Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Obama Should Borrow A Page From FDR This Labor Day
President Obama will speak in Milwaukee this Labor Day, his second Wisconsin appearance in as many months.
The president's attentiveness to the state is notable, if perhaps somewhat less than altruistic.
This is, after all, an election year. And Wisconsin is the swingingest of swing states -- a state where a governorship that has been in Democratic hands could be lost, and where a Senate seat and at least one U.S. House seat are vulnerable.
So, this Labor Day, Obama wants to reconnect with voters in a state that gave him overwhelming support in his 2008 campaigns for the Democratic presidential nomination and the presidency.
Unfortunately, polls suggest that Wisconsinites -- like residents of other Midwestern swing states -- are not quite so impressed with Obama as they were two years ago. It is not that the people of the state have given up on the guy. But they are looking for something more than managerial pronouncements about the economic shambles that he inherited from George Bush and Dick Cheney.
Midwesterners are not naive and nostalgic. They know that Bush and Cheney did not "get it."
What they're not so sure about is whether Obama "gets" it.
To answer the question, the president would do well to borrow a page from the wisest of his predecessors.
Seventy-six years ago this summer, Franklin Roosevelt came to another Wisconsin city, Green Bay, at a similar point in his presidency.
Like Obama, FDR had been elected on a promise of "hope" and "change."
Like Obama, FDR had tried with mixed success to deliver on that promise.
In Green Bay, in the summer of 1934, the 32nd president needed to explain to a crowd that was sympathetic but worried that the economic wrangling in which he and his administration was engaged had to be seen in perspective - not just the perspective of the presidency of the man he replaced, Herbert Hoover, but the perspective of the long American struggle between a privileged few that engaged in the "private means of exploitation" and the great many that had "waged a long and bitter fight for (their) rights."
Roosevelt did this with a history lesson, of a sort, in which he traced back to the founding of the republic in to recount the long fight "against those forces which disregard human cooperation and human rights in seeking that kind of individual profit which is gained at the expense of his fellows."
That fight between patriotic proponents of economic justice and the Tory defenders of an old economic royalism had, Roosevelt argued, come to a head with the arrival of the Great Depression.
Recalling the 1932 election that swept Democrats to power and ushered in the New Deal era, the president argued, "In the great national movement that culminated over a year ago, people joined with enthusiasm. They lent hand and voice to the common cause, irrespective of many older political traditions. They saw the dawn of a new day. They were on the march; they were coming back into the possession of their own home land."
"As the humble instruments of their vision and their power, those of us who were chosen to serve them in 1932 turned to the great task," Roosevelt continued. "In one year and five months, the people of the United States have received at least a partial answer to their demands for action; and neither the demand nor the action has reached the end of the road."
The primary barrier to action, the president explained, was erected by those who still entertained the fantasy who argued that FDR could restore confidence only by "(telling) tell the people of the United States that all supervision by all forms of Government, Federal and State, over all forms of human activity called business should be forthwith abolished."
So, like Obama, Roosevelt faced an opposition that claimed government was the problem.
Unlike Obama, however, Roosevelt refused to even entertain - let alone embrace - the absurd constructs of the private-sector fabulists who "would repeal all laws, State or national, which regulate business-that a utility could henceforth charge any rate, unreasonable or otherwise; that the railroads could go back to rebates and other secret agreements; that the processors of food stuffs could disregard all rules of health and of good faith; that the unregulated wild-cat banking of a century ago could be restored; that fraudulent securities and watered stock could be palmed off on the public; that stock manipulation which caused panics and enriched insiders could go unchecked."
"In fact," the president continued, "if we were to listen to (the anti-government crowd), the old law of the tooth and the claw would reign in our Nation once more."
"The people of the United States will not restore that ancient order," thundered Roosevelt. "There is no lack of confidence on the part of those business men, farmers and workers who clearly read the signs of the times. Sound economic improvement comes from the improved conditions of the whole population and not a small fraction thereof."
With those words, Roosevelt took a side.
He did not imagine that it was possible to compromise with those who wanted to return to the "tooth and claw" past.
No, he would stand against the Tories and for the new order where it was understood that the purpose of government was to achieve "the improved conditions of the whole population and not a small fraction thereof."
Were Obama to take a similar stand this Labor Day, were he to echo Roosevelt's call for economic justice, the energy of this election year would shift - in Wisconsin and nationally - because voters would know, finally, which side their president was on.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

124 Comments so far
Show AllObama should admit that he knows little about the struggles of the poor and working class of the world and just leave FDR out of it.
Obama campaigned as a progressive Democrat and has ruled as a corporate Republican. Heck of a sell-out, Barack.
No, he campaigned as a Business as Usual Democrat; a real progressive would never escalate any war let alone say s/he would while campaigning.
I think the free spirit that won World War Two was taken over by the war profiteering business structures that still dominate the business world.
When FDR died and later, JFK (coup) a great free spirit was almost extinguished but the sparks are still around.
Sparks is what we got.
This fantasy brings into stark contrast Oilbomber's campaign mantra, that he was going to change politics in DC.
Well, he has changed it alright, for the worse.
He has moved the power base of the Democratic Party to the right with his supposed seeking bi-partisanship bullcrap. Both parties use that empty framing of bi-partisanship to hide the real political game being played, namely that K Street wins no matter what. Both the current power center of the Democratic Party and Republicans are firmly aligned with, and have been bought, by the MIC, the Big Banks/Finance, the Medical Industrial Complex, the Media Industrial Complex, the newly post 9/11 expanded Security Industrial Complex, big Agriculture with its henchmen Monsanto and ADM, and the list goes on and on and on and on.
Oilbomber has now basically sealed the deal, and empowered the burgeoning oligarchy, made up of money worshiping CEO pimps, and their corresponding whores from both parties in DC.
The biggest transfer of wealth, probably in our nation's history, is underway, and has been going on for the last 30 years. Bill Clinton and Oilbomber, are key players in this absolute criminal conspiracy, along with every other Democrat that has voted for NAFTA, GATT, the WTO, and every brutal war that comes down the disaster capitalism pike. My emphasis on Democrats here, is just to bust the myth, that somehow Oilbomber wants to do something different than what he has done, or that Bill Clinton was a great president residing over a great economy. Sure, there were some good economic policies under Clinton, but to not see, especially now, the Corporate Trojan horse that was set free to attack the middle class in the bloody trade agreements that he championed and signed, is to be blind to the fact that both Republican and Democrats have worked diligently to dismantle the middle class. Clinton also signed into law, deregulation of media ownership, and of Banking/Financial Services companies. These two chess pieces put into place by Clinton by his pen, have been absolutely pivotal in the huge power shift toward corporate rule of our lives.
Happy Labor Day!
No. What would a good statistician respond? No. What would a good behavioralist offer? No. Why belabor the point (no pun intended)? No. No. No.
FDR would have a difficult time recognizing today's Democratic Party; the DP is actually to the right of Eisenhower's 1956 Republican Party!
No need to call upon the ghost of FDR. Obama's more likely to channel Dick Nixon for inspiration.
Let's hope he's a one-termer.
Green Party come up with anyone? Michael Moore? Bill Maher?
let's remember that obama was well behind mccain until the lehman bros fell and the stock market imploded -
and then we find out goldman sachs was up to their necks in stock market manipulaiton and the sub-prime mess.....
so we got the candidate most likely to pander to wall street and the vampire banksters......
last election (2004) it was bush supported by these vampires - in 2008 it was obama....
i doubt these folks will jump onto the palin bandwagon - i'm sure tey'll stick with obama in 2012 and then turn around and give the white hosue to the rethugs - my money's on jeb bush!
let's face it you can't win the white house without the support of the vampires and the banksters.....
I voted for Obama precisely because I hoped that he would, in some ways, be a reincarnation of FDR. He has failed badly. It is said by his apologists that the President doesn't have that much power to really change things. Tell that to the people who saw FDR in action. What we have seen from Obama has been a systematic sellout and the continuation of Chicago-style politics. I knew something was awry with his very first appointment, Rahn Emmanuel, and it has been largely downhill ever since with Obama kowtowing to every special interest imaginable. Real healthcare reform? Nope, but a huge present for the HMOs and Big Phrama. Real financial reform? Nope, but the CEOs of Wall St., etc. are delighted with what was passed. It barely effects their obscene, and I would say treasonous, rush to transfer the rest of the nation's wealth to the ruling elites and their ilk. Protection of Social Security? I don't think so. Obama approved every member of the behind closed doors Deficit Reduction Commission which includes Alan Simpson who recently referred to people who receive Social Security as "parasites". Even with calls for Simpson and his big mouth to resign Obama has made no effort that I am aware of to do so. I believe that when this commission comes out conveniently AFTER the November elections (so that "Blue Dog Demos" among others can protect their seats from backlash) and recommends that Soc. Sec. benefits be cut and that retirement ages be raised that Barry O. will go along with this. He will tell us in that calm, measured way of his that our deficits have gotten dangerous and there is no way to keep Social Security and our economy solvent without cuts.
What he won't suggest is more taxes on the richest earners, trimming the military budget by 1 Trillion dollars over the next decade, or eliminating various forms of corporate welfare and tax dodges.
In other words, that "hopey changey thing" that we all voted for was a slick and, I would say cynical, ploy to continue Big Business as Usual with a recycled cast of corporate whores.
As we prepare to enter the second phase of the "double-dip recession" with the stimulus money largely gone, very few real jobs created and Obama having put The Usual Suspects into the real positions of power I have become quite pessimistic about our future. I also believe that Obama will be a one-term president and that he will replaced by someone even worse. Contrast that with FDR who served for an unprecedented 4 terms!
I was watching TV the night of his victory speech from Grant Park in Chicago. There were tens of thousands there and many of them were crying with joy that AT LAST we could try and repair our country after the ravages of George W. Bush and Dick Cheney. It was not to be. I was fooled again with the words "hope" and change". Never again. I will not vote for this failure of a president again and I will never again vote for a Democrat for President. I firmly believe that whomever gets the nomination is so hopelessly compromised and BOUGHT that my vote will be wasted.
It's really incredible that after Bill Clinton, the best Republican president we ever had, a person with a 3-digit IQ would vote for a Democrat again.
Unlike you, I was never fooled by Obama and would never have voted for the fraud. There were plenty of signs in his record as senator that had alerted me. He voted to fund the wars and voted for the FISA bill, he was to the right of Richard Nixon.
The title of the article brings to mind April Fools Day not Labor Day. Is Nichols trying to make some kind of joke with this?
Barack Obama climbed to the political pinnacle by carefully avoiding anything that resembled leadership or independent thinking. If the ruling class had ever detected anything resembling a backbone in this "triangulator" in the image and likeness of Bill Clinton they never would have allowed him to pretend to be President.
But he was willing, no eager, to disown and renounce truth-tellers like Rev. Jeremiah Wright and surround himself with calculating political hacks like David Axelrod and Rahm Emmanuel who pass down his marching orders from the banks.
The collapsing capitalist US economy will soon be in need of a scapegoat. If Barack Obama doesn't get lucky and the Generals and Bankers don't call for war on Iran, he's going to be it! Obama will not make it to 2012 as President. I hold no ill will towards him as a man and he has a beautiful family and those two innocent little girls, so I hope his penalty will not be imprisonment or worse. But that's a decision his masters will make.
John Nichols on the Detroit march for “Jobs, Justice and Peace”: Deceit and self-delusion
“By David Walsh
6 September 2010
“John Nichols in the Nation (August 28) counterposed the Detroit march to right-winger Glenn Beck’s rally the same day at the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, where the latter laid claim to the heritage of the massive civil rights march in August 1963 famously addressed by Martin Luther King, Jr.
Nichols asserted that “anyone who was paying attention Saturday knew that the continuation of the 1963 ‘March on Washington for Jobs and Justice’…was not the slick, right-wing spin–dominated event in Washington. It was the serious, issue-oriented march organized by the United Auto Workers union, a key supporter of the 1963 march, and the Rev. Jesse Jackson, a former aide to King.”
Nichols continued, “Jackson and the new activist president of the UAW, Bob King, led the march, which marks the beginning of what the union head describes as a ‘massive campaign that brings so many concerned citizens together in the name of peace and mobilizing forces for change.’”
What proportions of self-delusion and deliberate deception are involved in such a comment is not entirely clear, but it is a secondary matter. Nichols treats the UAW under King and Jackson’s traveling “Keep Hope Alive” circus as the legitimate leadership of a new popular movement.
This is the opposite of the truth. Under conditions of widespread economic suffering, growing anger and great disillusionment with Obama, Jackson and King are intervening to block the emergence of an independent movement of the working class against big business and its political representatives.
Nichols’ vision of the Detroit march as the restaging of the 1963 Washington rally is a fantasy and has an almost farcical element. Hundreds of thousands rallied in Washington in August 1963, as part of a vast movement for equal rights. Black and white youth, in particular, turned out in massive numbers.
Much water has flowed under the bridge since then. American liberalism and the AFL-CIO have turned sharply to the right, long ago abandoning even token opposition to the status quo. The less than half-hearted and cynical character of the Jesse Jackson-Bob King march and rally communicated itself to the population. Almost no one showed up.”
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2010/sep2010/nich-s06.shtml
Revenge Girl
“I think Obama is gullible because he actually believes
his own BS, that's why he hired Summers and Geitner.”
LIGHT
Paid actor Obama was hand picked by the rich, so he is a most deceitful dictator who dictates to us out of the script the rich hand to him each morning.
So we may never know if Obama is gullible or stupid, as he just talks for effect and repeats exactly what the rich want him to put into effect.
It was clear that all of this was coming, when Obama voted for the FISA Bill, for continued funding of our war on Iraq, and his promise to escalate, expand and extend our war in Afghanistan, which he's most certainly done.
The New Deal: Cost: $32 billion in 1934-36(Est), Inflation Adjusted Cost: $500 billion (Est) today.
50 billion, President Obama, is just not going to change much.And it keeps us trapped in danger,by sending money to our enemy's for oil.
Can we get serious, or is breaking off the oil teat just to difficult.
When did America decide that new advanced technology is not good for the energy Independence industry. Oil has cost us lives, trillions of dollars,and gotten a really piss poor foreign policy agenda.
Lets get out of the fossil fuel stone ages, its time, and it only enriches and empowers people that have brought us more than enough danger and grief.
We need mass manufacturing of solar and wind farms, a new smart power grid,and new factory and technology development for great energy efficiency products
Come on, the neocons have bilked us for trillions for wars of deception to boost and protect profits for oil company tycoons and the military industrial complex.
I dont want my tax dollars spent for them, I want it spent on protecting the American people.
And no one has stopped this insanity, and more is on the way, because we wont move in a new direction for energy independence.
We need the jobs, and the national security. 50 billion, are you kidding, have you already ear marked the next trillion on the next war????
Control of Iran's oil , is that the next neocon war.
Say it aint so!!!
WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
>>
We need mass manufacturing of solar and wind farms, a new smart power grid,and new factory and technology development for great energy efficiency products
<<
Which would also put millions of people back to work.
Somehow these goddamned wars have to stop. Somehow we have to strangle the military budget. We need a defensive force confined to the United States. No more thousand bases world wide "to protect American interests". What are these "American interests"? Multi-national oil companies for one. Let them provide their own defenses in countries where they do business. "American interests" like multi national corporations doing business in China? Let them fend for themselves. American interests like "containing China" or "Containing Russia"? Fuck that. Is China trying to "contain the USA"? Is Russia trying to "contain the USA"? Bullshit bullshit bullshit. We are letting a handful of paranoid assholes and profiteers destroy our lives and our country. We cannot have national health care because we have to "contain China", because we "have to fight them there so we don't have to fight them here"? More bullshit. More lies. I'm sick of it. Sick of it. Sick of it.
WTF indeed, sir!!
Piano wire and lamp posts.
The US deficit is 13 trillion 500 billion dollars.
It has gone up 3 trillion since the first bank bailout
during the death throes of the "Deciders" reign.