EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
At CPAC, Conservatives Glorify Attacks on Public-Sector Unions
WASHINGTON, D.C.—Right-wing activists who gathered over the weekend for the annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) cheered a political climate that is increasingly hostile to public-sector unions.
Panelists on a Saturday morning panel called “Bleeding America Dry: The Threat of Public Sector Unions” pointed to Republican victories in state capitals across the country and to Democratic governors in New York and California who have vowed to fight labor. Most dramatically, the Republican governor of Wisconsin, Scott Walker, has called for radically limiting state employees’ collective bargaining rights, and says he is prepared to mobilize the National Guard to deal with disturbances.
“I think it’s okay right now to talk about unions and tell the truth about unions. And I think the public is starting to understand," said Tom McCabe, who led the Building Industry Association of Washington (BIAW) for two decades. The night before, McCabe received CPAC’s Ronald Reagan Award for his activism. "It’s thanks, of course, to the think tanks on this panel...You can say stuff now in Washington, in New Jersey, any liberal state, that you could not say ten years ago.”
Building the conservative revolution, one t-shirt at a time, at the American Conservative Union's Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) February 12, 2011 in Washington, D.C. (Brendan Smialowski/Getty Images) The campaign to shift the public perception of public-sector workers has in many ways been a success. The present moment is a perfect storm for an attack on public-sector unions: a conservative populism that encourages jealousy of unionized workers rather than anger toward business and Wall Street; nationwide shortfalls in pension funds thanks to under-funding during flush times and investment losses; and an economic crisis that has blown a hole through the middle of countless state and municipal budgets.
“You have to understand something,” Steve Malanga of the Manhattan Institute’s City Journal said at CPAC. “If we just stop and cure the pension problem, we have not gone far enough.”
As the situations in Wisconsin and New Jersey demonstrate, the right is moving not only to permanently curtail retirement benefits but to fundamentally curtail the power of unions. “We know who the enemy is,” Malanga said. “What we need in so much of public life is courage. I was very fortunate to work for a guy who personified courage. His name was Ronald Reagan.”
Reagan demonstrated that courage, of course, by firing all of the country’s air traffic controllers in 1981—the mention of which drew wild applause.
CPAC was all about being tough: on workers, on the poor, on the environment, and on crappy little countries that dare to mess with the United States (though the Ron Paul folks would take exception to that last one).
New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, an anti-union stalwart in a “blue” state, is the paragon. Interestingly, Christie was not present at CPAC. I don’t think that is an accident. He excels at appealing to the right-wing base while presenting himself as a pragmatic, commonsense conservative to everyday voters. The fight against unions is part and parcel of a broader conservative assault on the tattered remains of the welfare state. In fact, it’s the linchpin.
'The big government coalition'
“Everyone’s been talking about public-sector unions,” said Vincent Vernuccio, labor policy counsel at Competitive Enterprise Institute, a big-business think tank. “No. These are government sector unions. They are the main force that are fighting for bigger federal, bigger state, bigger local budgets. They are one of the main reasons for the bloated bureaucracy and deficits we’re seeing today. More government equals more workers equals more dues money for them.”
Community activists and advocates for the poor and uninsured are just a Trojan Horse for public-sector unions, inventing social problems out of whole cloth to line the pockets of bureaucrats. Malanga calls it “the big government coalition” of unions and “social service advocacy groups.”
“We happen to have in the White House today a former community activist,” he said, adding:
A former government-funded community activist who was elected with tremendous support from public sector unions. I can guarantee you that no public sector union official in America could be elected president. But a community activist could be.
This is the way this coalition has worked for thirty, forty years. The community activists are the sympathetic part of this coalition. They have commanded the high ground. They produce the studies that say, ‘we have a problem here, we have a problem here in our society and we need to spend more money on it.
There was no discussion of the things that public sector workers do: educating children, picking up our trash, ensuring public safety. It’s the same for everything at CPAC: government programs are the problem. There is no acknowledgement of problems that are caused by anything but government or someone’s personal and moral failings.
Nor do they acknowledge the unique role that municipal unions have had in black economic advancement over the 70 years, providing an economic foothold long denied them in the private sector. With the disappearance of industry, public-sector jobs are some of the only good jobs left for working class people in American cities.
Upside-down conservative martyrdom
Conservatives are particularly thrilled to see Democratic pundits and politicians taking up the fight against labor. There was an entire panel dedicated to the documentary Waiting for Superman, which attacks traditional public schools as an intrinsic failure and touts charter schools as the sole solution. Superman, directed by An Inconvenient Truth director Davis Guggenheim, was panned by many education scholars. But for many conservatives, the film’s success was proof that conservative ideas can win ground on the left, especially when they’re dressed up as a story of poor people of color fighting for justice.
Breaking public-sector unions is a priority for the right as a whole—not only of business, but for conservatives of any stripe who want to defeat progressives at the ballot box or in government.
“I think everyone understands here that unions are the most important power on the other side of the political equation,” said Donald Devine, director of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management under Ronald Reagan. “Remember, Karl Marx said there are only three things necessary to overthrow capitalism: one, is the unions need to organize the masses; two, some of the businessmen...need to sell out...and thirdly intellectuals. And that’s still the three powers that are most important in fighting against the free constitutional society that we are all about.”
The entire conference is infused with an air of conservative martyrdom and belief in a world where the people on top are the ones who are always getting stepped on.
Someone in the audience asked if unions had threatened McCabe with violence. He said no, but that his “wife is good friends with some police officers in the Olympia Police Department. Because the union officials do come by our house frequently.”
A reporter from another news organization told me he thought it was the day’s most caustic panel. He was right—despite the fact that David Horowitz had just finished a speech in which he complimented the McCarthy-era House Un-American Activities Committee.
“I believe you must understand the opposition in order to defeat the opposition,” said McCabe.
It was one point which the country's emboldened conservatives and embattled unionists can agree on.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

13 Comments so far
Show AllYeah, good ole Ron Paul, the doublespeak man.
He gave a speech that said we should all be only taxed a flat 10% and in return not expect or ask the government for anything.
So, why am I paying the government 10%?
and if you knew anything about Ron Paul, he believes government should be limited to Protecting the individuals Rights & Freedoms (unlike what has been happening in this country over the past 3 or so decades, from both Democrats & Republicans, the eroding of our rights & Liberties.) as well as True National Defense (Not the Invading of Nations around the Globe, Preemptive Wars and 700+ Bases all over the World).
This would be why you would be paying the government the flat fee of 10%, just for the basic protection of the people - not for an intrusive & abusive government power.
peace. love. & Ron Paul!
Not defending Ron Paul here, but being somewhat familiar with his rhetoric I assume the 10% is for basic infrastructure and homeland defense???
When he says "not expect... anything" he is referring to what he perceives as special interests, you know like education and health care... I believe he said churches should provide that.
Ron Paul spends 90% of his time talking about the 10% of his platform that has some broad appeal and 10% of the time talking about the 90% of his platform that is just nuts.
the first part of your comment was spot on.
please explain and show some example of your second half - "10% of the time talking about the 90% of his platform that is just nuts."
what are the nutty parts?
Ending the WARS? Closing down the 700+ bases around the world?
Ending American Imperialism?
Restoring the Individual Liberties & Rights to people in this Country?
Ending Unconstitutional policies like the Patriot Act & the Groping by the TSA?
etc etc etc
"CPAC was all about being tough: on workers, on the poor, on the environment, and on crappy little countries that dare to mess with the United States (though the Ron Paul folks would take exception to that last one)."
Ron Paul is probably the only person in politics today who is truly for the people. He is definitely one of the only true Anti-War candidates, unlike the Democratic President Barack H. Obomber.
Ron Paul is all about individual Liberty, not government interference in your life, that means if you are gay and want to get married, government should have no say in the matter, and other example like that of civil liberties.
Ron Paul was against the Corporate Bailouts and the Saving of the Too BIG to Fail government subsidized corporate Conglomerates, like AIG etc, unlike Mr. Wall Street himself, Barack H. Obomber who actually supports corporate Welfare and the Bailing out of Wall St.
And anyone here who questions Ron Paul, then might want to question their own Left wing Heroes like Kucinich, Barney Frank and Bernie Sanders whom are all allies of Many of Ron Paul's policies.
Ron Paul is way more PEACEFUL and liberty oriented than the Corporate Oligarch & War Monger who is currently running this nation, Barack H. Obomber.
Ron Paul 2012!
Odd, are not State and Federal Workers people, dare I say indivduals? are not the poor People?
Are you sure this Ron Paul is much over 6yrs old. Just based on his gripp on facts and his lack of concern for anyone not of his caste to be seen as people.
>^^<
Ron Paul is the good cop, in a good cop/bad cop routine.
Virtually every Social ill one can name is directly realted to how wealth distributed in a Society.
As example Countries with high rates of Unionism as compared to the USA and better wealth equality have..
Lower Crime rates.
Less people incarcerated in prisons.
Lower Drug Use.
Lower Teen pregnancies.
Higher rates of Education.
A Higher trust level of their fellow Citizen.
Lower Obesity rates.
Longer life expectancies and lower Infant Mortality rates.
Higher Social Mobility.
Less violent crimes such as Homicides rapes and assaults.
They also have interestingly enough.
Lower rates of MENTAL illness. Incidents of Mental illness go UP as wealth disparity rises.
This is not true just country to country. These same factors were measured in the USA State to State and the correlation was the same.
The greater the Wealth disparity in a nation between a Countries wealthiest and its poorest, the greater the Social ills.
The Fix for this is not making the wealthy wealthier and those with relatively decent salaries poorer yet this latest US budget and these "Conservative Groups" promote this very things with an ideology that is a complete failure.
The "wars" On crime, drug use, teen pregancies mental illness and PLUG IN CAUSE here can ALL be won with more socialism and better distribution of wealth.
The Promotion of Capitalism and the "Marketplace" makes all of these things worse.
How in the world did you come up w/ this idea that Drug Use, Incarceration, etc etc etc has anything to do w/ Unionism?
The united WAR states government and their Non-Sense "WAR on Drugs" is why we have the highest rate of Incarceration in the World.
The Drug War creates the Violence & The Black market sales of Drugs and it also Generates quite a lot of money for the government, the REAL reason for this "WAR".
How can the WAR on "Plug in Cause" be won by more socialism? That is ridiculous, explain yourself. More socialism would mean More Government Control & Interference, this is why we have these problems to begin with.
END The War on Drugs and you would virtually eliminate the black market sales, the violence and the arrests for use of drugs.
Legalize drugs & make it a non taboo issue and treat it as any other issue and educate people and treat those w/ problems.
A TRUE Free-Market, which this country does NOT Have (we have a government subsidized - government picks the winners & losers corporate welfare state) would Not make things worse, it would offer real alternatives, real choices for people that would in turn make peoples lives easier, better and more affordable - like cell phones & computers have become exponentially more powerful while becoming cheaper, this is what a TRUE free-market would do for our nation.
Government interference & Subsidies do NOT help the people, they only work to fatten the pockets of the Oligarchs & their Corporate friends, the Democrats & Obomber included.
The problem in the USA is they have privatized everything and tried the market solution to addressing social ills. This can not be done by the "marketplace".
The marketplace does not "fix" mental illness. The Marketplace is a piss poor soultion for addressing health care needs. You have tried that crap in the USA and it is not working. The "True free market" is a MYTH. It is an imagined entity. It has never existed and never will. You can not have a TRUE free market if you have the private ownership of property and resources. The Entity that controls MORE of the means of production can and will manipulate the market.
>>How can the WAR on "Plug in Cause" be won by more socialism? That is ridiculous, explain yourself. More socialism would mean More Government Control & Interference, this is why we have these problems to begin with.
I suggest you THINK for yourself as to how a better distribution of wealth can lessen such social ills. It is not ridiculous at all to suggest that there less drug usage in countries where there better and fairer wealth distribution.
People do not use drugs or self medicate because the drugs are illegal. They use drugs to deal with stress in their lives and or low feelings of self worth.
The same applies to all other things mentioned. When wealth inequitably distributed a society starts to decay and suffers more Social ills. This is not rocket science. Native American tribes knew this 10000 years ago. Your own CIA knows this.
The so called "free market" does not equitably distribute wealth. Capitalism is based upon maintaining wealth inequity.
The "Cheap products" you mention come at a cost. They are not cheap through the magic of this mythical "free market". None of those "cheap computers" are made in the USA nor are those cell phones.
They are cheap because they are made in China by workers that make 2 dollars a day instead of in the USA where a worker makes 100 dollars a day.
They are cheap because the Corporations making them transfer the costs of the same to the Enviroment with that enviroment and the people living there bearing the costs.
They are cheap because resources like tantalum are extracted from places like the Congo with little of the wealth left behind for the people of the Congo..
"People do not use drugs or self medicate because the drugs are illegal. They use drugs to deal with stress in their lives and or low feelings of self worth."
I would disagree, most use drugs to get high.
Oh those pesky unions. They are the worst thing to ever exist! How dare they ask for: A standard 40 hour work week, Over-time pay, Paid Holiday's off, Extra pay for working on Holiday's, Paid Vacation Time off, Sick Leave pay, Rest Breaks every 2 hours, Safe Work Environments in manufacturing, warehousing, transportation/shipping, etc. If we just left things to the "free market dynamics" all this would be given to workers without union help. Just ask any worker who is working on Christmas how wonderful it is to be employed as that is all that matters in the "free market" and after all, it is just another work day, isn't it? This is not to say any union anywhere is anything close to wonderful but most of corporate America is not interested in anything but profits and there are plenty of "bad apples" on the corporate side. People will say, "Oh but there are labor laws to protect workers." With a Republican "stacked" U.S. Supreme Court those laws will be pushed to the way side once they are challenged. Just think, maybe American workers will get to the level of their Chinese counterparts?
why waste your and our breath on those who gibberish "obama is socialist because he mandated private health insurance"?
why bother with such nonsense that the "government that privatizes everything, ensures maximum corporate profits, fork over trillions of public money to the 400-family- oligarchy, and complete the corporate enslavement of the people is communist"?