Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Bees in Freefall as Study Shows Sharp US Decline
Disease and low genetic diversity might have caused US bumblebee decline over the past few decades, say scientists
The abundance of four common species of bumblebee in the US has dropped by 96% in just the past few decades, according to the most comprehensive national census of the insects. Scientists said the alarming decline, which could have devastating implications for the pollination of both wild and farmed plants, was likely to be a result of disease and low genetic diversity in bee populations.
Bumblebees are important pollinators of wild plants and agricultural crops around the world including tomatoes and berries thanks to their large body size, long tongues, and high-frequency buzzing, which helps release pollen from flowers.
Bees in general pollinate some 90% of the world's commercial plants, including most fruits, vegetables and nuts. Coffee, soya beans and cotton are all dependent on pollination by bees to increase yields. It is the start of a food chain that also sustains wild birds and animals.
But the insects, along with other crucial pollinators such as moths and hoverflies, have been in serious decline around the world since the last few decades of the 20th century. It is unclear why, but scientists think it is from a combination of new diseases, changing habitats around cities, and increasing use of pesticides.
Sydney Cameron, an entomologist at the University of Illinois, led a team on a three-year study of the changing distribution, genetic diversity and pathogens in eight species of bumblebees in the US.
By comparing her results with those in museum records of bee populations, she showed that the relative abundance of four of the sampled species (Bombus occidentalis, B. pensylvanicus, B. affinis and B. terricola) had declined by up to 96% and that their geographic ranges had contracted by 23% to 87%, some within just the past two decades.
Cameron's findings reflect similar studies across the world. According to the Centre for Ecology and Hydrology in the UK, three of the 25 British species of bumblebee are already extinct and half of the remainder have shown serious declines, often up to 70%, since around the 1970s. Last year, scientists inaugurated a £10m programme, called the Insect Pollinators Initiative, to look at the reasons behind the devastation in the insect population.
Cameron's team also showed that declining species of bee had higher infection levels of a pathogen called Nosema bombi and lower genetic diversity compared with the four species of bee that were not in decline – B. bifarius, B. vosnesenskii, B. impatiens and B. bimaculatus.
The N. bombi pathogen is commonly found in bumblebees throughout Europe but until now has been largely unstudied in North America. The infection reduces the lifespans of individual bees and also results in smaller colony sizes.
The reduction in genetic diversity seen in the declining bees means that they are less able to fight off any new pathogens or resist pollution or predators. "Higher pathogen prevalence and reduced genetic diversity are, thus, realistic predictors of these alarming patterns of decline in north America, although cause and effect remain uncertain," Cameron wrote today in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Insects such as bees, moths and hoverflies pollinate around a third of the crops grown worldwide. If all of the UK's insect pollinators were wiped out, the drop in crop production would cost the UK economy up to £440m a year, equivalent to around 13% of the UK's income from farming.
The collapse in the global bee population is a major threat to crops. It is estimated that a third of everything we eat depends upon pollination by bees, which means they contribute some £26bn to the global economy.
Other identified causes of bee decline include parasites such as the bloodsucking varroa mite and viral and bacterial infections, pesticides and poor nutrition stemming from intensive farming methods.
"Pollinator decline has become a worldwide issue, raising increasing concerns over impacts on global food production, stability of pollination services, and disruption of plant-pollinator networks," wrote Cameron. "In accordance with the goals of the United Nations convention on biological diversity to reduce the rate of species loss by 2010, such efforts to elucidate the causes and ecological impacts of bumble bee decline, in co-ordination with informed conservation strategies, will go a long way to mitigating further losses."
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


59 Comments so far
Show Allwhen one places this article alongside recent large-scale deaths of birds and fish, one has to wonder what signs of natural distress will be taken seriously...
or if we will even have the opportunity to do so...
my 16-year-old and I were discussing timelines for various things last night, and he asked if I thought alot of things would come to pass by, say, 2075? I said I thought much, much sooner...next 5 or 10 years, I said...
by that, we mean change of such scope that life as we have known it is no longer...
how's that house value today?
>>when one places this article alongside recent large-scale deaths of birds and fish, one has to wonder what signs of natural distress will be taken seriously...
Absolutely none. There are literally trillions of dollars in profits at stake. You do the math.
http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World-News/Hundreds-Of-Birds-Drop-Dead-In-Louisiana-After-Thousands-Were-Found-Dead-In-Beebe-Ark-Arkansas/Article/201101115879821?lpos=World_News_First_Home_Article_Teaser_Region_1&lid=ARTICLE_15879821_Hundreds_Of_Birds_Drop_Dead_In_Louisiana_After_Thousands_Were_Found_Dead_In_Beebe_Ark_Arkansas
yes dubet, i found this story very disturbing and depressing..........wonder if we'll ever find out the true reason for these deaths.........
hey, coco!
I will suggest winds carried some of the toxic fumes off of the Gulf and into this flock...
humans are still suffering serious health impacts from the fumes...why not birds?
The bird bodies all showed trauma inflicted in the air, not poisoning.
Not so fast, JohnSlade. A lot of the birds had absorbed and been poisoned by the oil.
Not so fast, JohnSlade. A lot of the birds had absorbed and been poisoned by the oil.
Dear dubet"
I wondered aboout the Gulf evaporations too. The stuff that BP put into the water was said to have damaged the sytems of the water life. Why wouldn't these same chemicals rise in the air just from the water cycle?
Then I read another news story that said that poison is ruled out. Dogs and cats which ate them were said to have no ill effects. One report said that the bodies that fell were like frozen balls with feathers.
Could this have been some kind of a military test? California's L.A. sherriff was looking at a kind of sound machine that would almost boil the blood ( for prison crowd control, which would of course soon come to the regular population.)
Are there military installlations close to any of these bird death areas? I wonder if any drones are carrying these kind of sound or heat devices?
There is also some kind of machine, or grid bomb, that went used, kills all the electricity in the grid. I think it was used in Baghdad too. If someone had such a machine in the area, would it interfere with the birds hearts and cause mass heart attacks or a disruption of their systems?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110105/ap_on_re_eu/eu_sweden_dead_birds
well here's another lot in sweden. i don't think the fumes would have travelled that far would they?................
you could be right...on the other hand, our activities are sure to bring repercussion...
I do know the Gulf Stream makes a pretty straight shot across the Atlantic to the very places we're talking about: the British Isles, Scandinavia...
what made the Deepwater Horizon event so critical, to me, was the fact that the oil was entering global currents, with the potential to reach precisely the places mentioned...
I understand there are a number of theories regarding these bird deaths, but I believe the effects of the oil, and the Corexit, having entered the global system, may show at any location along such a route...and in the neighboring air and waterways...
as with 911, nothing speaks as loudly as the utter lack of information...
I wish planetary damage disappeared as readily, and completely, as human thoughts of such things do...
well yes i agree, but it all seems too 'clockwork' to me. you'd think they would die off in spasms; not all at once like this. this is a warped scenario.
i am happy to report however, that my little feathered friends here in southern europe all seem to be faring well. the sparrows, robins, warblers, magpies, hawks, blackbirds, tits, hoopoes are not dropping from the skies...........
if only as you say, humans took more interest in their natural surroundings and what is happening to the creatures that help our well-being...........
Along with concern over house values, I'd like to add that the wars are certainly going well aren't they? No need to worry about worldwide famine. No need to change our ways. Sweet sweet denial. I recommend it.
Article: "higher infection levels of a pathogen called Nosema bombi... Other identified causes of bee decline include parasites such as the bloodsucking varroa mite and viral and bacterial infections..."
Low latitude pathogens exist in greater variety due to longer growing seasons, less winter die-back and extreme variability in habitat. As global warming progresses, these pathogens are finding new feeding grounds in higher latitudes. Although this article doesn't make the connection, whats 'eating' the bumblebee may have, as its root cause, the same as whats 'eating' the lodgepole forests of British Columbia: a lower latitude pathogen that has expanded its range into upper latitudes.
The article opens with the contention that disease and low genetic variation are causing the die off. Those are just symptoms of root causes. Later it introduces the possibility that loss of prime habitat and pesticides might be contributing. Of course it failed to take into account global warming. What I really find alarming is how academia in this country are really dragging their feet in regards to this die off. You would almost think that there are corporate skeletons in the closet.
I wouldn't be surprised if it is pesticides and/or fertilizers. These are already implicated in coral die-off's in coastal waters.
weren't gmo'd seeds supposed to reduce the amount of pesticides use? here they say the use has gone up? oh wait chemicals are part of the MIC...
now of course they've even gotten suburban "landscapers" to use alot
GMO's are generally designed to withstand herbicides, not reduce the use of it. So 'Farmers' can dump herbicides on them, and still get a crop. Yum.
It's primarily pesticides, especially neonicotinoids (Imidacloprid, et al) which are not only toxic to bees but also destroy their ability to know where they are and to get back to their nests/hives. Using these pesticides is especially egregious because this is known throughout the world, and some countries have banned this particular class of pesticides.
But nearly all pesticides - along with pollen from genetically modified crops (all of which contain insect-killing pesticides - what do they do to us?) - will harm and/or kill bees. That's the bottom line cause.
Academia will not talk about this because they all, nowadays, take money from the big chemical companies - Monsanto the Evil, Bayer, et al.
A "scientist" at the University of Maine, for example, planted g-e corn and soy from Monsanto within easy distance of home gardens which were growing corn, so that the pollen easily carried into people's organic gardens and they ate the poisoned corn without their knowledge.
He said, when I asked him why he planted it without any study beforehand, that "the Monsanto salesman gave him the seed so he planted it." Stupid and irresponsible.
Perhaps people don't know this aspect - faculty at universities are allowed to "consult" for corporations and that pay is separate from the money we pay them to work for us. Corporations can pay them all they want - and they do - for results of their "research" to come out the way corporations want.
Just another way money/profit is destroying life on earth. The remedies are quite simple - stop poisoning our air, land, and water and we can begin to heal.
Please speak out on the pesticide issue - plenty of good info at www.panna.org which is the Pesticide Action Network. Stopping the poisoning by pesticides and industrial chemicals is critical to saving life on earth.
www.cleanearth.net (that's me)
Thanks for articulating what I've been suspecting for a while now. I can't tell you how many articles, news reports and documentaries I've seen with purported experts beating around the bush on what's gone wrong with our agri-business model.
Ironically enough, considering the devastation that Monsanto wrought, along with Dow Chemical, upon Viet Nam with its criminally insane defoliants, it turns out that when I go to my local supermarket, the best deal on honey is a brand that is sourced from Communist Viet Nam. Go figure. The wonders of globaloney.
Apparently Viet Nam isn't a hot neonicotinoid market, yet. Maybe we need a war to help spread American capitalism there. Oh, wait a minute. Tried that already didn't we?
Don't you find it odd that the same people who tell you that the world has a climate crisis, are also invested in Monsanto, and the spreading of GMO's? It is not coincidence.
Scientists can be bought? You don't say!
Why all the fuss? We only need pigs, chickens, and cows. The rest of the life forms are in the way and not marketable. Please pass the soylent green. Yummy!!
It's nature's plan to save the biosphere... The humans kill all the pollinators and then the humans, who are too stupid to realize they've killed themselves by their destructive behavior, will die off a few years later.
Ain't biology a gas?
To bee or not to bee, that is the question.
Joe
Dear Joe:
it could be worse than that: "to serf or not to serf."
If the bees go,then with this massive unemployment, I'm sure that the corporates will come up with a " pollinating by hand " job for us all.
Actually, those jobs will go to the illegal aliens, and millions of refugees, from the "third" world.
Dea Freewheelin Franklin:
Well that won't be a problem, as I'm sure that the new Congress will declare all unemployed people a drain on the economy, along with the Social Security people and medicare/medical/food stamp people. All will be declared "illegal" and then hiring us will be so much easier with no NLRB, or even an OSHA; I'm not sure what ICE will be doing though!!
Don't forget, during the last depression, Mexican citizens were "taking too many jobs" even though they were citizens, and these U.S. citizens were sent back to Mexico and forgotten. However, during the next war they did receive their draft notices in Mexico!
There is no level of insanity that some in the government cannot reach!
Groan. Somebody was gonna write that. I'm glad it was you, before I got to it!
I sympathize. I hate myself for it, but it had to be said.
Joe
I am glad I am older and nearer to death. The earth is fast becoming a very sterile place. In 50 years it will be very empty!
It was one thing when large mammals were declining; but now it is insects, fish,corals--god! Everything is collapsing. The list is 10 miles long!
Humanity should be ashamed of itself.
Eventually humanity will have nothing left to exterminate and will finally exterminate itself. Small consolation to the bees that is, but at least we're working on it, and diligently at that.
There is ample science to back up Cleanearth's statements.
Capitalism despises those who actually do the work including bees
deleted
2 culprits; global warming and pesticides: I just don't know which is number 1. the timeline is just about perfect, factory farms, monsanto, etc. The dead birds and fish in Arkansas; I was thinking something out of a scifi movie. Are there any secret labs there or a military base? Tony
Global Warming is not a problem. Normal average temperature for the globe - when most life, flora and fauna, flourished - were 10 degrees Celsius warmer, and CO2 levels were between 2000 and 2500 ppm. Only twice in the history of life on earth has this planet been this cold.
Our current climate is the equivalent of the cold period of 450 million years ago, which caused the first extinction, and CO2 levels have only once in history been as low as today. Don't be fooled by the people who want to forcibly eradicate most of humanity.
Dear John Edwards, this is a dear John letter. After reading two of your inane comments I'm ending our relationship. I will no longer read your JE comments as there are enough thoughtful and insightful bloggers here on CD's that will have precedence over yours. Your not even on the back burner but off the stove completely.
Dear Ralph:
Adding to the general break-up of the nuclear family, I see. These young folk just don't got no staying power these days.
One wonders if the corporate whore has seduced you away from your ties?
Thanks for an interesting article. I wasn't aware of the dependence of various fruits, vegetables and many other natural plant and animal life depending on the pollination of bees, but it does sound logical. Could it be that the overall health of humans, as well as the survival of fewer animals, particularly birds, too, will go down, as the quality of such produce declines as a result of the lack of pollination by bees? It sounds logical to me.
Last year my pepper plants were very tall and lush, with hundreds of blossoms. There were no bees, for the first time ever that I recall. I got almost no peppers. Right at the end of Summer, in late September, there were a few minor bees around, and I got some small peppers just before frost.
No bees is a big problem, especially if you want to eat.
Several hypothesis have been brought up. Radio waves from Cell Phones being one. GMO's that get drenched in pesticides is another. What really 'undid' humanity, was the beginning of agriculture, thousands of years ago. Our ancestors should have probably never broken the ground. One thing led to another, and by now, what probably should be 50 million of us, has 'blossomed' into 7 billion. The collapse cannot be avoided, and yet we proudly strut forward, to add another 3 billion within the next 30 years.
Exactly my story. Excepting my hot banana peppers planted in the same row won the grand champion prize at the local fair and there were bushels of them. Mayhaps it was too hot for the bells. Otherwise the garden was a waste of time- wasn’t that way ‘til recently. Ego don’t fill the tummy.
A perplexed MD
Wasn't it Einstein who said some time ago , that without bees, mankind can survive for only FOUR years ?
We haven't much time left, do we.......
It's all in the plan. The same people who bring you the climate scare, are also invested in poisoning the planet. It is not coincidence. Several of the billionaires behind the climate scare have voiced their support for a human population collapse.
Monsanto has some strong "Climate Scare" backers:
Al Gore, as Vice President under Bill Clinton, actively lobbied European leaders on Monsanto's behalf, as reported by CommonDreams http://www.commondreams.org/headlines/090300-03.htm
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. http://gateskeepers.civiblog.org/blog/_archives/2010/9/23/4638005.html
Maurice Strong http://www.enterstageright.com/archive/articles/1201/1201strong.htm
The UNFCCC http://www.cetri.be/spip.php?article1940&lang=en
The "Saviors" whose cause CommonDreams continually promotes, also envision rapid depopulation of the planet. People in general don't care to inform themselves. If it sounds good on the surface, they'll support any cause, even if ultimately it means their own undoing. One only needs to look at how people fell for "Change we can believe in". The same people get fooled over and over again. Humanity is doomed.
You are sooooo RIGHT!!!
For proof you are correct just search the net for : Georgia Guide Stones
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones
What Jonathan Edwards blogged is also CARVED IN STONE in REAL LIFE.
"THEY" want the earth population down to around 500 million cause its more manageable.
Climate scare? Bet you're in the petroleum business. And drive an SUV. My Grandpa's mule had more synapses.
ARRRGGH-- MD
I'm in the Engineering business, and I don't own a car.
It looks like the “Einstein/bee” statement is a statement that was placed into the mouth of a famous person in order to give it the appearance credibility.
http://www.snopes.com/quotes/einstein/bees.asp
The idea that the quote surmises does hold some water though.
I have heard that bees have an instinctual suicide gene that when one bee feels ill they will abandon the hive to protect the hive. If all the bees abandon the hive it leaves an empty hive which is the sign of colony collapse.
I remember seeing swarms of insects/bees around apple and plum trees when they were blooming when I was growing up and do not see as much of that now as an adult
december twenty-first twenty-twelve
the cataclysm has already begun
Reality is an Obsolete Concept.