Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
- In Blind Poll, Republicans Choose Progressive Budget Solutions Over Their Own Party's
- Not Guilty By Virtue of Videotape, Which, Unlike the Police, Doesn't Lie
- Manning: Before Wikileaks, Leaked Docs Offered to NYT, WaPo
- Bob Woodward Embodies US Political Culture in a Single Outburst
- State Dept. Releases Keystone XL Environmental Impact Statement
Popular content
Today's Top News
Chavez to Nationalize Venezuelan Gold Industry
CARACAS -- Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez said on Wednesday he will nationalize the gold industry, including extraction and processing, and use its output to boost the country's international reserves.
Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez, left, and Maria Emma Mejia, secretary-general of South America's UNASUR organization, walk during a meeting at Miraflores presidential palace in Caracas, Venezuela, Tuesday, Aug. 16, 2011. Chavez said he's improving after undergoing a second round of chemotherapy in Cuba to treat his cancer, and boasts that he has never felt healthier. (AP Photo/Ariana Cubillos) The move follows a dispute between his government and foreign miners who say the rules limiting the amount of gold that can be exported from the South American nation hurt their efforts to secure financing and create jobs.
Toronto-listed Rusoro, owned by Russia's Agapov family, is the only large gold miner operating in Venezuela. It produced 100,000 ounces last year.
The gold industry will be just the latest part of the economy to be put under state control by the socialist leader, who said he would issue the necessary decree in the coming days and called on the military to help control the sector.
"I have here the laws allowing the state to exploit gold and all related activities ... we are going to nationalize the gold and we are going to convert it, among other things, into international reserves because gold continues to increase in value," Chavez said in a phone call to state television.
The announcement came a day after an opposition legislator revealed a report showing the government's top finance officials were recommending the repatriation of 90 percent of Venezuela's gold reserves held abroad.
The government has not commented on the report, which the opposition legislator said Chavez had yet to approve.
"We've managed to increase the international reserves. We have close to 12 or 13 billion dollars in gold reserves. We can't allow it to continue to be taken away," the president said, referring to reserves held in banks overseas.
According to the report revealed by the opposition legislator, Venezuela has total international reserves of $29.1 billion. About 63 percent of that is in gold worth $11 billion held overseas and $7 billion at home, according to the report.
Venezuela has some of Latin America's largest gold deposits, buried below the jungles south of the Orinoco river. According to official figures, formal mining in the country produces 4.3 tons a year.
Chavez agreed last year to let gold miners export up to 50 percent of production, from 30 percent previously. The other 50 percent must be sold to the central bank.
But that did not satisfy foreign companies like Rusoro, which said the limits made it much harder for them to secure financing abroad, develop projects and create local jobs.
One victim of the dispute has been a huge but long-troubled project called Las Cristinas. It has been in limbo since the government canceled a development license with another Canadian miner, Crystallex, in February.
Rusoro had expressed interest in Las Cristinas, which has not been developed since the 1980s but has reserves estimated at 17 million ounces. Locals once found a 1-kilo (2.2-lb) nugget there.
But the company's chief executive told Reuters in an interview in June that it could not take on the project unless the government scrapped its export rules.
Sources at Rusoro said the company planned to make a statement on Wednesday's developments in the coming days.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



31 Comments so far
Show AllBravo. Why should a foreign Corporation profit off shipping the resources of a Country outside its borders?
Converting the Gold to reserves is an astute move but another Leader did this as well and this helped raise the wrath of the Western world. Libya was building up gold reserves so as to try and create an African, gold backed, currency.
GW,
Yes! I remember reading that the Central Bank in Libya had somewhere around $30 Billion in gold. Who has it now?
It's the end of the US dollar.
Chavez is brilliant! And gives meaning to the name, "leader."
What's this? A spontaneous popular uprising against Chavez? Who could have guessed? Why it's just like what happened in Haiti. Just another example of a
Community In Action, taking care to make things right.
I mean really, the cheek of the man, trying to claim the people owned the country's resources. What did he think would happen?
He should've done this long ago. Of course, maybe he couldn't until now. In any case, I'm not complaining!
He's doing this now because the price of gold is going up. Nothing wrong with that, in fact, that is PRECISELY what he should do. If the price of gold is low, and not all that valuable, then let foreign corporations exploit it, paying a cut back to the gov. Now that gold is ever more valuable, then, it is in the interest of Venezuela to nationalise the stuff, and kick the foreign corporations out.
All this is true, of course, but you do assume that Venezuela ever got a decent cut of the profits when gold prices were low. This may or may not have been the case. I think it's also possible that Chávez may not have done so earlier because it was too risky. I'm hoping that if that ever were the case, it is no longer.
I can't pretend to know what Chavez could have gotten away with early, but he must ride a very delicate balance: progressive enough and socialist enough to pry free his country's economy a piece at a time, cooperative enough to never once allow an invasion to become profitable.
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
You just know Hillarita and Barry O go over those cost benefit figures with their Latin-invested $upporters each little bit and say "Not yet: there's the poppy trade, Mideastern oil, and we can still cut Venezuela off from Eurasia if we have to."
And the various investors with their various commitments and their various portfolios run by their various arguments. But if this is a chess game, Chavez has just picked up a very important pawn.
Yes, exactly.
It is more risky now. The higher the price of gold, the more valuable it is, the greater the stakes, both for governments seeking to nationalise gold mines, and the private corporations who will see their mines nationalised. When the prices are low, the stakes are lower. If Hugo Chavez sought to nationalise sand, say, how many people would even care?
"All this is true, of course, but you do assume that Venezuela ever got a decent cut of the profits when gold prices were low. Th"
I assume that they got a cut that was decent enough that Chavez saw no point in nationalising, ie the costs, the problems, the complaints, the lawsuits, (not to mention possible coup attempts) of nationalising would not be worth the returns.
True, but (1) we know too little about Chávez's internal enemies, and how powerful they are; (2) much as Oblahblah and Killary would love to see Chávez's head on a pike, Chávez knows that they have their hands full with its current wars and all of Israel's and Big Oil's chosen enemies in that part of the world.
Foreign companies can still buy known gold mining land for about 24 dollar per acre. A Canadian firm recently bought land in Colorado which was said to be rich in gold.
The American law was written in the 1800s.
There are quite a few foreign mining companies operating in Alaska as well, if memory serves me correctly.
Good for him. I applaud his courage. Now he needs to beef up his personal security. Russians play dirty and nasty. The international banksters will be sending their hitmen and jackals after him. If that fails, Venezuela will have to be invaded to "liberate" it and spread democracy 'murkan style.
Correct! Allende attempted to nationalize the copper industry. See what it got him! The USA, CIA and corporations took him out.Mostof the world's copper happens to be located in third world countries. Allende attempted to organize all of these countries in an OPEC-style (CPEC) organization because the were tired of getting screwed by American mining companies. So, we installed dictator Pinochet.check the history on this and you will find out what really happened and not the USA version of these events in Chile.
Ya gotta love this guy
No you don't. He sold out Honduras.
Maybe, but then, so did we.
We didn't sell them out. We acted in accordance with our principles:Do not allow democracy anywhere,all governments must be responsive and subservient to ours, andgive whatever there is to the trans-national corprations.
This makes total economic sense. The gold is a gift ofrom nature. It shouldn't go towards the benefit of a small group of people, especially when that wealth can to towards the development of the domestic economy. It isn unearned wealth, why give away a gift to a bunch of rentiers? Would never happen here.
"Would never happen here." You're kidding, right?
Are you freaking joking? Do you think the government here would nationalize the gold industry? Do you see the government here nationalizing ANY industry outside of the extreme situations where it is doing so to socialize the losses of a company they deem to be important? Why in the hell would I be kidding? We are long past the time when the government could do things like provide financial services as a public utility and I see no movement in that direction. No, it would never happen here. That is outside of the question as to whether we should.
Good move. Now build more direct democracy to preserve good government forever.
"Venezuela has some of Latin America's largest gold deposits, buried below the jungles south of the Orinoco river."
The ecosystem won't care who owns the gold after the rainforest has been destroyed to obtain it. The climate won't care who owns the gold after the carbon dioxide in the rainforest has gone into the atmosphere.
Leave the oil in the soil ... and leave the gold under the mold.
Sorry, but that is a hard pill to swallow for a poor country like Venezuela. For an American, who on average lives a lavish lifestyle, to tell another poor country to not use a resource to help it develop is a bit much. I agree with you on principle, but only if we pay for the country to leave the gold in the ground. We could pay them for the fact that there are certain benefits and costs to society not captured within the capitalist market economy. We could, for example, pay them for the ecological value of carbon sequestration and other ecological benefits. Just telling them however to leave that resource in the ground within the current system though is not going to fly nor is it fair. I agree with you, they should leave it in the ground because of ecological concerns, but countries like Venezuela should get some money for doing so.
Just as with oil, foreign companies thinking that the gold they mine also belongs exclusively to them. A Spanish word says it: descarados! Look it up.
Hugo is a brilliant man with diverse tastes in books. He knows history and I feel confident that he waited until he thought the rewards made the risks worth taking. Good luck to him and the people of Venezuela. About the only visible lights showing there might be a future for the human race are shining from South America.
The Bullion Banks in must be crying over this.
The people of this land should own their industries through their government. What's so terrible about really applying democracy so it means something big?