Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
- Wealthiest Kissed, Weakest Kicked: Obama's Ugly 'New Deal' Offers to Cut Social Security
- What If All the World’s Debt Just Went Away
- Bolivia's Morales Calls for New Era of 'Peace and Unity' to Break Greed of Capitalism
- Sen. Bernie Sanders: 'Mr. President, I am Disappointed'
- Gun Lobby Speaks: We Need More Guns, Especially in Schools
- Wealthiest Kissed, Weakest Kicked: Obama's Ugly 'New Deal' Offers to Cut Social Security
- Bolivia's Morales Calls for New Era of 'Peace and Unity' to Break Greed of Capitalism
- What If All the World’s Debt Just Went Away
- Sen. Bernie Sanders: 'Mr. President, I am Disappointed'
- 8 Deficit Reducers That Are More Ethical—And More Effective—Than the 'Chained CPI'
Popular content
Today's Top News
BP Spill: WH says Oil Has Gone, but Gulf's Fishermen are Not So Sure
Counsellors and lawyers are busier than seafarers in Louisiana, as some experts warn that fishing industry will never recover
High tide, and the remains of a late summer storm, and it is hard to tell on this strip of land between the Mississippi and the marsh where land ends and water begins. It was here - in the most southerly reaches of Louisiana on terrain that is slowly sliding into the sea - that oil from BP's Macondo well first started coming ashore, about a week after the 20 April explosion on the Deepwater Horizon. Eleven men were killed when the drilling platform blew up.
An oyster boat sails past anchored fishing vessels on a waterway in Yscloskey, Louisiana. Fishermen fear that the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico will cause longterm harm to their industry. Photograph: Patrick Semansky/AP And it is here where local people will take the most convincing that the worst of the oil spill is behind them and that recovery is under way.
Barack Obama's point man on the spill, the US Coast Guard's former commander, Thad Allen, said at the weekend that the well no longer posed any threat to the Gulf. Crews will begin the last few remaining operations needed to abandon the well this week.
People here live and die by the water. On a fine day the docks in Venice empty out, with seaworthy boats and able-bodied crew off to look for oil contamination, at sea and in the marsh grass.
No one, it seems, believes the assurances from the White House or government scientists that the oil is largely gone. And no one really believes BP when oil company executives say they will stay in Louisiana for the long haul.
They have seen one exodus already, just before Tropical Storm Bonnie blew through, about a week after the well was capped in mid-July. BP evacuated work crews and boats; many have not returned.
"Oh, the oil's out there," said a captain of one of the air boats chewing through the marsh. When the water is clear the oil pops out like a giant black teardrop. He said the air boats were carrying away up to 3,000 white plastic trash bags of oiled sand from a nearby section of marsh each day. "We'll be here for at least a year - if they still want us, that is."
The autumn shrimping season opened on schedule on 16 August and the authorities have steadily been opening up more of the Gulf for fishing. About 83% of US waters in the Gulf are now open for fishing. The first tests on shrimp, swordfish and tuna hauled out of the Gulf showed no traces of oil.
But Acy Cooper, who wears a shrimpers' white rubber boots even on days when he is not fishing, is possessed by a powerful sense of dread. How can we know for sure that the shrimp is safe from crude or its toxic components? He has seen oil in certain shrimping areas.
"We are only going to get one shot at this. If we don't do it right, we are going to be in big trouble if any tainted shrimp gets on the market," he said. "We don't want to get anything on the market that is going to kill us in the long run."
Not even the most stringent testing can ensure that fishermen stay out of oiled waters - not when some fishermen have been out of work since late April. "Some people are so hungry they are going to do what they can to survive," Cooper said.
Already the local economy is being transformed. On noticeboards, cards for mental health services and lawyers offering to sue BP are tacked on top of advertisements for fishing guides. It is getting harder to find a market for fish.
The other day George Barisich, the head of the United Commercial Fishermen's Alliance, had to drive all the way into Mississippi before he could find a processor who wanted his shrimp. He said he was reduced to selling for just $1.40 (90p) per pound.
Officials from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Agency have been on local radio shows, such as Talk of the Bayou, trying to persuade fishermen like Cooper they have nothing to fear.
"So far we haven't seen a bit of evidence the oil is getting real deep in the marsh," said Jacqueline Michel, a NOAA biochemist.
Only 22 of the 2,000 water samples taken from the Gulf contained traces of oil, and none has permeated deep into the wetlands, which are breeding grounds for shrimp.
The callers were not buying it, and neither was Cooper. He worries that the last few months may have ruined the fisherman's life for some.
Although local people complain that BP gave too many jobs to outsiders rather than locals for cleanup work, some taken on have become used to earning good money - even when they were waiting around at the marina - on the oil company's "vessels of opportunity" program for the cleanup.
Cooper is worried they may give up on shrimping, now that it's such an uncertain occupation.
"We are on the verge of losing this industry," he said. "The chain is broken with the vessels of opportunity."
For Al Sunseri that chain stretches back to 1876 when his family set up the P&J Oyster Company on the edges of New Orleans' French quarter.
He still turns up for work at 4.30am, but there are no workers shucking oysters on the loading dock. Eleven people have been let go.
Premium oysters are a vanishing commodity. Those oysters not killed by the oil were finished off by the Louisiana government's decision to flood the Gulf with fresh water to try to keep the oil offshore.
Sunseri now occupies his time taking orders on a clipboard, trying to mollify the desperate chefs who are his main customer base. He is running dangerously low on shucked oysters.
He asks callers if they could get by with a smaller order. "I am just going to have to tell people I don't have them and that is not something that I am used to doing," he said.
The shortage has pushed the price of oysters in the shell up 40% since the spill. That is too rich in the depths of a recession - even for a luxury product. Sunseri also worries that what oysters he can find are of variable quality.
"I know they say about 40% of the oyster growing area is open but as far as productive areas, it is maybe about 15%," he said. "We don't have babies, and we don't have the market-sized ones."
He moves over to a tabletop display of oyster shells. Those that are being harvested are about half normal size. "These would ordinarily not be harvested for another year," he said.
"They really should be in there developing. The few little oysters that I am selling right now are really inferior."
Even industry cheerleader Mike Voisin, who chairs the Louisiana Oyster Task Force, admits it will be three years before the oyster beds resettle. Until then, he says, the harvest will probably fall to half of the usual 113,000 ton annual take.
The timespan is depressing for Sunseri. He said he is telling his children: "Your daddy does not care if this business fizzles away. Don't feel the burden of carrying this on."
For Ryan Lambert, who once counted himself the biggest fishing charter operator around Venice, such acceptance is unthinkable. He is much too angry to be resigned.
The spill left him with a calendar showing week after week of canceled bookings, gutting a business that once brought in $1.3m a year.
By BP's reckoning though, his losses were just $66,000. Lambert is furious. He said he has paid his accountant hundreds of dollars to meet BP's demands for documentation. "I shouldn't have to fight for the money that is owed me," he said. "I am not the bad guy here. They are the ones who ruined it for me, not vice versa. For me to have to fight for them to pay me for what they did makes me sick."
He is also worried sick that the fish will start disappearing, as they did in the years after the Exxon Valdez spill in Alaska, and that his business will be dealt a slow, painful death.
He built his company from scratch, starting from his love of bass fishing; now his clients troop into his fishing lodge from all across the country. He rebuilt once before, after Hurricane Katrina. He is not sure he can do it again, or wait for the Gulf to make a full recovery.
"I am 52 years old. I can't wait 20 years for them to clean things up."
He feels certain BP will pull out much sooner. "The well will be stopped, and then they will hang around until the oil stops coming up on the beaches, and then they will be gone," he said.
"Anything they don't clean will be left to me and the microbes and Mother Nature until all of a sudden we won't be America's best fishery any more.
"This will be history some day, and I will still have that problem."
Voices on the ground
'On television they are saying all the time that there is no oil. What BP did is that they succeeded in buying off the White House and Congress and most of the senators, and now they are buying off the networks'
-- Dean Blanchard, shrimp magnate
'The oil is still very in the coastal areas, it's still coming up along the beaches, and it's in the bottom offshore as well as in the bays and estuaries. A lot needs to be addressed before BP says it has all been attended to'
-- Wilma Subra, chemist
'The only silver lining that is going to come out of this is that the government and the country are going to understand the importance of the Gulf'
-- George Barisich, president, United Commercial Fishermen's Association
'Ironically, this catastrophe may in the end run have more impact on oil leasing programs than on the Gulf of Mexico ... We recognize now that we have something much more like a nuclear reactor on our hands than a wood-burning stove and that is an awareness that is new to the federal government, new to the public, and new to Congress'
-- Oliver Houck, environmental law professor at Tulane University
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


14 Comments so far
Show AllLive by the sword etc. A crew arrives in their oil burning cars, they get on their oil burning boat, harvest oysters, keep them iced, likely with oil produced energy, transport them in oil fueld vehicles in the air and overland, to locations around the world where other oily transport takes them to retailers and restaurants, where they are sold and served by people getting to work in their cars, to usually upscale customers who arrive in their electric cars to sample the delicate salty and slowly disappearing bivalves.
An absolutely absurd assertion, and of a meme not even original. This idiocy has been proposed by others on CD.
Lots of idiocy here, like the headline that's not supported by the article.
Well, there was a time about a century and a half ago, when fishing was carried out under sail. The catch was unloaded on the beach and the fishermen's wives hawked their catch through the local villages from barrows.
Somehow, I don't see that happening again. Amongst other things, I'm sure the government would quickly regulate it out of business. OSHA would say it was too dangerous, fish and oysters would not be in a "properly refrigerated" hold for the few hours needed to return to port. The barrows would require refrigeration and special handling. In general, nothing that has gone on in the past is considered to have any value now, for we are so much wiser than our forefathers. Meanwhile, we continue to self destruct, and Gaia continues to bleed to death for profit.
but but but . . . I thought that both Bobby Jindal's Louisiana Rethug gummint and Barack Obama's American Democratic gummint were both agreed that the seafood is safe to eat now!
Big Pigs new slogan: FISH OIL IS GOOD FOR YOU.
Olive Oil, Canola Oil, Polyinternal Olefins, Corn Oil, Fish Oil, Chain Saw Oil, Oil of Ole . . .
Really, it's all just a matter of taste.
BP ,,,, stands for Be Patient , mother nature will fix all bad things, in time.
Never be the same , are strong words. I would like to think that all will be well, maybe not in this life time or the next, but never be the same, well, thats not right.
Mother nature fixed things after the Permian extinction. Took 250 million years. That's close enough to never for me.
I like the comment that BP has bought our politicians and now the media. Nothing is said about the lingering impacts of the spill. In the absence of hard science--the claim that 75% of the oil is gone is not widely accepted--we can only assume the worst.
And what is the worst? First, that even if the Gulf doesn't look bad, it holds vast quantities of crude oil and other toxic chemicals. Worst case scenario is that the Corexit being sprayed actually makes the oil more toxic. Corexit is designed to break oil molecules apart and it actually does the same thing to blood cells, rupturing them. Also, the Corexit atomizes the oil molecules--making them easier for microbes to consume, yes, but also creating tiny airborne particles of oil that get caught up in rains far from the Gulf.
One family's swimming pool in Florida registered large quantities of a potent toxic component in Corexit. Reports of acidic rain and chemical burns on vegetation have appeared as far north as Tennessee and Iowa.
Also, people who live along the Gulf coast are getting large daily doses of the chemicals associated with the crude--benzene, etc.. Their health is in clear danger but our gov't does nothing. Like 9/11, and Valdez where many clean-up workers died, Fedgov says nothing about the risks. We can only assume the worst because they're saying nothing, and therefore we know the problem is bad enough to be covered up.
Much of the oil on the beaches was plowed under and is starting to re-emerge. Bulldozing saved massive penalties imposed on a per barrel basis.
The deception revolves around money. Just like the failed safety precautions, greed played a role in the decision to (continue to!) use the dispersant to hide the scale of the spill. New York attorney Feinberg handled 9-11 payment and is now denying thousands of claims. The main purpose of the compensation fund appears to get people to sign away their right to sue BP. I'm sure the cleanup workers are similarly screwed. And the fund has only 2 of the promised 20 billion dollars.
My advice is for Gulf residents to demand justice. If no one resists this atrocity, just what will they next be forced to endure? How much more ecological and economic damage will the gov't allow people to suffer? The answer is: it will allow favored corporations like BP to get away with everything they wants. The legal system will deny "rights." As George Carlin said, "they're not rights if someone can take them away." People really know how bad it is but no one is talking. Everyone down there should move and carry on the fight against corporatism and destruction of their way of life. If not, many are likely to die of cancer from the spill and dispersant.
A couple of things:
1) Did Exxon ever pay the fine levied against them for the Valdez spill?
2) Since our Supreme Court has ruled that corporations have the same rights as individuals, I feel sorry for Ryan.
******************
For Ryan Lambert, who once counted himself the biggest fishing charter operator around Venice, such acceptance is unthinkable. He is much too angry to be resigned.
The spill left him with a calendar showing week after week of cancelled bookings, gutting a business that once brought in $1.3m a year.
********************
BP probably pays at least a dozen politicians that much each year just so Ryan can be told, "fuck off, buddy".
Terrific! If the Whitehouse has announced the oil is gone and its safe, we can be absolutely certain that the oil is still there and it is not safe.
This White House like the last may be depended on to avoid the truth at all costs.
The comment is somewhat misleading. The White House hasn't said the oil is gone. The oil spill task force and government agencies report that a large fraction of the oil spilled is gone. They didn't say all of it was gone. Portions of the Gulf of Mexico remain closed for fishing due to the presence of oil, and will not be opened until measurements provide the security that is needed to fish and sell those products.
What I see is an absurd generation of a false reality, as if you were Faux News agents, creating this false reality to attack President Obama. Yours are very transparent lies, if one is reading the actual government agency reports, but I suppose there are innocent sheep in this world who will gather around lies, without checking facts.
The reality is that there is oil in the water, in the marshes, and below the surface in beaches which have already been cleaned. The government uses a system which requires that an area be certified not to have oil for a period of time before it is opened for fishing, and some areas may not be opened for months or years. The reality is also that right now there are permits being sought to dig the beach sand, such that the oil can be cleaned at a deeper level. This request is under examination and permits have not been issued for deeper cleaning to take place. Thus the oil may indeed remain buried in the sand for a long time.
I have also read in the available literature that a system of protective berms proposed by Mr Bobby Jindal, the governor of Louisiana, is a failure. Mr Jindal pressured the federal government to allow the construction of these berms, which was eventually allowed, and the contract was issued to a Republican contractor. They have already spent tens of millions of dollars to build about 5 km of berms, most of which have already been destroyed by the sea. Meanwhile, environmental experts continue to warn that berm construction may damage the wetlands, because it impedes the flow of sea water with oxygen and nutrients.
These are the real facts, which many of you ignore.
I live in Spain, near a beach, and i am interested in the subject of beach fouling and contamination. If I can access the websites with the reports, and be better informed, you can do so. And please do not attack your President, he is doing a good job, and a lot of what we see are warrantless attacks, probably carried out by Republican agents.
I am sure you have a good heart, but the comment was in general and a bit sarcastic
My friend, if you believe this President is doing a good job, I simply do not know what to say to you.
He is in the midst of a failed Presidency. He has failed the American people in
almost every way there is. On Health Care, on the Economy, on Jobs, in generally keeping the faith with his Promises.
The republicans LOVE him. Between he and Nancy Pelosi they have returned control of our government to them. Raised them from the dead and given them life they simply couldn't have regained for themselves.
I won't bother to list the lies from this administration as you may certainly look them up.
As to "warrentless attacks" and the hilarious suggestion that these suggestions are made by "republican agents", let me tell you I voted for this Bozo and have lived to bitterly regret it. He will be the worst President in our modern history.
Be well.