Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
- When You're Cutting Social Security, 'Wealthy' Begins at $25K
- With Little More Than a Note, Obama Deploys US Troops To Niger
- Stripped of 'Country of Origin' Label, US Agrees to Sell Tear Gas to Egypt
- Who Can Own Life? Farmer vs. Monsanto Before US High Court
- The 'Land of 10,000 Lakes' Is Running Dry
- Who Can Own Life? Farmer vs. Monsanto Before US High Court
- Decolonize the Consumerist Wasteland: Re-imagining a World Beyond Capitalism and Communism
- Scale Implosion: After Ruining America, the Era of Giant Chain Stores Is Over
- 5 Reasons Why the Keystone XL Pipeline is Bad for the Economy
- Lose Your Lawn
Popular content
Today's Top News
ALEC Exposed: A Nationwide Blueprint for the Rightwing Takeover
“Never has the time been so right,” Louisiana State Representative Noble Ellington told conservative legislators gathered in Washington to plan the radical remaking of policies in the states. It was one month after the 2010 midterm elections. Republicans had grabbed 680 legislative seats and secured a power trifecta—control of both legislative chambers and the governorship—in twenty-one states. Ellington was speaking for hundreds of attendees at a “States and Nation Policy Summit,” featuring GOP stars like Texas Governor Rick Perry, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and House Majority Leader Eric Cantor. Convened by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC)—“the nation’s largest, non-partisan, individual public-private membership association of state legislators,” as the spin-savvy group describes itself—the meeting did not intend to draw up an agenda for the upcoming legislative session. That had already been done by ALEC’s elite task forces of lawmakers and corporate representatives. The new legislators were there to grab their weapons: carefully crafted model bills seeking to impose a one-size-fits-all agenda on the states.
Founded in 1973 by Paul Weyrich and other conservative activists frustrated by recent electoral setbacks, ALEC is a critical arm of the right-wing network of policy shops that, with infusions of corporate cash, has evolved to shape American politics. Inspired by Milton Friedman’s call for conservatives to “develop alternatives to existing policies [and] keep them alive and available,” ALEC’s model legislation reflects long-term goals: downsizing government, removing regulations on corporations and making it harder to hold the economically and politically powerful to account. Corporate donors retain veto power over the language, which is developed by the secretive task forces. The task forces cover issues from education to health policy. ALEC’s priorities for the 2011 session included bills to privatize education, break unions, deregulate major industries, pass voter ID laws and more. In states across the country they succeeded, with stacks of new laws signed by GOP governors like Ohio’s John Kasich and Wisconsin’s Scott Walker, both ALEC alums.
The details of ALEC’s model bills have been available only to the group’s 2,000 legislative and 300 corporate members. But thanks to a leak to Aliya Rahman, an Ohio-based activist who helped organize protests at ALEC’s Spring Task Force meeting in Cincinnati, The Nation has obtained more than 800 documents representing decades of model legislation. Teaming up with the Center for Media and Democracy, The Nation asked policy experts to analyze this never-before-seen archive.
The articles included below are the first products of that examination. They provide an inside view of the priorities of ALEC’s corporate board and billionaire benefactors (including Tea Party funders Charles and David Koch). “Dozens of corporations are investing millions of dollars a year to write business-friendly legislation that is being made into law in statehouses coast to coast, with no regard for the public interest,” says Bob Edgar of Common Cause. “This is proof positive of the depth and scope of the corporate reach into our democratic processes.” The full archive of ALEC documents is available at a new website, alecexposed.org, thanks to the Center for Media and Democracy, which has provided powerful tools for progressives to turn this knowledge into power. The data tell us that the time has come to refocus on the battle to loosen the grip of corporate America and renew democracy in the states.
In coordination with the Center for Media and Democracy and The Nation, Common Dreams will be re-posting many of the articles examining the leaked ALEC files. To see what's already available go here and here. Updates to Common Dreams will be added here.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


87 Comments so far
Show AllThe definition of a conspiracy is a bit broader than you would have us think Tom.
con·spir·a·cy
n. pl. con·spir·a·cies
1. An agreement to perform together an illegal, wrongful, or subversive act.
A conspiracy does not necessarily require that the act be technically either criminal or illegal.
Capitalism is, by nature, a conspiratorial endeavor that tends always away from its alleged competitive paradigm to one of collusion and cooperation among the most successful participants.
The greatest success is often, if not always, achieved through the commission of innumerable wrongful acts.
After all, the absolute purpose of competition is to eliminate your opponent. The ultimate goal of capitalism is monopoly and, taken to its logical extreme, totalitarian control.
Yes, it is a small pain in the butt. Use some simple html.
That is put <p> at the beginning of each paragraph and put </p> at the end of each paragraph and you will have paragraphs again.
The good side of this annoyance is that those posters who often cut and paste long postings into the comments will need to do a bit more work to do so.
I also strongly suspect that ALEC is not quite so Red Party-only as Nichols alludes.
The Corporatists really are in the last stages of their take over (with help from the Imperialists). ALEC really is one of their tools for this.
But the idea that the Red Party is more complicit than the Blue is ludicrous, and Nichols' and The Nation's attempt to frame the story that way is a cynical manipulation.
BOTH parties have their "genuine representation wings". The Blues have the "progressives", and the Reds have the "constitutionalists". Also, elected officials ALSO do some amount of real representing in order to get re-elected. The "Tea Party Movement" is the Red Party version of the same "co-opt, then control" technique used on "progressives" by Obama and the DLC in 2008.
That being said, as long as we keep the above manipulation-prevention facts in our minds, this series of articles exploring ALEC should be useful. ;)
-matti.
Nonsense, Mr. Nichols; what you say here is as deceptive as any other Ruling Class Big Lie.
What the data tells us is that capitalism is the most cleverly malicious Evil in human experience -- that the time has come to deal with it accordingly...lest it destroy us all.
If you were to look at capitalism from the perspective of its victims -- millions of First Nations people; millions of war casualties; millions more tortured and murdered in Nazi concentration camps and by Mussolini, Franco, Pinochet and their ilk; Martin Luther King Jr. and thousands of lynching victims; Joe Hill, Karen Silkwood and all the other murdered labor activists; now today in the United States the thousands of people exterminated by denial of health care and the millions more (myself among them) who will be slain when genocide-by-default terminates our Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid -- you'd see the effects of capitalism are far worse.
Then there's the matter of doctrine:
Capitalism is the ultimate reversal of morality: the elevation of infinite greed to the height of virtue, of limitless selfishness to maximum good, precisely as Ayn Rand decrees.
Communism is the ultimate restoration of the virtues that have kept our species alive for 100,000 years: from each according to their ability; to each according to their need.
Capitalism not only traffics in Evil – the Evil of our species' darkest impulses – it now does so openly, defiantly, even gloatingly: exactly as capitalism did under Hitler, Mussolini, Franco and Pinochet.
Communism at least renders lip-service to the Good: the well-being of even the most vulnerable among us and the economic as well as political democracy essential to achieve it.
Capitalism tells us we're creatures of greed desperately clawing toward ever-greater fulfillment of selfishness.
Communism asks us who we are, and what therefore is our species' quest? Is it merely for profit, as the capitalists maintain? Or do we seek the individual and collective improvement of our species, our world?
Capitalism claims perfection – not just economic perfection but theological perfection: the doctrinal will-of-god endorsement of the Abrahamic religions: Judaism, Christianity, Islam.
Communism admits imperfection; there is no denying it has fallen too readily to local conditions, whether the dark undertow of Russian history or the U.S.-evoked savagery of a war-ruined Cambodia.
Thus Communism is clearly a work-in-progress: which means it is up to us to reshape it in accordance with the lessons of its past.
And – despite its flaws – only Communism is proven by the historical record to offer sufficient discipline to defeat Capitalism, which is increasingly manifest Evil: the deliberate, premeditated Evil of genocide, ecocide and quite possibly the matricidal death of Mother Earth.
Don't take my word for it; see for yourself; be courageous enough to begin the struggle against generations of capitalist brainwashing. Here's the link to the basic document of Marxism, The Communist Manifesto: http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1848/communist-manifesto/ (That's right, you don't even need to buy the book. It's available on line -- at least for now.)
That's good to have, of course. The more the merrier - sort of. But I think we have the proof already, in the effects of the lack of input of public opinion into official policies.
How many citizens voted for, or even support, the war - sorry, "military operations" - in Libya?
Yemen?
Pakistan?
Afghanistan?
Iraq (still 1 - 2 US soldiers dying there every week)?
Tax cuts for the richest?
"Austerity" cut-backs?
Increased oil-dependency, Mexico gulf drilling etc, by denying climate extreming countermeasures?
Continued infinite growth in the finite and much resource-depleted Biosphere?
Less for the poorest, more for the richest?
No need to be a genius to work out the "proof positive of the depth and scope of the corporate reach into our democratic processes".
In fact, anyone needing more proof is pretty dumb.