Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Afghanistan: Ouster of Contractors Throws US Strategy in Doubt
NEW YORK - Charging that U.S. private security contractors are "mafia- like groups" being financed by U.S. taxpayers to carry out "terrorist activities" with the support of the U.S. government, Afghan President Hamid Karzai has ordered a four- month phaseout of all private security companies in his embattled country.
An Afghan bodyguard. Afghanistan's President Hamid Karzai has issued orders to immediately begin dismantling private security firms, which are believed to number around 40,000 and are extensively used to protect embassies and offices, guard bases and escort convoys. (AFP/File/Massoud Hossaini)
Asserting his oft-challenged authority as the country's chief
executive, Karzai's move, if implemented, would likely change the
security landscape in Afghanistan. Critics are saying it would be
likely to result in potential delays of many foreign projects and
undermine the strategy being followed by top U.S. commanded in
Afghanistan, Gen. David Petraeus.
Economic organisations such
as the World Bank, and compounds of embassies, consulates,
nongovernmental organisations, would be exempted from the rule.
But
it appears clear that Karzai's hostility toward U.S. contractors is
fuelled by their impact on domestic Afghan politics. Attacks by U.S.
drones and other forces have resulted in the killing of innocent
Afghanistan civilians.
This has not only turned into hostility
by Afghans toward U.S. and allied troops, but it puts at peril the
strategy announced by the new U.S. military commander in Afghanistan,
Gen. David Petraeus. That strategy depends on the military courting
Afghan civilians by protecting them from the Taliban and improving the
government services they receive.
In a related development, Xe
Services, the private military company formerly known as Blackwater
Worldwide, has agreed with the U.S. State Department to pay 42 million
dollars in fines for hundreds of violations of United States export
control regulations, after allegedly illegally sending weapons to
Afghanistan and training international civilians to be soldiers.
The
latter charge includes making unauthorised proposals to train troops
in south Sudan and providing sniper training for Taiwanese police
officers.
The company is said to be pleased with the settlement, which will allow it to continue to get government contracts.
However,
the settlement does not resolve other legal issues the company is
facing. Five former Blackwater executives are under indictment
executives on weapons and obstruction charges.
In a related
development, the Iraqi government said it plans to seize weapons from
foreign security firms and expel ex- Blackwater contractors still in the
country, according to Interior Minister Jawad al-Bolani.
The
decision was triggered by the Iraqi government's outrage over the
dismissal by a U.S. court of charges against Blackwater Worldwide
guards who were accused of killing 14 Iraqi civilians in Baghdad in
2007. The guards said they shot in self-defense.
The judge said
there was evidence of prosecutorial misconduct. The U.S. government is
appealing the dismissal of the court case. The Iraqi government, which
has prohibited Blackwater from operating in Iraq, has hired U.S.
lawyers to prepare a lawsuit against the company.
For many
Iraqis, the killing of the 14 civilians became emblematic of the
impunity from prosecution in Iraq enjoyed by foreign security
contractors after the 2003 U.S. invasion. That immunity ended last year
under a U.S.-Iraqi security agreement transferring sovereignty back to
Iraq.
Karzai took the challenge to U.S. and NATO influence over
his much-criticized government to the American airways over the
weekend. During an appearance on ABC's "This Week," he pressed for the
removal of the vast majority of U.S. private contractors by the end of
this year. He said their continued presence inside Afghanistan was "an
obstruction and impediment" to the country's growth, a waste of money,
and a trigger for corruption among Afghan officials.
He added,
"One of the reasons that I want them disbanded and removed by four
months from now is exactly because their presence is preventing the
growth and development of the Afghan security forces - especially the
police force - because if 40, 50,000 people are given more salaries
than the Afghan police, why would an Afghan ... man come to the police
if he can get a job in a security firm, have a lot of leeway without
any discipline? So naturally our security forces will find it difficult
to grow. In order for our security forces to grow these groups must be
disbanded."
Karzai's proposal drew cautious support from Senator
John Kerry, Democrat of Massachusetts and chairman of the Senate
Foreign Relations Committee, who was on a two-day visit to Afghanistan.
Kerry said a reorganization of the country's security was called for.
"It
is in (President Karzai's) interest to build his own security capacity
as fast as possible," Kerry said, adding that it was also in the
U.S.'s interest. However, he said, the timetable would need to be
worked out.
But, according to U.S. officials, Afghanistan's army
and police are not yet ready to take up the roles now played by
private security contractors. If anything, the corruption that Karzai
sees in the contractor corps could get worse if the Afghan army -
itself a reported haven for corruption - is now asked to take on an
even larger role.
Yet Karzai said, "I'm appealing to the U.S.
taxpayer not to allow their hard earned money to be wasted on groups
that are not only providing lots of inconvenience to the Afghan people
but are actually, god knows, in contract with mafia- like groups and
perhaps also funding militants, and insurgents and terrorists with
those funds."
- Posted in



11 Comments so far
Show AllA Hero willing to stand up to the corporate Monster.
How corrupt was Iraq after the USA invasion, its Corporate USA that is criminal and corrupt to the core.
What is more corrupt than killing millions of people for mercenary objectives?
If only USA politicians would banish the mercenaries instead of empowering them as OilyBomber is in both Iraq and Afghanistan.
I would trade OilyBomber for Karzai in a flash!
I agree. The USA has a killing lust. The corporations will do anything to make more$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.
Whats going on here? Why is all this truth being told? Its just plain weird. Isnt he just supposed to say what they tell him to say?
Next thing you know our Iraqi puppets will start telling the truth about our contractors there too.
What these articles never suggest is that the USA military go back to its traditional roles and thus eliminate the need for mercenaries.
Are we to believe we have a military which cannot guard itself?
I know your question is rhetorical, but for those who might not...
It's not that our military can't guard itself (except from it's own sins) it's that it's way too small. Contractors are used in order to avoid having a draft.
The very last thing our government wants is to have to bring back the draft. They know it would bring about the end of their wars, the end of the enrichment of the MIC, and the end of their plans to dominate the world from space.
They would rather pay billions to contractors than have to start drafting middle class American youngsters.
Karzai shows more competence than Bush/Cheney/Obama. Having mercenaries makes it much easier to prosecute a war, economically and from a standpoint of soldiers killed. No one wants to see people killed, but it appears more palatable if they are mercenaries.
Additionally our 'oligarchy' gets to pocket billions and their workers don't have to answer to anyone for their actions, which is what Karsai is getting at. Blackwater pays a relatively small fine, Eric Prince moves to the United Arab Emerates and lives like a king without chance for normal extradition.........
Strategy? What has strategy got to do with this?
The only real question here is just how low can the US go?
When a quisling (see Quisling Wikipedia) has to correct the occupier it would seem the situation is laughably stupid and futile.
Does the US not see this absurdity?
Or is the entire country just a conceited, pompous, deeply and idiotically dishonest stuffed shirt stayed with myths of Jesus, and Justice, and Democracy, and Apple Pie?
And of course the entire world knows the answers are yes and yes.
Time to look in the mirror USA. You are disgustingly and absurdly holding this repulsive bloated self on display as a model of probity while killing for profit.
With the US strategy hopeless and impossible in every way except pumping taxpayer money into the hands of corporate war merchants, I hope that something puts the strategy in doubt. Most anything is better than a really expensive slow motion disaster that we can never end because we would have to admit that we made mistakes - that every one with any brains can see plain as day.
We can't afford the empire. We will give it up like the Romans, Soviet Union, Germans, Japanese, Spanish, French, English........ had to. We can do it voluntarily if we hurry or lose it in a collapse.
I don't blame Karzi. He has to deal with his own chieftans who are rightfully upset. A war with mercenaries will never end.
What is that comment about, that it will make things difficult for Petraeus? If he is the great general that so many say he is, then this should be no problem. Maybe LESS is MORE.
I had no idea that generals made a war plan and then everything just went perfectly. The "Charge of the Light Brigade," yeah that was a plan.
O, what delightful cynicism (not) from a CIA spokesman saying that if we want real information in Afghanistan, it won't come from Sister Theresa or Mary Poppins.
And in truth life in Kabul has always been about dealing with shady figures, i.e., paying them money, or was at least during the few months I lived there in the 1960's.
But the new revelations of Afghan kingpins using American money to build second home McMansions in Dubai is so consistent with the tenor of this war that we might want to ask, once again, How many ways can we make idiots of ourselves in and over Afghanistan?
The 55 per cent of the American population now opposed to the war is a better figure than in the past but still not enough. As John Steinbeck had his main character say in THE SHORT REIGN OF PIPPIN IV, "a confused people can make no clear demands."
And the confused 45 per cent includes, unfortunately, President Barack Obama as he tries, one would hope, to balance his personal ideals with his perceived political reality.
Steinbeck also suggested in PIPPIN IV that all of our presidents must have tried to improve the lot of man, but that "simple honesty and logic has never worked."
Should the CIA operative I mentioned be eaten alive by carpenter ants? Probably, when one considers that the information elicited from the shady Afghans is good for nothing except to perpetuate war. Those ants should also bite a thousand bloggers and letter-writers every day, in fact almost anybody who says anything about the Afghan war which distracts from consideration of its stupidity, the only possible main topic.
Yet Karzai said, "I'm appealing to the U.S. taxpayer not to allow their hard earned money to be wasted on groups that are not only providing lots of inconvenience to the Afghan people but are actually, god knows, in contract with mafia- like groups and perhaps also funding militants, and insurgents and terrorists with those funds."
Watch your back, Pres. Karzai. State-sanctioned Murder, Inc. has cowed a nation of oil addicts to rubber-stamp these illegal wars.