EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Eve of Destruction (or How to Destroy a Planet Without Really Trying)
- President Obama Uses a Sledgehammer Against Dissent
- 'We Are Movement, Not a Moment': North Carolina Peaceful Uprising Continues
- 'Masters of Austerity' Targeted as Blockupy Activists Shut Down European Central Bank
- In Turkey: 'Resisting for Our Future'
- Eve of Destruction (or How to Destroy a Planet Without Really Trying)
- The World Economy Is a Ticking Time Bomb (and The Fuse is Burning)
- Is Enbridge Building a Secret Keystone Pipeline?
- President Obama Uses a Sledgehammer Against Dissent
- Victory: Connecticut Becomes First State to Require GMO Labeling
Popular content
Today's Top News
Quran Burning and US Inconsistency
Why does the US government think burning Qurans is less civilized than drone attacks on civilian populations?
Barack Obama, the US president, has warned that threats to burn the Quran are a sure and effective way to swell the ranks of al-Qaeda. This may be true, but largely because such symbolic acts of 'Islamophobia' are widely viewed as verifying the perception that the US wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, along with its backing of Israel, are motivated by its hostility towards Muslims.
The previously unheard of pastor
of a small Florida church may have scrapped his plan to publicly burn
hundreds of Qurans on the ninth anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, but the
threat alone has done untold damage to the already troubled
relationship between the Muslim world and the West.
The US government's reaction to the plan will not have gone unnoticed. But no matter how strong the words of condemnation, those on the receiving end of US occupation or air raids will be struck by the apparent inconsistency.
General David Petraeus, the US commander in Afghanistan, warned that burning the Quran could endanger the lives of US troops who might become the target of retribution. But why do Obama and Petraeus think that burning the Quran is any less civilized or more dangerous than their use of unmanned drones to target suspected Taliban or al-Qaeda fighters and the subsequent civilian casualties these attacks often entail?
Terry Jones, the pastor behind the planned Quran bonfire, may be insane, as some, including his own daughter, have suggested. But what excuse do sane and sophisticated people like Obama, Petraeus, and Robert Gates, the US secretary of defence, have?
Dehumanization
In his Cairo speech, Obama attributed the blame for some of the misunderstanding between the West and the Muslim world to the acts of terrorism carried out by a minority of Muslims. "The attacks of September 11, 2001 and the continued efforts of these extremists to engage in violence against civilians has led some in my country to view Islam as inevitably hostile not only to America and Western countries, but also to human rights," he said. But he totally glossed over the fact that before - just as after - 9/11, the US engaged in unjust wars against mainly Muslim countries - a threat that is more potent than any plan to burn Qurans.
If it were not for these wars and a history of US support for the Israeli occupation and dictators in the region, the threat to burn Qurans - as ugly and offensive as it clearly is - would not have been anything more than the act of a small-time minister searching for attention and obsessed with his own prejudices.
But in an atmosphere of 'Islamophobia' - fed by a mistrust and ignorance of Islam - and US wars against Muslim countries, the suggestion of a Quran-burning day becomes something much more significant.
It also reflects the general dehumanization of Muslims and Arabs - particularly those who have been the victims of American and Israeli bombings - that has taken root, allowing some of the US public to become immune to the crimes committed by their own government or with their government's backing.
Today, as Americans grieve the victims of the 9/11 attacks, it is important to recognize that sorrow is a shared universal sentiment that does not exclude religions or races.
In the weeks following 9/11, the American press devoted pages and air time to giving a human face to the victims of the attacks. It is not realistic or even right to expect the American media to give the exact same treatment to the victims of US wars. But, until very recently, the US media rarely even questioned the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and when it did, the questions asked rarely centered on the civilian deaths, which were at best seen as inevitable incidents of war and, at worst, as necessary collateral damage.
Such a mentality is more damaging in the long run than any individual threatening to burn the Quran, because it plants the seeds of dehumanization.
In the words of Kathy Kelly, an American peace activist who is currently facing trial for 'trespassing' in a drone-manufacturing plant during an anti-war protest, the mainstream media "does little to help ordinary [Americans] ... understand that the drones which hover over potential targets in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Yemen create small "ground zeroes" in multiple locales on an everyday basis".
Lamis Andoni is an analyst and commentator on Middle Eastern and Palestinian affairs.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

74 Comments so far
Show AllGoddamn good question, and one that deserves an answer from every state official of every state that has its hand on the button.
I believe that 90% of all thought is subconscious, which is a scary as hell prospect when you consider decisions are being made on behalf of everyone on the planet by a few not unusual people who are at best merely human.
If 19 Islamic Arabs has incubated a US-wide fear of Muslims, it stands to reason that a universal disappointment with Americans will develop in Islamic countries.
Yes, it's irrational. Religion makes smart people stupid.
US-wide fear of Muslims, minus my width.
I had to wrestle with understanding your quip, but it finally soaked in.
Good one.
Add my width as well. If you have as much girth as I, we may be able to make a difference.
no it makes dumb people stupid and smart people open-minded
"Kill a commie for Christ," was an old right wing chant.
now it's "Kill a Muslim for the Florida preacher."
zero progress
So, what is the solution? I keep on mentioning One World Government... and 'too many people'.. (bbc today : by 2050 the population in India alone.. will have doubled ) We all know that Earth cannot sustain an ever-growing amount of pollution of air, water and soil - healthy crops to feed the ever-growing number of living, breathing animals.
That we STOP the growth of humans is only too obviously a rationally-right thing to do. This to be done by 'natural attrition' (hopefully!). No more multiplying of polluting humans - thus leaving Earth once again bountiful and beautiful for those who are left. (Guess who those will be?)
We know of BF Skinner's 'Waldon Two' where he is trying to get across the idea of Man being able to 'Alter the minds of people with precision.'
Well, Ullman under the google title **** "Shock and Awe.. is this the new Hiroshima"*** (or similar), who 'altered Powell's consciousness by several levels' suggested that the 'enemies' (the innocents in the streets of Iraq..et al) minds be altered by electromagtic waves... For the moments of Shock and Awe.
There is so much going on of which we have no idea.. We do have some, and that is : the ability to alter weather patterns, cause earthquakes, volcano eruptions - at LEAST, that is what the ex Secretary of Defence Cohen said we (oh, no, not us... our ENEMIES!! ) could do.. and that was a few years ago now. !
Anyway, mainly, perhaps we just have to come to terms that unless something is done about the population on this Lifeboat, we will all sink together. And our wars and all the sufferings will have been for naught.
Maybe with our brains and with good will, we can live peacefully together again in a bountiful world. And have the excitement of looking to the planets of the stars and visiting them, at least virtually.
~sc
Above poster is of the ruling class, the 51% most aggressive and wealthy. And so, if his upper half will not limit their excessive wealth, then why should we limit our babies?
EVERYONE BLAMES RELIGION -- WHY?
Every religion under the sun claims to have a cure for greed, which we all agree is the root cause of all wars, but none claim that some evil religion is the root cause of greed.
For fake moralities and fiction religions are just another symptom of greed. For greed, sin and an intent to commit crime, they are one and the same, a desire to enrich yourself upon the misery of another.
And so, the root cause of all crime, wars and evil on earth, this is an ingrate frame of mind thinking you deserve more then this day of life. Which gives you a guilt-free conscience always striving to take all you can take.
Razor..
Good post.. but you are talking to those who have said exactly the same about the way we rip people apart with our drones and our bombs.....
What is not so often mentioned, however, is your last word, culminating from your chastisement of how YOU try to do something, but you can't do it on your own.
~sc
"John_Ellis September 12th, 2010 8:13 pm
Above poster is of the ruling class, the 51% most aggressive and wealthy. And so, if his upper half will not limit their excessive wealth, then why should we limit our babies?"
COMMON SENSE.. RATIONALITY....
And as for speaking of 51% is of the ruling class!!
More like 15% (literally) ...And, I would hardly qualify as one of the FIFTY-ONE per cent..... sheesh.
~sc.
The top 1% rules. They, astoundingly, own over 40% of the wealth in this country.
""Ellis September 12th, 2010 7:30 pm
EVERYONE BLAMES RELIGION -- WHY?"
Leaving politics out of it for the moment, and my usual : all successful politicans are corrupt - or they would'nt be successful'. (Obama is a successful politician!)
Obama, at least, decidely was NOT blaming religion...He had this to say..... very passionately, with conviction... One might say he may be, at heart, a muslim.
"As Americans we are not - and never will be - at war with Islam - It was not a religion that attacked us that day - it was al-Qaeda, a sorry band of men which perverts religion"
If one looks up 'Jesus in Islam' (wikipedea and its links) one might have a very different idea of Islam and its very, very, very great respect for Jesus, in the bible story.
~sc
i agree, muslims tend to be a peaceful religion anyways.
wouldn't
Then there's this:
Bumper Sticker" 'IF IT AIN'T KING JAMES, IT AIN'T BIBLE.
"ThinKingOutsIDe... September 12th, 2010 10:48 pm
General David Betrayus, the Head US Baby Killer in Afghanistan, warned that burning the Quran could endanger the lives of US troops who might become the target of retribution.
FIX THE MEDIA Then FIX THE WORLD
He must be delighted. His perfect, most recent, excuse -
for losing.
~sc
Yes, drone attacks that kill innocent Muslim civilians sends a message to the Islamic world much more powerful than burning Korans.
The American mantra: "Burn people, not books."
The common dreams mantra: Our wars are just. Not theirs.
war cannot be considered just either way unless you are implying that killing itself is alright and it's not. killing is murder and wars are a stupid way to try to get a point across. it's like someone pointing a gun to your head and telling you to jump off a cliff, it's pointless. my point is we will all die anyways, but it is not the job of humans to take lives themselves. nor to judge though we do both anyways and that is what our problem is. if we can't all try to take a step back and open our minds to eachother than this world will never get any better. it is going to keep going down hill.
Very well said.