EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
Popular content
Today's Top News
Texas Earthquakes May Be Linked to Wells for Gas Mining
Saltwater pumped deep into the earth in a natural gas mining operation offers a "plausible," though not definitive, explanation for small earthquakes in Texas in 2008 and 2009, scientists say.
On Oct. 31, 2008, small (magnitude 3.0) tremblors shook homes in the Dallas-Fort Worth area. Similar shakes (3.3) occurred again last May.
"The earthquakes were right in our backyard, and quakes don't happen too often in Texas," says seismologist Brian Stump of Southern Methodist University in Dallas, senior author on a Leading Edge journal study. "We usually only get small ones."
Some suspicions centered on wells involved in "hydraulic fracturing" of shale layers in Texas and elsewhere. The shale is cracked by injections of high-pressure water, loaded with sand, to free natural gas trapped within. The U.S. Geological Survey estimates that 200 trillion cubic feet of natural gas may reside in shales nationwide.
Stump and colleagues analyzed records from 11 quakes. Triangulating from different earthquake waves, the group narrowed the origin to about one-tenth of a mile just south of the Dallas-Fort Worth airport, atop a geologic fault about 15,000 feet down.
"It's an old fault, but it still has stresses on it, which can trigger quakes," Stump says.
About 13 fracture wells have been drilled since 2002 near the locale, but the team found the epicenter sits almost exactly on the location of a wastewater "reinjection" well, where about 9,000 barrels of saltwater a day was deposited 10,000 to 14,000 feet deep. The salty "flowback" water was pumped to the surface in the fracturing process, and disposing of such brine by reinjecting it into deep rock removes the need to treat it for safety reasons.
"These kinds of induced quakes are widely accepted in the seismological community, and it looks like they have a case here," says geophysicist Jim Dewey of the U.S. Geological Survey office in Golden, Colo. "The vast majority of wells don't have quakes associated with them, of course."
But geophysicist Shaopeng Huang of the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor cautioned in an e-mail that "a causal link between a given earthquake with a particular borehole is debatable," given the tremendous energy involved in even a minor quake.
"We are only saying a link to the well is 'plausible,' not definitive," Stump says. Still, he notes, the quakes have ceased since the saltwater reinjection was stopped at the site after a third set of tremblors in June.
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

10 Comments so far
Show AllOil is a cushion,one reason for not letting them drill off the coast of CA.Tony
I doubt the oil in sediments offshore has any effect on strains on the San Andreas fault which cuts through mostly metamorphic and igneous rocks inland.
The effect of deep injection wells (and also the filling large reservoirs) in triggering small earthquakes is well-known. However, they are not exactly the cause of the earthquake - the existing strain energy on the fault is. They may even be preventing a larger future earthquake, by releasing the strain energy before it builds even higher.
California has some live earthquake regions due to plate motions. There are no plate motions in or at the border of Texas which is the reason why a comparison of the two states on this issue is ludicrous..
That may be true for "small" faults but water is not oil and the cushion effect in a large fault like the San Andreas is not proven.Also if you have ever read Revelation and the end times about all the earthquakes that will be triggered in the middle east and think of all the oil pumped out there and it looks like humans are setting up their own Armaggedon.Tony
Whatever... (sigh).
Indeed, the notion that a few piddling oil wells can "wake up" an essentially dormant if not dead San Andreas fault (which is essentially identical to the Rhine Graben or the famous African Rift Valley) which requires an Eastern pull at the Eastern edge and/or a Western pull at the Western edge of the fault system is utterly ridiculous. Before there will be even any new motion of the fault system the dormant volcanoes such as "pilot's knob" at Austin will spring alive. And what has Armageddon to do with this?
Every geologist knows that the principal reason for the small earthquakes in Texas is the fact that comparatively recent formations are continuously bent, strained, and cracked by the massive load of the deposits of the Mississippi river into the Gulf of Mexico. These small earthquakes occurred even before drilling for oil in Texas began.
"small (magnitude 3.0) tremblors shook homes"
I think the word you are looking for is "temblors", although I must say I am impressed by the number of syllables in this article e.g. "Triangulating".
I didn't think USA Today actually had any content to speak of, or allowed more than 3 syllables -given the audience it is designed for?
If the "science of earthquakes is so known why cant they be predicted,at least a good guess?Tony
Jesse Ventura did a good story on HAARP - Weather Modification, Military Defense and Mind Control. Check it out on You Tube: (http://socioecohistory.wordpress.com/2009/12/19/jesse-ventura-haarp-weather-modification-military-defence-and-mind-control/)...