Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
- A Culture That Condones The Killing Of Children And Teaches Children To Kill
- Slaughter in Connecticut: 20 Children, 6 Adults Dead in Kindergarten Massacre
- How the Mighty (Mississippi) Has Fallen: Historic Drought Plagues US
- Wealthiest Kissed, Weakest Kicked: Obama's Ugly 'New Deal' Offers to Cut Social Security
- 'I'd Rather Fight Like Hell': Naomi Klein's Fierce New Resolve to Fight for Climate Justice
- A Culture That Condones The Killing Of Children And Teaches Children To Kill
- 'I'd Rather Fight Like Hell': Naomi Klein's Fierce New Resolve to Fight for Climate Justice
- Wealthiest Kissed, Weakest Kicked: Obama's Ugly 'New Deal' Offers to Cut Social Security
- Remember All the Children, Mr. President
- Save the Children: Tears and Tragedy in Connecticut
Popular content
Today's Top News
Obama Is President of Extra-Judicial Killing, Says Ex-Guantánamo Inmate
US PRESIDENT Barack Obama's attempts to reach out to Muslims have been an "utter failure" given his broken promises on several issues including closing Guantánamo Bay detention facility, former inmate Moazzam Begg has said.
Begg, a British national who spent two years in Guantánamo before being released in 2005, fears the detention centre may become permanent.
"People who were released from Guantánamo after Obama came to power told me that conditions had improved slightly but nobody there was under the illusion that [it] was going to close," Begg said during a visit to Dublin.
"It is like a town now and every thing around it has continued to expand. It seems that this is a permanent facility and they intend to keep it as such."
Begg, whose organisation, Cageprisoners, recently expanded its work to include the highlighting of extra-judicial killings, particularly the use of drone strikes, argued little had changed despite Obama's promises. "We say that Bush was the president of torture, but Obama is the president of extra-judicial killing. The difference between the two is that while one used to extra-judicially detain people, the other has gone a step further and extra-judicially kills them."
Begg singled out Obama's decision to authorise the targeting of Yemen-based cleric Anwar al-Awlaki for assassination earlier this year. Cageprisoners took on Awlaki's case when he was detained in Yemen in 2006.
Awlaki has been linked to al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, which has been blamed for several terrorist plots. The group claimed responsibility for the two parcel bombs found on US-bound cargo planes last month. Last year, Awlaki praised Nidal Hasan, the US soldier accused of killing 13 colleagues at Fort Hood, Texas.
Begg said Cageprisoners was still campaigning against Awlaki's targeting by the US, but it was distancing itself from his calls for the killing of civilians. "I have said many times that I don't and we don't support the killing of civilians full stop, whether it is by B-52 bombers or suicide bombers; whether it ordered by Obama or Awlaki."
Begg, who has admitted attending a training camp in Afghanistan in 1993 before moving to the country with his family in mid-2001, was at the centre of a row earlier this year when Gita Sahgal, then head of Amnesty International's gender unit, said the human rights group had been damaged by its collaboration with him. She alleged Begg was a supporter of the Taliban and Cageprisoners was a "pro-jihadi" organisation.
Begg says he later discussed the allegations with Sahgal. "Every argument she put forward seemed to fall apart completely. Because I advocate a negotiated settlement in Afghanistan, she portrayed me as the greatest supporter of the Taliban and therefore, by extension, a supporter of everything they have said in terms of rights of women and so forth. That's not very clever, nor is it very honest."
Begg said he would describe himself as "a human rights campaigner who is Muslim and who has a Muslim ethos . . . I don't like the term Islamist in the way I don't like the term jihadist or any other Islamic terms Anglicised with an -ist at the end . . . I don't know what people are trying to compartmentalise me into.
"If you are asking me what are my feelings towards people fighting occupation, the answer is I completely support them. I believe in the inalienable right to defend yourself against foreign occupation.
"There is no doubt in my mind that if resisting the occupation of Afghanistan was not only considered good but lionised [in the 1980s] by the British government and US . . . then nothing has changed other than interests."
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

14 Comments so far
Show AllGeez... you kidnap a guy and throw him in a hell-hole for two years.
And then when you finally let him go, this is the thanks you get!
My guess is that Anwar al- Alwaki was like Osama bin Laden, a CIA asset that maybe they couldn't use anymore and like Saddam knew too much and that is why Obama has him targeted for assassination.
That's a good guess.
We need a regime change here in the USA.
Mr. Begg's statement sound much more reasonable and sincere than those of our political "leaders".
Mr. Begg said "I believe in the inalienable right to defend yourself against foreign occupation." Compare that to Bush's "We have to fight them over there so we won't have to fight them over here", or to whatever disingenuous drivel Obama has dished out lately.
Bush: " We have to fight them over there so we do not have to fight them here". I have got news for anyone that believes this punic, canard....they are already here! And it is time we started fighting them here before it is too late.
I often wonder if the "progressives" who still support Barrack Obama have any critical thinking skills or a moral compass.
When Bush gave the green light to torture the progressive community was in a furor. When da Obomber...he who bombs, put a hit out on a U.S. citizen, most were strangely silent. Why is there such a disconnect when the chosen one, the president of hope and change, engages in crimminal activity/war crimes?
The other day I read an article on commondreams condemning the tea party and white supremists for their hatred of among other things Barrack Obama, who the author described as one of the most beautiful creatures on this planet. While I can certainly understand the authors disdain for the tea party and white supremacy, there exists that inability to gauge Obama's actions.
A certain large portion of the progressive community seems to suffer from the same malady as the rest of our nation. The name of that malady is Hubris, and it's symtoms are loss of critical thinking skills and a moral compass.
I am very concerned that a Harvard educated constitutional scholar has come to the conclusion that it is legal to bypass our legal system and execute a U.S. citizen living abroad. I am even more concerned that anyone calling themself a progressive would support that man.
"I am very concerned ......bypass our legal system and execute a U.S. citizen living abroad.......a progressive would support that man"
My respect for Michael Moore vanished after the interviewed with Brian Williams on MSNBC before the Midterm. How about Harold Hongju Koh clerked for Associate Justice Harry Blackmun on the U.S. Supreme Court from Yale?
http://www.ufppc.org/us-a-world-news-mainmenu-35/9600-commentary-harold-kohs-endorsement-of-the-legality
-of-obamas-drone-war.html
Dubya’s John Yoo and Obama‘s Harold Hongju Koh. We really need a Regime change ending Dubya's third term!
Yes, we DO need a regime change, but who's going to sponsor it effectively? and would we just "elect" another lier and money-grabber?
We recommend Green Party. But how to get it on the ticket?
Green Party is not good enough, as Ralph Nader have tried so many times. Progressive Democrats are brain DEAD!
Bush confesses to ordering toture. Obama is ordering executions without trial, that is called murder. The law is clear, no torture, no murder. The perpetrators are free. That these crimes are not being brought to justice makes it much more likely that they will continue and multiply. Think what a Tea Party president might not mind doing.
Bankers and Wall St. run the system so crooked they almost destroy it for the second time and they get put in charge of fixing it and guess what? The really rich get really richer and the rest of us get poorer. I want a big bonus too, but not at the expense of people losing their homes. Again, crimes of massive victimization are committed and we are all witnesses but the cops fail to do their job.
Can we sue the government to enforce the law? Can the ACLU or other groups file an injuction or something. Do us citizens have the right to have a judge force Eric Holder, the Attorney General, to uphold the law? Do we have judicial tools to make the Justice system fuction?
Jeffryy Dalmer: " Your Honor, all I did was an Enhanced Interrogation prior to an Extra Judicial Killing, followed by a light snack"
I read Begg's book when it first came out, and I don't recall his admission that he attended any Al Quaida training camps. This is the first I have heard the allegation.