Subscribe to Common Dreams News Updates
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Breaking: Anti-MTR Activists Risk Arrest at EPA HQ with Elaborate Protest
Group Erects Purple Mountain Majesty At EPA; Say “If Administrator Lisa Jackson Won’t Visit the Appalachian Mountains, They Will Bring The Mountains to Her”
WASHINGTON- In an attempt to further pressure EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson to enforce the Clean Water Act and halt mountaintop removal coal mining (MTR), activists early this morning erected two 20-foot-tall, purple tripod structures in front of the agency's headquarters. A pair of activists perched at the top of the tripods have strung a 25-foot sign in front of the EPA's door that reads, "EPA: pledge to end mountaintop removal in 2010." Six people are locked to the tripods and say they won't leave unless Administrator Jackson commits to a flyover visit of the Appalachian Mountains and MTR sites, which she has never done before.
(photo on flickr from Rainforest Action Network) This is the latest in a series of actions and activities aimed at pressuring the EPA to take more decisive action on mountaintop removal coal mining. Today's tactic is modeled on the multi-day tree-sits that have been happening in West Virginia to protect mountains from coal companies' imminent blasting. Called the worst of the worst strip mining, the practice blows the tops off of whole mountains to scoop out the small seams of coal that lie beneath.
"We're losing our way of life and our culture," said Chuck Nelson, who worked as a coal miner in West Virginia for three decades and came to DC to support today's protest. "Mountaintop removal should be banned today. The practice means total devastation for communities, the hardwood forests, the ecosystems, and the headwaters. Why should our communities sacrifice everything we have?"
Despite the Obama administration's big announcement last year that it was going to take "unprecedented steps" to reduce the environmental damage from mountaintop removal coal mining in Appalachia, the EPA has been slow moving. Two weeks ago, the EPA delayed action on a set of broad-ranging and specific measures to reduce the environmental impacts of mountaintop removal, after details of the plan were leaked to coal-state mining regulators. The EPA has for months been close to finalizing these permit guidelines, which many hope will mandate tougher protections to limit damage to water quality and be a step in the right direction toward abolishing the practice.
The delay in EPA's announcement of more detailed permit guidelines came just as the agency also asked U.S. District Judge Robert C. Chambers for more time to decide if it will veto the largest mountaintop removal mining permit in West Virginia history, the nearly 2,300-acre Spruce No. 1 Mine in Logan County.
"The science has become clear that mountaintop removal is harming water resources in real and measurable ways," said Kate Rooth of the Rainforest Action Network, which organized the protest. "The EPA definitely can and must do much more on mountaintop mining and that includes exercising its full regulatory authority to block every single mining permit application that seeks to remove America's oldest mountaintops and dump the waste into waterways."
Based on EPA Administrator Jackson's statements on March 8th at the National Press Club, it appears that the EPA is seeking ways to "minimize" the ecological damage of mountaintop mining rather than halt the most extreme strip mining practice. A paper released in January by a dozen leading scientists in the journal Science, however, concluded that mountaintop coal mining is so destructive that the government should stop giving out new permits all together. "The science is so overwhelming that the only conclusion that one can reach is that mountaintop mining needs to be stopped," said Margaret Palmer, a professor at the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Sciences and the study's lead author.
"Ultimately, what is clear is that mountaintop removal cannot be regulated. It must be abolished. Otherwise, we will continue to jeopardize our historic mountains, precious drinking water and especially the lives of the people who call Appalachia home. All of this for a tiny percent of dirty coal, the tradeoff doesn't add up," said Kate Finneran, one of the two main climbers in today's protest.
Called the worst of the worst coal mining, mountaintop removal coal mining results in the clear-cutting of thousands of acres of some of the world's most biologically diverse forests, the burying of crucial headwaters streams and the contamination of groundwater with toxic levels of heavy lead and mercury. According to the EPA, this destructive practice has damaged or destroyed nearly 2,000 miles of streams and threatens to destroy 1.4 million acres of forest by 2020.
- Posted in

13 Comments so far
Show Allwe need to say good riddance to coal. its too dirty and the risks with acquiring it are too great. as society continues moving towards more sustainable energies, i think that coal will soon become a thing of the past.
I don't know where you reside margoelena but I live in the Appalachian coal basin (eastern Ohio in the Uper Ohio River valley) and I can tell you that coal's demise will not occur anytime soon. Though we may be able to replace the electricity generated by coal with solar, wind, and other renewables the coal industry lobby is working very dilligently to stifle any serious moves away from coal.
The "Smart Grid" initiative is a pre-emptive strike by coal, oil, and natural gas to swallow whole any funds available from the Federal government for energy reform. The renewables industries will once again receive only lip service and crumbs. There will be no change in the status quo.
It will only be after the water is poisoned, the ground is sterile or toxic, and the entire region resembles the surface of Venus that the awareness will dawn that we did the wrong thing. Of course Don Blankenship (Massey Coal) and Bob Murry (Murry Coal) will still claim to be the ultimate patriots for delivering cheap electricy to an ungrateful nation.
By the way, surface mining is accelerating here in the more gentle hills of eastern Ohio. With the machinery now available the coal companies can now remove about one hundred feet of overburden to get at the coal seams. Though they do the reclamation that is required under the Surface Mine Reclamation Act these restoration efforts may be just an illusion. My brother pointed out that these massive fields of broken and unconsolidated overburden, though graded and seeded have no ability to capture and hold the rainwater they recieve leaving the surface arid, toxic, and unproductive for any plantlife of any value.
My scepticism about the demise of coal comes not only from a knowledge of the machinations of the coal lobby but from the fact we will ALL have to consume much less to rid ourselves of coal, and I see no appetite for that generally in the American populace.
The arguments of Msrs. Blankenship and Murry resemble that famous utterance by an officer in the U.S. military: "We had to destroy the region in order to save it."
The other day an ad FOR coal here presented a purported coal miner advocating the incresed mining of coal. Among other nonsense this personage uttered the phrase "carbon sequestration." This is a sham. Not only are there no large-scale demonstration projects of sequestration technology, there are not any medium-scale projects operating. In fact the very idea is just wishful thinking and is at least decades away from any sort of implementation.
If the choice is between reliable electricy service 24/7 or the abolishment of coal-fired electricity generation I am sure that the American people will clamor for coal until there is no clean water to drink and no clean air to breath, and my home resembles the surface of an asteroid. But as bad as surface mining for coal is, from what I've seen the oil sands operations are even worse.
It's OK though, 'cause after we've poisoned ourselves out of existance mother nature in a few thousand years will reclaim the place. We just won't be here to see it.
You are corect that much of the push for a "smart grid" is to open up more distants markets for Ohio valley/Appalacian coal-generated power, and especially allow big power plants to be built right next to the huge Basinstrip-operations in the huge but unpopulated Wyoming and Montana Powder River Basin, instead of having to ship the coal east.
But, a "smart grid" is even more important for shuttling wind and solar power between producing areas (especailly the central plains and southwest) to distant unproducing areas with changes in the weather. So, a smart grid is still something we need to support.
pjd I don't know what happened: saw your reply soon after you posted it, prepared a response and went to review it, and then the CD website was no longer available to my computer. ? Anyhow, I'll try again as I was able to copy my text before I exited.
"pjd I'm not sure just how much benefit would accrue to renewables from dumping huge sums of money into the distribution grid. My feeling is that the correct application of solar, if not wind, is right at the point of consumption.
Now don't take me to task because of the current state of technology or the current lack of real government incentives for home solar installations. If we had been seriously working towards widespread solar generation, say for the last several decades, we may not be in the situation we find ourselves.
I think you're aware of what I'm trying to do here at my home. It is a (hopeful) experiment. One, that IF it is successful, I hope to help others accomplish. The cost for all energy will continue to increase, no matter the fossil fuel used to produce it. I do not wish to continue to be shackled by ever-increasing cost for electricity.
Although I am glad to see the proliferation of wind farms I still wonder if this is the correct form (large installations of very large apparatus) for harnessing the power potential of wind. Sometimes I wish I had studied mechanical engineering instead of Surveying and Civil Engineering."
OK that was it, but in the meantime other thoughts occured to me. I told you some time ago I would be in DC this weekend. The time has arrived while I was absorbed with other things. If I don't go, then I don't have a hair on me. A twofer - a war protest and an MTR protest. Are you travelling alone?
Home-rooftop solar is fine if one is so situated to take advantage of it. But such people are a minority. Most poeple don't live in homes with the necesary roof-areas, without obstructions, in open areas with sunny climates. We can go for weeks under cloud cover where I live. Actually, I suspect that a majority of the population doesn't live in detached single family homes at all.
Home power generation is generally only practical in the sprawling suburban environment, which is a huge source of carbon due to the car usage. If we are going to get more poeple to live in compact European-style communities where car-free living is possible, individual solar generation is even less practical.
Localism is fine for a lot of things, but for electricity generation it makes no sense. The generation has to take place in the geographical areas where the generation resources are abundant.
pjd: don't know if you'll revisit this thread, but I'll post nevertheless.
What I'm trying to do here I certainly don't expect to be applicable universally - give me some credit please. I am very well aware of all the arguments that you advance. However: the U.S. is not Europe and we will probably never emulate or resemble their cultural mindset or their population density and create European style communities. My younger brother living on the north shore is a strong advocate for those very ideas that you suggest and we have discussed them at length. I have also discussed these ideas with university trained urban planners.
Suburbia is a blight on our health in very many ways as you say, but it also represents a huge investment in resources that is already in place, and to dismantle or destroy what exists would be not only wasteful but counterproductive. What is lacking is not technical know-how but the will to act cooperatively.
There are many, like myself, that could not live in an urban environment. I enjoy all the diversity that cities offer, and I am glad to be only 45min away from Pittsburgh, a city that is greatly under appreciated by the majority of Americans. But as much as I like what it has to offer, before too long I have to get out and back to my rural surroundings.
There are no universal solutions and I certainly don't think in terms of black and white. As was recognized and exclaimed upon before the cult of negativity and the status quo drowned everyone else out, the solutions to our energy and environmental problems will require a wide mix of technologies and new, unimagined cooperative efforts.
Having been a surveyor all of my life I am a keen observer of the weather - it is an occupational necessity. I am well aware of the annual average of solar exposure days for this region (it is no different here than in Pittsburgh) and it may be impossible to say just how climate change may affect those historical data. I do notice however, that during the winter when our energy needs are the greatest that we still experience here the Canadian or Arctic high pressure systems with clear skies and much sun in January and February. One of the greatest impediments to common sense change is this attitude of all or nothing, or hoping to find that silver bullet that will cure all our ills.
Your approach is fine as far as it goes and those like you and my brother should do all you can to make our cities and urban areas more livable and energy efficient. I will do the same for the environment that I choose to live in and hopefully help make energy efficiency strategies workable and affordable here.
The bottom line is we as a whole in this nation have not faced up to the real facts of physical reality. That will change and is changing, and the rate of change will definately accelerate as the real costs of energy become impossible to ignore. Unless we begin to energetically explore new strategies while we still have a semblance of civil society and a sense of social order, the chages that are necessary will be all but impossible - physically, socially, and economically.
I attended the protest in DC before the invasion of Iraq and I travelled on the bus convoy organized by the Merton Center in the burgh. I shared a seat with a Quaker from just west of here whose grandfather apparently was a pioneer of the current stormwater control strategies now used throughout the country. His grandfather was an engineer in Dayton that experienced major flooding in the early 20th century.
Unfortunately, for the last month I was occupied with several projects that came my way unexpectedly and this weekend arrived to find me unprepared. I'm trying to find others to go with me, but may have waited too long, and I don't want to travel alone.
I'm taking a bus, hopefully (buses) that is being organized by the Merton Center in Pittsburgh. Look for the guy with the peace flag on a long pole. I think I'll paint it black or black/red this time - peace and anarco-syndicalism.
Why do we have to fight for what are so obviously the right decisions, choices the government (and corporations) consistently get wrong? Our country is being methodically destroyed in front of our very eyes.
Kudos to the activists at the EPA, persons of which I expect to see many many more in the days to come. There are dozens of issues to speak and act on, but there are millions of us to do so. It's OUR country.
Anyone who supports or participates in MTR should have the roofs of their homes removed until they desist from this MTR insanity.
This corporate and governmental nation is totally insane.
I will certainly be there at the EPA HQ this Saturday in conjubction with the anti-war rally. Let's try to get a feeder march there. The EPA is at 12th and Pennsylvania - just blocks from the demonstration site.
Also, with the health care crap going down, congress, the president and lots of staff will be in town working through the weekend so we WILL have visibility this Saturday.
I wonder what Obama's position is on MTR? Oh, nevermind...
If anyone wants to CALL ADMINISTRATOR LISA JACKSON AND TELL HER TO LISTEN TO THE PROTESTERS, TAKE THE FLY OVER TOUR OF MOUNTAIN TOP REMOVAL SITES, AND STOP MTR: the phone number is 202-564-4700. It would be good if about, say, a million folks would call today.
just a thought!
If I was the director of the EPA (which I would never be), I would be embarrassed to not have visited central Appalachia and seen the devastation. For as much lip service as this administration is giving to basing policy on science, they can't even trouble themselves to visit a site? What is it, like a couple hours away? What a shame to the name Environmental Protection Agency. More like Department of Environmental Fees; let's just not pretend they protect anything.