed for public consumption. Since when is it flawed behavior for someone considering running for public office to listen to those that they may represent? And, what is all this hyperbolic nonsense about wasting time, it is 15 months until the election?
Speaking of "BS", LBJ was a staunch CONservative, and the only reason JFK put him on his ticket was to garner the CONservative southern fundamentalist Protestant vote. Turn off the TV, and do some reading.