Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Goldman: We Are Not 'Vampire Squid Wrapped Around Humanity's Face'
Goldman Sachs Denies 'Betting Against Clients'
Nine months after being labelled "a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity", Goldman Sachs has issued a wide-ranging justification of its conduct before, during and after the financial crisis.
Goldman Sachs chief executive Lloyd Blankfein. Rolling Stone journalist Matt Taibbi wrote of Goldman Sachs -- "A great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money" (Chip East/Reuters) In a letter to shareholders issued alongside Goldman's 2009 annual report,
the Wall Street bank denied that it "bet against its clients" when it
changed its position in the housing market in 2007, shortly before
prices began to collapse.
The eight-page letter, signed by chief executive Lloyd Blankfein and president Gary Cohn, also contained a detailed defence of the $12.9bn (£8.5bn) payout which Goldman received from AIG after the failed insurance giant was bailed out by the US government.
The letter appears to be a detailed response to some of the allegations made nine months ago by Rolling Stone journalist Matt Taibbi. His article, which argued that Goldman had repeatedly profited by inflating unsustainable financial bubbles, received widespread coverage. It included the claim that the company was "a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money".
One of Taibbi's key charges was that Goldman had helped to fuel the housing boom during the last decade by packaging hundreds of millions of dollars worth of housing loans into complicated financial products such as collateralised debt obligations (CDOs). These CDOs were sold on to other banks and investors such as pension funds, who suffered big losses when the sub-prime housing bubble burst. Goldman, though, actually profited from the fiasco by short-selling the market before the credit crunch struck in summer 2007.
In the letter, which includes the word "clients" 56 times, Blankfein and Cohn attempt to rebut this charge. They admit that Goldman "went short" in the housing market while simultaneously continuing to trade mortgage-backed securities to its clients. They deny, though, that this was wrong, arguing that various sophisticated investors simply took differing views.
"We certainly did not know the future of the residential housing market in the first half of 2007 any more than we can predict the future of markets today. We also did not know whether the value of the instruments we sold would increase or decrease. It was well known that housing prices were weakening in early 2007, but no one – including Goldman Sachs – knew whether they would continue to fall or to stabilise at levels where purchasers of residential mortgage-related securities would have received their full interest and principal payments," they wrote.
"Although Goldman Sachs held various positions in residential mortgage-related products in 2007, our short positions were not a 'bet against our clients'. Rather, they served to offset our long positions. Our goal was, and is, to be in a position to make markets for our clients while managing our risk within prescribed limits."
'An inside job'
Goldman was the biggest beneficiary from the US government's bailout of AIG in autumn 2008. Goldman claimed at the time that its exposure to AIG was "immaterial", but in March 2009 it emerged that it actually received $12.9bn of the $44bn handed to various counterparties who had taken out insurance contracts with AIG.
Some critics have questioned whether then-Treasury secretary Hank Paulson – who was Blankfein's predecessor at Goldman – acted properly by authorising the payment of an estimated $90bn of taxpayer funds to various banks. The rescue came just a few weeks after the US government allowed Lehman Brothers – a key Goldman rival – to fail.
Today's letter lays out in some detail why Goldman received so much from the collapse of AIG. They said that $4.8bn of the money was paid in return for securities which could otherwise have been sold for the same price, while $2.5bn covered existing debts owed because of the deteriorating market.
Another $5.8bn was handed over to settle credit default swaps, or insurance contracts, on the CDOs that had helped to create the crisis. These CDS contracts were settled at face value, rather than at a discount to reflect the fact that the counterparties could have faced a lengthy wait to recover any money if AIG had simply gone bust.
Eliot Spitzer, the former governor of New York, called Paulson's decision to fulfil AIG's CDO contracts in full a "disgrace".
"The appearance that this was all an inside job is overwhelming. AIG was nothing more than a conduit for huge capital flows to the same old suspects, with no reason or explanation," Spitzer wrote last year.
Blankfein and Cohn insisted that "the vast majority of the money we received" was used to buy back the underlying bonds. They admitted, though, that they and the rest of the financial system benefited significantly from the rescue of AIG.
"Although it is difficult to determine what the exact systemic implications would have been had AIG failed, it would have been extremely disruptive to the world's already turbulent financial markets," they wrote.
- Posted in

81 Comments so far
Show AllIt's interesting that Eliot Spitzer's prostitution scandal emerged in early 2008 about six to nine months after Goldman-Sachs started shorting the housing market. Also, Spitzer had been a thorn in AIG's side since at least May 2005 when as New York's attorney general he filed a lawsuit against AIG accusing the firm and two of its top executives of "deception and fraud" to enhance the company's stock price.
I'm not saying there's any connection; I don't know if there is or not. It seems fishy to me that Spitzer's scandal erupted when it did. The creeps who run the giant corporations are probably not above digging up a scandal about someone who is exposing their corruption.
By the way--This Lloyd "Just Doing God's Work" Blankfein character seems especially sleazy. I think he would steal the coins off a dead man's eyes if he had the chance.
They all have mistresses and weekend dalliances. They know about each other. How could they not? They visit the same hotel on a regular basis. They collude in keeping the secret...until...one of them threatens to topple the apple cart in their business. And so Spitzer gets his butt kicked. It's absolutely more than a coincidence. Some enterprising young investigative journalist ought to go after the story; it would be a very hot item.
Rumor has it that the trail to Spitzer's escapades at the Mayflower Hotel was picked up by the Homeland Security sniffing dogs eavesdropping into cell phone calls records and credit card purchases logs. Its all part of the Bush years "war on privacy" as such information is scrutinized in the hopes of tracking down the money laundering schemes of rouge, clandestine groups seen as potential enemies of the state. Word is that along with Spitzer other fat cats were also nabbed in the surveillance nets of the feds but were not prosecuted and that particular investigation was shut down as soon as they discovered who Client Number 9 really was. Spitzer was loathed by Wall Street as he made no secret of his intentions to go after much of the corruption he believed was part of Wall Street's modus operandi. When you consider that the Treasury Dept. is practically owned by Goldman Sachs, a Republican administration was in power having gone steroidal shredding American's constitutional liberties, and a Democrat governor had declared war on their turf, it's not much of a stretch to think the levers of power and influence were greased by the well-positioned to cook up a convenient political scandal that would rid them of their nemesis. It's a messy business at times but after the aforementioned inconvenience and a bit of a bumpy ride for about a year or two, the good times are back with a vengeance for the Money Masters at The Street.
He already has.
Salutations to Rolling Stone journalist Matt Taibbi. His words are a refreshing & concise summary what most American corporations are to the world.
"a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money".
===============
http://wikileaks.org
if I were matt taibbi I wouldn't be flying in any small planes for a while!
"...it would have been extremely disruptive to the world's already turbulent financial markets..."
I dunno - sounds like a ransom note to me.
California Penal code 518:
"518. Extortion is the obtaining of property from another, with his
consent, or the obtaining of an official act of a public officer,
induced by a wrongful use of force or fear, or under color of
official right."
obtaining property -- Check
obtaining an official act of a public officer -- Check
by wrongful use of...fear -- Check
But we all know who those laws were written for.
These predatory vampires are not only draining the blood of the citizenry of this country (pensions, investments, homes, etc.), they are also behind Empire's endless wars that have by now more than emptied the nation's coffers and have drained the blood of millions of people around the world.
Will justice ever be served?
Exactly we have a photo of the real enemy right there, the militia is just a distraction to divide our energies, which should be untied to defeat people like Blankfein who exactly are a vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity. People like Blankfein rub their hands with glee when we direct our wrath towards the rural poor and not his penthouse and 100 year old champaign set.
Yep, divide in order to distract and thus to rule, as they did in Iraq. Blankface knows that.
Yes, here is an agent-of-empire.There are many like him.He's probably just a piker though.Probably one of those "errand boys" sent to Bilderberger-like meetings to set the imperial agenda of the REALLY big & truely evil players-of-empire,whom we probably don't even know by name or photo. Of course, the bought politicians don't even amount to "house servants" in their world.
When the pigs start squealing like this, you know they've been stuck. This is just confirmation that every word Matt Taibbi wrote is true.
Exactly. The vampire squid is poetic license but you know the story is true and well and multiply sourced, otherwise Matt would be spending his time in court fighting libel suits.
https://webdisk.lclark.edu/econ/steinhardt2010/steinhardt2010.html
When you have about 70 free minutes watch the above lecture. The Prof lays out in detail how corrupt the entire system was, (and still is), leading up the the collapse. IMHO, after watching it, I think you will come away KNOWING that Mr. Lloyd Bank-fiend is nothing more than a two-bit liar covering his sorry ass. IMHO most of the chiefs at Goldman Sachs should be either in jail for fired for negligent econocide.
IMHO any organization that would leave the world a better place if it ceased to exist, should not exist in the first place.
The prime crew of crooks who blackmailed the American taxpayer, "Bail us out or suffer another Great Depression," continue to lamely justify or obfuscate their crimes...and the lead story in the US corporate media is the latest sexual peccadillo of the celebrity du jour.
I know this is a delicate question, but why are all high officers of high finance, in the US at least, to a person, Jews?
If they were all Italians, or Catholics or such, there would be all sorts of speculation. Of course, small family businesses in certain sectors are often dominated by an ethnic group - in my town, small building contractors are often Italian, small bars are run by slavs, the city government is largely Irish or Italian - just like is lampooned in "The Simpsons". Large manufacturing or mining firms are dominated by WASPs, but that is simply becasue the US was predominantly settled by WASPS and so the old land and money is in WASP hands. But in this case we are talking about the most powerful corporations in the world, all led at mid-ranks on up by people of the same middle-European ethnicity/religion, who came here relatively recently.
I have no interest in dragging up sinister anti-semitic conspiracy theories, so if you have one to offer, please don't. I just want a simple answer, why are huge financial corporations dominated by a single ethnic group?
Jews have specialized in banking and finance for thousands of years.
So basically the trade gets passed on to their offspring as with every other
ethnic group you described. They eventually make so much money and game
the system so well that they end up being hated for it.
I agree, but once a firm has thousands of employees, if we assume meritocracy, than one would assume oher ethnicities would rise in the ranks. This is true in the conctruction contractor example - large construction firms have no tendency to be led by Italians.
So, obviously our assumption of meritocracy is wrong, and these huge financial firms are actually quite nepotistic.
Your and some of the other posts give the following explanation for Jews being concentrated in finance- It happened because of antisemitism.Racism which is similar to antisemitism resulted in the Blacks being exploited and impoverished.Logically any such feelings of hatred against any group should have resulted in their weakening.Antisemitism helped the Jews control money and finance thereby making some of them very rich?The caste system in India made the 'lower' castes perform menial tasks.What you are saying is illogical.
It cannot be antisemitism that made the Jews enter finance.
Your comment is generally true, but there are exceptions. It's not "to a man" Jewish. Hank Paulson is a Christian Scientist. Joe Cassano, who sunk AIG is not Jewish. His father was a policeman.
I think it's basically as adnoseum puts it. Just as Irish and Italians run so many city governments, Jews dominate the financial industry, because they have for centuries. There are still plenty of WASPS in high finance but Jews seem always in long supply. There are obvious links to the Israel lobby, the New York Times, and dozens of other power centers. Jews do exert a disproportionate amount of power, politically and economically, and most of it derives from their dominating positions in finance. Especially since we have hardly any manufacturing sector any more, finance and the military constitute the majority of the US economy. Blankfein can lie with same impunity about Goldman Sachs' motives and machinations as the Pentagon lies about its own. When you own the country, nobody nowhere is going to call you out on the lies. And since the USA is essentially now just a festering mountain of lies and criminality, not lying at the highest levels is tantamount to treason.
I'd speculate that this, at least in part, descends from medieval times in Europe when Jews were legally barred from many businesses and professions. Money lending however, was a prohibited practice for many Christians so they relied on the Jewish community to provide those services. Over the centuries this forced segregation produced the ethnic concentration in finance and related businesses such as trade in jewels and precious metals. This pattern was reinforced by the increasing expertise and reliability of the Jewish practitioners that evolved as each generation taught the next one. Further, the extended Jewish community, being transnational, provided relatively secure channels for international commerce immune to the difficulties of lcoal politics. Thus their success grew and expanded over the centuries while often remaining an essentially family business.
Unfortunately, human nature has a propensity for knee-jerk animosity toward those to whom we are in debt, especially when abetted by xenophobic fear and suspicion. And heaven forbid that any non-Christian appear to be more successful than I, lest I suspect them of secret and nefarious plots. The fact is, the overwhelming majority of Jewish business people are impeccably honest and their customers know it -- else they'd have disappeared many generations ago.
That said, there is absolutely no ethic group that does not produce a sociopathic sonofabitch once in a while.
This is a cultural left-over from medieval Europe, where the Catholic Church promulgated laws that forbade the faithful to practice usury & forbade Jews from living in most areas (ghetto is an Italian word referring to a specific portion of town where Jews were required to live) & banned them from most professions. Thus, money lending was one of the few occupations available to Jews (if they weren't being expelled or killed in superstition inspired riots winked at by the nobility to whom were indebted to Jewish money lenders). This also occurred to a large extent in Eastern Orthodox (particularly Czarist Russia) lands as well.
Secondly, the median educational level of the American Jewish (and the world, for that matter) community is higher than the average, as higher learning has a great position of cultural respect in the Jewish tradition. Thus, there is a higher proportion of Jewish college graduates than in relation to the slice of the general population. In recent years (beginning with Grandpa Caligula's reign [Reagan]), the financial industry has attracted the higher GPA earners of elite universities, thus it is natural that a fair amount of said "achievers" would be Jewish.
Make no mistake, the elite that runs America is WASP old money, who's most recent representative in the White House was Dubya. In fact, the great majority of American presidents, senators, & congresspersons have been and continue to be WASP's. Murmuring darkly about a "Jewish conspiracy" is merely one of the WASP elite's obfuscation strategies.
pjd I am guessing it's because Catholic Christians were barred from collecting interest by Catholic doctrine (against usury) and people of Jewish descent pushed out of many jobs other than finance due to anti Semitism and segregation of neighborhoods in the middle ages. So anti Semitism I am guessing led to family traditions of Jewish people pursuing jobs in the finance industry in areas where they were unfairly barred from other means of employment. There is some truth to the fact that example the Rothschild family is powerful in finance. That is obviously *not* an excuse to discriminate against Jewish people the vast majority of whom are *not* employed in the financial industry but just one possible reason I can think of to answer your question.
It seems others agree and slipped in with basically the same response while I was typing. :)
interesting responses to pjd's question:
if loaning at interest fell to the jews due to christians being forbidden to do so, and jews being forbidden to do much else, do we, at this point in time, feel loaning money at interest is 'good', or not?
I am a hundred percent atheist, but the "sin" of usury is one thing Catholics got right. Labor free investment and financier class income, and people who control and profit from vast flows of capital invested in things like the MIC are at the very root of our problems. I suggest read the story of money (I want the world plus 5%) to get a feel for how we got here:
http://www.larryhannigan.com/EarthPlus.htm
Dr. Blankenstein sez: "It was well known that housing prices were weakening in early 2007, but no one – including Goldman Sachs – knew whether they would continue to fall or to stabilise ..."
***
Beggin' pardon, sir, but somebody knew.
It was the icing on the poop cake that prompted the missus and I to sell the home place in '06 and split the country.
Our economic expertise? Opening our eyes.
That phrase was very carefully written to be totally true, but to also be completely misleading.
"...but no one - including Goldman Sachs - KNEW whether they would continue to fall or stabilize".
It is obvious that no one can KNOW the future for SURE, but you can, if you study a financial situation carefully enough, make a very good educated guess/bet on how it will play out. This is EXACTLY what G.S. (or should the now be referred to as B.S.) did.
"We certainly did not KNOW the future of the residential housing market in the first half of 2007 any more than we can predict the future of markets today."
Again it is obvious that they can't KNOW the future, but they can and should be very good at predicting it. Isn't that why people are their clients. Aren't they supposed to be providing a service, or are they implying they are no better than somebody picking stocks by throwing darts at a listing of publicly traded companies? If the later is true, why the hell do the exist?
Good points, Tom, but it's even worse than Gold in Sacks "knowing" what the markets might do. These bloodsuckers are in a position to manipulate those markets to their own ends -- and do so on a daily basis.
same here..i worked very briefly in real estate in 2005 and i saw what they were doing..the outfit i was with had a financial partner in-house and i saw what they were doing too and knew it was unsustainable..i've been saying ever since that if i could see it these guys had to have known..they are pretending to be as blind as most of the masses, but they are far from it.
"Yes, I broke into the house; the video camera shows that. It also shows I was armed and robbed the occupants at gunpoint. Yes, I fenced the valuables at Milton's Pawn Shop; his testimony bears that out, I know. But I don't want you to be fooled by what your eyes and the evidence perceive was a crime being committed. I am innocent of any wrongdoing and will be totally vindicated of these heinous charges."
I honestly don't see a dime's worth of difference between this and Blankfein's assertions that Goldman didn't do anything wrong.
Goldman: We Are Not 'Vampire Squid Wrapped Around Humanity's Face
All the vampire squids say that.
G-S is clearly an organized crime syndicate. They'll just keep on plundering everybody in sight until there's nothing left to steal. That's what they do. That's all they do.
The obvious thing to do is to confiscate their assets and convert their offices into penitentiaries at their expense.
Not addressed in this article is the degree to which Gold in Sacks has infiltrated the federal government. It seems to occupy a position slightly above the "Justice Department" (sic).
And recall the spectacle of the past year: When Blankenstein wants a private meeting with Obomber, he's in at the drop of a hat.
But when the prez calls in the banksters for a P.R. dressing down, Lloyd and his buddies ain't got the time.
Justice Department--Now there's an oxymoron for you!
hey Blankfein The Vampire Squid wrapped around our faces, you know you're a schizoid assmouth thief, and so do we
"Sophisticated investors" who are betting against the United States by selling us short. Could they be classified as terrorists?
Are weapons of mass destruction "bond bombs"?
It is time for a little bonded malt.
during the revolution we tarred and feathered scumbags like blanfein.....
hell the whole revolution was about the monopolies created by the queen and the east india trading company.....
time for a new revolution - or at least a few boiling pots of hot tar....
and the teabaggers? historically they would have been called the tories
too bad we lack any sort of historical knowledge in this country
not a vampire squid......
just a VAMPIRE
no use in denigrating an innocent animal!
but a vampire....yes indeed....
1.can't stand the light - or sunshine (laws)
2. lives forever
3. sucks the blood(lifeforce) from innocent unknowing beings
that sums up a VAMPIRE perfectly.....
what a scumbag.....
only in a fascist state where the corporations make the laws over the interests of WE THE PEOPLE do people like this command vast sums of money for wrecking havoc and profiteering off people's misery that THEY THEMSELVES created.....
bring back the gullotine!
this scumbag is an enemy of humanity and democracy....
his actions have led directly to people losing their pensions, savings, jobs and health care - people have commited suicide over this economic crash goldman in large part created.....Blankfein has BLOOD on his hands.....
if anyone posting here did that we'd be looking at serious jail time - for manslaughter SEC violations.....
but this VAMPIRE is instead "good friends" with obama and has placed over 25+ ex goldman employees in the obama whitehouse and are now in charge of the us economy....
and we wonder why there are no jobs and 40% of the us economy is now banking profits(ie:FAKE) with another 25% based on the war machine....
that guy shouldn't be able to walk to the streets safely without a bodyguard......
Rolling Stone journalist Matt Taibbi wrote of Goldman Sachs -- "A great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money"
Sometimes, the truth really hurts, doesn't it. you GS Scum. Especially when it's printed in a mass circulation periodical. On the other hand, if you truly believe in capitalism, you should be proud of the description and tell the world you wear it as badge of honor.
how about front trading? did the scumbag mention that?
in a "free market" front trading is manipulating the system and stealing from every single investor!
martha stuart went to jail for stealing a nickle and this guy destroys the entire economy and is instead becomes "best friends" with the president -
this guy is an enemy to humanity.....
plain and simple.....
I guess he's not to blame for hiding the debt and risk of greece so greece could load up with even more debt while as the same time goldman was shorting greece's position.....
so goldman cooked the books to allow some corrupt politician in greece to bury his country in debt THEN goldman shorted greece debt - directly putting greece in a position to fail on these loans.....
that's happened more times than we can count and he still professes innocence?
these people have no conscience - ie:they are SOCIOPATHS
and that's where we are today - the SOCIOPATHS have cornered the global economy - while the vast majority of the world starves -
"it's easier for a camel to go thru the eye of a needle than for a rich man to enter heaven"
it's scumbags like blankfein that Jesus was talking about.....
Matt Taibbi struck a nerve, didn't he?
According to Blackfein, he is "doing God's work."
And, according to Obama, Blankfein, et.al., are "savvy businessmen."
From the beginning, we knew that Summers, Geithner, Senator Dodd, and so many others that are too numerous to count, are the enablers in a system that is completely rigged against anyone but themselves.
Brooksley Born is continuing to warn that another collapse/crisis can NOT be avoided. Nothing yet has been fixed.
Elizabeth Warren continues to fight for "we the people."
Nomi Prins continues to speak out that what we need first, and most importantly, is the reinstitution of the New Deal Glass-Steagall Act.
Yesterday, NC-Tom recommended the following lecture by William Black, who talks openly about how this culture of "sociopaths" was spawned:
https://webdisk.lclark.edu/econ/steinhardt2010/steinhardt2010.html
In addition, the 2005 documentary, The Corporation, is available as a 2-DVD set, and contains additional interviews.
It's interesting how many women in the story are on the right side: Prins, Warren, Born, and Sheila Bair (fdic)
It was the Iroquois nation I believe that only allowed women to represent voting for the whole nation; since they believed the female spirit was best suited to looking out for the needs of future generations. I sometimes wonder how different everything might be if only women were allowed to rule or be elected representatives. It would have to be better, imo.
Did Margaret Thatcher and Condoleezza Rice make the world any better? Are Hillary Clinton and Tzipi Livni improving the world? At this point, I see little difference between men and women in that department. When it comes to screwing up the world up, they are definitely on equal footing.
I think the people you mentioned were men in drag. :-)
Comparing them to men in some of those same positions? Well, aside from Thatcher, I would say, yes. We should throw in Pelosi and Palin too ;) Palin has no comparison.. Well, in general, I wonder how it might be different, I think it would be better.
You are correct about the Iroquois -- the grandmother council had the power to "fire the chief," so to speak!
Send the squid-man to the depths of the deepest ocean--so ,even if Obama or Scott Brown needs his money, they won't be able to find him.
So what does he consider himself wrapped around?