EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Lethal Injection Treads Murky Ethical Waters
ATLANTA, Georgia - The death penalty is in limbo in several states since the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency confiscated several states' supplies of sodium thiopental (ST), a key drug used in lethal injections, and as the supply of the drug to the U.S. grows even tighter.
The death penalty is in limbo in several states since the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency confiscated several states' supplies of sodium thiopental (ST), a key drug used in lethal injections, and as the supply of the drug to the U.S. grows even tighter. (AFP/Paul Buck) First, the DEA confiscated Georgia's supply of ST on Mar. 15 after questions surfaced about the origin of the drugs. Then, on Apr. 1, Kentucky and Tennessee voluntarily gave up their supplies to the agency.
Georgia had purchased its supply of ST from a pharmaceutical company operating out of the back of a driving school in London.
Meanwhile, the supply of ST has gotten even tighter in the U.S. On Apr. 7, the Indian company Kayem announced it would no longer supply ST to states that practice the death penalty.
"In view of the sensitivity involved with sale of our Thiopental Sodium to various Jails/Prisons in USA and as alleged to be used for the purpose of Lethal Injection, we voluntary declare that we as Indian Pharma Dealer who cherish the Ethos of Hinduism (A believer even in non-livings as the creation of God) refrain ourselves in selling this drug where the purpose is purely for Lethal Injection and its misuse," Kayem said in a statement.
On Apr. 14, Britain said it would block exports to the U.S. of three lethal injection drugs, including ST, and urged the European Union to do the same. Britain had previously blocked exports of ST to the U.S. for use in lethal injections in November 2010.
Hospira Inc., the only U.S. manufacturer of ST, announced it would no longer make the drug at its new plant in Italy. Hospira had intended to begin producing out of its plant in Italy. However, the death penalty is unconstitutional in Italy and the government had insisted the company take responsibility for the end use of its product.
Now, some states are switching to a new lethal injection drug, pentobarbital (PB), which is also used in medical treatments as well as animal euthanasia.
Last week, Georgia - which had its supply of ST confiscated - said it is considering use of PB and that state officials have traveled to Ohio and Oklahoma to learn about their recent experiences using the drug.
The state of Oklahoma already began using PB as part of a three drug combination in December 2010. In March, Ohio executed a man, Johnnie Baston, a convicted murderer, with PB. Ohio officials said it worked just as well as ST.
On Mar. 16, Texas decided to start using PB.
Pentobarbital is made by Lundbeck, a Danish company, which does not condone the drug's use by U.S. states in carrying out the death penalty. However, Lundbeck has not gone as far as some other companies and is continuing to sell the drug to distributors.
"I don't really know who the distributors are," said Laura Moye, death penalty abolition campaign director for Amnesty International USA. "Lundbeck has made it clear they don't want it sold for these purposes. I don't know how many times it changes hands until gets to the Department of Corrections. They essentially lose control of what happens to the drug."
"It presents a very difficult ethical dilemma. They're ultimately buying these drugs from a manufacturer who's very clear [that] the purpose of the drug is to heal people, not kill people," she said. "It just kind of underscores how ethically complicated it can be to carry out executions."
"The availability of these drugs in the U.S. has become so limited, and the European countries said they don't want these drugs used for executions. States have to figure out how to get these lethal injection drugs," Moye added.
"It's not clear what's going on in these states. Are they getting it from other states that had a pre-existing supply, or from other sources?"
An Apr. 13 article by the New York Times reviewed depositions in various lawsuits brought by death row inmates, revealing that states conspired to avoid inspections of shipments containing the drugs.
In one case, Wendy Kelley, an Arkansas Department of Corrections official, actually got in her car and drove to other states such as Tennessee and Texas to traffic the drug back to Arkansas to be used to execute a man.
"We would have hoped that Georgia would have had the foresight and decency to halt executions in light of the national and international concerns about the source and viability of lethal injection. Instead, the Georgia Department of Corrections went around the law to buy questionable drugs and then used them to extinguish two men," said Kathryn Hamoudah, chairperson of Georgians for Alternatives to the Death Penalty.
"Now, federal intervention has forced Georgia to give up its black market drugs," she said.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

19 Comments so far
Show AllInteresting dilemma. One of the few remaining civilized western countries who practices capital punishment no longer manufactures the means of that punishment and the rest of the world is no longer willing to enable what they see as an abhorrent practice.
Would appear to be an opportunity for the US capital markets to fill a demonstrably unique national need in a wide open market. Will be fun to see which business interests will step up to the plate. Think of the domestic jobs that could be created.
"One of the few remaining civilized western countries who practices capital punishment ..."
It's an open question whether a country that practices capital punishment can count as "civilized".
Also, America is not a Western country. I know this is a radical statement—so radical that I know of only one other person who says it, and that only privately—but I believe it and I invite you to consider it. As you consider the historical stages of the development of Western civilization—Greek philosophy, Roman social organization, Christian universalism and truth-seeking, the feudal social contract, the Reformation and the Enlightenment—you will see that each is present only very weakly, if at all, in the US. You will find that this insight explains a great deal about America that is obscured by the mental habit of including it in the West.
I'd have to agree with you, but it's the way we've always been depicted. (western, civilized)
Angry Kraut said, "It's an open question whether a country that practices capital punishment can count as "civilized".
Sounds reasonable but then you say "...Western civilization—Greek philosophy, Roman social organization..." These are places where capital punishment was practiced. Socrates comes to mind for Greece and I seem to recall there was a fairly famous victim of Roman capital punishment, the anniversary of his crucifixion was just over a week ago. Is this not a contradiction in your position?
I happen to agree with your first assertion. Perhaps you meant 'that practices capital punishment now' in your first assertion?
I couldn't be more opposed to barbaric capital punishment, but I'm puzzled by all of the heinous hijinks surrounding lethal injection.
Last year, I was truly surprised-- pleasantly, under the circumstances-- when I received anasthesia for the first time in my life for a long-delayed colonoscopy screening. I thought it might be similar to getting injections of novocaine at the dentist's office-- where the pain is blocked but there's still a disagreeable awareness that your body is being physically traumatically invaded.
Instead, I went out like the proverbial light, and as abruptly woke up clear-headed in the post-procedure area. It's hard to believe that a combination of normal anasthesia and use of one of the super-toxic natural or manmade poisons supposedly available to military chemical weapons divisions or espionage agencies wouldn't be authorized for executions.
Again, I regard the whole idea as reprehensible, evil, and utterly wrong. But given the fact that capital punishment remains legal, and is generally enthusiastically supported by our scurrilous Elected Misrepresenatives and the law enforcement community, it's hard to fathom it turning into this gruesome Keystone Kops routine.
I found Alinsky's account of his time as a prison sociologist extremely important and saddening, and germane to organising too.
He reported that the death penalty is popular only with those who aren't really involved, like politicians. Those who have to carry it out hate it, because it's never carried out immediately, so everyone gets to know the future victim.
So when the time comes, they're usually not executing some avatar of depravity, but a human being, someone they know, someone who has a family, friends, many good qualities, and often true repentance of his crime.
So typically, on the day of the execution, everyone in the prison administration from the warden down would have to start drinking in the morning and not stop til it was over. They just couldn't bear to go through with the execution without being numbed nearly to unconsciousness.
It's hard to imagine a more powerful indictment.
Mairead, your comment reminds me of something I haven't thought about for a long while.
I never saw the film "Dead Man Walking", but many years ago a co-worker and friend came upon me in a break room, reading the book by Sister Helen Prejean upon which the movie is based. My friend is a good-hearted and generally pleasant person, but she mentioned with some irritation that she didn't like the movie at all.
"They kept tryin' to make you feel sorry for the Sean Penn [condemned prisoner] character, and I didn't feel sorry for him at all-- and didn't WANT to!"
I didn't argue about it; that is, after all, what considering the story is ABOUT. And mainstream Hollywood movies almost invariably resort to blatant emotional manipulation, so her determination to remain hard-hearted might've been an appropriate reaction to a manipulative screenplay as much as the reality it purported to depict.
I did tell her that in the book, hard feelings, sorrow, and victimhood were not one-sided, or either-or, zero-sum qualities. There's plenty to go around. We left it at that-- this nice woman and mother, with a penchant for bringing home the gnarliest dog at the SPCA, convinced that Death Row convicts have it coming, such that mercy and compassion are a misplaced and a weakness.
As your observations reminded me, and you may know, Sister Prejean's compelling account details the ways in which the state "copes" with its legalized homicide by reducing and effectively trivializing the process down to an elaborate sequence, or ritual, of discrete impersonal procedures and "technical" problems to be solved.
This approach is taken, in part, to habituate and anesthetize the cast and crew of this state-sponsored Passion Play from the horror and loathing inherent in carrying out cold-blooded homicide, even the ostensibly righteous kind.
It's obvious to the discerning eye that meticulous considerations such as swabbing the pre-corpse's arm with alcohol before a lethal injection is really for the benefit of the killers and their duly authorized enablers-- to numb the last stirrings of deep, pre-rational conscience, and sterilize the unseemly and unsavory traces of Sin that cling to the business.
If you're going to use capital punishment why not make the deaths a punishment? Bring back the Roman cross to deal with those who'd dare defy the new Empire. Why be so goddamn squeamish about it, eh? Instead of killing them in an expensive manner, you could drag the condemned from the courthouse (or the police station if you really want to save time) to the nearest light-pole, nail his hands to a crossbeam and haul the bugger up to scream in agony for the next week or so. Don't forget to break the legs either. Total cost would be about twenty bucks for the materials, the major expense would be the need to have a guard to make sure that no one cut them down. (I suppose some of those guards would need therapy as the method of death is rather cruel)
What? Too brutal?
If you really want to punish someone for murdering another person, lock them in a cage and let them die of old age. The nice thing about that system is that you can rectify a mistake in convicting the wrong man. The only downside is that it's not a public spectacle like lethal injection is, or crucifixion would be (again)
they always get some prick to do the killing...
p.s.
re:"The death penalty is in limbo"
"how low can you go?"
however - the pope has declared limbo nonexistent.
"the pope has declared limbo nonexistent."
I have been wondering ever since the pope did that - what exactly does it mean to declare an imaginary place non-existent?
p.p.s.
"It just kind of underscores how ethically complicated it can be to carry out executions."
the ethics of murder?
surreal.
"Lethal Injection Treads Murky Ethical Waters"
Capital punishment is unethical, no matter how it's done.
There *is* a humane method of execution. It is also much cheaper than lethal injection. Why won't states use it?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQPA5Rniodk
Another drive by comment,eh dave_m? First, a capitol is a city like Washington DC, or London UK, or Paris France. The word you're looking for is 'capital'. Secondly you might notice that none of us want to give the 'evil' the easy way out of a bullet to the back of the head. But thanks for trying again.
Didn't you like my suggestion that we bring back crucifixion for the condemned?
LNFTT
oh this one never responds. Hence my point about him being a 'drive-by poster' grin.