EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Iraq Hit by Wave of Deadly Attacks
At least 62 people have been killed across Iraq after a series of 16 attacks rocked the country.
Iraqi soldiers stop vehicles at a checkpoint in Baghdad in April 2010. An apparently co-ordinated series of attacks targeting security forces and a Shiite mosque in Iraq killed 32 people in the worst violence to hit the country in more than a fortnight.(AFP/File/Sabah Arar) A dozen of the attacks on Monday occurred in the capital Baghdad
alone, executed within hours, with assailants using silenced and
automatic weapons, roadside bombs and cars rigged with explosives.
Security forces were the apparent target of much of the assault, with patrols and checkpoints manned by local and federal police, as well as the Iraqi national army, all being hit.
In the latest incident, however, two cars parked outside a textile plant in the city of Hillah and laden with explosives blew up as workers were exiting the building, killing at least 36 people and wounding more than 140 others.
A car bomb and roadside bomb were also detonated at a market in the city of Suweira, Wasit province, killing eight people and injuring 29 more.
Earlier, a car bomb in Baghdad's northern suburb of Tarmiya, targeting a police officer, killed three people and injured 16. One of the roadside bombs, set off as a patrol passed, also killed two civilians.
The rest of the deaths in Baghdad were reported to be security forces.
A suicide bomber targeting a police checkpoint also killed two people in the northern city of Mosul.
In the western city of Fallujah, four separate bombs killed four people, while 10 police officers were wounded in the western on Monday after explosives were planted outside their homes.
Rising violence
The attacks on Monday showed a new tactic being used by anti-government fighters in the country, Reuters news agency quoted an interior ministry spokesman as saying.
"This was a message to us that they can attack us in different parts ... at the same time because they have cells everywhere," he said.
The attacks come just two days after reports that the Iraqi defence ministry was considering building a "security fence"around the capital as a way of curbing violence and controlling the movements of anti-government fighters.
Access to the city would be controlled by eight checkpoints, and construction could be completed by mid-2011, reports from local broadcaster Al Iraqiyya Television said.
Violence across Iraq has dropped significantly since 2006 and 2007, when the country's sectarian conflict was at its height. But attacks have been on the rise in recent months, particular in Baghdad.
National parliamentary elections on March 7left no clear winner, and continuing wrangling by political blocs to form a governable coalition have left an atmosphere of instability in the county.
'Backlash'
Security forces have in recent weeks also made a series of arrests of high-profile members of the al-Qaeda in Iraq group, Al Jazeera's Mike Hanna, reporting from Baghdad, said.
"Certainly, authorities were predicting a backlash against that, we had seen a number of attacks recently, but this is the most serious in terms, not only of the death toll, but of the sense of co-ordination," he said.
"It would be a very strong answer, if indeed it is an al-Qaeda group [behind Monday's strikes], that despite the fact that their leadership is gone, they are still capable of carrying out this type of attack."
Police said three of checkpoints fired at on Monday were in the west of Baghdad, with two more in the east and one in the south. The checkpoints that were bombed were in the south and southeast of the capital.
Source: Al Jazeera and agenciesComments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

18 Comments so far
Show AllThe most powerful, most fearsome, world garrisoning military of all time, manned with the best and the brightest of America'a youth, even with the assistance of a hundred thousand $200,000 per year mercenaries, simply has not and can not pacify even one city in one country without a military of any kind.
Are we receiving good value for our military tax dollars?
Should we allow such an ineffective and feeble military continue to invade and occupy weak coutries that they cannot defeat?
The American military is a pathetic, stumbling, bumbling assemblage of ineffective idiots who apparently couldn't find their asses with either hand. (Well, they ARE pretty good at murdering innocent civilians.) STOP FUNDING THEM. THEY ARE NOT EFFECTIVE. THEY ARE NOT DOING THEIR JOBS.
Militaries destroy societies and capture land. Farmers build them and hold it.
"The attacks on Monday showed a new tactic being used by anti-government fighters in the country" - quoted an interior ministry spokesman
They have their PR people at work, "anti-government"?
Its obvious, if you want to control the middle east , or 2/3rds of the worlds oil reserves, its going to cost you.
If Russia or China had stormed into Iraq , what would we have done.
There are two solutions, one leave, and let the dust fall where it can, two , carve up Iraq and Iran for empire , between us china and Russia.
Either way , its going to be costly to America to stay or leave.
But if we leave, and sink trillions into our own alternative energy programs, solar, wind etc, create jobs, and keep the money here, we will be better off.
If we stay the course , global war is inevitable .
"If we stay the course , global war is inevitable."
Our "leaders" just love war as long as they do not have to themselves or have their own children participate. War is wonderfully profitable for those people. War is good. Greed is good. Fraud is good. Murder is good. Famine is good. It's all good. As long as you make a million dollars a year it's all good. For the rest of us maybe not so much.
Oh my, what a situation. On one hand I wonder exactly where the funding for these attacts are coming from? We very well know the CIA is everywhere and in all things. Might be that America does not want peace in Iraq as it might be profitable at this point in time. On the other hand if we've been there this long, (actually doing the job we tell the public), then it's not working. We are not achieving any goals. Either way, bring them all home. Lets regroup and work on our own country.
Iraq, Af-Pak, Gulf catastrophe, Goldman Sachs, financial meltdown, totally corrupt political system - ah, the Empire is falling apart right on schedule.
I think it is high time they took the show on the road. Have the attacks in downtown Bumblefuck, Kansas. The Jihad Olympics. There can be corporate sponsorship. Oh, right, there already is. Sorry, forgot.
Wikileaks should be required viewing for all Americans. Maybe then they'd get off their fat, apathetic arses and put a stop to the horseshit that is their country.
Oh, but that might also require that they get their heads out of their 'Christian' arses, their pseudo-religious arses. And that won't happen. After all, God, the unscrupulous fuck, is on their side.
Out of greed came hate, because we demanded control in Iraq, and like the Palestinians, the Iraqi's stood up and fought back against the invaders, and thus the land owners became the terrorist for fighting back. What upsets me the most was the innocent, especially chilren, whoes bloody, broken bodies were under the Bombs dropped, and the innocent troops that were told lies, forced to kill and be killed thinking it was to free the people from a terrible dictator, when the want to be dictator Bush, and friends wanted the oil. The hate and discrimination against Arabs began with the help of Israel, the fundalmentalist, the tea party and far right have escalated the hate.
"US drone 'kills 14 Pakistan militants'
US drone attacks are being stepped up along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border
"At least 14 suspected militants have been killed by unmanned US drones in Pakistan's tribal region of North Waziristan, local officials say.
The planes fired a dozen missiles at an alleged hideout some 30km (20 miles) from the region's main town, Miranshah.
The US has stepped up pressure on Pakistan's government since linking a failed car bombing in New York to the Pakistani Taliban.
(BBC)
So now, America can use the FEAR FACTOR.... no need to murder any of their own, on their own soil.. Just mention 9/11. And the people will forget about the pathetic, BUNGLED attempt to murder americans on American soil by a "trained Pakistani terrorist".
As long as the USA occupies Irak there will be turmoil. If the USA already has the oil, President Obama should analyze reality and get out of there just like he promissed and be wise for once.
such things must be...and the end is not yet amen...pounding the taliban/al qaeda will result in more poundings in the form of suicide bombings/attacks...the life in you is god amen...
"American commanders, worried about increased violence in the wake of Iraq's inconclusive elections, are reconsidering the pace of a major troop pullout this summer, U.S. officials said".
President Truman is turning in his grave. Since when are American commanders empowered to reconsider a policy announced by Mr. Obama who, together with Congress, are the only constitutionally empowered "agencies" that can reconsider all Iraq policy? That begs for the obvious question. Where is Mr. Obama who announced the major troop pullout this summer? Is he cowardly hiding again (it has happened before) behind "American commanders"? Is he too busy giving commencement and other meaningless speeches at a time when his administration is beset with disasters in the Gulf of Mexico, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan? Or has Mr. Obama already decided (after all, presidents are our "deciders", right?) to slow down the major troop pullout from Iraq this summer and has funneled his decision through "American commanders" making them the conduit for his anonymity"?
And who are these "US officials"?
Military personnel can advise the president and congress about their view. That is the only action they are allowed under our constitution. Are we on the way to a semi-military rule of our country?
Then again if u look at all the millions of people who starved to death in North Korea since the soviet union fell apart , maybe Douglas McArtuther had the right idea. We have to make sure Iraq's stabilized before we leave. The vast majority of the Iraqi people are not terrorist killing there own . There people with hopes and dreams just like us, it's just a relative few who keep the rest of the populace in fear.
Iraq was not some peaceful utopia before we showed up ( please note if we had a time machine we could debate about how we shouldn't invade iraq but now it's pointless) , just pray it's a better place once we leave.
Prayers with God on Bush's side are what started this war crime.
If I was the praying type, I would pray that we just leave and end the war.
The Obomber Administration™ is committed to carrying the PNAC water pail with Obama™'s legions of 'We Can©' Blind Lemming™ followers being lead around by the nose supporting him.
What just angers me no end is the 'We Can©' followers of Obomber™ supporting Obomber™ extraordinary rendition policies who would be seething if it were Bush doing the same things, but Obomber™ fans are OK when he is carrying out repressive policies.
On election eve when Obomber™ won the presidency and it was as if Jesus Christ himself just won the presidency
what with all the adulation of the network talking heads all swooning over Sir Obama of Camelot™.
Obama™ is PNAC with a Smiley Face instead of a Smirk that we got from ShrubYa Jr.
The Democrappers™ foolishly allowed the Chimp's invasion of Iraq to be funded and now they own it.
Nancy 'No More Blank Checks For Bush' Fancy Pants Pelosi is the biggest aider & abetter to the Chimp giving him everything
he needed to pull off the PNAC scam in Iraq and Pipe-O-Stan.
Please Wake up 'We Can©' Obomber™ Lemmings™, your Sir Galahad is a PNAC automotan!
Well, as I can see the proof now, killing insurgent leaders makes things worse.
A leader must control operations so as not to get caught and is also valuable to the government when it comes time to negotiate.
Without leaders, anything goes and the ranks now have nothing to lose but everything to gain by attacking more violently than ever.
Now we see the results... more massive killing because the US invaded and won't leave.