Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
A Race to Introduce GM Corn Before Africa's Climate Worsens
In Kiboko, Kenya, a barbed wire fence separates a field of hybrid corn from the surrounding lands. Inside the fence, food safety regulators are learning to grow the crop with little water. In recent years, droughts have hit the region between June and September, reducing yields.
But two new varieties of corn, also known as maize, are coming to sub-Saharan Africa. One of them is conventionally bred; the other, better-yielding variety is genetically modified. Both are drought-tolerant and the seeds are royalty-free. Together with other agricultural interventions, they have the potential to feed some of the 300 million people for whom the plant is a staple.
There is now a great rush in parts of the continent to get biosafety regulations in place before the transgenic corn arrives on commercial markets in 2017.
Sylvester Oikeh, based in Kenya, is an agricultural scientist and the project manager for the drought-tolerant maize initiative (called Water Efficient Maize for Africa, or WEMA), run by the African Agricultural Technology Foundation. He described the promise of the Kenyan fields in a phone interview.
"Maize happens to be one crop in Africa that is consumed by more than half of the population, and it is badly affected by drought," he said. "With climate change, the problem will become worsened."
The initiative has big names behind it. The Gates Foundation and Warren Buffett fund it. Monsanto developed the crop for North American farmers using a gene from the lowly Bacillus subtilis bacterium, which is found in dirt.
For a region such as northeastern Uganda, which has seen its twice-in-a-decade drought cycles arrive once in two years, yield matters a lot. Corn is grown in rain-fed regions that already feel the ill effects of climate change on their agricultural output, according to Oikeh.
The fear of droughts and heat in the future
"The food crisis of 2008 was a harbinger of things to come," said Nina Fedoroff, the science and technology adviser to U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton. "The impact of climate change is just beginning to be factored in."
With a burgeoning population, water scarcity, rising numbers of meat-eaters in the developing world, and greater competition for land, agricultural productivity needs to increase dramatically. The first green revolution of the 1970s was an easy accomplishment in comparison to this one, according to Fedoroff.
Climate change will deliver a triple curse on agriculture, forcing crops to deal with rising temperatures, droughts and the rising salinity of water in parts of the world. The numbers speak for themselves. By the end of the century, the average global temperature will be 3.5 degree Celsius above normal.
The optimal temperature for photosynthesis is 20 to 25 degrees Celsius. By 2080, the average temperature in Uganda, for example, will rise to 29 degree Celsius (an increase of 4.3 degrees above the current average), according to a report by U.K. Department for International Development and LTS International.
The rise in temperature will be accompanied by erratic rainfall and increasing drought, the likes of which have already been seen in the country, according to the report.
"A third of the world's population already lives in dry lands," said Fedoroff. "The shape of the future is pretty daunting."
Land near the tropics fares worst
Other experts agree. Charles Godfray, a professor at the Department of Zoology at Oxford University who recently co-authored a paper in the journal Science about the challenges of feeding 9 billion people, said that the impact of climate change on agriculture will be negative. Although warming will open up lands in cooler regions for cultivation, it will not compensate for the loss of water and land in areas near the tropics, he said.
"The current system of agriculture is not sustainable," he said. "Water is arterial. We will run out of water in parts of the world."
There are many ways to get greater productivity. The rise of precision farming, conventional breeding techniques aided by biotechnology, improved irrigation and genetically modified crops are all important in helping the world cope with its food challenges, said Godfray.
In 2008, constrictions in the food supply chain led to a spike in global prices and riots around the world. The situation will only get worse. Drastic improvements in agriculture are necessary to cope with increased demand in a complex world. South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa will be worst hit.
In Africa, improving infrastructure, better fertilizer use, improved irrigation and other constraints can be relieved to increase yield. But the continent is drought-prone, with millions of farmers relying on rainfall for their crops grown in small land holdings. Corn is most widely grown, with almost 300 million people in sub-Saharan Africa using it as the main source of food. And it is grown in rain-fed regions prone to crop failures.
"Africa is greatly in need of transgenic crops," said Oikeh. "The way our agricultural productivity is declining, there is no other way than to look for the best of science and technology to address the problem now."
Racing to stay ahead of food demands
In the medium term, conventional crossbreeding helped by molecular biology techniques (a technique called "marker assisted breeding") may suffice. But such methods take time. Where it would take about 10 years to develop a transgenic crop, it will take twice that time to develop a similar plant using marker assisted breeding.
Wild relatives of crops could be better suited to harsher climes, but efforts to collect and breed such crops are just beginning. And sometimes, the traits are just too complex to replicate. Multiple genes can feed into a single trait. Other times, the desired trait, such as the ability to resist certain pests, can be absent in plant genomes.
Molecular biologists and neutral policymakers expect genetically modified (GM) crops to occupy an important role in the future. Currently, there are about 30 commercial crops worldwide. By 2015, the number will increase to 120, according to the European Commission's Joint Research Centre.
"Would you get rid of surgery?" Robert Zeigler said when asked if GM crops were dispensable. He is the director-general of the International Rice Research Institute based in the Philippines, an organization that was instrumental in helping Asia increase its rice yields during the first green revolution. "With GM, you have a powerful tool that offers the potential for most people on the planet to be fed, and decrease the footprint, and live comfortably."
Enter Bacillus subtilis. The bacterium's genome resembles corn in at least one respect. Despite millennia of evolution between them, both contain the genes for the CspB protein, which helps the organism adapt to stress. For a plant, there are few greater stresses than a lack of water.
Looking for plants that tolerate stress
Inside the cells of a corn plant, tiny molecules called RNA relay messages to help with cell activity. But during drought, the molecules are misshapen and unstable. The CspB protein grabs the molecules and stabilizes them, allowing the RNA to fold neatly into their proper shape. Photosynthesis happens at a greater rate. There are more kernels in a given ear of maize.
The gene was developed by Monsanto to increase yield by 10 percent in North America. The scientists in Africa are placing this proprietary gene inside drought-resistant corn developed by non-transgenic breeding techniques by a Mexico-based research center called CIMMYT. The scientists hope that the resulting crop will increase yield by 30 percent, according to Oikeh.
"In the five countries we are operating [South Africa, Mozambique, Uganda, Kenya, Tanzania], that should give us an additional 2 metric tons of maize that can feed 14 to 21 million people," said Oikeh. "If this is used around Africa, we will have higher benefit than that."
Despite its promise, the only nations in Africa that could bring a GM crop to market are Egypt, South Africa and Burkina Faso, according to Guillaume Gruere, a research fellow at the International Food Policy Research Institute. Others do not have a government body in place to set up the rules needed to commercialize a transgenic crop.
"My big uncertainty is whether there will be regulation in place when they get ready," said Gruere. "In those African countries, we work a lot there in setting up regulations that would be functional, but it's not there yet."
- Posted in



22 Comments so far
Show Allevrything seems to be falling in place for codex.
do they know the long term effects of the GM corn on people that eat it?
what happpens to the soil after all of the supposed yields of corn. wont they have to spray insecticides on the corn?
thus causing pollutants into the already lack of water and atmosphere? oh, wait, according to the guy Obummmer just appointed, those pesticides aren't harmful.
nevrmind then.
i'm not saying i have the answers but GM crops isn't one of them.
peace,
-fallenpatrick
There is NO infrastructure to support GM crops in Africa. There is NO infrastructure to promote any crops in Africa.
Decades of food aid have made imported food cheaper than home grown food. It is cheaper to ship corn from the midwest that to produce it and transport it several hundred miles in most African countries.
* Politicians and the well-connected make huge profits on food aid and imported food.
* They "own" the ports and the distribution systems.
* High value commercial crops get priority. Green beans are flown to France from above-mentioned Burkina Fasso. High value coffee is flown from Rwanda to Mombassa in Kenya.
*Corn (or maize) is not a high value crop. Most of the corn that gets beyond the ports is subsidized by USDA and the European Community.
* If the only food that is affordable is in the cities, mass in-migration and urbanisation becomes the norm.
* Rural farmers cannot compete. There are pockets of surplus where crops rot in the fields due to lack of any affordable transport.
It's instructive that two of the three countries that could grow GM foods have the best developed infrastructures. The third - Burkina Faso - may have the "Government body in place to sup up rules to commercialize a TG crop" but this would come at the expense of French commercial agriculture which provides winter foods to Paris and very expensive food downstream to Abidjan and the Ivory Coast (rail line).
Typically, Gates and the bribe infested UN and Unicef bureaucracy, promote this type of expolitation. It's great to get a tax write-off for exploiting thrid world countries.
I'd much rather exploit a country for tax purposes than to pay money to the Treasury. By avoiding taxes, gates has shifted more tax burden to you. You are paying for the exploitation of Africa and the world.
Wake-up and realize you are the ones who will pay for the transfer of TM crops to Africa. You have just screwed the developing world.
You have to start thinking beyond green (ie tax laws) to realize how we are all inplicated in this transfer.
Some of your statements need a bit of clarification. South Africa grows a lot of corn. The idea is not to produce and transport "hundreds" of miles in Africa, but to have many smaller, local producers. It is critical that they have good quality, drought tolerant seed. The seed I planted when I began farming in the 1970s was pathetic compared to today's hybrids. Giving them better quality seeds is a GOOD thing. Whether they put this seed to its best use is up to them.
It's so refreshing to have an agricultural article on CD that is not twisted and biased by absurd fear-mongering. I never thought I'd live to see the day...
It's so refreshing to have an agricultural article on CD that is not twisted and biased by absurd fear-mongering. I never thought I'd live to see the day...
------------------
What you actually mean is it's nice to see a pro-industry puff piece most likely written by someone in Monsanto's PR division.
Please, I beg of you, eat LOTS of GM corn. Please!
DITTO.. eat lots of GM, greg r, and you might indeed live to be the absurd.
Attn: Liberals Gone Wild, the world can't afford you (either) no more.
This is merely the tip of a huge iceberg.
Find a copy of Food, Inc. Even if you already know the facts presented, actually seeing what's going on will change your preception.
It's a bigger issue than organic vs. the pesticide industry. It's bigger than the GMO fight.
We MUST stop supporting corporate farming... totally.
Demand REAL food... not "notional" food!
Our very survival depends on it.
Start now! Grow your own veggies. Keep a handful of chickens for eggs and meat. Find a local dairy products supplier that is not a corporate farm.
Investigate Square Foot Gardening! Anyone can do it anywhere!
----------
A "friend of Ishmael"
The dirty Fu<#1^g hippies... were right - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iKEZoY-TMG4
We disagree on some things, but there is no better plan than "grow your own veggies." We've been growing lots of our own for a long time. We very rarely use pesticides because a bit of hand work does the job and it's good exercise. Best of all: the food tastes great.
Certainly this is replete with the same propagandistic misinformation that brought us widespread health and environmental and economic (small farmers fare worst w/ GMO crops,) problems. Here in Hawaii where MOnsanto, Pioneer, Syngenta et al. exploit our land and water to develop most of the world's polluting GMO seed corn - we are countering this kind of fear-based corporate agenda.
Most encouraging of all ~check out what real farmers valuing the gift of Life can do:
www.seedweneed.com
also
www.hawaiifarmersunion.org
Monsanto in the White House Garden: One Recess Appointment That's Toxic
Obama appointed Islam Siddiqui, former vice president of science and regulatory affairs for CropLife America, the lobby group representing pesticide and biotech crop producers to the post of Chief Agricultural Negotiator.
CropLife's clients include Monsanto, Dow, Syngenta and DuPont.
Full and unedited at:
http://blog.buzzflash.com/analysis/1012
** Monsanto is now the "Food Wing" of the government just as Goldman Sachs is the Treasury Dept.
It is disgraceful that this corporate hack piece gets any promo on CD! As a non-GMO activist here in Hawai`i for the past decade, I can tell you how Monsanto et al are changing paradise into an uncontrolled outdoor lab, where the rats are us. Of course, Africa is even less able to defend itself against these corporate predators who see conservation as an inconvenient impediment to profits. Please look at the stats. GM crops have lower yields and can decimate an entire industry, as happened to Big Island papayas. Doesn't Burkina Faso wonder why GM crops are banned in most of the civilized world?
GM crops have higher yield, not lower. (Sometimes by 30%)
Soybean yields are similar, gm corn yields are higher.
This is 100% the WRONG Approach... GMO Crops Are HUGE Polluters as they need Vast amounts of RoundUp Pesticides which in Turn Produce What are Known as SUPER WEEDS that take over the land... This Method also Kills all of the Microbes in the soil... making it Useless after a couple of years...
This is Total B.S. For Monsanto's Benifit and Nothing Else... GMO Crops are also Known to be Toxic Killers of Human Life Not to mention that they Turn your intestine into Pestiside Producing Factories,,,
The Correct approach would be the Geoff Lawton Method as seen on Youtube... He also turned parts of the Desert into Food Producers using Water swails... as seen in this Youtube Video...
Greening the Desert... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sohI6vnWZmk
Keep Monsanto Out Of the Food Production Business... They are KILLERS looking out only for the money to be made from their Manmade seeds and pesticides...
Some think it's preferable to write about things of which one has actual knowledge. The funny thing is that one would expect that even with a total lack of knowledge, one might be correct half the time, simply by the law of averages. Yet, in this case, you are quite extraordinary.
It's nice to see them "racing" to "deal" with the side effects of post-colonial neoliberalism and climate change, by introducing trade marked, pesticide dependent corn to the continent of Africa. That'll fix it.
Now the IMF can extend credit eternally, corporate revenues can sky-rocket, and generations of Africans can be subjugated for our holy permission to breathe in and out and feed themselves. We can probably finance it as a nation, with the increased tax revenues we'll get from offshore drilling the Prezzie just authorized; and the sale of petroleum based fertilizers on credit to starving third world nations.
I haven't felt so good since Uncle Bill Gates and Uncle Sam, decided to subsidize the mega-pharms by buying medicines for Africa, to treat the diseases we may well have caused. Retail prices, biblical volumes... life is good.
I think we need to create a new "Dick Cheney" award for the most creative and entrepreneurial projects that capitalize on human suffering. I tell ya... I'm inspired.
Now excuse me; I need an apoplexy break.
edited to add: Anyone that makes a living from their relationship with Ag-Biz, and shows up here, proffering their "expert" opinion, has obviously suspicious motivations. "Truthiness..." presented as fact, resembling the truth, often with detailed and scholarly "substantiation," and always with snide condescension and personal abuse. Stephen Colbert salutes you.
Which diseases may we have caused? That's quite an unsubstantiated allegation. Wild ranting is not helpful. Wow, I thought I was cynical.
"Speak of the Devil, and up he jumps."
Like I told my teens, "You must first develop ideals, for everyone to fall short of, before I will permit you to be cynical."
There is a phase of development missing in this equation. I know, all that money is probably just a happy coincidence for certain stock holders, eh? Interesting you cite the one statement that would require volumes of discussion, to take issue with; while ignoring the hand off of billions (trillions?) to transnational corporations that have your government in their hip pocket. Ignore the causes of the problem, minimize the corruption that motivates this solution, attack anyone that suggests potential harm, to people and their environment.
Rockefeller loves you. The rest of us? mmm... not so much.
Back on track. My first statement, neo-liberalism, extractive, exploitative foreign policy, climate change? Hello?
You really don't want to mix it up with me.
hey, grandma, you sound a bit dictatorial with your pronouncements to your teens. Hopefully you strike the right balance between teaching and judging. The "one statement...to take issue with" seemed important to me. I prefer my discussions to be grounded in facts unless we're doing humor. Actually, I guess I even like my humor to have a factual basis. Just because corporations are making money doesn't mean everything involved is bad. Of course we all know the power of corporations is completely out of hand and is extremely worrisome. And that is a fact.
Why grow corn in Africa?
It is an imported crop which requires much water and is not good for the soil-
In Africa plenty of other cereals grow, they are indigenous and well adapted to local conditions and have been used as food for generation, why not grow them?
spot on, stranger