Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
NATO Could Target Civilian Facilities in Libya
Alliance warns Gadhafi that such buildings won't be protected if used to launch attacks
NATO warned on Tuesday that its warplanes will bomb former civilian facilities if Moammar Gadhafi's forces use them to launch attacks, as the UN said Libya's capital is suffering shortages of fuel, medicine and cash.
NATO warned that its warplanes will bomb civilian facilities if Moamer Gadhafi's forces use them to launch attacks, as the UN said Libya's capital is suffering shortages of fuel, medicine and cash.
(Photo: Ed Jones, AFP/Getty Images) The alliance warned it would target facilities including factories, warehouses and agricultural sites being used by loyalist troops.
The warning came a day after foreign reporters were taken to Zliten, east of Tripoli, by government minders and shown what they were told was the remains of a clinic hit by a NATO bomb that killed seven people.
Alliance military spokesman Col. Roland Lavoie said in Brussels that in recent days NATO had hit a concrete factory near Brega where regime forces were hiding and firing multibarrel rocket launchers.
"Pro-Gadhafi forces are increasingly occupying facilities which once held a civilian purpose," Lavoie told reporters in a video conference from the operation's headquarters in Naples, Italy.
"By occupying and using these facilities the regime has transformed them into military installations from which it commands and conducts attacks, causing them to lose their formerly protected status and rendering them valid and necessary military objectives for NATO," Lavoie said.
Earlier, NATO said it had "no evidence" that civilian facilities were hit in air raids near Zliten on Monday.
NATO's daily operational update said it had also hit a military facility, armoured vehicles, tanks and light military vehicles around Brega on Monday.
It also hit a command centre, antiaircraft weapons, multiple rocket launchers and a military vehicle in the Tripoli area and armoured fighting vehicles near Garyan.
The United States' top military officer, Adm. Michael Mullen, spoke on Monday of "stalemate" in NATO's Libya campaign, but still voiced optimism that Gadhafi would go.
"We are, generally, in a stalemate," the chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff said in Washington, but added that NATO attacks had "dramatically attrited (reduced) his forces."
"In the long run, I think it's a strategy that will work . (toward) removal of Gadhafi from power," Mullen said.
Baghdadi Mahmudi, the Libyan premier, reiterated on Tuesday that Gadhafi's departure is "not up for discussion," after meeting UN special envoy to Libya Abdul Ilah al-Khatib.
"The departure from power of Col. Gadhafi is not up for discussion," he told a news conference after British Foreign Secretary William Hague demanded on Monday that Gadhafi step down but said he might be allowed to stay in the country.
"With all due respect to the British foreign minister, it is not up to him to take decisions on behalf of the Libyan people."
Speaking before meeting French counterpart Alain Juppe, Hague said Britain would prefer for Gadhafi to leave Libya and stressed that London and Paris were "absolutely united" in NATO's current mission against Gadhafi.
"What is absolutely clear, as Alain (Juppe) has said, is that whatever happens, Gadhafi must leave power."
UN Humanitarian Co-ordinator for Libya Laurence Hart said Monday the weeklong fact-finding UN mission to Libya had identified several problems besetting Gadhafi's regime, particularly in the health sector.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


29 Comments so far
Show AllAlong with a Blitz of media lies worse than what Bush/Cheney used on Iraq.
It simple really. All they want is a group in power who will be under the control of the Western Countries wherein Oil resources and water are turned over to the control of the Corporations and Libya is "Privatized".
They gain control of Countries like Greece via the IMF and banking system. The same will not work in Libya because Libya is debt free and Gadaffi will not allow those bastards in.
Which is totally unresponsive to the allegation that NATO bombed that clinic and killed seven people. Were pro-Gadhafi forces occupying and using that clinic?
Earlier, NATO said it had "no evidence" that civilian facilities were hit in air raids near Zliten on Monday.
No evidence? NATO planes do not carry cameras to record their strikes?
Would someone please expain to me what the function of NATO is?
probably, but on stretchers and gurneys...
And what are you going to do? Have a beer and watch TV? Consider instead, going to Washington D.C. on Oct. 6 2011 to stop the machine. Look up Oct 6, 2011 on Google.
BTW, rather than google it, the site is here:
http://october2011.org/
Maybe I'm just dense, but, even with your explanations, I still can't see any legitimate purpose for there being a NATO, nor any non-criminal use for such an organization.
It's almost as though the US just keeps it around to do its dirty work where the US wants to minimize the appearance of its presence...or would, if the US had any such dirty work or nefarious motives.
He was just born a century too early, I guess.
He did pretty good for an amateur, but the pros are in charge, now.
http://edition.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/africa/06/18/libya.nato.al.brega/
You know I think NATO poses a threat to civilians on both sides. Hence we all know it has nothing to do with humanitarian concerns.
Convenient, no? I guess the US learned more from the Nazi's than launching rockets...
Why are we not surprised? And why would we be? - NATO's been escalating and "mission creeping" the attacks on Libya since day 1.
The intention to "target civilian facilities" - bomb them - and aid "rebels" with arms is in breach of UN SC resolutions 1970 and 1973, the UN charter articles 39 through 42 ("to maintain or restore international peace"), not to mention article 1.1 and 2.4, the Geneva conventions, and a host of other international laws.
NATO acts despicably in Libya.