Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
UN Says Climate Change Threatens World Security
Climate change could exponentially increase the scale of natural disasters while at the same time threatening world security, a senior UN official told the UN Security Council Wednesday.
Climate change could exponentially increase the scale of natural disasters while at the same time threatening world security, a senior UN official told the UN Security Council Wednesday
Though science cannot yet explain all the reasons behind global warming, "a changing climate is a reality," and one that effects all sectors of society, said Achim Steiner, director of the UN Environment Program.
Steiner cited a worst-case scenario prediction that temperatures will rise 4 degree Celsius by 2060 while the sea level will rise one meter over the next century.
There are myriad threats already and their numbers will rise, he said, noting droughts like the one currently afflicting Somalia, floods such as the ones that hit Pakistan, and their implications on the food markets.
"The scale of the the natural disasters will increase exponentially," he added.
Two regions of Southern Somalia, hit by a devastating drought, were declared in a state of famine Wednesday by the United Nations, who called it the worst food crisis in Africa in 20 years and have mobilized efforts to stem the situation before it worsens.
"The signs of climate changing, not only is it happening, it is accelerating," he added.
The famine and rising sea levels "are all threats to peace and security," said Steiner. The next climate conference will take place in Durban in December and "must be decisive."
Developed countries must manage their actions but emerging nations must also play their role and cannot be spectators, he urged.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


50 Comments so far
Show AllIf the former, we're in even bigger trouble than I thought we were.
Ratios of Record daily high to record daily low temperatures - USA::
1950's - 1.09:1
1960's - 0.77:1
1970's - 0.78:1
1980's - 1.14:1
1990's - 1.36:1
2000's - 2.04:1
past year - 5.25:1 [correction 2.86]
EDIT:
Oops! I was mixing data. The 5.25 (up to 5.5 today) ratio is for all-time high vs all time low temperature records set. The rest of figures are for daily records set. The figures are still on the rise.
I do actually agree with you that a new derivatives market and subsidies won't change the outcome. It's far too late for that, and the PTB don't give a damn about the environment or anything other than gold anyhow. Nope. They've been removed from the natural world for so long that they just can't comprehend the idea of the consequences. .
Speaking of consequences, how's your A/C working? It's actually pretty temperate up here, lots of rain and more mosquitoes than we've had in years. Oh, and the new birds, bugs and botanicals in the area are quite nice, strange how they've moved 200 KM north from where they used to live. Shame about the critters who can't move quickly enough.
The audacity of heterocentric dogma.
http://www2.ucar.edu/news/1036/record-high-temperatures-far-outpace-reco...
and information I researched myself here:
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/extremes/records/:
And note - except for a couple weeks in December, and just in the southeast, even the supposedly "record cold" past winter saw far more record highs than record lows.:
Anecdotally speaking, this trend of setting record highs, but hardly ever record lows has become quite noticable. In particularly, the temperature does not fall nearly as rapidly at night - even on the clearest, calmest nights with snow cover - especially dramatic on hilltops. This is one of obvious expected effects of CO2 impeding radiational cooling. The SW Pennsylvania hilltop area where I live has become so frostproof that I was still picking tomatos in Novermber last fall.
Hey wasn't it the UN that oked the war with Iraq and Libya? You have to wonder how much fact checking they actually do. Hey those porta potties Colin Powell presented were seen as evidence of WMD. God knows what they used for justification to do what they are doing in Libya.
If China's seeding of the clouds has nothing to do with "climate change", and all the bombs dropped in wars and exhaust from the planes have no impact, then I think my driving back and forth to work has even less affect of the global climate.
I think that you will be ok- it won't kill you, BUT there has been an obvious and detrimental affect upon your ability to spell and make a cohesive statement.
Provided we keep our fingers off the nuclear arsenals I imagine that millions of humans might pass through the bottleneck, perhaps as many as 50-100 million.
There will be novel habitat for many new species to evolve and exploit but the Earth will be very different. It will take several millenia to capture and lay down the carbon and return to more moderate temperatures.
Here is an update from James Hansen, which appears to render the following quote from this article outdated - already:
"Steiner cited a worst-case scenario prediction that temperatures will rise 4 degree Celsius by 2060 while the sea level will rise one meter over the next century."
James Hansen (excerpt):
"Thus goals to limit human-made warming to 2{\deg}C are not sufficient - they are prescriptions for disaster. Ice sheet disintegration is nonlinear, spurred by amplifying feedbacks. We suggest that ice sheet mass loss, if warming continues unabated, will be characterized better by a doubling time for mass loss rate than by a linear trend. Satellite gravity data, though too brief to be conclusive, are consistent with a doubling time of 10 years or less, implying the possibility of multi-meter sea level rise this century."
http://arxiv.org/abs/1105.0968v3
Manysummits
========At 3:39 pm, if I am correctly evaluating your intent, you are saying that money making / cap and trade SCHEMES will do nothing to stop climate change? I 100% agree with that. The part in all caps, I'm still not sure what your intent is, but I would say that by the earlier comment, you do know what's going on. I apologize to have "jumped" on you, but I really didn't know where your 3:39 post was coming from.
Many of us get carried away, etc because the stress being inflicted upon us by THEM can be unbearable at times. There are those who for whatever strange reasons feel the need to drop in and make some of the most outre comments, probably with the intent to rattle cages. There are many whose sole intent seems to be to admonish us to "work within the system", "behave like sheep", "understand that we are powerless against the mighty elites", etc. It makes me get carried away, too!
Keep on punchin', friend. I'm with you.
I find the major place I trust to give the real data is the government's National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, NOAA. There are other but to start NOAA is best for information. If you search the sight, you will find a wealth of information on weather, EL NINO/LA NINA, hurricanes satellite imagery and loops and much more.
For starters, here is the climate change page on NOAA's site:
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/ctl/clisci100k.html
Never leave the el nino/ southern oscillation or la nina out of the global climate phenomena.