Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Oil Reaches Shore as Weather Threatens Cleanup
WASHINGTON — As oil began washing onto Louisiana shores teeming with wildlife and weather threatened cleanup efforts, President Barack Obama today insisted that energy companies will have to employ new precautions in future offshore drilling to prevent a repeat of the Deepwater Horizon rig disaster.
Dr. Erica Miller, with Tri-State Bird Rescue and Research, works to give a dose of Pepto-Bismol to a Northern Gannet bird, normally white when full grown, which is covered in oil from a massive spill in the Gulf of Mexico, at a facility in Fort Jackson, La., Friday, April 30, 2010. (AP) class="Text-TextBody HoustonText" id="id2423392">“I continue to
believe that domestic oil production is an important part of our
overall strategy for energy security,” Obama said in remarks at the
White House. “But I've always said it must be done responsibly, for the
safety of our workers and our environment.”
Obama said he had ordered Interior Secretary Ken Salazar to conduct “a thorough review” and report back within 30 days on what safety steps can be taken to prevent accidents like the April 20 explosion at the Transocean-owned and BP-leased rig about 50 miles off the coast of Louisiana.
Eleven rig workers are missing and presumed dead, and crude is leaking into the Gulf from three breaches in the pipe called a riser that once ran to the rig from the well under almost a mile of water.
Salazar, along with the heads of the Environmental Protection Agency and the Department of Homeland Security were visiting the region today and planned aerial tours and meetings with response teams.
Nearly 2,000 workers are trying to contain the widening spill in the Gulf, even as up to 5,000 barrels, 210,000 gallons, of oil gush from three leaks in an underwater pipe.
Despite the containment efforts and what government officials said was the removal of 20,313 barrels of crude-water mix, oil had reached Louisiana wetlands by this morning.
The National Weather Service predicted winds, high tides and waves through Sunday that could push oil deep into the inlets, ponds and lakes that line the boot of southeastern Louisiana. Seas of 6 to 7 feet were pushing tides several feet above normal toward the coast, compounded by thunderstorms expected in the area Friday.
The weather will keep crews from skimming oil off of the surface or burning it off for the next couple of days because of the weather, Coast Guard Rear Adm. Sally Brice-O'Hara said on ABC's “Good Morning America.”
Waves may also wash over booms strung out just off shorelines to stop the oil, said Tom McKenzie, a spokesman for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, which is hoping booms will keep oil off the Chandeleur Islands, part of a national wildlife refuge.
Top administration officials declared that the spill would halt new drilling under Obama's proposal last month to open up parts of the Atlantic and Arctic oceans, as well as the eastern Gulf of Mexico, for new oil and gas leases.
“No additional drilling has been authorized and none will until we find out what happened here and whether there was something unique and preventable,” White House Senior Adviser David Axelrod told “Good Morning America.”
Axelrod's comments seemed designed to tamp down a burst of outrage from environmental advocates and coastal residents, but might not have a major immediate effect on the administration's development of a plan for drilling on the outer continental shelf.
The Interior Department is at the very beginning stages of a lengthy process of implementing the president's proposal as part of a new plan governing outer continental shelf leases from 2012 through 2017.
Even without changes, no new leases under Obama's proposal would be sold until 2012 or later, and many industry leaders already expected most activity on the Atlantic could be even further in the future.
The White House's top energy adviser, Carol Browner, on Thursday noted that the announcement of a new drilling plan “is the beginning of a process, not the end of a process” and “there will be ample opportunity for public input.”
But Browner left open the possibility that the spill will affect the shape of the 2012-2017 plan, including where it might schedule leases.
“Obviously, what's occurring now will also be taken into consideration as the administration looks to how to advance that plan and what makes sense and what might need to be adjusted,” Browner said.
Environmental advocates seized on the disaster as evidence that the U.S. should immediately clamp down on offshore drilling and urged the Obama administration to go further.
“This disaster changes everything,” said Michael Brune, the executive director of the Sierra Club. “This tragedy should be a wake-up call. It's time to take offshore drilling off the table for good.”
More than a dozen federal agencies and departments — including the Pentagon and Justice Department — have been tapped to assist with the recovery and monitor the spill.
Attorney General Eric Holder today said he was dispatching a team of attorneys to meet with response teams in the Gulf and “vigorously enforce the laws that protect the people who work and reside near the Gulf, the wildlife, the environment and the American taxpayers.”
The Associated Press contributed to this report

147 Comments so far
Show AllThe Mess That's Texas:
Meanwhile, it appears an investigation regarding the complicity of Halliburton with Deepsh*t (Deepwater) (and Blackwater as well?) is forthcoming: http://online.wsj.com...
Wow.
These recent disasters unfolding cover just about ALL the oil-gas-mining industries that happen to have been complicit in the rewriting and exclusive approval of only the "Tex"-books that would claim that global warming and climate change are NOT happening and that humans are not creating pollution.
(That same Texas Board has been doing some related revisions of texts recently, too: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/13/education/13texas.html )
Education historian Joel Spring explains with more needed detail:
"...Since the disappearance of Soviet-style communism in the 1990s, the primary enemy of consumerism has become environmentalism. A threat to consumerism is seen in calls for reduction of air pollution; improved mileage standards for cars; criticisms of the mass production of sport utility vehicles (SUVS); demands for more stringent controls on pesticides and herbicides; restrictions on the use of snowmobiles, jet skis, all-terrain vehicles, and motor bikes in public parks and recreational sites; reductions in the use of packaging material for consumer items; protests against the building of mega-discount stores; and protection of green spaces in urban and suburban development. Supporters of consumerism see these demands as threats to the American way of life.
At the 2002 hearings of the Texas State Board of Education, science textbooks were condemned for saying that there was a scientific consensus that the earth’s climate is changing because of global warming. This claim was labeled as “anti-technology,” “anti-Christian,” and “anti-American.”104 Textbook approval by the Texas Board was important because Texas was only one of two states, the other being California, in which approval occurred at the state level. The board rejected Jane L. Person’s Environmental Science: How the World Works and Your Place in It because of statements such as “Destruction of the tropical rain forest could affect weather over the entire planet” and “Most experts on global warming feel that immediate action should be taken to curb global warming.”105
To gain acceptance by the Texas Board, the statements were changed to “Tropical rain forest ecosystems impact weather over the entire planet” and “In the past, the earth has been much warmer than it is now, and fossils of sea creatures show us that the sea level was much higher than it is today. So does it really matter if the world gets warmer?”106
In 2001, the Texas Board singled out for censorship Daniel Chiras’s Environmental Science: Creating a Sustainable Future. The book opened with the phrases such as “Things can’t go on as they have been,” “We must change our ways,” “throwaway mentality,” and “obsession with growth.” The board attacked the text for using the “oft-used falsehood that over 100 million Americans are breathing unhealthy air.”107
One textbook that did win approval was financed by a consortium of mining companies. Global Science: Energy, Resources, Environment was praised before the Texas Board of Education by Duggan Flanakin, formerly of the U.S. Bureau of Mines and currently a member of Texas Policy Foundations. The book was also commended by Ms.Shore, chair of Texas Board and co-owner of TEC Well Service. TED is a producer of gas and oil and repairs and deepens oil wells. Ms. Shore remarked that the oil and gas industries “always get a raw deal” in the environmental textbooks.108 (471 – 472)
from Joel Spring, American Schools: 1642 – 2004 (Sixth edition)
"Drill, Baby, Drill" gas-oil interest cries, mining disasters, thousands of safety violations, denial of human-caused climate change, scoffs at regulation...
They’re not doing very well lately, are they?
As Sojourner Jim Wallis might say, just call it "GOD'S POLITICS."
Better get your Lenin act together, Senora.
Ever heard of running an underground railroad, Senor?
Do you make good pancakes too?
Actually, I don't like pancakes.
Nor does one but they have their uses in a pinch.
Here's a quick, simple very useful appetizer.
One ripe spoonable avocado, red or black caviar, sour cream.
Cut the avocado in half.
Remove seed.
Fill halves with sour cream.
Top with caviar.
Instruct the guests to get a bit of each flavor with every spoonful.
An interesting little concerto for piano.
Different kinds of avocado and different kinds of caviar lead to easy expansions.
Kind of an analogue to Bach--nothing spectacular or overly subtle but quick and logically interesting.
Stylistically uninteresting and unappetizing. Period.
Whatever turns you on.
Even with the worst oil spill on Earth Obama refuses to flat out CANCEL all oil drilling proposals.
Instead he says he will see what the "study" shows can be done to improve future off shore oil rigs to make them "safer"???:
http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Politics/gulf-mexico-oil-spill-jeopardize-obamas-offshore-drilling/story?id=10512504
Obama is such a tool.
I am so glad I have finally divorced myself from the totally corrupt Democratic Party.
DOA http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/30/bill-nelson-energy-bill-w_n_558465.html
"In the wake of the tragic accident, loss of life, and pollution in the Gulf of Mexico from the Deepwater Horizon oil rig, we are even more steadfastly opposed to any offshore drilling that could imperil the environment or economy of coastal New Jersey. While we appreciate the White House's announcement that no additional offshore drilling will be authorized until a full investigation of the accident is complete, we urge you to go further and reverse your decision on proposed new offshore oil and gas drilling for the outer continental shelf."
Senators Frank Lautenberg and Robert Menendez
Representatives Frank Pallone and Rush Holt
The US duopoly has two parties: (1)Right Wing (Democrat); and (2) Even More Right Wing (Republican).
They are both Fascist, Imperialist, and Corporatist, and have been since the '50's.
Most US "Socialists", on the other hand, are actually "Intervention Capitalists", that is, they consider that Capitalism with Social Welfare is Socialism.
The old Communist Party USA, on the other hand, besides being replete with FBI agents, is a rigid ideological dinosaur that has not kept up with the times, and the Bernaysian outflanking.
If there were ever a time for a renewed Leninism--updated and Neo-Marxist--it is now.
If you have not already, better study your Marcuse.
He has no specific advice on action but he has sound economic and psychological analysis.
Realize also that most US Labor Unions, a small percentage of the work force, are strictly Corporatist adjuncts, like the Democrats they support.
Don't forget the rest of us...
http://howtheuniversityworks.com/wordpress/
No! To be more exact, to quote Bill Maher:
"There are two parties here in the USA: The Conservative Party and the Batshit Insane Party."
As corrupt as the Democratic Party at large is, I honestly don't think that this:
"Obama is such a tool."
is really true. Like many, if not most politicians, he knows EXACTLY what he's doing.
US oil must be nationalized immediately.
Without that first step there is not even a chance of an economic recovery or resolving the financial and currency crisis.
Are we to infer that you don't mean that "in a Gracie Allen" kind of way? Just sayin'.
Private US oil is behind the effort to denationalize Pemex in Mexico, and to acquire Mexican offshore drilling rights.
They are pretty clearly, with other US Corporate interests, trying to destabilize the country for US intervention of some sort, direct or indirect.
That is also behind Obama's doublebind treatment of Cuba--US oil wants rights to drill the whole Caribbean.
This is lunacy, but then the lunatics are in charge of the asylum, aren't they?
Call it Neoliberalism and we may become good friends.
Si senor, "Neo-Liberal" is accurate in terms of Classic British Liberalism, which was predatory Capitalism in one of its worst forms, and also conveniently confusing to many US "lefitst" yahoos, eh?
And the secret handshake is...Gracie, Gracie...
The "name" has many forms, including "Neoconservative" depending upon where you stand on the earth - but it describes the same thing.
Don't forget Freire, either. That's Paulo.
And I am Señora, Señor. I refuse your insincere "Gracie-Gracias"-hand shake.
Porque, Senora?
(Wasn't offering a handshake, dearie).
But, should you ever wanna come make the road by walking with us - just some country "hicks" and "yahoos" ya know - with Paulo and Myles (Horton) - we won't turn ya away, honey.
Dearie, you don't know what walking is.
http://www.temple.edu/tempress/titles/804_reg.html
You don't know me, honey.
Don't have to, Dearie, when it comes to the subject of walking.
Who needs fucking roads?
Again, you greatly misapprehended there.
Might you consider that the act of walking with others where there are no "roads" may indeed create them?
You are WAY over your head, Senora.
And, as for "roads" already made - and "maps" of the terrain. They are all good to know, too. Both for knowing where and how to go, and, just as often, where and how not to. (How to move around.)
Si?
Finally, you talk a little sense. Including the "How not brown cow."
Or, FINALLY, you have acquired some "sense."
(Remote sensitivity and good manners, however, are OTHER things entirely which you have not acquired yet!)
Politesse has its place.
One of many.
Again, you are way over your head.
You should try the jello, it is excellent.
You know, Dearie, there's a metabolic point at which starvation actually begins to feel good.
Will you two please get a room and let the rest of us read in peace?
LOL!
What's the harm? New Orleans is a long way from Washington. This has already been demonstrated.
Plus haut les jambes, plus haut les jambes....
Peut-être apprenant à nager ?
"Obama today insisted that energy companies will have to employ new precautions in future offshore drilling..."
Haven't we heard that song before?
Isn't that what Obomber just told us about them coal mines?
How come precautions weren't taken before the disaster? Why is it that precautions are always taken (assuming that they are taken at all) after a disaster?
The whole thing is so sickening and Obomber so totally bankrupt, enough to make one vomit all over the White House.
Obama will not take off shore drilling off the table--too much money/greed involved.
He never takes the wrong things to do off the table--one just needs to look at health care deform.
Single payer off the table, drill baby drill will be on the table to stay--Obama is just taking a break from the subject until this oil spill becomes old news.
There will be drilling--count on it.
Double.
3
TRIPLE.
Two-pronged.
Three-pronged: Thirdness.
Not speaking in the context of Peirce. Nor the "Third Way."
There is a reason for the "two-pronged", which is strictly tactical.
If one had the leisure one might begin with Aristotle and finish with Deleuze and Guattari.
The search for the truth is in one way hard and another easy. For it is evident that no one of us can ever master it fully nor miss it wholly. Each one of us adds a little to our knowledge of nature, and from all the facts assembled arises a certain grandeur.
- Aristotle
It is always unfinished, Senor. THAT is THIRDNESS. THAT is Aristotle, AND Peirce, and Freire, and many, many others to come....
And that's a very "critically hopeful" lived-idea, too.
Please go lecture in the peanut gallery if you must.
You are WAY over your head.
Actually no--stay out of the peanut gallery, you will ruin them for life.
"In over your head."
I imagine, that we are indeed coming from very different places. And that's fortunate:
"...It would be salutary for contemporary critics to turn to Rosenblatt's explanation of her principal ideas because they will find there a more authentic understanding of C.S. Peirce and William James than they will get, say, in reading one American academic's interpretation of another's reaction of a British expositor's rendition of an idea gleaned from a European critic's uninstructed reading of Peirce. Sometimes cross-cultural exchange can be generative, as when Martin Luther King, Jr. found in Gandhi what Gandhi had taken from Thoreau who had gathered it, in part, from Eastern mysticism. But the reheated, refiltered, decaffeinated criticism currently available is neither generative nor instructive. Reading Rosenblatt brings us closer to the genuine sources of some of the most significant concepts in contemporary philosophy...."
- Ann E. Berthoff, Democratic Practice, Pragmatic Vistas
http://www.hu.mtu.edu/reader/online/20/berthoff20.html
And that would be well out of reach for you, and of you, Senor.
Peirce must be read and understood and used, not interpreters of Perice.
You are WAY over your head.
Peirce also had blind spots.
He wrote in patches as he did for a reason, but it was not the same reason that Danto exposited in relation to Nietzsche.
Do indeed stay out of the peanut gallery until you mature a bit.