EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- Disaster Capitalism Strikes as Hedge Funds Circle Near-Bankrupt Municipalities Like Vultures
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
- Patent Filing Claims Solar Energy ‘Breakthrough’
- Wisconsin Bill Would Treat Organic Milk, Sharp Cheddar, Brown Eggs as "Junk Food"
- Climate Change's 'Evil Twin': Ocean Acidification
- In 'March Toward Disaster,' World Hits 400 PPM Milestone
- Ignoring Bee Crisis, EPA Greenlights New 'Highly Toxic' Pesticide
Popular content
Today's Top News
Netanyahu: US Easily Manipulated
A recently-revealed tape has shown Binyamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, discussing ways to undermine the Oslo Accords and calling the United States "easy" to manipulate.
The video was shot in 2001, apparently without Netanyahu's knowledge [Channel 10] The video was filmed in 2001, apparently without Netanyahu's
knowledge, during a meeting with Israeli settlers in the occupied West
Bank. It aired on Friday night on Israel's Channel 10, and several
translations have been posted online.
At one point on the tape, Netanyahu threatens a "broad attack" against the Palestinian Authority.
"The main thing, first of all, is to hit them. Not just one blow, but blows that are so painful that the price will be too heavy to be borne," Netanyahu said. "A broad attack on the Palestinian Authority."
The tape was shot during the early stages of the second intifada, when violence between Israelis and Palestinians was escalating. Netanyahu was speaking with settlers who lost family members to Palestinian attacks.
Ariel Sharon, the Israeli prime minister at the time, had recently deployed additional Israeli troops in the West Bank.
Undermining the Oslo Accords
Netanyahu - who did not hold political office when the recording was made - was dismissive of the United States, calling it easily manipulated.
"I know what America is," Netanyahu said. "America is a thing you can move very easily, move it in the right direction. They won't get in the way."
Netanyahu also spoke extensively about undermining the Oslo Accords, the agreement signed in 1993 which set a framework for future Israeli-Palestinian negotiations.
The Oslo Accords specified that Israel would be allowed to keep "military zones" in the West Bank in any future agreement with the Palestinian Authority. Netanyahu told the settlers he would use that loophole to retain large portions of Palestinian territory.
"I'm going to interpret the accords in such a way that would allow me to put an end to this galloping forward to the '67 borders," he said.
"How do we do it? Nobody said what defined military zones were. Defined military zones are security zones; as far as I'm concerned, the entire Jordan Valley is a defined military zone."
In the recording, Netanyahu described Bill Clinton - the former US president who helped to negotiate the accords - as "radically pro-Palestinian".
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

133 Comments so far
Show All- this galloping forward to the '67 borders -
These would the '67 borders called for by U.N. Security Council Resolution 242.
The USA invaded Iraq to force Iraq to obey UN SC resolutions.
Public Law 107-243 - "(2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq."
Israel has violated the law for over 40 years, and receives $7 million/day.
American hypocrisy, as usual.
The Palestinians' big problem is that they can't afford to buy enough American politicians.
"enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq"
"relevant resolutions" is Newspeak for "resolutions which enable Oceania to plunder/steal/enslave".
De-countrify Israel Now.
I don't think we could de-country Israel any more than we could de-state Texas (though, I can dream).
Israel has much sway on US politics for one reason: The US born Isreali operatives living, contributing, writing, and voting in the US. Aka, the Israel Lobby.
Don't de-country Israel, de-port the Israel Lobby. Let the sons (and daughters) of Israel go to Israel and be honest citizens for once.
I stated what needs to be done
for a better world.
It's a moral position.
AND It's a practical position.
That you don't agree doesn't change any of that.
And keep the militant Zionists from having it both ways (security of the US, money for the homeland)? Good luck with that. Do you think all the neocons are ready to leave the comfort of the US. They are traitors to both countries.
My comment was as rhetorical and unrealistic as the poster I was addressing. Neither of these events will happen.
I agree with your assertion that they are traitors, but only to the US. As long as they remain US citizens, living in the US and working for another nation's security over ours, they are traitors to the US. As such, they should be deported. As I stated above...
Netanyahu: US Easily Manipulated
That asswipe ought to know.
just knock down a couple of skyscrapers ...
Zing. Spot on comment.
No seven words were more true.
Further proof (as if it were needed) that Netanyahu is arrogant, bullying and incompetent. He can't even control his own cabinet - apparently Foreign Minister Lieberman has just appointed a new Israeli ambassador to the UN without telling Bibi.
In a democracy should the people be held responsible for the results after electing a monster to public office? The truth is that everyone is partly responsible. The elites more so and those in public office more still. But what's actually sufficient for the people to uphold their responsibility? At the very least voting peaceful candidates in the elections. In the USA 100 million dumped their responsibility in 2008. Apparently Isreelis dumped theirs too.
Easily manipulated? Yep. The US Government holds up the extension of UI benefits to American Workers because it will add to the deficit.
Meanwhile they have announced the single largest Military aid package to the Government of Israel in History.
How many Governmnet officials are calling for that aid package to be rolled back because of the deficit? Why all that opposition to extending UI and not a single voice concerned about sending billions more to Israel?
Israel is a black stain on the map of the Middle East. The sooner they return the land they stole in 1948 the faster the world will be a better place.
As for Netanyahu he's just about the devil incarnate in my book.
Of course we can't forget what the Palestinians are doing to Christians. See this site http://www.ouwet.com/n10452/regional-politics/hamas-persecuting-christians-in-gaza/
Also look at how Hamas treats women. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38296242/ns/world_news-mideastn_africa/
You're so busy singling Israel out that you ignore other people's atrocities.
The world is full of atrocity.
This topic is Israel/US.
Seems to me that you're so busy spouting anti-muslim propaganda that you ignore Isreal's atrocities.
Were you so busy defending christians when the abuser was Israel and the christians were displaced Palestinans?
You sound like a zionist imperialist to me and perhaps prejudiced against muslims.
Please respond.
Just GTFO. The fact that crimes exist elsewhere doesn't give Israel the green light to commit even more heinous crimes.
Just return the land that was stolen in 1948, it's simple. GET OUT.
"I know what America is," Netanyahu said. "America is a thing you can move very easily, move it in the right direction. They won't get in the way."
Key in on the word "right". Behind the Liberal mask is a fascist fist, that's why the US in not in Israel's way - they are going the same direction. Ever heard of operation Claudio? Sleeper cells of fascist terrorists (from WWII) located throughout Europe controlled by the CIA to be activated in case left wing candidates started winning elections. The actions of Israel are not an aberration, they are a continuation.
Sure Rich,
We have heard Netanyahu admitting to zionist influence in Anmerica.
We have seen American zionist attacks on those who dissent from uncritical support of Israel, such as Cynthia McKinney.
We know that many dual US-Israeli citizens occupy and have occupied high level posts in the US foriegn policy establishment.
We have seen politicians of all stripes genuflecting at the altar of AIPAC.
But we'll ignore all that because of your theories about US imperialism.
Sorry Rich M, there are many shared US-Israeli imperial interests, but there is also a fear of offending the Isreali Lobby that is shared by just about every person who holds national power in Ameica.
So your effort to split hairs about words seems disingenuous to me.
Rich, I've been protesting US imperialism since the late 70's movement against US intervention in Central America. I certainly don't subscribe to "the theory that America's sins are largely the fault of Zionists (aka "The Jews")."
You accuse me of being dimwitted and scapgoating Jews. Write what you like about my intelligence, but your accusations of anti-semitism are totally unfounded, and I demand an apology from you. You have no right to throw around charges of bigotry, simply because I disagree wih your theories of US-Isreali imperial dynamics.
Now back to the land of reason:
I think we agree that Israeli Lobby employs tremendous resources trying to influence US policy in the middle east. If "the lobby finds it easy to exert influence, only because (and insofar as) the US & Israel have an underlying convergence of interests", then whay the need to spend all those millions lobbying?
Why the need to attack and ruin public figures who disagree with the Lobby?
The recent controversy surrounding written statements by Petraeus about Israel endangering US troops immediately comes to mind as a dynamic that is not accounted for by your theory. Bibi's sucker punch at Biden regarding settlements is another.
But I'm sure that a superior intelligence like yourself can easily explain all this to a a simple American dimwit like me.
There is NO convergence of Zionistic interests and US interests. Why that myth is being pushed is beyond me, so it is so shockingly and obviously false, even upon the most cursory examination.
So I guess "disingenuous" was the polite way to say it.
A lot of hand waving, and after all that
my point still stands.
Zionism and Israel are contrary to the best interests of this country.
Define the "best interests of this country". Are you referring to the interests of the US ruling class? Or, the interests of average Americans?
Exactly what plot is that, pray tell? Looking forward to your answer.
No "plot", no conspiracy, it's the way the system works.
Exactly. It is a myth that there is a convergence of interests when in fact, Israel manipulates the US into actions that destroy the interest of the average citizen. Why this myth of "convergence of interests" which is so laughably false is being pushed is beyond me.
Except for the concept that a lie told often enough will be considered the truth. I suppose that we are now to believe that it is in our "mutual interest" to invade Iran. Amazing. Israel does us to do its dirty work to the detriment of all of us, and then claim we did it in our own interest.
You Zionists have ridden off the rails.
You have a video of someone boasting about manipulating the US
and you say something like:
"Perhaps the manipulation is only apparent to sway people like yourself to feel greater animosity toward Israel.Perhaps the manipulation is only apparent to sway people like yourself to feel greater animosity toward Israel."
Hey - it's Bibi saying it, not me. So much for your silly post.
Clearly NOT the best interests of the average citizen who has to bear the brunt of the costs of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars (and Iranian war when the Zionists have their way) - both physically and economically.
And NOT the best interests of almost all the citizens as they have their civil liberties destroyed by a right wing embraced by AIPAC and the Zionists, who have no use for politicians with principles.
As for the US ruling class - they're fine no matter what happens.
I'm always agreeable except for those who piss on our legs and tell us it's raining.
So the point stands -
Zionism and Israel are contrary to the best interests of the average American citizen. I NEVER indicated otherwise. In fact, pretty much contrary to the concept of peace for any citizen.
As for American Empire, it's bad for that too, unless somehow you decide that the Iraq and Afghanistan wars are good for... what?
In the meantime, why aren't you asking why that myth of convergence of interest, so laughable, is being pushed so hard?????
RE:As for American Empire, it's bad for that too, unless somehow you decide that the Iraq and Afghanistan wars are good for... what?
Why are the wars good for the empire? For a start:
1) Securing the greatest oil reserves in the world - the blood of global capitalism.
2) Keeping rivals (like China) away from that vital resource for the continuation and expansion of empire.
3) The mutual benefit of keeping your most profitable industry (oil) profitable.
4) Maintaining massive military spending, very good for the MIC, banking and the transfer of public wealth upward into private interests.
These things are very good for the US empire, US capitalism and ruling elites. Wars serve their interests very well - always have. Do they serve the interest of regular people? Of course not.
RE: ...myth of convergence of interest, so laughable...
Not laughable, obvious to anyone not under the trance of Liberal mythology. Where do you get your information, CNN?
Laughable indeed, if only so because it's so obvious.
1) Our access to oil reserves was always fine, and we have the ability to lay our hands on raw materials without invading. Painfully obvious. What is also painfully obvious is that in a few years we will withdraw badly injured, AND OUR ACCESS TO OIL IS LESS SECURE BECAUSE OF ISRAEL.
2) We are not keeping rivals away - we are driving oil producing countries to other because of our support of Israel. That is as plain as can be, and you can't see it because.....????
3) Again with the oil? Give it a break. You got a one-note song, and that note doesn't work.
4) And so you admit that massive spending helps the wealthy. So the convergence is... where? What?? HUH????
CNN? Hahahaha! I really did LOL. You're identified yourself as a right-winger, totally compatible with Zionism.
...CNN! Hahahahaha!!!
So you agree with me. Cool.
Zionism is just another way of ripping us off.
You ARE a troll. Why did it take me so long to figure it out? You think I'm a "right-winger"? Interesting, I've never had that label applied to me before. You really have no clue.
CNN???? Hahaha!!! Finger says 'no'.
Thank you for answering the question of "best interests". Normally, it would go without saying (as it would be understood by most critical readers), but needs to be said now in your case:
When the term "US interests" (and its variants) are used by government officials and therefore also by its mouthpiece corporate media, "best interests" represent the interests of ruling elites - not average people. Both government and corporate media wish the American people to believe that those "interests" are the same. Clearly they are not. There is nothing new about this. This conflating of the interests of the few at the top with the interests of the many at the bottom goes back to the beginning of class societies.
By the critical standards of most CD posters, your understanding of "best interests" is naive. This thread would have been totally different had we been using the same notion of "interests."
I'm with Rich M. To blame US imperialism on Israel/Zionists is very simplisitic. The US first got involved interferring in Middle Eastern affairs during the cold war. Making sure governments did not nationalize their oil industries (see Iran).
Even if Israel did not exist the US would still be involved in the Middle East. To what extent is debateable.
By your own timeline, the US first got involved after the creation of Israel. And by your own admittance, to what extent is debatable. So you point is?
There is no convergence of interests, and that is obvious. In fact, Israel is detrimental to US interests, which is also painfully (and I use the word purposefully) obvious.
Where this Zionistic talking point came from is beyond me. It's a transparent lie.
Gladio. Operation Gladio.
Thanks for the correction!
And as long as we're on the subjects of manipulating the US and Operation Gladio, here is former Italian President Francesco Cossiga (who had admitted his involvement in Gladio) in a 2007 interview with an Italian newspaper commenting on Osama bin Laden's supposed "9/11 confession" video:
"All of the democratic circles of America and of Europe, in the front lines being those of the Italian center-left, now know well that the disastrous attack [on 9/11] was planned and realized by the American CIA and Mossad with the help of the Zionist world, to put under accusation the Arabic countries and to persuade the western powers to intervene in Iraq and Afghanistan."
Mr. NetenYAHOO:
I have been working with my Latin dictionary, and I have a few words for you:
NOTHOS = bastard
Momento mori = remember your mortality
Ira decorum = WRATH of the gods
and here's one for the Palestinians:
Invictus manco: I REMAIN UNVANQUISHED!
Please go directly to the vomitorium, mr. netenyahu and mingle.
As Franz Liebkind (almost) said in "The Producers":
"Bibi! Bibi!... Why does he say this "Bibi"? The Führer has never said "Bibi". I did not write, "Bibi". What is it with this, "Bibi"?
Look folks our congress is controlled by special interests (AIPAC). NO ONE gets elected to to the Presidency without first being approved by AIPAC, (they have the money). HEll, our votes hav'nt counted since before the 2000 election. C'mon did GW Bush really win the election?! Washington DC is occupied Israeli territory. Not going to change anytime soon, even with this kind of exposure. Too much money. Too many Zionist Christians in positions of authority. Learn your history, read the Balfor declaration, or agreement, whatever it takes to really understand whats really going on. Peace to all good men.
Hell, read article 11 of the treaty of Triploli. A treaty that this country entered into 151 years before there even was an Israel! Perhaps that would help straighten out alot of Americans misguided views on the world!
Z, a quick summary of Article 11 would be appropriate here, particularly if this will explain the world to Americans, no?
Is this the treaty signed in 1797? If so, Article 11 reads as follows:
Art. 11. As the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion,—as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquility, of Mussulmen,—and as the said States never entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mahometan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries.
The relevance to Netanyahu's claim does not jump out at me.
This shows two things. It shows how actually easily manipulated the USA is, but also how far to the right Nut to Nut You is by claiming that Slick Willy was "radically pro Palestinian." That's as crazy as hell to put it mildly.
AD
This shows two things. It shows how actually easily manipulated the USA is, but also how far to the right Nut to Nut You is by claiming that Slick Willy was "radically pro Palestinian." That's as crazy as hell to put it mildly.
AD