EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- One American Who Isn't For Sale
- Transcript: Today's Live Q&A With NSA Leaker, Edward Snowden
- Remembering Satyajit Ray’s Hirok Rajar Deshe: On Edward Snowden, Resistance and Inverted Totalitarianism
- Obama Cans Regulator Who Crossed Wall Street
- Pentagon Bracing for Public Dissent Over Climate and Energy Shocks
Popular content
Today's Top News
Japan Set to Ban Fukushima Cattle Shipments After Radioactive Meat Scare
Government expected to suspend movement of cattle as fears mount over contaminated straw in region hit by nuclear crisis
Japan is poised to impose a ban on shipments of cattle from Fukushima prefecture – the scene of its worst ever nuclear crisis – after discovering that meat containing abnormally high levels of radioactive caesium had been processed and consumed.
Cattle are fed at a farm where officials declared the straw safe, in Fukushima, Japan. Japan is poised to impose a ban on shipments of cattle from Fukushima prefecture after discovering that meat containing abnormally high levels of radioactive caesium had been processed and consumed. (Photograph: AP) The cows had been fed on rice straw containing high levels of the radioactive isotope that was harvested after the 11 March tsunami triggered a core meltdown at Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant.
While officials said consuming the meat did not present an immediate threat to health, the incident has highlighted concerns over food safety in the wake of the crisis, which has caused contamination in milk, tea, leaf vegetables, fish and water.
The government is expected to announce the suspension of cattle shipments from Fukushima, and possibly other areas nearby, on Tuesday.
"The most likely outcome is that we will ban beef shipments," Goshi Hosono, a special adviser to the prime minister on the nuclear clean-up, said on a TV programme. "We are discussing the matter along these lines. We have to ensure food safety."
Authorities in the prefecture confirmed that 84 head of cattle from five affected farms had been shipped to eight locations, including Tokyo and Osaka, between late March and mid-July.
Local media reported that the contamination risk could be more widespread, affecting farms 60 miles from the power plant. Kyodo news agency said it had calculated that as many as 143 cows sent to all but 10 of Japan's 47 prefectures may have been exposed to radiation via feed.
"We may need to increase our response by checking the distribution of contaminated straw," said Kohei Otsuka, the senior vice-minister for health. "We are currently considering Fukushima prefecture, but we may have to consider the need for a further response by checking the distribution of contaminated straw."
Retailers said it was highly likely that some of the contaminated beef had already been eaten.
On Sunday, the Aeon chain of supermarkets said 319kg (703lb) of beef from a farm in Asakawa in Fukushima, had been sold at 14 of its stores in Tokyo and the surrounding area between late April and the middle of last month.
Tests on straw at a farm in Koriyama city in Fukushima prefecture showed caesium levels as high as 500,000 becquerels per kg. Those readings are about 378 times the legal limit set by the government.
Farmers in the area said they had not been told about a government warning, issued days after the nuclear accident, not to give their animals feed that had been stored outside.
The Tokyo metropolitan government said on Sunday that high levels of radioactive caesium were detected in meat from a cow shipped to a packing plant in Tokyo from a farm in Koriyama.
The meat contained radioactive cesium at measurements as high as 2,400 becquerels per kg, nearly five times the government-set safety limit of 500 becquerels per kg.
Efforts to track down exposed cattle began earlier this month after meat from cows at a farm in Minamisoma, about 15 miles from Fukushima Daiichi, were found to have been fed with contaminated straw.
Authorities in Tokyo said they had detected radiation levels in beef originating from the farm of up to 2,300 becquerels per kg.
Government officials and some experts played down the risk to health. "This is not a number that would clearly cause abnormal effects on health even if the beef was eaten," Ikuro Anzai, honorary professor of radiation protection at Ritsumeikan University, told Kyodo.
But he added: "It would be better to refrain from eating it until the situation becomes clear."
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



12 Comments so far
Show AllOoops. Time to up the standards again.
"While officials said consuming the meat did not present an immediate threat to health..."
Right. It will take years for the cancer to develop. No immediate threat at all.
You could eat it along with your words.
BTW: Are you Nuclear Engineer James Hopf, who produced the World Uranium Reserves Report?
Do you still think the following, from another article of yours, is accurate, or, post-Fukushima, would you change it?
" It (nuclear power production) has caused no deaths among the general public and has not had any significant environmental impact." http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1141/is_34_42/ai_n16765551/
'A total of 373 kg of suspected meat was sold to consumers. Even if all that meat had the maximum level of 2,300 Bq/kg, and a single person at the entire amount, they would be exposed to a radiation dose of ~1,000 mrem (what people get from natural background sources in many parts of the world) and they would have a ~0.05% chance of getting cancer.'
I don't know how you get that figure of 1,000 mrem; my figure is over 164 times that of yours (assuming Cs-137). And background radiation really shouldn't be compared to internal exposure for several reasons. For one thing, background radiation is uniform over the whole body; internal radioisotopes often accumulate in certain organs. For another, background radiation is limited to X-rays and gamma rays, only a fraction of which is absorbed by the body. Radiation from nuclides taken internally, however, are completely absorbed by the body.
'One possible reason is that since nuclear power doesn't emit anything at all under normal operation...'
I believe that in normal operation, tritium is regularly released to the atmosphere.
John
here is a july 14 article regarding the Browns Ferry reactor after the big tornado storm in April that has got absolutely no play..
=============
But documents the utility is required to submit to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission show reactor operators became distracted while manually operating cooling water flow to the Unit 1 reactor and water began boiling off faster than it was being replaced.
Additionally, a valve failed, a diesel-driven fire pump failed, the diesel-driven generator for the security station failed, the warning sirens were lost, power to the chemical lab was lost, and an emergency diesel generator keeping cool water flowing to one of three reactors shut down because of voltage fluctuations caused by a fluid leak after a brass fitting broke.
When one of the generators failed at Browns Ferry, there was a temporary loss of shutdown cooling for one reactor for about 47 minutes, but the water level in the reactor never got near the boiling point, officials said.
So when the cacophony of systems began showing signs of trouble at Browns Ferry in late April and early May after the tornadoes, it’s little wonder there were distractions in the control room of Unit 1.
“Operators had taken manual control of the system, as required by the procedure, and ... got distracted, allowing water make-up to be less than it should have been,” Golden said.
http://timesfreepress.com/news/2011/jul/14/tva-defends-browns-ferry-afte...
=================
so there was almost a core uncovery event just lke Fukushima 1 that caused the explosions. Browns Ferry is the same design.
"never got near the boiling point" and "allowing water make-up to be less than it should have been". are a bit contradictory methinks.
=========================
Official: Radioactive materials around Los Alamos may get redistributed at “measurable” levels — “Sometimes that will manifest itself as a health advisory”
Gov’t allows cows to emit up to 100,000 CPM of radioactivity — Humans would be required to undergo full-body decontamination
Tokyo gov’t finds iodine-131 levels up to quadruple cesium levels in water reclamation centers
Difference between Los Alamos fire and other wild fires can be summed up in a single word: “Radiation” — More firefighters on way to battle blaze
Test results show Plutonium-239, Americium-241 and Cesium-137 levels in air around Los Alamos (CHART)
Indoor mushrooms contain 1,770 bq/kg of radioactive cesium — Gov’t “determining the cause”
' more articles at http://enenews.com/ :
'=========================
'Official: Radioactive materials around Los Alamos may get redistributed at “measurable” levels — “Sometimes that will manifest itself as a health advisory'
Gov’t allows cows to emit up to 100,000 CPM of radioactivity — Humans would be required to undergo full-body decontamination'
Something's apparently wrong with that, since a 70 kg male human emits over 400,000 CPM.
John