Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Introduced Legislation to Shift Tax Burden Back to Billionaires
WASHINGTON - Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) is sick of the super-rich avoiding estate taxes.
On Thursday, he made good on his word: he today introduced legislation to restore the estate tax on the wealthiest Americans, which he says would bring in at least $264 billion in the next ten years to help reduce the national debt.
"This legislation would ensure that the wealthiest Americans in our country, millionaires and billionaires, pay their fair share while exempting 99.7 percent of Americans from paying any estate tax whatsoever," Sanders said in a release. "At a time when we have a record-breaking $13 trillion national debt and a growing gap between the very rich and everyone else, people who inherit multi-million and billion dollar estates must not be allowed to avoid paying their fair share in estate taxes."
Sander's release notes that the estate tax was abolished this year "as a result of tax law changes signed into law by President George W. Bush in 2001. For the first time since 1916, heirs to multi-million and billion dollar fortunes may receive their entire inheritance free of any federal taxes, a giveaway that will cost the U.S. treasury at least $14.8 billion in lost revenue this year alone."
"I get a little bit tired of being lectured by Republicans for the deficit we are in," Sanders said -- asserting that Bush-era Republicans "funded but failed to pay for wars in Iraq and Afghanistan; tax breaks for the wealthy; a prescription drug bill written by the pharmaceutical industry; and a $700 billion Wall Street bailout."
Among the legislation's highlights:
- Exempt the first $3.5 million of an estate from federal taxation ($7 million for couples), the same exemption that existed in 2009. That would leave 99.75 percent of all estates exempt from the federal estate tax next year.
- Create a progressive rate so the super wealthy pay more. The tax rate estates valued between $3.5 million and $10 million would be 45 percent, the same as the 2009 level. The rate on estates worth more than $10 million and below $50 million would be 50 percent, and the rate on estates worth more than $50 million would be 55 percent.
- Include a billionaire's surtax of 10 percent. According to Forbes Magazine, there are only 403 billionaires in the United States with a collective net worth of $1.3 trillion. Clearly, the heirs to these multi-billion fortunes should be paying a higher estate tax rate than others.
- Close estate and gift tax loopholes as President Obama proposed in his budget for next year. The White House estimated that closing the loopholes would generate at least $23.7 billion in revenue over 10 years.
- Protect family farmers by allowing them to lower the value of their farmland by up to $3 million for estate tax purposes. The bill also would increase the maximum exclusion for conservation easements to $2 million. The non-partisan Tax Policy Center has estimated that only 80 small businesses and farm estates throughout the country paid an estate tax in 2009, affecting only three out of every 100,000 people who passed away.



16 Comments so far
Show AllLegislation proposal by Sanders would be a good start.
It has about as much chance of passing the Senate as a snowball passing through hell.
Bernie Sanders is one of the very few principled people in government who keeps his eye on the ball. Keep up the good work for all of those whose voices have almost been rendered mute by a pervasive corruption the likes of which this nation has rarely seen.
The republicans will pitch a fit and obama will do what he always does. He'll provide no support. I'm sick of Obama. We need an advocate. We need change
obama cant do much without the votes
so he must compromise to get anything done
you should run for president if you think you can do better
Right! Just wait until this becomes law. Then the Supremes will say it is unconstitutional to interfere with the profits of the Oligarchy in any way, especially taxation. It will then be thrown out.
Obama must be forced to nominate someone far more progressive than Kagan. She is just a crony of Summers, and he is a bankster who has been sociopathic in his economic policies.
Everyone can see by now what a disaster Summers, Rahm, Axelrod, and all the Goldman and Rubin boys have been. It is criminal that the Fed gave Trillions to their crony banksters, and even allowed Goldman to become a bank.
Some saw how disastrous Summers, Rubin et al. were many years ago, they are Bubba Clinton re-treads remember? Kagan is a right-wing Zionist ally of the Banksters, that is why she will be easily confirmed after the disgusting charade of Senate confirmation hearings.
We have no genuine democratic choice in the first place, you must vote for the pre-selcted corporate-approved big-money candidates in the phony and expensive PR stunt that we call elections. Two evils are your choice, neither are lesser.
No, you don't have to vote for one of the two pre-approved candidates. I choose neither evil ....
True, I voted for McKinney. Since the corporate media censored her, scant few knew who she was, let alone voted for her. So, again the overwhelming majority of folks only knew of the two corporate candidates. Besides the winner takes all election system and electoral college favor only two parties.
In the winner takes all system, here in the US where barely 50% of eligible voters bother to register and vote, outcomes are determined by 25% or less of the population. That alone presents serious problems to any form of representative democracy based on majoritarian principles.
When folks are fed propaganda as news, money is legally defined as free-speech, corporations have human rights etc. democracy is only a word that rhymes with hypocrisy.
Hmm, that means we don't have to get a majority of folks to agree with us, only a majority of voters. Shucks, that may, indeed, be doable .....
Nice, but we need far more systemic changes to do any good. Bernie Sanders continues to be a disappointment in terms of real vision.
Actually, I think it would be neat if we had a Sen. full of Bernie Sanders' .....
I think it's interesting that he continues to run as an independent - no need for "party loyalty" as so many other would be "progressives" have felt the need to exhibit. He uses his vote to leverage out as many concessions as he can from a house filled with schmucks .....
He got 10 billion for expansion of community health centers in an otherwise abysmal health care bill, which is more than Kucinich got (zippo).
One of my dreams for the 2010 election is that in AZ we elect the Green candidate to Congress. With Sen. Sanders as a Progrssive Independent and get another Progressive Green than we will have another real Progressive voice in Congress.
I admire Bernie Sanders. Even though some Progressives are disappointed in him, we must remember that if he had more in Congress like him, he would be able to accomplish more as their would be another Progressive who has a seat at the Political table.
One of the problems with this nation, and I believe Bernie Sanders understands and that is why he is an I, instead of a D or R after his name is he sees that we must be one nation who works together regardless of rather one is a Democrat or Republican and put the nation first over political party. Both the other parties put political party over what is best for the nation sometimes. That is why I am a Green Party member, so that I can try and bring this nation together regardless of political party to start FIGHTING to SAVE THIS NATION.
Bosh!
More Midterm deceptions. If anything passes, it will be as good as useless.
Call the WH. Obama said "Make me do it". It only takes about 5 minutes of wait time. I love Bernie Sanders; he does what he can to stick up for the people, fairness and ethicality. So call your members of Congress and the WH, ask them to support this bill introduced by Bernie.
Amen, have called my Sen.s