Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
- In Blind Poll, Republicans Choose Progressive Budget Solutions Over Their Own Party's
- Not Guilty By Virtue of Videotape, Which, Unlike the Police, Doesn't Lie
- The 'Land of 10,000 Lakes' Is Running Dry
- Manning: Before Wikileaks, Leaked Docs Offered to NYT, WaPo
- Bob Woodward Embodies US Political Culture in a Single Outburst
Popular content
Today's Top News
Chuck Schumer Targeted By Progressives Over Jobs, Taxes
WASHINGTON -- Progressives are targeting the Senate Democrats’ top message and policy maestro, New York Sen. Chuck Schumer, telling him not to "cave" on key investment priorities in spending negotiations with Republicans.
Progressives are targeting the Senate Democrats’ top message and policy maestro, New York Sen. Chuck Schumer, telling him not to "cave" on key investment priorities in spending negotiations with Republicans. The group Progressive Change Campaign Committee is delivering that message through its New York members after a Washington Post op-ed said Schumer and his colleagues have concluded the only jobs bill Republicans will let pass would be based on tax cuts -- not infrastructure spending, investments in education and other areas aimed at spurring longterm job-growth.
So the group is asking members to call Schumer and tell him to fight, rather than settle for whatever Republicans say they will accept at the outset.
"Democrats shouldn't be seeking the lowest common denominator with extremist Republicans -- that's not leadership," says an email sent to New Yorkers from PCCC’s Jason Rosenbaum. “They should fight for the real investments in jobs that America needs."
Schumer spokesman Brian Fallon countered that his boss is indeed determined to win the items PCCC is talking about.
“The group is mistaken if they think Sen. Schumer isn’t fighting for measures like infrastructure, as well as tax cuts, when it comes to job creation,” Fallon said. “He agrees both approaches are necessary, and has advocated them both privately and publicly.”
Still, having watched Senate Democrats give in on liberal priorities over the last two years, PCCC thinks Schumer needs to be pushed to try harder.
"This isn't about Chuck Schumer's preferences -- it's about his strategy and willingness to fight,” said group co-founder Adam Green. “Will Democrats propose a major jobs investment bill, fight for it, rally the public around it, bring it to a vote, and dare Republicans to vote against it? Or will they pre-emptively capitulate before the fight even begins?"
Some Senate Democrats recently felt similarly about their budget committee chairman, North Dakota Sen. Kent Conrad, and recently forced him to shelve a plan that they felt was too far to the right.
Schumer was not publicly critical of Conrad, but he was believed to be more in line with the more liberal-wing of the party. He has also argued for many of the items PCCC supports in the past.
But the group is hoping for a stronger stance now.
“Chuck Schumer is known as a smart guy. But in this case, being smart means recognizing that when the public is on your side, you don’t pre-emptively cave,” Rosenbaum wrote, referring to polling that his group has done showing Americans favor investing in infrastructure and jobs. “You certainly don’t give Republicans a veto."
“You lay out a big vision, mobilize the public around it, and dare Republicans to oppose it,” he argued. “After all, the big lesson of Paul Ryan’s budget is that if Democrats fight and mobilize the public, Republicans will backtrack and cave.”
Democrats, including Schumer, have been hammering the GOP -- and getting some Republicans to retreat -- on Ryan's plan to turn Medicare into a private, subsidized system that will cost seniors more.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...



11 Comments so far
Show AllThey should ask AIPAC to intervene--that's the only constituency Schumer listens to.
POLITICAL CHOICES
Schumer and both the Democratic and Republican parties have chosen to
support AIPAC, racist,apartheid Zionist Israel, military and domestic support
of Israel. This choice has been in their "political" interest.
They have also decided that they do not want (need etc.) the support of
those of us who oppose occupation, international crimes, blockades,
ethnic cleansing and so forth. I understand their decisions. They cannot expect
my support and will not get it.
I support the freedom fighters of Palestine (I cannot do so but by expression
due to US law). When Zionist Israel and the US are ready to negotiate
with Palestinians as equals (not negotiating for complete surrender of
their victims), with HAMAS, things may change.
That does not seem probable in the near future.
Remember the Nakba!
End Israeli occupation!
email:peterloeb@yahoo.com
You two are monotonous and single issue posters who come here, not to engage but to harangue. Every thread is not, as you seem to believe, a forum for your opinions on AIPAC and its support for heinous Israeli policies. Please use a bit of maturity and courtesy and confine these opinions to threads where it belongs.
Thanks much.
As to the topic in question, I woud remind everyone that Schumer and Rham Emmanuel committed political assassination on Howard Dean's leadership of the Democratic Party. While Dean's fifty state strategy was crucial to the victories at the polls in that election cycle these two DLC loyalists immediately made public denials that said strategy was the reason for those results.
Fallon's statement that Schumer is fighting for measures like infrastructure investment is a joke. This same Schumer, following a pattern of feeding the US oligarchy's hunger for easy profit by taking advantage of the population's paranoia, has proposed that money be pored into the black hole of the US's gargantuan security apparatus to enhance the country's rail system safety. The US should be investing in bringing the US's commuter and traveler rail system from the 19th Century into the 21st Century, where the railroads of all the other advanced countries of the world are, and expanded the systems coverage instead of feeding the Global War on Terror chimera.
For god's sake, the Amtrak express from Seattle, WA to Los Angeles, CA averages 23 MPH. Schumer's activities in the Senate are about as useless as are those of all the other members of that blighted institution.
Wouldn't it be wonderful to abolish it outright?
Chuck Schumer is part of the 'Old Guard'. We need more young progressive blood in Washington. DC needs a transfusion. Time for Chuck to retire. We thank you for your service Senator Schumer. Term limits would solve a lot of our problems.
(Historical note: The Roman Republic fell for two reasons: 1) The patricians, (nobility), would not stand for agrarian reform. They were not about to have any of their assets redistributed. 2) Leaders, (military), originally had term limits of one year. This limited their power and financial incentive to act against the interest of the plebs (people). This was slowly done away with and an old guard became entrenched, powerful, wealthy and self-serving.)
I'm sick of people saying "Thank you for your service"! This man is a thief and rapist of the people. Thank you, indeed.
The whole tone of this Huff-Blow Post is DLC apologist, concessionary to Republicans, and tolerant of Schumer's bogus belief that more tax cuts to the rich and offshoring corporations will lead to ANY significant job growth inside the U.S.
Common Dreams should not re-post Huffington Post farticles because Arianna Huffington is anti-labor and anti-union. Her business model relies on unpaid bloggers (competing by the hundreds in hopes that getting posted on her site will lead to enough name recognition for them that SOMEONE SOME DAY will actually pay them for their work) to make her tens of millions of dollars a year. She's a pig and her site is a fount of neo-liberal apologism.
Is it possible to be a progressive bankster?