EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Anti-Nuclear Rally Protests Against 'Chernobyl on Wheels'
Protesters confront Areva shipment of 123 tons of radioactive waste on 900-mile run from France to Germany
About 30,000 anti-nuclear protesters are expected to demonstrate Saturday against a shipment of highly radioactive nuclear waste, nicknamed "Chernobyl on wheels", that is being moved across France and Germany by train.
Police approach a group of anti-nuclear activists who attached themselves to railway tracks to block a train (L rear) carrying nuclear waste to Germany during a protest near Caen November 5, 2010. Activists from "Sortir du nucleaire" (Phasing out the nuclear age) halted the train in the northwestern city of Caen after its departure from Valognes. Although the exact route of the convoy is being kept secret, protesters have organized demonstrations at cities along its 900-mile route.
At least 17,000 German riot police are poised for what could be one of the biggest anti-nuclear demonstrations in years. By early this afternoon hundreds of activists had chained themselves to trees along the route or were preparing to lock themselves to the railway track.
The specially constructed low-speed train, carrying 123 tonnes of German radioactive waste, which was reprocessed in eastern France, started out today from Valognes, Normandy, near La Hague. It was expected to cross the French-German border early tomorrow and to arrive in Gorleben, in the far north-east of Lower Saxony, a few hours later.
Yannick Rousselet, of Greenpeace, said: "Never in history has such a quantity of radioactive material ever been transported."
Laura Hameaux, of Sortir du Nucléaire, a network of 875 anti-nuclear groups, said: "It is at least twice the radioactivity of all the radioactive pollution from the Chernobyl catastrophe and [local people] haven't even been informed of its route."
The waste convoy is the 11th of its type between France and Germany since 1996. In 2004 an anti-nuclear protester died in France after his leg was cut off by a train transporting nuclear waste to Germany. He had been sitting on the railway track.
Protesters have tried to block previous trains, but protests over the latest convoy have been boosted in Germany by growing public anger at the decision by Angela Merkel's government to extend the life of the country's existing nuclear power plants for an extra 12 years.
The decision is a reversal of one of the policy achievements of the government of the former Social Democratic chancellor Gerhard Schröder. Areva, the industrial conglomerate and leader in nuclear power, has agreements with Germany, Japan, Switzerland, Belgium and Holland to reprocess spent fuel from nuclear power plants. It receives, stores and processes the fuel, which remains the property of the country that produced it; the waste is sent back after treatment.
The latest shipment of waste will arrive in the German town of Dannenberg tomorrow and be transported the final 12 miles by lorry to Gorleben to be dumped into underground shafts. There are doubts about the safety of the storage following evidence of a high danger of groundwater contamination at the site.
Rebecca Harms, a Green MEP, said she expected the protest to be the biggest for years. "This year's transport of nuclear waste will provoke more opposition than ever before. It's time that people's concerns are finally listened to." she said.
Greenpeace has warned that the load contains even higher than normal levels of radioactive waste, due to the fact that the rods were in use for longer than usual.
Police and politicians have called for the nuclear industry, and not the taxpayer, to foot the €50m (£43m) bill the security operation is expected to cost.
Areva said today: "All operations related to these transports and the equipment used comply with the relevant national and international regulations that have been issued with the involvement of representatives from member states." The company insists the waste containers have been designed to withstand a 50-meter fall on to concrete and a fire of 800C (1,472F) lasting 30 minutes.
Christophe Neugnot, Areva spokesman, called Greenpeace's action a smokescreen avoiding "the real issue of the rebirth of nuclear power throughout Europe". He said: "If we want to produce electricity all the time at a reduced price and without heating up the planet we cannot do without nuclear. Renewable energies remain insufficient today. This convoy is less radioactive than six similar transports carried out by Areva in the last few years. We have nothing to hide." Greenpeace is suing Areva for what is says is "illegal storage of waste" at Valognes.
Anti-nuclear protesters said they were not aiming to hold up the convoy but highlight the failure of the nuclear industry to find long-term solutions to the waste it produces. Every year about 7,000 cubic meters of waste are produced by the 143 nuclear reactors in the EU. "It's like thinking up the idea of an airplane without thinking of where it's going to land," Rousselet said.
Waste disposal
The radioactive by-products of nuclear fission were processed by heating the waste until the liquid evaporated and formed a powder which was then "vitrified" - fused with glass in a melting furnace. The molten glass was then poured into stainless steel canisters, left to cool and fitted with a welded cover. The canisters, weighing 400kg each, are being carried in 11 train wagons made of forged steel or cast iron that have been used to transport nuclear waste between France and Germany since 1996. Another four carriages in the train are occupied by French CRS - armed riot police - ready to intervene in the event of security breaches. Helicopters are flying over the train paying particular attention to bridges and possible obstacles on the railway line. On arrival the estimated 308 canisters will be removed from their casks and buried into rock.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

29 Comments so far
Show AllWe've had "civilization" on the planet for an estimated 7-10,000 years. We've had a "technological society" since the "Industrial Revolution," in the mid 1800's. That's less than two centuries.
In that short time, we've seen horrible exploitation of the various peoples, our warfare has become increasingly impersonal and deadly. The majority of the earth's peoples are again descending from citizens to serfs as the Corporate States flourish.
There is nothing we have built in those last two centuries that does not deteriorate, needs maintenance and repair. The higher the "tech" the more maintenance it needs.
We continue to generate nuclear waste at an increasing volume. Nobody knows how to deal with it, so it piles up. The proposed methods of storage "Safe for thousands of years" already are found to contaminate ground water, be subject to quakes and other natural disasters.
Even if we can justify the hubris of those claims of safety, we haven't been around long enough to judge the harm. What if someone mines their way into those storage areas? What if civilization no longer recognizes the ubiquitous radiation sign? If we do manage to store this horror safely for our lifetime, can we just write off our posterity?
I wrote the following about DU. It can also go for our thousands of tons of nuclear waste scattered around the world.
----------------
Depleted Uranium
by
Steve Osborn
Depleted Uranium, the new panacea
The Arms Maker’s choice with a half-life of only 4.5 billion years.
Workers in DU must wear exposure suits and respirators
Just a creative use of atomic leftovers.
Dense, hard, it punches through armor like tissue,
Vaporizes and fragments into dust and tiny chunks.
Dust to be breathed and chunks to be embedded
As shrapnel or become buried in earth.
Battle tested in Desert Storm and Kosovo,
Now everyone is making them, and selling them,
To armies around the globe, eager for the latest thing.
Meanwhile, the Iraqi desert and Kosovo are laden with tons.
Pay no attention to the sick and the dying.
The Government says it is anything but DU.
Agent Orange was all in the mind, too.
Birth defects and cancer are coincidence in Govspeak.
A hundred or a thousand years from now,
When Hussein and Imperial America are long forgotten,
Or are but spooky tales told around the campfire
As a new civilization tries to grow.
Peasants, trying to coax food from the ground will stir up clouds of dust.
They, their children and their animals will slowly sicken and die,
And they will know not why.
Just collateral damage from a weapon long ago.
19 February 2003
----------------
The word "posterity" is not just our children and grand children. It extends to our great-great-great-great-grandchildren and beyond.
minitrue,
Well said. The whole nuclear industry is a pandora's box. When I think of it, I see that old Disney cartoon where Mickey is the sorcerer's apprentice. At the end the sorcerer shows up to stop all the broom sticks from flooding the place. It doesn't look good for us. It is really quite damning of our species that a bunch of ETs have had to monkey with our nuclear missles and have been buzzing around us. Maybe they have some kind of 'prime directive' not to interfere but just can't help themselves. I can imagine some telepathic shouting match between them about letting us destroy ouselves on the one hand or stopping us on the other to keep our atomic war from causing some quantum worm hole they use for interdimensional travel from being trashed.
So it seems the europeans are taking measures to contain radioactive waste, and to provide for proper maintance of their plants, Something the USAns are not. and yet they get protested on anyway. Should the germans freeze in the dark? or should they giveup on nuclear power and start burning jews/ whoops I meant coal? (sarcasm) industrialized socities need power, in quanities. To care for their tightly spaced populations.
I think they should be applauded for taking serious measures for safety.
>^^<
The Germans, like all of us, do what they can. I don't believe the elimination of nuclear power plants equates to freezing in the dark, considering humanity managed to survive without nuclear power plants for over 100,000 years but, whatever. Coal is the only substitute, right? Uh huh. Just the discoveries in insulation technology in the last 30 years have totally changed the heating energy requirements of cities, to name only one factor in this energy game. Combine that with geothermal and the numbers might be very embarrassing to pro nuclear folks.
What you want to believe or what I want to believe doesn't really matter. Maybe you are right and nuclear power is the best thing since toasted bread. Then again, maybe it's a dead end like hydrogen filled dirigibles.
All I know is that there are two subjects that all advocates of nuclear power either avoid discussing or twist out of all semblance to reality:
1) From the mining to the waste disposal total KWH cost (including the education of nuclear scientists and technicians) of nuclear power as compared to other energy technologies.
2) Honest appraisal of the point in time when sequestering the massive inventory of ever increasing waste will require shielding technology we do not yet have in geologically stable earth areas for at least 25,000 years (no such area of the earth exists).
The bottom line to me is that any technology that produces waste products which harm humans and the surrounding ecology for more than a human life time (about 90 years) should be banned. Coal, by the way, fits that category as well as nuclear even though it is somewhat more managable.
Your thinking that without nuclear power that Germans would freeze in the dark shows your serious lack of general knowledge of electric generation in Germany. Why did you even both to post with such an uninformed statement? Makes you appear foolish.
deleted due to duplication.
Industrial society is doomed; it is just a matter of time.
Since very few people (and least of all our deluded leaders, be they Dimwits or Repugnants) want to draw the consequences of our unavoidable collapse, the transition to scarcity industrialism and eventually out of industrialism is in all likelihood going to be painful, if not very painful.
The nuclear garbage is going to be with human beings for hundreds of thousands of years, if they manage to be around for that long. The stuff is clearly totally unmanageable and will eventually cause huge problems, accidents, and, of course, uncountable deaths. The unmanageability of the stuff will greatly increase as we lose our large-scale industrial capacities.
My point, exactly.
Good god's go chase glowing rabbits! Nuclear waste is perfectly manageble, with due care taken! accidents will happen they always do, but you can't just turn your back and expect it to go away. It must be faced and be delt with!
You might as well remove your house wireing, and internet connection. stareing at that screen too long will give you eye cancer didn't your mom tell you. If you leave the wireing in the natural magnetic fields get messed up, and you just might turn into a republican!
>^^<
Your comments match up to that of a Republican when it comes to your apparent stated love for nuclear energy. Your use of exaggerated extremes if nuclear energies were to be completely eliminate shows you general lack of understand the many other ways electric power is created. You generalizations are simple which seems to reflect your understand of electric generation in general. In the same sentence you state nuclear power is perfect yet accidents occur. Which way is it? I know, because I'd never say..."Nuclear waste is perfectly manageble,..." (manageable)
So much for cheap and safe nuclear power. :( You don't have to drill into solid rock to dispose of wind powers non existent (other than entropy from electricity use) waste.
No but you do need a bag to put the dead birds in, for when they fly into the blades.. Nothings perfectly safe for everyone unless care is taken. maybe big fan cages around the blades are whats needed... pity I can't give you a picture, I promice it was silly and funny :(
From what I have read, painting eyes on the blades is pretty effective at keeping birds away.
Cell towers are the real bird killers to worry about.
Sounds like you have been caught in the petro dollar web of lies!
Richard has foolish replies to serious issues.
"It was expected to cross the French-German border early tomorrow and to arrive in Gorleben, in the far north-east of Lower Saxony, a few hours later."
I remember reading about Gorleben in the major German newspaper Die Zeit many years ago. A nuclear waste facility was built there. The facility was referred to with the incredible euphemism "Entsorgungsanstalt" -- literally, an institution or installation for the removal of care or worry.
When Angela Merkel was first elected, many Germans rejoiced at her administration's plan to phase out all that country's nuclear power plants and replace them with renewable energy sources. The fading economy has since made that dream unworkable.
France produces a great share of its energy in nuclear plants and sends much of its waste to Russia for reprocessing, but this article shows that Germany apparently also does such work.
Thats what changed my mind and allowed me to vote green, it seems their not all neolithic wannbes. Some can even see reason when nessary.
Pity they lost... again :(
>^^<
"Chernobyl on Wheels" is probably the dumbest thing I've ever heard. The problem with the Chernobyl event is that it was an explosion - it spread fission products far and wide, contaminating the entire world with a higher radiological load than had been released since the weapons testing of the 1930's, 40's and 50's.
The train cars, by contrast, were well-armored casks carrying solid waste with no risk of explosion. There's a difference. It's like saying that a train car full of aluminum is at risk because some of the handrails are rusty and when mixed, rust and aluminum make thermite.
Nuclear power and its use is the dumbest thing I've ever studied in Environmental Engineering. After the classes of studying its health risk, development cost from mining to waste containment and the potential long term risk to large land areas plus its history, all made our whole class question its continued existence and development! High capital flow !!!...replied our teacher ...nuclear power creates large capital flow of money so banks like it up to the point of insurance and then and only then if the government covers the insurance based on the VERY high risk. If the government doesn't cover that very high cost, because the rate payers can't...then banks shy away! It is a dangerous source for electric power that requires thousands of years of government welfare. Governments barely last a few hundred years!
Marci ,
Hear, Hear!
Very, very well said.
Thank you
We have had, for some time, the ability to provide for all our NEEDS with safe alternative energy sources. We need black power for all our desires. Blow up your TV
But now there are 6+ billion of us + the internet, which use a lot of power, So go eat your soylent ant be quiet :)
TheUN is way ahead of you.
See Agenda 21
All those big flat panel screens will soon be the only way we, or our children, see nature. We will be happy sardines in stacked and packed cans.
;(
"vitrified" : Adj. Clandestine dumping in a poor neighborhood or country.
the corporate polluters, mostly from western europe and the US, have been dumping toxic industrial garbage into the somalian sea for the last 20 years.
still more toxic rubbish is sent to china, india, and other countries around the world.
where have germans and french been all these years?