Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
More Fertile Imagination: 'Nature Deficit Disorder' Gains Traction
Revealing the inspiration behind his latest epic, Avatar, legendary filmmaker James Cameron recently described himself as a ''nature geek'', and said modern humans were suffering a degree of ''nature deficit disorder''.
(photo by flickr user andy_carter) It may not be a
medically recognised condition, but ''nature deficit disorder'' is a
concept gaining traction with childhood and behavioural experts around
the world.
Afflicting those in hard, urban environments deprived of nature's randomness and balance, it is a challenge facing cities such as Melbourne, whose children will grow up with rising urban density and pressure for open space.
Just as it inspired Cameron, experts hope an appreciation of the modern ''nature deficit'' can inspire Melbourne's city planners to plot a future with vegetative density amid the urban density.
Fertile as his imagination is, Cameron didn't coin the phrase ''nature deficit disorder''.
That honour belongs to Richard Louv, the American author of the award-winning book Last Child in the Woods.
Compiling research from around the world, Louv's book argued strongly for children to be reintroduced to the wilderness. Suggesting social and developmental benefits from exposure to nature, the book highlighted research claiming that a range of psychological conditions could be mollified, at least partially, by spending more time in the great outdoors.
Australian authorities hold similar views: in a 2007 investigation into playground spaces in Victoria, the state government found that young children ''need exposure'' to natural environments to appreciate the ''complex variations of texture, sound, light, smell, colour and temperature''.
The government report The Good Play Space Guide, highlighted the creative impulses that can be fostered by play with the ''loose parts'' of nature - the leaves, twigs and gumnuts.
''Such play is uniquely satisfying as there is no pressure to conform. Various ability levels and strengths, whether they are physical, imaginative, sensory or social, can be applied to loose natural elements to promote meaningful play,'' the report said.
Vigorous debate over the use of public space has long been part of Melbourne life, as organisers of major international events including the formula one grand prix and the Commonwealth Games have discovered when trying to use the city's parks for their events.
But Louv - speaking to The Age ahead of his visit to Melbourne in April - says it will no longer be enough to preserve the parks we have.
''Conservation alone won't provide the biodiversity we need in the future. To achieve that we need to - as ironic as this sounds - create nature in our yards and our cities,'' he says.
Rethinking the urban park is one of Deakin University expert Mardie Townsend's favourite conversation topics, and one she thinks the nation will be focusing on more often as it evolves towards high-density living.
''We now have a lot more people with little or no backyard, so there's much more pressure on the public parks, and we have to find a way of creating more public parks or more green spaces that people can access,'' she says.
Townsend believes parks need to become more interactive and offer not just trees and grass to visitors but also spaces to cultivate plants.
''Parks that include a gardening element will be really important,'' she says.
Melbourne's inner suburbs already have several community gardens, where locals can lease a plot of dirt to grow vegetables or other plants. Townsend says multiple benefits flow from such places: they offer recreation and encourage healthy eating while tackling the problems of rising food prices and carbon emissions from the transporting of food.
''It has very significant impacts on children's understanding of food - where it comes from and how it's grown - but also their willingness to try new foods, their willingness to eat nutritious food and their engagement with food,'' she says. ''All of this is really important in modern society, where kids are often sitting in front of computers, televisions and not socialising.''
Towns in northern England, such as tiny Todmorden, have already ripped out council flower beds and replaced them with simple crops such as broccoli, encouraging passers-by to harvest vegies at their leisure, free of charge.
But in Melbourne, meddling with parks has always been easier said than done. Yarra Council discovered that last month, when plans to establish a community garden within a park in Princes Hill sparked local anger. One group of locals wanted the space to grow plants, while others saw the move as a reduction of existing park space for the benefit of few.
The passion sparked by the debate caught the council by surprise, and it will come to a head at a council meeting in April.
Mindful of that controversy, and echoing Louv's comments, Townsend says we will need to be creative when scouring the urban environment for places to establish new parks and community gardens. She suggests taking advantage of laneways, disused blocks of land and river frontages that are unsuitable for housing developments.
Longer term, she says, there may be commercial benefits for private companies that turn some of their land into public recreation spaces.
''Think of a place like Chadstone [shopping centre], where they have miles of car-parking and have two or three layers. Why not make the top one a [nature] park, which keeps everything cool under that roof and provides a wonderful open space for people,'' she says.
''People are far more likely to go to Chadstone if there's a nice park there, where they can sit and have their lunch before going in to shop, so it becomes an economic attractor to business.''
In the serious business of playtime, few places are more important for children than school.
In a more congested city, the sports fields, playgrounds and other facilities within schools will be too valuable to be simply locked up after 3pm.
Victorian government policy already encourages schools to open their facilities to local communities outside school hours, welcoming night schools into empty classrooms, and sports clubs on to vacant ovals.
While each school decides for itself the extent to which it opens its gates to the broader public, the idea is to turn schools into ''community hubs'' with greater connection to those living nearby.
In places where social disadvantage coincides with a paucity of parklands, such as Dandenong in Melbourne's south-east, there is an even greater need for schools to take a leadership role, according to Martin Culkin.
Culkin is principal of Dandenong High School and says he wants to see his school enjoyed by community groups at night and on weekends. ''I like to see the facility used; it's not right that a facility that will be a $45 million cost to the taxpayer be locked up at 3.30pm. We will want to see some use of the sporting areas, the gym areas and other areas by the community,'' he says.
While vandalism has forced some schools to limit access to their grounds after hours, Culkin takes the opposite view. ''If you lock a place up, you are asking for trouble. If you allow managed access, you get a better result. You're not going to get a high volume of intruders and people up to no good when you've got activity in a place.''
Finding the space for parks in the decades ahead will be one battle, but keeping those spaces green and usable will be quite another. Melburnians need no reminding of the impact drought has had on their parks and sports fields in recent times. As a drying climate has turned fields to dust, many councils have installed artificial surfaces in recreation spaces, including sand, asphalt and, increasingly, synthetic grass.
While those solutions have had localised success, they don't suit a society wanting to curb urban heat absorption, grow food in parks and combat ''nature deficit disorder''.
Instead of looking to the heavens for rain, the answer to keeping parks green seems to be stirring in the pipes below. Authorities in charge of Melbourne's sewer network have recently conducted a major review of the city's wastewater system, and are writing a strategy for its management in the decades ahead.
A key focus of the strategy, led by Melbourne Water, was to investigate whether the treatment of sewage could be conducted in a less centralised way.
Virtually all Melbourne's sewage and wastewater is pumped long distances to one of two massive treatment plants, one in the west at Werribee and one in the east at Carrum. Despite being treated to very high standards, the vast majority of that water is then simply pumped out to sea.
The recent sewage strategy investigated whether a larger number of small treatment plants could be built around the suburbs - reducing the need to pump the water long distances, and increasing the likelihood that treated water could be re-used locally on parks, gardens and fields.
The strategy ultimately found it could be done - but at a ''significant'' cost.
CSIRO water expert Tony Priestley says ''sewer mining'' is another option, where existing underground sewage pipes are tapped at strategic locations where water is needed above ground.
Once wastewater is tapped, pumped to the surface and treated, it can be used as a reliable water source for parks.
Successful trials have been conducted around Melbourne at places such as the Botanic Gardens, and Priestley says the technology is ready to go. ''But,'' he warns, ''it's bloody expensive. It's basically a matter of having enough money - and what value you put on the parks, gardens and recreation spaces.''
The mythical Navi people - the indigenous tribe portrayed in Avatar - valued nature and their forests above all else. As heroes tend to do in big-budget Hollywood films, they prevailed in the end, protecting their wilderness against the advances of the corporate bad guys.
Good and evil are not so easily cast in the real world, where the good guys might as easily be those creating affordable housing as those protecting parks.
Louv openly declares he is not an architect, nor an urban planner. But as cities such as Melbourne contemplate fitting more people in the same amount of space, he says, ordinary people must make their voices heard in the evolution of their cities - by starting petitions, writing to MPs and attending community meetings.
''Let planners understand how vital it is in a civic blueprint to build or retain natural spaces ... let lawmakers know that natural play areas need to be part of the mix.''



21 Comments so far
Show AllYes!
Where I live, nature deficit disorder isn't at all a consequence of city living - city dwellers in the two large cities I've lived in are much more likely to be seen outsoors hiking, canoeing, birding, rock climbing and generally observing nature - either on outings or in the city parks, than rural or exurban dwellers.
When I go out on hikes or to our hang gliding sites I can name far more trees, birds and astronomical features than the noisy ATV-riding trail-trashing redneck rural country people whose knowlege of nature seems to only extend to the behavior of whitetail deer or largemouth bass.
When I was at geology field camp at Saltville, Virginia, all we heard from the locals was how it would be suicide to go into the woods in summer becausue the copperheads and rattlesnakes would get us. In reality, perhaps only one or two rattlesnakes might be heard or seen be seen over the whole 8 week course. No one has ever been bitten.
Astute observation.
Seems most of my encounters with other "folk" in the woods these days run along the same lines. Lots of self-proclaimed "outdoorsmen", mostly Texans in my neck of the woods; the more they talk the more they reveal their ignorance, except for killing things. Their life is so much noise, unfortunately they always seem to bring it with them to the forest.
Ouch way to stereotype rural people, when I lived in northern Michigan in both the U.P. and outside Traverse City, and rural Oregon, and rural northern California I'd see all types living out there from nature sensitive back to the landers, to methed out scary ATV riders with sniper grade rifles. And no not all the back to the land people were city imports either, some were local people who hung out with the long time hippies and learned something because unlike you the long time hippies there were open to all kinds of people and sharing information and even wisdom. If you wonder why poor rural people turn to Libertarians and even tea baggers and horrendous far right militia type groups maybe it's because they get sick of being condescended to and called " trail-trashing redneck rural country people whose knowlege of nature seems to only extend to the behavior of whitetail deer or largemouth bass." Hint if we are going to win as green decentralist leftists we are going to have to talk to people and not just write them off with broad brush stereotypes. Remember what Dr. King said judge people by the content of their character not the color of their skin, or their class ie whether or not they live in a trailer home, or a pickup, etc. The elite likes nothing better than we sow division and hatred amongst ourselves as poor oppressed people and do their work for them.
Your average fisherman who lives in the country and goes trout fishing I suspect gets out in the deep woods *far* more often than the average urban CD reader and isn't that what this article is about is renewing our preconscious bonding with the planet by going into the woods?
Try again posters your urban elitism is showing, which again is exactly how rural folks get picked off by astrotrurf teabaggers who at least pretend to like them, even though that bonding then leads those people to sadly go against their self interest by say opposing single payer health care which would very much benefit most rural poor people. Where is the Joe Hill of today who will go organize people in the mines? You can bet he didn't write rural poor exploited peoples as "rednecks."
a long time ago - when i was in college in the philippines - i came across some kids visiting from england - what really struck out to me and "us" with them was this:
they were so frightened of "bugs" -- when they saw , as we were eating together, a line of ants on the floor...they said they'd NEVER seen them before...
i'm so glad i spent a childhood in the province freely running around in the woods or fields after school and watching birds, or "hunting" for spiders with friends, standing under the darkening shadows under tall treess , loooking up to watch the spiders finish their nightly webs through the dusk light, or trying not to fall OFF the butt-end of a big "carabao" (those huge water-buffaloes in the philippines) with 3 or 4 of us kids riding , feeling its great lumbering power and size under us, while smelling all that stink that nature always provides...even with all the "yuck"..or going down to the streams up to our waist or chest to put our hands into the mudbanks under the flowing water trying to find some hole to catch a lurking slimy fish -- or god-knows-what, yikes...which could really "bump" you very hard with its head in your tummy to escape and proudly bring them home for the aunt to cook as a "special"...
and today - realize that I HAD something many might never have...a little experience that this "world" is NOT as "neat and tidy" as most western social orders might like it to be.
"More Fertile Imagination: 'Nature Deficit Disorder' Gains Traction"
This is the kind of ecologized thinking we much need about urban spaces. Humanity as a whole now suffers from 'nature communion deficit disorder'.
"We're all outgrowths on this planet
working out this planet's growth"
But while urban environments can be improved by 'greens gardens' and similar initiatives, the paramount need is to take the extravagant (i.e. larger than the natural 1.3 % overall growth) passive profit motive out of all interhuman enterprises. Our greed is killing US.
Unreasonably high profits (cf. the 1.3 % annual natural human growth/decay rate) is what drives ecological depletions and destructions. It also drives growth in human population, by creating artificial need for consumers and workers to keep stoking the profit systems at each end of the production lines, while the sucking-straws of profits keep the gains trickling up. The economic system of extravagant profits is a pyramid-scheme, demanding ever more workers to invest their efforts to participate in the global middle-class life. If and, due to Earth's limitations, when the entry of new workers - i.e. population growth - stops, the exorbitant profits in the economic system we thrive on will not continue. That's about now. The pyramid scheme A-frame house of cards then falls down. When not supported by uncontinuable growth, our capitalism doesn't work. And now it doesn't work with that growth any longer. Simply put: it can't stop and it can't go on. Choose! The changeover to a global economy attuned to the Earth's premises looks to be brutal on US humans. Even more brutal than we are to ourselves now. Getting us spoiled global middle-class internet-accessing people down to a globally continuable level of equality in consumption is going to be hard on US. We'll need all the empathy we can muster.
Human population growth is the worst ecological threat we humans face. We're now close to 7 billion, doubled since 1965. No wonder life feels steadily noisier.
"We gotta get outa' this mode
- if it's the last thing we ever do..."
Most of the comments feature a knowledge of the 'specifics' of nature, this plant or that animal etc. I propose that a direct and experiential unity with nature is the core issue. If one sees their individuality as 'part' of nature, then all actions that take place in nature will be automatically in harmony. The connectedness to nature is already an established reality, one only needs to realize this and stop denying and resisting this fact. The sense of separation is completely concocted by the mind, which creates the illusion of separation. in reality it is not possible to be on the 'outside' of nature acting as an observer. We are totally 100% dependent on the natural world, without it we could not eat, drink water, breath air, keep warm in winter and cool in the summer, etc. Only an arrogant fool thinks that they are separate from nature.
sirios my friend, I'm afraid this lost soul of a nation has too many such arrogant fools. What's worse is that there are ongoing conflicts out in other countries including the Far Eastern nations my wife and I went to. The yuppie style capitalism is spreading like wildfire and even when talking to intelligent people who support it about its consequences, they laugh and scoff thinking that we have mental problems for trying to "scare" them.
While we're always hanging by a thread to nature as long as we're alive, the elastic is certainly pulled pretty far for the 50 % of humanity now living in cities. The 'illusion' of separatedness from nature as our origin and our common connector, is due to the delivery lines having grown, sorry, been made by humans too long for many people's mind to follow. That harms them themselves through a feeling of disconnectedness they can't easily trace, and it harms the community and nature due to their becoming ecologically unreliable decisionmakers and voters.
In addition to this there's a domination-game of greed going on between classes and groups of people in this world, further confusing the widespread understanding of the delivery lines of natural resources and consumer goods. US middle-class people largely don't want to know about the suffering our consumption is based on, suffering by both other people and nature. It's an incre-mental willful denial, rather than 'illusion'.
While I agree with you with regard to "seeing our individuality as "part of nature", and the idea of separatness, I don't believe there's anything "automatic" about the impacts of our behavior. What will change, however, is that we'll be more aware and conscious and open to when we're blowing it, and be more likely to take the effort to do thing differently. It's magic in a way, feeling that connection, but it doesn't mean we will then always do the right thing. Becoming aware, however, is a big step in the right direction.
Why not both? There a moments in the woods where I want poetic unity, and other moments where the complexity and wonder of the woods is more manifest to me when I know the difference between say a Yellow Warbler and a Yellow Finch. Yes to the ecstasy of occasional preverbal bonding with nature, no to new Agey rejection of science which is also a one sided view of our complex fractal like world. The beautiful metaphor of the fractal would be impossible of if culture remained static at a medieval pre scientific level often advocated by New Agers. :(
Parks and tree farms can't substitute old growth forests and ancient coral reefs that harbor the most species. The loss of species diversity needs to be addressed.
Bravo, Ezy, now go tell that to your beloved Dims who are in the pocket of corporations. Hint Obama is pro "clean coal," and nuclear power. :(
Love this article as it points toward something that we can work on, lean into and make more of, our connection to nature. It's the "nature" of our modern society that we're out of touch with the very fundamentals.
The good and bad news is that "peak oil," climate change, the inexorable resource limits we're up against are going to put us back in touch with nature. If we go with our intelligence and work together, there's no end to what we can do - in the way of adapting if not totally succeeding (there's going to be trouble now whatever we do). If we try and cling to the old story, it doesn't end pretty.
Here are some ideas for local actions that can build local resilience: http://www.RadicalRelocalization.com/actions.php
Gaia’s Family empirePie March 19th, 2010
Mix the genes
end the isms of division
power is the promise of youth
the better brew is in the blend
there is no other.. just the friend
we are all one people sharing one home
think three dimensions think blue on blue
co-opetition is the hue
the blend is in the brew
love the other, love the you
the accident of birth doesn’t need to pad your berth
a stylish nest is not your worth
get off the treadmill
buck the trend
your strength is in the blend
extend your family
freedom means befriend
we don’t need a new world order
just fix our “nature deficit disorder”
mix the genes, love the other, love the you
7,000,000,000 people going out and 'trying to connect or reconnect' with nature; well, good luck with that but don't forget the mosquito repellent and the cell phone and the battery operated cd player and headphones and the cokes and pepsi and chips and dips.
There was once a time when the people anywhere were connected with nature and worshipped that nature and lived with that nature but now, just like the last remaining animals that have had nature taken away from them and put in zoos for human amusement, so we are 'sectioning' off what little of the natural world is left as parks but it would not take much to grasp the whole of the past when one just happens to walk up on the mountain removal ventures the greedy deem as being so necessary for their amusement or ride through southeastern New Mexico and inhale all that hardy and stringent hydrocarbon air.
Two urban people on a day-trip out sitting under a tree on a hillside, enjoying a flaming sunset. One says to the other: "It's so nice out here in nature, one has to wonder why they didn't put it closer to the city...".
A step in the right direction.
Very likely, a bunch of Nature is coming our way.
Why do I forsee a new Faux News series of warnings of the dangers of 'back to naturism' on the horizon? ("it'll lead to living in caves, wearing animal skins, living in communes!")
According to Faux News, there can be only one place we should go for information about our world, especially as the natural part of it disappears thanks to the preachings of ... Faux News.
http://www.rattlesnakeroundup.net/main/modules/page/
Yes, There is a need to bring "nature' back into the cities, re-wild our cities so everyone can have access to quality green spaces. I see this, not being a debate of native verse exotic, but creating complex, multipurpose spaces that embrace wildness. So people re-engage and use their local urban parks. We need to transform our parks and cityscapes by creating areas of for food production, deliciousness in our cities, line our streets with veggies and fruit trees, also areas that provide habitat for birds, lizards,insects and other animals, areas for of playable space for children and areas that foster tradition ecological knowledge. As we all know, there is not one way to create this complex multipurpose place. Using local plants and engaging local community to see what they want. By using local plants, art and the creation of complex spaces we could create unique places, that build local character that will be as identifiable and as iconic as our architecture.
We need to create complex multipurpose spaces that embrace wildness in our cities- celebrate our cities and make them livable and vibrant. www.wildthecity.wordpress.com