Get News & Views Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Major Economies to Delve into Climate Impasse
WASHINGTON - Representatives from the world's leading economies were to meet here Sunday to see if they can find common ground on climate change, as wide gaps divide the United States, China and other key nations.
The US-led Major Economies Forum includes 17 countries responsible for the bulk of global emissions -- and excludes smaller nations such as Sudan whose firebrand negotiators held up sessions at December's much criticized Copenhagen summit.
The United States hopes that the closed-door talks, which start with a dinner, will let key nations quietly assess what, if anything, they can achieve heading into the next major climate summit in December in Cancun, Mexico.
"Clearly, there is still a gap between the views of the developing and developed world," State Department spokesman Philip Crowley said.
"We're going to see if we can, through the course of this discussion, narrow that down," he said.
White House aide Michael Froman and US climate negotiator Todd Stern sent participants a set of questions for the discussions, starting simply with, "What is the outcome we are all seeking in Cancun?"
Alden Meyer, director of strategy and policy at the Union of Concerned Scientists, which supports action against climate change, said it was "very difficult to close the deep gaps between countries such as the US and China."
The Washington talks offer a chance to "see if there is any convergence on what these key countries want, because if there is, that will give us a sense that there might be some way forward to get progress in Cancun," Meyer said.
China has surpassed the United States as the world's top emitter of carbon, which UN scientists say is causing global warming that could put entire species at risk if unchecked.
China has announced plans to reduce the intensity of carbon emissions.
But China, India and other developing nations have resisted a legally binding climate treaty, arguing that wealthy nations bear primary responsibility for climate change.
The United States was the only major country to reject the Kyoto Protocol, whose obligations expire at the end of 2012, calling it unfair because it made no demands of emerging economies.
President Barack Obama is pushing for the first-ever nationwide plan to curb US emissions, with senators set to present long-delayed legislation later this month.
In a recent interview with the Australian Broadcasting Corp., Obama said that while the United States needed to act on climate change, China and other emerging countries should not wait until their living standards improve as it was "not a sustainable, practical approach."
But Ben Lieberman, an expert at the conservative Heritage Foundation, doubted that the talks in Washington could bridge the divide, pointing to China's heavy reliance on coal to power its economy.
"They get a lot of positive press about the wind power and solar power that they have and that they export, but that's a trickle compared with their coal-fire generation," Lieberman said.
"They've made it very clear they're not going to jeopardize economic growth for global warming," Lieberman said. "And even if they were to focus on the environment, they have more pressing problems."
Still, some China watchers say that climate change could mark a turning point in the nation's global role. Beijing, long a champion of the developing world, faced criticism both in wealthier and poorer nations for its position.
"Copenhagen, in this respect, may have been a watershed event," said Elizabeth Economy, director of Asia studies at the Council on Foreign Relations.
"For many developing countries, climate change has revealed China as less and less 'one of us' and more and more 'one of them,'" she said.
The Major Economies Forum on Energy and Climate (MEF) was launched in March 2009 with the purpose of facilitating dialogue among major developed and developing economies.
The 17 participants include Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, the European Union, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Russia, South Africa, the United Kingdom, and the United States.
The forum has held five meetings thus far. The most recent took place in London last October.
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...


5 Comments so far
Show AllThere is a borad game, "Pollution" which is just like Monopoly with the additional feature that when you make money the pollution index rises. If the pollution index gets too high the game ends because everybody dies. There are features like "chance" but also initiatives that can be voted on to reduce the pollution or the causes of pollution. I used this as a part of course on environment studies. If you had a group of young men playing the game, they would generally die quite soon, but a group that had only young women, would survive and pass a lot of the initiatives and actually make their own rules based on controlling pollution. An example would be changing from cars which pollute to using bicycles which don't, but then they only used one die instead of two.
It seems as though the world is controlled by the thought processes used by young men.
Gee, no mention by AFP of the really BIG conference aboout to start in Bolivia that ought to trump anything coming from Depravity Central's smokestacks.
Here is President Morales's welcoming statement:
"It’s with the utmost pride and sincerity that the Plurinational State of Bolivia calls on the peoples of the world, defenders of Mother Earth, social movements, scientists, academics, lawyers and governments committed to their citizens to actively participate in the Conference on Climate Change and the Rights of Mother Earth from the 20th to 22nd of April in the city of Cochabamba.
"We want to celebrate the International Day of Mother Earth with a massive statement in support of the restoration of the rights of mother earth and harmony with nature. Last year in Copenhagen, 192 countries met to reach an agreement to resolve the problems of climate change. The result was shame, anger, betrayal, uncertainty, opportunism, failure – those were the adjectives most used to describe the outcome of that summit.
"I attended these meetings and told them that in the last century our ancestors, both blacks and Indians, were treated like slaves and their rights were not recognized. Likewise our Mother Earth was treated like a lifeless thing as if she had no rights.
"That was the result of the capitalist system that only gives value to gold and everything that can be expressed in a corresponding monetary value. In this context, planet Earth has for a long time been exploited for its non-renewable recourses to favor elitist, looting and insatiable societies without taking into account that our planet has finite resources.
"Mother Nature in her goodness has the ability to feed all of humanity today and much more, yet her collapse and death will be imminent if we pretend to satisfy the greed of irresponsible governments who tried, offering $100 million until the year 2020, to avoid reaching unilateral agreements in Copenhagen and consequently scheme ways to manipulate and disregard their commitments to the current Kyoto treaty."
It continues further at this URL, http://www.indiancountrytoday.com/opinion/91038604.html
Thank you for posting this, karlof1.
There is always guff and puff at the beginning of conferences indicating the preponderance of powder puff politicians.
But what Morales says indicates he is a leader. Things can change.
What mystifies me is how the hot air has managed to dominate. It is as if humanity has a congenital defect.
I wonder at the lightweight mind of Elizabeth Economy, director of Asia studies at the Council on Foreign Relations.
Where does the USA get these people? Are they a product of the education system?
Here is another one: 'White House aide Michael Froman and US climate negotiator Todd Stern sent participants a set of questions for the discussions, starting simply with, "What is the outcome we are all seeking in Cancun?"'
It is silly because if they knew they would not need to meet. All his question means is 'we'. It does not take too much intellect to see the problem with that for it is used in the playground at primary school level. A simple us and them and woe betide any here who do not join us.
It seems the problems start at the top.
What a top!