EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Israel Thwarts Palestinian 'Flytilla' Campaign
BEN GURION AIRPORT, Israel — Israel said on Friday that it has prevented hundreds of pro-Palestinian activists from flying to its main airport in a mass protest but that security forces will stay on alert for the time being.
Pro-Palestinians activists protest at Charles de Gaulle airport, north of Paris, as they are blocked by police at the airport, Friday, July, 8, 2011. Israel increased security at the Ben-Gurion International Airport ahead of the activists' arrival and asked foreign airlines to prevent blacklisted travelers from boarding Israel-bound flights, as hundreds said they would travel to Israel to protest Israeli policies toward the Palestinians. (AP Photo/Thibault Camus) less
Organizers of the "Welcome to Palestine" campaign, which some have called the "flytilla," had said up to 800 activists were to fly in to Ben Gurion Airport, near Tel Aviv, in a peaceful mission to visit Palestinian families.
But the Israeli authorities said they managed to preempt the campaign, by foreign activists -- most of them from France -- demonstrating for the right of access to the West Bank.
Regional police chief Benzi Sau said that a joint operation by police, the foreign ministry and transport officials "succeeded in significantly affecting the intentions of those behind" the planned protest at Ben Gurion.
It "prevented the departure of hundreds of activists at their points of departure for Israel," he was quoted as saying in a statement from the public security ministry.
"Public Security Minister (Yitzhak) Aharonovitch instructed that... forces continue to deploy so as to be able to deal with incoming flights this afternoon, including the prevention of disturbances, while exercising the necessary sensitivity."
Apart from deploying police in and around Ben Gurion Airport, the main Israeli tactic was to discourage airlines from allowing them to board at their points of departure.
"Israel has given airlines a list of 342 unwanted people, warning them that they will be immediately turned back at the expense of the companies," Israeli immigration spokeswoman Sabine Hadad told AFP.
Following the warning, "the companies have already refused to take on board around 200 of these passengers," she said, adding that two US activists who arrived overnight were sent back to the United States.
The two American women had originally been involved in a scuppered bid by activists to sail to the Gaza Strip on a 10-boat flotilla in defiance of an Israeli naval blockade of the Palestinian coastal territory.
Some 50 airline passengers who described themselves as "pro-Palestinian" were prevented from embarking on a flight to Israel from Geneva airport on Friday, officials said, prompting flight delays.
"This morning passengers for an easyJet flight were prevented from embarking," airport spokeswoman Aline Yazgin told AFP, adding she did not know why they had been prevented from boarding.
She said that as a result several people belonging to a French group of pro-Palestinians had tried to get past airport security doors, resulting in authorities temporarily shutting down boarding areas.
At Roissy airport in France, at least nine activists were prevented from boarding a flight of Hungarian carrier Malev to Tel Aviv via Budapest.
"Their reservation was cancelled at the request of Israeli authorities who have drawn up a list of undesirable persons," an airport source said.
In a statement, the organizers of the "flytilla" campaign condemned the Israeli pressure on airlines and threatened legal action.
"We call on all airline companies not to accept such provocative, blackmailing, and illegal actions by the Israeli government," it said. "Visitors traveling between countries have rights under international law and bilateral travel agreements," it added."Those who had reservations cancelled will exercise their right of protest including bringing legal cases in their own countries."
Hundreds of police are on standby at the airport near Tel Aviv, but no incidents had been reported by early afternoon on Friday.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

87 Comments so far
Show AllAmnesty International sez: "Some 1,400 Palestinians were killed in attacks by Israeli forces during Operation “Cast Lead” between 27 December 2008 and 18 January 2009. Some 5,000 were injured, many maimed for life. Hundreds of those killed were unarmed civilians, including some 300 children, more than 115 women and some 85 men over the age of 50. The figure is based on data collected by Amnesty International delegates in Gaza and on cases documented in detail by local NGOs and medical personnel in Gaza. According to Palestinian human rights NGOs two thirds of those killed were civilians"
http://www.amnesty.org/en/library/asset/MDE15/015/2009/en/8f299083-9a74-...
Even Salubrius' defense, that " the civilian toll was less than one out of two" shows the basic inhumanity of Israel's defenders. It's okay to kill civilians as long as you kill slightly more combatants.
More from the AI report: "However, the killings of many of the hundreds of Palestinian civilians not involved in the conflict, including some 300 children, cannot simply be dismissed as “collateral damage” – incidental to otherwise lawful attacks – or as mistakes. Nor can they be attributed to panicked reactions of lone soldiers operating under fire. The attacks that caused the greatest number of fatalities and injuries were carried out with long-range high-precision munitions fired from combat aircraft, helicopters and drones, or from tanks stationed up to several kilometres away – often against pre-selected targets, a process that would normally require approval from up the chain of command. The victims of these attacks were not caught in the crossfire of battles between Palestinian militants and Israeli forces, nor were they shielding militants or other legitimate targets. Many were killed when their homes were bombed while they slept. Others were going about their daily activities in their homes, sitting in their yard, hanging the laundry on the roof when they were targeted in air strikes or tank shelling. Children were studying or playing in their bedrooms or on the roof, or outside their homes, when they were struck by missiles or tank shells. Others were in the street, walking or cycling. Paramedics and ambulances were repeatedly attacked while rescuing the wounded or recovering the dead. "
Oh, the IDF denies targeting civilians. Well that clears everything up. Sorry I brought up Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and the Goldstone Report. Perhaps someone should tell them Israel denies targeting civilians. I'm sure such a stunning revelation would cause them to reverse their findings. Then they could focus solely on the rocket attacks on Israel, like you want to do.
"Three members of the UN fact-finding mission on the Gaza war of 2008-09 have turned on the fourth member and chair of the group, Richard Goldstone, accusing him in all but name of misrepresenting facts in order to cast doubt on the credibility of their joint report.
In a statement to the Guardian, the three experts in international law are strongly critical of Goldstone's dramatic change of heart expressed in a Washington Post commentary earlier this month. Goldstone wrote that he regretted aspects of the report that bears his name, especially the suggestion that Israel had potentially committed war crimes by targeting civilian Palestinians in the three-week conflict.
The three members – the Pakistani human rights lawyer Hina Jilani; Christine Chinkin, professor of international law at the London School of Economics; and former Irish peace-keeper Desmond Travers – have until this moment kept their silence over Goldstone's bombshell remarks. But their response now is devastating.
Though they do not mention Goldstone by name, they shoot down several of the main contentions in his article and imply that he has bowed to intense political pressure.
They write that they cannot leave "aspersions cast on the findings of the [Goldstone] report unchallenged", adding that those aspersions have "misrepresented facts in an attempt to delegitimise the findings and to cast doubts on its credibility".
In their most stinging criticism, the three joint authors say that "calls to reconsider or even retract the report, as well as attempts at misrepresenting its nature and purpose, disregard the rights of victims, Palestinians and Israeli, to truth and justice". They point to the "personal attacks and the extraordinary pressure placed on members of the fact-finding mission", adding that "had we given in to pressures from any quarter to sanitise our conclusions, we would be doing a serious injustice to the hundreds of innocent civilians killed during the Gaza conflict, the thousands injured, and the hundreds of thousands whose lives continue to be deeply affected by the conflict and the blockade".
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/apr/14/un-gaza-report-authors-golds...
Salubrius: In case you missed that, the U.N. and three of the four authors of the report still stand behind ALL the conclusions of the report, including the deliberate targeting of civilians by Israel (like there's any other way to interpret bombing hospitals and dropping white phosphorous in civilian areas and on a U.N. compound where over 600 civilians had gone for shelter).
So my opinion of Israel has changed dramatically over time. It's been an ongoing issue since I was young. I have no such history with Syria. It hasn't been on the radar news-wise for most of my lifetime so I feel less able to comment on it because I am less educated about the situation.
"Why do you focus on Israel and not X?" seems to be a consistent plaint among supporters of Israel. Ask yourself the same question. Why are you defending the indefensible instead of focusing your attention elsewhere?