Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Spy Bloggers Not ‘Friending’ U.S. Targets, Centcom Says
The U.S. Central Command says its new “Persona” social media "infiltration" software is designed to cozy up to extremist bloggers overseas, not law-abiding Americans chatting on Facebook or similar sites.
Earlier this month, the Web buzzed with a report that the software was designed to “manage ‘fake people’ on social media sites and create the illusion of consensus on controversial issues,” implying that the Defense Department was targeting critics of the war in Afghanistan and other conflicts.
Further compounding a sinister view of the software was the discovery of e-mails from the head of a company implicated in “dirty tricks” against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and a pro-labor organization, which discussed how such technology could be used.
"There are a variety of social media tricks we can use to add a level of realness to all fictitious personas...” wrote Aaron Barr, the chief executive officer of HBGary Federal, a Colorado Springs company whose hacked e-mails revealed plans to attack critics of Bank of America and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
Barr resigned Feb. 28 “to allow the company to move on after an embarrassing data breach,” according to the technology Web site ThreatPost.
Centom's June 22, 2010, contract, offered through the U.S. Air Force’s Air Mobility Command, specified that “Individual applications will enable an operator to exercise a number of different online persons from the same workstation and without fear of being discovered by sophisticated adversaries…while hiding the existence of the operation…and provid(ing) excellent cover and powerful deniability.”
“Individuals can perform static impersonations, which allow them to look like the same person over time,” the contract added. It “also allows organizations that frequent same site/service often to easily switch IP addresses to look like ordinary users as opposed to one organization.”
The fake Internet personas, the contract specified, “must be able to appear to originate in nearly any part of the world and can interact through conventional online services and social media platforms.”
Centcom spokesman Cmdr. Bill Speaks acknowledged in an interview last week that the Air Force had a contract for the Persona Management Software, but denied it would be deployed against domestic online protesters.
“The contract, and the Persona management technology itself, supports classified blogging activities on foreign-language Web sites to enable CENTCOM to counter violent extremist and enemy propaganda outside the U.S.,” Speaks told SpyTalk. “The contract would more accurately be described as supporting U.S. Central Command, rather than the Air Force -- the Wing here at MacDill provides contracting support for us -- efforts.”
Speaks said the software would "absolutely" not be used against law-abiding Americans.
Former CIA director and retired Air Force Gen. Michael V. Hayden called the technology cutting-edge but “developmental.”
“Operationally developmental, technologically developmental and legally developmental,” he told Washington Times reporter Shawn Waterman.
But in testimony last June, then-Centcom commander Gen. David Petraeus suggested the use of such technology was well underway.
“Operation Earnest Voice (OEV) is the critical program of record that resources our efforts to synchronize our Information Operations activities, to counter extremist ideology and propaganda, and to ensure that credible voices in the region are heard,” Petraeus told the Senate Armed Services Committee.
“OEV provides Centcom with direct communication capabilities to reach regional audiences through traditional media as well as via Web sites and regional public affairs blogging,” Petraeus said.
The FBI has also used fictitious identities for years to infiltrate jihadist Web sites.
Sometimes touted as "America’s first online operative in the War on Terror," the FBI's Shannen L. Rossmiller, a former Montana municipal judge, is said to have "created 30 fictitious male Islamist undercover identities...for purposes of communicating and tracking the enemy [in] Arabic language Internet forums."
"Since 9/11, Judge Rossmiller has delivered more than 200 cases of actionable intelligence and stings -- including two of the largest convictions in the War on Terror," her Web site claims.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

23 Comments so far
Show AllWhen will these useless tools in our military be forced to get a real job?
National security? How about JOB SECURITY?
Concom
I wonder how many of these spies are commenting here.
America when I was seven momma took me to Communist Cell meetings they sold us garbanzos a handful per ticket a ticket costs a nickel and the speeches were free everybody was angelic and sentimental about the workers it was all so sincere you have no idea what a good thing the party was ... Everybody must have been a spy.
Fr America by A. Ginsberg
i can name more than a few potentially "fictitious" personas bullshitting at CD.
You all are a bunch of pinko pansy, tree hugging, Ronald Reagan hating, eco-terrorist, silly socialist health care crybabies. The FreeMarketron always works, always will. Buy War Bonds.
Signed,
---------> Fakedemocracy (i.e insert Centcom robo blogger name here)
I saw the document that outlined who and how. CentCom is a lying sacka.
I believe the pdf was a file out of Team Themis. I believe Bob Levin wrote about that..
From the article:
"Centcom spokesman Cmdr. Bill Speaks acknowledged in an interview last week that the Air Force had a contract for the Persona Management Software, but denied it would be deployed against domestic online protesters."
"Speaks said the software would "absolutely" not be used against law-abiding Americans."
"Former CIA director and retired Air Force Gen. Michael V. Hayden called the technology cutting-edge but “developmental.”
“Operationally developmental, technologically developmental and legally developmental,” he told Washington Times reporter Shawn Waterman.
"But in testimony last June, then-Centcom commander Gen. David Petraeus suggested the use of such technology was well underway."
And... we are supposed to actually BELIEVE these people?!? Like the Telecom Act to post facto absolve Telecoms of highly Illegal actions that invaded the privacy of millions of Americans. Let alone the Politicians from the President on down who 'authorized' the Illegal behavior.
We should believe the NSA spooks? We should believe the FBI with it's sordid History of officially prohibited but actually ordered by our Politicians spying, infiltration, entrapment, and harassment of American Citizens ! COINTELPRO anybody!
WTF - How can this be interpreted other than yet another revolting development in the long history of surveillance of law-abiding and Constutionally protected speech & assembly by Americans. For crying out loud, these Criminal Lunatics have even harassed Quakers and Nuns!
None of these people - and I use the term loosely - can be trusted NOT to use this computer technology on us - on 'We the People'
Can a virtual spy catch a virtual spy?
This will put reality TV out to pasture.
Perhaps Steven Spielberg can make a movie of it, right after he's finished with his Wikileaks one?
I wonder how long it will be before the SCOTUS decides that these personas are people like Corporations now are, and deserve all the same rights that real people do...
LOL
This is not new. US regime agents have been constantly involved with these type of activities (especially targeting US dissidents) ever since the Internet was created. For example, Wikipedia articles that in any way relate to political/economic matters are full of such "editors", pushing the regime's line.
How naive will we be and for how long? The military-industrial-CIA-congressional complex (configure it however you would like -- it is basically the two-party ruling class political consensus and its military at the service of money and power) intends to crush us. They use a concept of total war which views everything - politics, economics, social media, culture, technology - as a front in what Mumia Abul Jamal called "the war against us all". They will spy, they will use hummingbird drones, they will preemptively arrest, they will win (read "buy") our hearts and minds, they intend to win. Our job is to stop them.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-MpG36nD2@l8&feature=related
Exactly. What will it take to wake this country up? You're link doesn't work BTW.
Facebook links to the CIA and the Pentagon:
"...The second round of funding into Facebook ($12.7 million) came from venture capital firm Accel Partners. Its manager James Breyer was formerly chairman of the National Venture Capital Association, and served on the board with Gilman Louie, CEO of In-Q-Tel, a venture capital firm established by the Central Intelligence Agency in 1999. One of the company's key areas of expertise are in "data mining technologies".
Breyer also served on the board of R&D firm BBN Technologies, which was one of those companies responsible for the rise of the internet.
Dr Anita Jones joined the firm, which included Gilman Louie. She had also served on the In-Q-Tel's board, and had been director of Defence Research and Engineering for the US Department of Defence.
She was also an adviser to the Secretary of Defence and overseeing the Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), which is responsible for high-tech, high-end development."
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/technology/news/article.cfm?c_id=5&objectid=10456534
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KpLNlSKugHw
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In-Q-Tel
Facebook's own Terms of use state: "by posting Member Content to any part of the Web site, you automatically grant, and you represent and warrant that you have the right to grant, to facebook an irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, transferable, fully paid, worldwide license to use, copy, perform, display, reformat, translate, excerpt and distribute such information and content and to prepare derivative works of, or incorpoate into other works, such information and content, and to grant and authorise sublicenses of the foregoing."
And in its equally interesting privacy policy: "Facebook may also collect information about you from other sources, such as newspapers, blogs, instant messaging services, and other users of the Facebook service through the operation of the service (eg. photo tags) in order to provide you with more useful information and a more personalised experience. By using Facebook, you are consenting to have your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States."
I remain apalled and utterly perplexed at how so many activists, even anarchists who should know better, have fallen in such adoration of Facebook.
My brother nearly lost his job (with a nonprofit social services provider) due to ligitimate criticism of nonprofits that wrote on his facebook page. His employer had been spying on him. An this happend in Canada by the way...
"Speaks said the software would "absolutely" not be used against law-abiding Americans."
This seems completely believable to me because of course such US agencies of force have never ever used their power against their own people. As everyone here would know. I'd understand the cynicism if there was precedent for this kind of action.
So if I oppose the war am I a law abiding citizen or an Arab terrorist? Are the people who spread rumours about President Obama law abiding citizens or Arab sympathizers?
ABSOLUTELY FALSE!!! I've already been approached. A blogger began responding to me in Rawstory comments and asked me to clarify something to him/her that I did not want to clarify in rawstory so I emailed him/her and the second that email went out, 4 months of non-stop Rawstory comments by that person stopped - as if they were just there long enough to gain my trust. I'm no fan of conspiracies but kinda weird, huh? It's now been a few weeks and not 1 comment has shown up by that blogger!
"Speaks said the software would "absolutely" not be used against law-abiding Americans."
If anybody in the world, let alone the US, believes that, I've got a truckload of genuine solid gold paving stones to sell them, along with the toll rights to the Brooklyn Bridge.
I don't Facebook by the way, nor do I twitter. I've always considered that an invasion of privacy. Also, have you noticed that when you get a notice from a friend to look at some photos, etc, you click on the site and it is usually Facebook, which requires you to join in order to look at the photos.
A lot of friends have sent me stuff that I'd like to see, but not on Facebook, period.