Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
French Ladies of the Left Spell Trouble for Sarkozy's Re-Election Bid
Despite the low turnout, last Sunday's first round suggests France has undergone a severe electoral earth tremor, if not an earthquake. Jean-Marie Le Pen's far-right National Front has regained some ground, but far more threatening to President Sarkozy may be the recovery of the left.
Marie-George Buffet, France's Communist leader, left, with Martine Aubry, the Socialist leader, centre, and Cécile Duflot, the Green leader, right. The left parties and the Greens look likely to take at least 21 of the 22 regions in this weekend's elections The Socialists, the Greens and two somewhat harder-left parties scored 49.9 per cent of the vote last Sunday - the highest score for the left in an equivalent nationwide poll for more than half a century.
The vote changes many of the calculations for the next presidential election in 2012. For the first time since the collapse of the Communist vote in France, the combined left appears to have the electoral ammunition to enter a presidential race with confidence.
All that the left lacks is a credible presidential contender. There has been serious talk this week of a combined left and Green presidential primary next year to pick a single candidate. This would be a revolution in French politics but, given the dispiriting list of likely runners and riders, it would not necessarily produce a "French Blair" or a "French Obama".
The Socialist leader, Martine Aubry, is given much credit for rebuilding her party but may lack the charisma to run successfully for the presidency. Some French journalists have started comparing her to the German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, but Ms Aubry is no Merkel and France is not Germany.
All the same, the resurgence of the centre-left, dismissed as moribund a year ago, has produced deep depression, and recriminations, within President Sarkozy's centre-right: its total vote last Sunday - just over 27 per cent - was the lowest in any poll since the Fifth Republic was founded in 1958.
Mr Sarkozy, and his close aides and allies, have refused to accept that this is the President's fault.
Senior figures in his own party, the Union pour un Mouvement Populaire (UMP), say the poor score can only partly be explained by the global recession. They say Mr Sarkozy has paid the price for his erratic reforms, his veering between statist and liberal attitudes, and his monarchical approach to issues such as the aborted promotion of his 23-year-old son, Jean, to a senior political post.
They also complain that Mr Sarkozy has made two serious electoral miscalculations. He has absorbed part of the old French political centre, and part of the harder right, under his own banner. And his political appointments have reached out to the left.
Far from broadening his electoral base to an unassailable size, as intended, Mr Sarkozy suddenly finds he has no electoral allies outside his own party. He has managed to offend part of his core vote and reduce the centre-right to its lowest level in half a century.
Less than a year ago, Mr Sarkozy was regarded, within his own camp, as invincible. Many grumbling voices have been heard this week. Senator Philippe Dallier, said that the President's policies had become "unreadable". Claude Goasguen, a UMP deputy on the economically liberal right of the party, said that the President's "ouverture" to left-wing appointments and his lurches into statism had "done us terrible harm".
Jean-Marie Le Pen's score last Sunday - nearly 21 per cent in Provence - has also embarrassed Mr Sarkozy. The President appeared to have ended the far-right threat by reducing Mr Le Pen's share to 10.4 per cent in the first round of the 2007 presidential election.
Nationwide, though, the NF scored only 11.5 per cent, compared with 14.7 and 15 per cent in the last two regional elections of 2004 and 1998. With the 81-year-old Mr Le Pen expected to retire next year, and the party divided and underfunded, the chances of a far-right resurgence are slight.



20 Comments so far
Show AllThe emergence of a credible Green party in France would be a great development, as the French have been the leading purveyors of nuclear power plants in the EU. An effective counter-weight to years of state-inspired pro-nuclear propaganda is badly need in France.
Very much agree
This article gives a view of the situation that doesn't sound as good as this article.
"the electorate registered its views largely through a vote for the opposition Parti Socialiste (PS). Paradoxically, this is a pro-business party whose policies are widely viewed as not substantially different from those of Sarkozy."
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2010/mar2010/fran-m16.shtml
Are the French gonna vote for a FDR and get an Obomber?
The French political system is not similar to the American.
They do have more radical leftists parties, which did pretty badly: Besancenot's Anti Capitalist party for example.
The Indy is writing from a left of centre, sort of social democrat viewpoint, so they like the results, and IMHO, are reading too much into them. Bad recession, regional elections, the ruling party is almost certain to do poorly. WSWS is writing from a radical leftist viewpoint, so is much less happy at the left of centre / social democrat parties doing well.
It would be so refreshing to vote for any of these left parties instead of our 2 pro-capitalist parties if they had a more than a 0 chance of actually winning. Our money-marinaded, over-200-year-old political system is dragging the US down.
I think the French realize they are on the wrong track, but can't seem to find an engine to pull them down the right track - this has been a problem for a long time, and people seem to be waking up - but very slowly. At least SOME of them are waking up - which is more than can be said for the US... and French society is leagues ahead of the US, even in its worst areas, such as immigration (thanks to the Nationalists and their xenophobic behavior).
Europe seems to be fracturing - the EU isn't operating the way it should be, and local politics is inflammatory. You'd think they'd learn to all get along by now - but they haven't. Still cutting of their noses to spite their faces... or their neighbor's...
I sense a new enemy du jour.
The more hysterical here may cry hell fire and brimstone. And anti French sentiments may rise among them.
What a subhuman expression of ignorant jingoism and xenophobia all that "effete French" nonsense is.
"This would be a revolution in French politics but, given the dispiriting list of likely runners and riders, it would not necessarily produce a "French Blair" or a "French Obama"."
Why would anyone want either of these two? Or are they talking about the charisma factor? Blair lost his charisma, and Obama's is really starting to wear thin over here.
Samalabear:
I completely agree. That sentence leapt off the page at me, too. I'm sure, too, as you allude, that the reference to a "French Blair" or a "French Obama" has to do with their 'charm' or 'charisma' quotients. Frankly, I find both the actual "British Blair" and the "American Obama" to be unctuous phonies.
As an aside, I am always amused and somewhat flummoxed when people place a high value on such superficial factors as charm and/or charisma when formulating a decision on the merits of other people, especially political figures. Yet, time and again, I hear people say, or I read posts here at CD from people claiming, they look for these factors when choosing a candidate. Personally, I deem 'charm' to be an over-rated ability. In fact, I think of 'charm' as a verb, not a trait, which is often used as a directed instrument to disarm, compel, manipulate, or control others by allure or attraction. I also think 'charm' is similar to 'niceness' in that, unlike actual 'goodness', neither are innate personality features or traits, but instead, they are conscious decisions or strategies of social interaction. In other words, people 'choose' to be 'nice' or 'charming', for a variety of motives, not all of which are nefarious. However, people who seek to control or manipulate others often seem 'charming' or 'nice', at first. In my experience, especially when evaluating politicians, rarely are 'charm' or 'charisma' indicative of integrity or substance. Instead, they're generally used to cover for lack thereof. I think this is true of both Tony Blair and Barack Obama.
Right. The left there in Europe sees our Democrats and Republicans as two arms of a right leaning party. And the Democrats here as being similar to the right in Europe. For, after all, they have a leftist left.
OMG! This is terribly cool -- all three LEADERS are WOMEN! We should be so lucky -- Canada has dropped to 21% women in government under Harper. We were at 23% under the previous government. Do ya think things might be just a little different if the ratio was inversted?
Yes, and what attractive women they are. Or, as human beings, at least so they appear.
Looks like France will start getting messages from the DEAD MAN, Bin Laden.
The dead guy is always helpful to keep stooges in power, like Germany's Merkel or to keep Americans scared witless, so we'll keep agreeing to kill more Arabs.
Remember, you heard it here first!
France opposed the Iraq war. Something like ninety or ninety five percent of the French were opposed to it, remember? That was one reason why here in the United States anti French sentiments rose on the right. Let's hope the Freedom Fries mentioned above favorably refer to the rise of the left against the right in France.
I doubt the French are moved by the same arguments which work here. Certainly Bush's arguments in 2002/3 didn't work there.
With a French left: FREEDOM FRIES returns.
France, and Europe, has a very different political climate than the United States. The left, the true left with full fledged Marxists and the like, has always been far stronger there than here. I don't know how effective the media is there but there are strong leftist cultural roots there which should survive a media blitz. Nor are terms such as "liberal," "progressive," "Socialist," or "Communiust" bandied about as smear terms. At least not to the same extent as they are here. For, after all, a Socialist there doesn't care if someone calls him a "Socialist."
Unfortunately, socialist politicians in France are sort of like Democrats of 40-50 years ago. They tend to go along with things, including the well-entrenched capitalist system.
Today's U.S. Democrats are like Republicans of 40 to 50 years ago. The establishment, starting with Nixon, and ending with Obama, have done exactly what they want. By defining the terms, they have bastardized the language, and moved all parties to the right. The Repugs are far rightists. Democrats-moderate right wing, with a couple of exceptions who move toward the middle.
The Democrats aren't anywhere near centrist.
As for the ladies of the left in France, they aren't very far left-more like centrist.
I would like to thank you for the efforts you have made in writing this article. I am hoping the same best work from you in the future as well
luxury paris apartments