Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
- This Is What Happens When You Rip a Hole in the Safety Net
- So Your Groundwater's Poison and Your Tap Water's On Fire. Not to Worry: Fracking Chemicals Are Trade Secrets You Don't Need To Know About
- Exxon Tar Sands Spill Continues to Devastate Arkansas Community
- An Outpouring of Love and Support for Bradley Manning to Receive the Nobel Peace Prize
- More 'Corporate Welfare': Obama Signs 'Monsanto Protection Act' Into Law
Popular content
Today's Top News
Rights Groups Deplore Order to Try 9/11 Suspects at Guantanamo
WASHINGTON - U.S. human rights groups reacted angrily to the Justice Department's announcement Monday that the self-acclaimed mastermind of the 9/11 attacks on Lower Manhattan and the Pentagon will be tried before a military commission at the Guantanamo detention facility in Cuba.
Obama U-turn: US to try 9/11 accused at Guantanamo The groups, which described the move as the latest in a series of reversals by the administration of President Barack Obama on the fate of Guantanamo detainees, charged that the decision was politically motivated and warned that it will prove counter-productive.
"The decision is clearly driven not by the nature of the alleged offence, or where and when it was committed," said a statement by the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR), which has represented many of the detainees held at Guantanamo since the first terrorist suspects were brought there from Afghanistan and Pakistan in early 2002.
"[T]his flip flop on the part of the Obama administration is devastating for the rule of law and greatly undermines America's standing abroad," said Anthony Romero, the executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU).
"Cases prosecuted by the Obama administration in the commissions now are sure to be subject to continuous legal challenges and delays, and their outcomes will not be seen as legitimate," he noted. "That is not justice. Americans deserve better."
In making the announcement that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four of his alleged co-conspirators will face trial by a military commission, Attorney-General Eric Holder expressed his own disapproval, blaming Congress for the decision which he said was made necessary due to legislation approved late last year that made it impossible for the defendants to be tried in a New York federal court as the administration had originally planned.
Led by Republicans and some New York Democrats, Congress passed a law banning the use of any appropriated funds to transport detainees held at Guantanamo to the United States or its territories.
Holder called Congress's action "unwise and unwarranted" but said the decision was made necessary because it was unlikely that the law could be amended or overturned "in the near future". He also reiterated the administration's determination to close Guantanamo which, in his inaugural speech in January 2009, Obama promised to achieve by the end of his first year in office.
"Members of Congress …have taken one of the nation's most tested counter-terrorism tools off the table and tied our hands in a way that could have serious ramifications," Holder said. "In reality, I know this case in a way that members of Congress do not."
He said the case against Mohammed was "one of the most well- researched and documented cases I have ever seen in my decades of experience as a prosecutor."
Like the human rights groups, he also pointed out that federal courts have successfully prosecuted hundreds of accused terrorists since the 9/11 attacks, the most recent in January, when a federal judge sentenced Ahmed Khalfan Gailani to life in prison without parole for his role in the 1998 bombings of the U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania that killed some 224 people.
At the same time, military commissions, whose operations were suspended by Obama after taking office, have obtained only six convictions - four by plea bargain - that actually resulted in much lighter sentences due to doubts about whether the commissions' procedures could withstand scrutiny once they were appealed to federal courts.
While Holder expressed confidence in the ability of the commissions to provide a fair trial – their procedures and some protections for the defendants have been strengthened by Congressionally-enacted amendments to the Military Commissions Act in 2009 and by an executive order issued by Obama last month – the rights groups disagreed.
"Any trial in the military commission system will carry the stigma of Guantanamo, be subject to challenge and delay, and keep the world focused on how the defendants were treated rather than on the crimes they are accused of committing," said Andrea Prasow, senior counter-terrorism counsel at Human Rights Watch. "A verdict in the federal court system, in contrast, would be recognised throughout the world as legitimate."
Moreover, she said, "trying the 9/11 case in New York made sense because it is where the crime happened and where most of the family members of the victims live. Now, with the trial taking place on a military base, far away, many of those affected will be shut out of the process."
The groups also described Holder's own reaction as somewhat disingenuous.
"This administration had two years to bring [Mohammed] and his co-defendants to federal courts for trial, and failed to exercise its authority to do so," said Daphne Eviatar of Human Rights First. "It can still prepare to do so now and begin those trials as soon as the temporary ban Congress has imposed is lifted." The current legislation will expire at the end of September.
"This purely political decision risks making a second-class justice system a permanent feature of U.S. national security policy – a mistake that flies in the face of core American values and will undermine U.S. standing in the world," she said.
Republicans and other lawmakers who opposed a New York trial, on the other hand, praised the announcement. New York Senator Charles Schumer said Obama's original plan was "wrong-headed" and that a military trial would make it possible for Mohammed and his co-defendants to get the "ultimate penalty", an apparent reference to execution.
Some New York politicians had warned that the security- related costs of holding the trial in the city would run in the hundreds of millions of dollars.
In a joint statement, Republican Senator John McCain and Independent Democrat Joe Lieberman said it was "well past time to end debate over where the 9/11 conspirators should be tried and move forward with military commissions at Guantanamo."
But others said trying Mohammed in a military commission would give him a stature that he did not deserve. "Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is no warrior. He is a criminal and should not be treated otherwise through commissions," said ret. Gen. Joseph Hoar, a former chief of U.S. Central Command.
In addition to failing to close to Guantanamo and reactivating military commissions, Obama has disappointed rights activists by issuing orders that could justify indefinite detention of terrorist suspects subject to periodic administrative reviews.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

26 Comments so far
Show Allhe escalated the Afghan war.
"Patsies", not "Plotters"
Amazing.
The Republicans marched in lockstep on behalf of George W's global war on terror legacy, while Lieberman and assorted blue dog Dems told Pelosi and Reid to take a hike. Now Eric Holder and the Obama White House have folded, blaming Congress collectively for this dismal end result. It's not clear what the reference in this article to the Supreme Court's most recent nonaction is all about, but what is clear is that Bush's military commission substitute for enforcing the federal Criminal Code against those accused in the official narrative of causing 9/11 has prevailed.
So much for campaign promises about restoring respect for the rule of law. Little George, Cheney and Rove can keep right on laughing all the way to the bank.
Bill from Saginaw
Well hang me upside-down and paint me blue!
Look for show trials a la Stalinist USSR. The AmeriKKKan government is a totalitarian police-state owned and operated by the Corporate States of AmeriKKKa.
The country is lost and it is time to We the People to abolish the failed state and begin anew.
Absolutely agree. If the US is not, as you say, a totalitarian police state, it is -- at best -- a dysfunctional failed democracy. To play devil's advocate and give BHO the benefit of the doubt, the best that can be said about this government is that even when the chief executive (the "most powerful man in the world") sets out on a policy, he is unable to achieve it due to authoritarian obstructionists in the legislature.
This government is so far out of step with what was intended by the founders, it makes one's head spin. There is nothing left even resembling a democracy, and Americans are well within their rights to rise up to overthrow this tyrannical, corrupt, fascist failed state.
How could the perpetrators of 9/11 allow the trial in their own crime scene? Giuliani had to have been deeply involved to not have been near his office in building #7, and he seems to have had prior knowledge of the collapse of the WTC in general. He also was involved in the planning for the "simulated" attack drill and the new facilities down on the waterfront.
So, it would be too risky for these probable killers, Giuliani, Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Rove, and all the others. It would be nice to have a real trial and find out how dirty these guys are. But this decision is consistent with their guilt.
Indeed. Much safer for the actual perpetrators to use farcical show trials in which "confessions" obtained through torture pass as evidence.
Obama Stays the Course: No Trials, Civilian or Otherwise, for the Real 9-11 Plotters
What this really says is that there is no case to prove that the people they are holding at Guantanamo committed the crimes. The U.S. Constitution says that a speedy trial is to be guaranteed, and of course evidence gained by Chinese Water Torture or any other such coersive methods is not admissible in U.S. Courts.
So who actually did it if it can't be proven the the "likely suspects" did it?
The left has the President it deserves due to it's blind love affair for an unqualified unknown entity it refused to properly screen.
Both the public generally, and the victims of the terrorism attacks of Sept. 11, 2011, and their families specifically, have a strong interest in seeing the defendants prosecuted in some forum," the document states. "Because a timely prosecution in federal court does not appear feasible, the Attorney General intends to refer this matter to the Department of Defense to proceed in military commissions.
WHAT A LOAD OF SH!T what about the families that DO NOT buy the "official" story?? When will that majority get air time on teevee ?? BTW where in thee blue fvk is OBL... the other purported mastermind?The military commissions should be held for the last 3 adminstrations.....
"Obama Reverses Course: No Civilian Trials for 9/11 Plotters"
You mean "ACCUSED 9/11 Plotters."
INNOCENT until proven guilty.
At least, that's what we believe in the mythical land I come from: The United States of America.
Ever heard of it?
Liberty & Justice,
sj
Now, THAT'S a good point.
sj
don't try this at home.
Article's picture:
How is this not "cruel and unusual punishment inflicted"?
Look and think!
Answer: We've been slooowly accustomed to it, so it doesn't seem "unusual" any more. The "cruel" remains. But amendment VIII says "and" unusual. So it doesn't count, then. Right?
Worth a read as a tangential piece of Guantanamo expediency:
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/MD05Df03.html
"the self-acclaimed mastermind of the 9/11 attacks"
Uh-huh.
After HOW many bouts of water-boarding?
After just one, most folks would happily self-acclaim to be that shooter on the grassy knoll.
You call that EVIDENCE?
sj
And that is precisely WHY the trial HAS to be in a military court. The fact that any such admission was made through torture would be a problem in any civil court.
There's an old saying that "Military justice is to justice as military music is to music."
One other thing:
"orders that could justify indefinite detention of terrorist suspects"
There IS nothing that could justify the "indefinite detention" -- that's imprisonment without due process -- of ANYone.
If you know enough to know they're so "dangerous" you should know enough to get a conviction in a criminal trial.
So charge them or cut them lose.
Period.
Liberty & Justice,
sj
"indefinite detention"
sounds like a bad semester in high school.
"illegal imprisonment" is the accurate description.
The education of Obama continues.
General Hoar is correct that these men are criminal. However, most of the world's criminals are not American citizens. An American military commission is much better than they deserve. Club Gitmo is much better than what they gave the innocent victims of their jihad.
Now, they will not have access to the US media to continue their diatribe against the great satan. That is the real victory for western civilization and those who love liberty.
The war on terror was political theater to cover the robbery of our treasury. The majority in Guantánamo are unfortunate pawns. We all know where junior was on 9/11 but do you know where daddy Bush was having lunch and who with? Do you know what war games Cheney was playing? If public trials were held, embarrassing questions would be asked. That is not going to happen. Move along, nothing to see here. Having eyes they did not see, having ears they did not hear.
(Do you know where daddy Bush was on Sept 11, 1990 - http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/war/bushsr.htm)
(Want some fun: Google Sept 11, 1973 - that was Kissinger's brainchild and they are using it on US now! )