Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Obama Seeks More Drilling in Alaska, Gulf of Mexico
WASHINGTON - U.S. President Barack Obama, under pressure from Republicans and the public to bring down gasoline prices, announced new measures on Saturday to expand domestic oil production in Alaska and the Gulf of Mexico.
President Barack Obama was photographed May 28 getting a close look at a tar ball that had washed onto the beach at Port Fourchon. Today, the president announced new measures to expand drilling in the Gulf of Mexico and off the Alaskan coast. (David Grunfeld, The Times-Picayune ) High fuel prices have dented Obama's ratings in opinion polls and threaten to dampen the economic recovery that is critical to his re-election in 2012.
The president, a Democrat, has pushed for reducing U.S. oil consumption and expanding renewable energy sources while also focusing on domestic oil and gas production -- an area Republicans want to expand dramatically.
In his weekly radio and Internet address, the president met some of those Republican demands, outlining ways to boost domestic drilling and better coordinate the process of issuing permits in Alaska.
"I am directing the Department of Interior to conduct annual lease sales in Alaska's National Petroleum Reserve, while respecting sensitive areas, and to speed up the evaluation of oil and gas resources in the mid and south Atlantic," Obama said in the address.
Government lease sales give energy companies the opportunity to rent offshore or onshore federal tracts, which can be drilled for oil or natural gas. Companies with the highest bids generally lease the tracts for 10 years.
Alaska's National Petroleum Reserve is a 23 million-acre area originally set aside in 1923 as a fuel source for the U.S. military. It is located in the northwest corner of Alaska near the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR), which the Bush administration tried to open for exploration against objections from environmental groups.
Energy companies have long dreamed of tapping oil reserves beneath that site, a home to herds of migrating animals.
A senior Obama administration official said the White House remained firmly opposed to drilling in that arctic refuge.
Alaska's NPR is a different story, however. Rising crude prices have boosted the amount of oil that can be recovered economically from that area, even though it holds less oil than previously thought, the government said last week.
EXTENDING DRILLING LEASES, STREAMLINING PERMITS
The White House is increasingly concerned about the effects of rising oil prices on U.S. consumers and on Obama's political prospects. While acknowledging the importance of domestic drilling, it has repeatedly said domestic production is not a panacea to solve the country's energy woes.
Taking new measures to boost drilling addresses criticism from some lawmakers in both parties, who put pressure on the administration to make it easier for energy exploration to continue in the Gulf of Mexico after the BP (BP.L: Quote) oil spill.
The administration banned new exploration on offshore leased tracts for about six months after the spill.
The president said the Interior Department would extend the life of the affected leases to make up for the lost time companies had to explore for oil and give them more time to meet safety requirements. That was one of the requirements of Republican-backed legislation approved this week in the House of Representatives to boost offshore drilling.
The legislation would also require the government to hold certain lease sales in the Gulf, which administration officials said the department would do by mid-2012.
"We plan to lease new areas in the Gulf of Mexico as well, and work to create new incentives for industry to develop their unused leases both on and offshore," Obama said.
Obama also promised to create a new inter-agency group to streamline the permitting process for Alaska drilling.
That drew praise from one Republican aide: "The single greatest obstacle to domestic production in the U.S. these days is permitting," he said.
That plan comes as Royal Dutch Shell (RDSa.L: Quote) relaunches its long-delayed push to drill off the coast of Alaska.
Over the past two weeks, the oil giant has submitted plans to the Interior Department to drill up to 10 wells in the Beaufort and Chukchi Seas in 2012 and 2013. [ID:nN1297919]
Opposition from environmental groups and other regulatory hurdles have scuttled Shell's Arctic drilling plans thus far, but the company said it has received more positive signals from government this time around.
(Editing by Todd Eastham)
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

32 Comments so far
Show AllIf you recall, just prior to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, Obama announced his energy plan that included more drilling, "clean" coal, and more nuclear plants. Obama is an agent of the energy industry. He can't cave in to an industry that he has faithfully served since he took office.
OilyBomber's Salazar went to DC District Court to overturn the ban on drilling in Mississippi Canyon block 252, even mentioned Deepwater Horizon in his brief, so Deepwater Horizon and others could drill.
Without OilyBomber there would have been No Deepwater Horizon drilling at all.
OilyBomber signed the first USA import license for the Framken Fuel Tar Sands Oil.
OilyBomber has done nothing to stop aquifer destroying Fracking.
But please vote for him (snark).
Until Obama re-regulates Wall Street and stops them from driving commodity prices up, irrespective of supply and demand, it won't matter what his relationship with the oil industry is.
Ayuh.
When, precisely, did "following orders" come to be redefined as "caving"?
"Caving" implies having taken a stand. Obama is extraordinary in his ability to stand for nothing.. And I thought Bush was vacuous. :(.
We brought the whales to the edge of extinction with our lust for their oil. We now bring the entire organic structure of the planet to the edge. Many would argue, we have already fallen off the edge. Some, the heavier ones, will splash when they hit bottom.
We will not "bring the entire organic structure of the earth" down.
We will probably make the planet toxic to humans and most species, but the earth doesn't give a fuck about us.
Her rules are simple: Survive.
We won't.
She will.
And she'll evolve something better next time.
You may be correct, Puffin; on the other hand, organic life had a beginning, and will likely have an end. For most of earth's history it was a lifeless rock circling the sun.
The greater part of earths future will be much the same. Enjoy, and give thanks.
Many planetary ecologists along with astrophysicists believe that the most clement time for life on earth has passes and as the sun heats up, the earth will become to hot for eukaryotic life (all multicellular life) in another 600 to 700 million years, while prokariotic life (bacteria) may hang on for another billion years, after that, the oceans will boil away and the earth will come to resemble Venus, then just a hot airless rock. It will then stay in this state for another 3 billion years until the sun engulfs it as it enters its red giant phase. This means that over its 10 billion year life, the earth will have been a habitat for complex live only about 10% of that time.
Do I still have to floss?
Fuel prices are coming down now because people quit driving.
Supply and Demand
If we were to reduce demand by including alternative sources, THAT would also reduce fuel prices.
Here's something for Colbert to do with all that money, bid on the leases, pay for them, then sit on them.
It's been abundantly noted in the corporate media that drilling for oil in Amerika will do little or nothing to reduce the cost of gasoline at the pump. It will only enrich members of the ruling elite who give large campaign bribes to lying politicians like Barry, while it speeds the destruction of the planet.
These sons of bitches, who would have us think that they give two shits about anybody but the ruling elite, make me retch!
So right.
Besides, Obama is the King of Cover Ups.
Even if there was an oil gusher in Alaska, Obama and the MSM will ignore it unless they're forced to respond. With any luck we'll never find out about it.
Just like BP and Tepco, covering up environmental crimes is paramount for Obama.
He doesn't give a damn about human health risks, either. He coordinates a cover up with them and leaves taxpayers to fend for themselves.
Corporations have carte blanche to do whatever they want to the nation and every living thing. It's tough shit if you don't like it.
Obama will do whatever he wants to advance himself.
With his refusal to acknowledge that the "energy problem" is much more profound than $4.00 a gallon gas, Obama is perpetuating a criminal fraud on the American people that should qualify him for a cell in some Supermax -- perhaps alongside Bernie Madoff.
Indeed, the last time a president spoke honestly to the American people about oil was Jimmy Carter in his infamous 1979 "malaise speech." Ridiculed by Republicans, Carter soon came to symbolize all that was wrong with the “doom and gloom” Democrats, and the following year, when Ronald Reagan won with his fantasy of “Morning in America,” our politicians took it to heart: ever since, an unspoken rule prohibits either party from speaking to the electorate about anything resembling reality where oil is involved.
What had Carter said? First, he naively hinted that the moral foundations of the nation’s economic and political system might be problematic, telling Americans that “too many of us now tend to worship self-indulgence and consumption.”
Worse yet, Carter singled out the nation’s addiction to living beyond its means—in particular, our dependence on imported oil, which grew rapidly after 1970, when U.S. production peaked and began to decline. Carter called on Americans to confront their profligate energy use with the “moral equivalent of war,” saying, “We simply must balance our demand for energy with our rapidly shrinking resources.”
He followed through with proposals for massive, government-supported programs of conservation and alternative energy development, promising to cut “our dependence on foreign oil by one-half by the end of the next decade”—that is, by the end of the 1980s. Lowering consumption, he said, was a matter of patriotism:
“And I’m asking you for your good and your Nation’s security to take no unnecessary trips, to use carpools or public transportation whenever you can, to park your car one extra day per week, to obey the speed limit [then 55 mph nationally], and to set your thermostats to save fuel. Every act of energy conservation like this is more than just common sense—I tell you it is an act of patriotism.”
The hyena-howls of derision were immediate. Why, just imagine linking morality and patriotism to conserving energy! How dare he preach thrift and responsibility to Americans!!! What if people stopped shopping? In brief, Carter’s proposals posed too much of a threat to corporate profits.
When Ronald Reagan took office, he quickly abandoned all such “gloom and doom” notions for a program of massively increasing oil consumption: phasing out conservation programs, alternative energy development, public transportation subsidies, etc. It was Reagan’s role, in short, to rehabilitate gluttony and self-indulgence, epitomized by the rise of the yuppies and ever larger SUVs.
In the short run, this was made possible by the large, new discoveries in the North Sea, Alaska, and Gulf of Mexico; but as these oil fields also began to run dry, it would require the efforts of a globe-straddling imperial military.
The Great Fraud—launched by Reagan and shored up by every administration since—is that not only can this imperial gluttony continue indefinitely, expanding every year, but that there will be no price to pay, no awkward consequences or painful blowback. Washington policymakers have known since the Carter years that the planet’s legacy of petroleum is running down, but have done everything in their power to conceal this from the public -- only increasing the likelihood that the petroleum age will end with a social breakdown like nothing humanity has ever seen...
Carter was the last POTUS to have any shred of honesty in his body.
A big part of Carter's "alternative energy development" was for government loan, price, and purchase guarantees for synfuels development from coal, oil shale, and tar sands. It is a dirty technology now, and it was a dirty technology then. Carter had a lot of positives, but that part of his energy policy wasn't one of them. Quite the contrary.
As a speaker said at a hearing on oil shale last month, are we really at such an impasse for energy in this country that we have to heat rock in order to get it?
He caves again to the cretins instead of educating the public as to the futility of domestic drilling as a factor in the price of oil.
Damn.
This is related to the real reason Democrats had to lose the majority. They can't appear to be in the pockets of growth oriented corporations and against We the People so they pretend to be "caving" under pressure from the big, bad Repubs. If they were still in the majority, this would be next to impossible.
Dems don't want the majority, it makes them look bad, which in turn could destroy the duopoly, a big scam.
The 3rd paragraph is BS.
Continuing the Corruption of the Consummate Consumption Confidence.
If nothing else, Obama is smart enough to have learned from history. The last president who called for alternative solutions (alternative energy, lowering the thermostat, wearing sweaters, driving slower) while oil prices were high was handed the pink slip by the voters.
We want what we want and we want it now.
"And so it goes." K Vonnegut
Just another classic moment of o 'jacking off the mule' to ostensibly show he is living the desire of the people when in reality he knows he won't get anything for his fawning placations.
AND: ""High fuel prices have dented Obama's ratings in opinion polls and threaten to dampen the economic recovery that is critical to his re-election in 2012.""
***************
This is just how the oil companies want us to think, that if we let them drill willy nilly then that will keep the oil/gas prices down. Another piece of false economics. The cycle(s) have been set where once every few years the oil companies will, on a whim, jack the prices up to a point of 'diminishing returns' where by the economy starts to crash and 'viola' all of sudden prices come down, only not near as fast as they went up.
"Obama caves in..."
Now that's a surprise...
"Caves in" gives Obama too much credit.
He's right up there with Exxon Mobile and BP in terms of what he cares about--Power. Money. Himself.
PRS problem, reaction, solution.
Problem: we are experiencing extortion at the gas pumps
Reaction: we scream for a solution to our agony
Solution: they quickly forget the Gulf mess or any future concerns for the area, AND they get to "drill baby, drill" in Alaska.
All the while justifying it will take light years to bring down the price.
The caption of photo used in this piece should read, "President Obama kneels to pick up a dime while he steps on a dollar."
So, President Zero wants to reduce US oil consumption huh! Well Barky, the best way to do that is to bring all of our kids home from Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan and Yemen. No more A-10, F-15, F-16 and F-18 sorties in skys thousands of miles from home. Bring home all of the Apache and Super Cobra helicopters. Bring home all of the Abram M1A1 tanks and all of the Strkyer and Bradley fighting vehicles. No more B-1, B-2 or B-52 sorties half way around the world to bomb a people who have been living in the stone age even further back into history. Take the whips and chains and joy sticks out of the hands of the CIA flunkies and put them back to work on their orginal mission as invisioned by Harry Truman, to collect actionable intelligence that the President can depend on to formulate US foreign policy. That and fire half of the Generals, so that the US Air Force can retire all of it's old T-39 Saberliners! That is just for starters, I'm sure alot of people here could give even more great ideas for reducing US oil consumption!
All of which indicates that Obama does not care about reducing oil consumption. He only wants to LOOK LIKE he is doing something about gas prices so he can get reelected.
McClatchy Newspapers has another take on gas prices: they'd be 40% lower if not for Wall Street speculators. That's $2.40/gallon instead of $4.00/gallon!
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2011/05/14-1
Of course, Obama is owned by Wall Street so a financial speculation tax won't happen.
Besides lowering gas prices, "a financial transactions tax (a very small levy on financial short-term transactions) would curb excessive speculation by big banks, but with minimal impact on long-term investors. It also would raise an estimated $100 billion a year..." (in deficit-reducing tax revenue).
http://www.citizen.org/pressroom/pressroomredirect.cfm?ID=3111
Even after the BP blowout in the Gulf of Mexico Obama would rather rape the environment than curb the excesses of his super-rich patrons on Wall Street.
This article is nonsense. "The president, a Democrat, has pushed for reducing U.S. oil consumption and expanding renewable energy sources ..." Give us some examples.
Oil and gasoline prices will go up. Period. No matter what anyone--or any president--were to do. No matter what the speculators do, or can't do.
We're living in the post-peak era. That means prices go up. Period.
Prepare the way for a good life after cheap oil.
Do so now -- for oil will never be cheap again.
Meanwhile, oppose drilling in all sensitive areas. (Mars is less sensitive.)
Don't be stupid.
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2011/05/14-1