EMAIL SIGN UP!
Most Popular This Week
- Corporate Win: Supreme Court Says Monsanto Has 'Control Over Product of Life'
- How the US Turned Three Pacifists into Violent Terrorists
- Cornel West: Obama 'Is a War Criminal'
- Revealed: How US State Department 'Twists Arms' on Monsanto's Behalf
- Victory in Seattle as Teachers Win Battle in Standardized Test Boycott
Popular content
Today's Top News
Hawaii Hopes to Become Greenest State
Kona, Hawaii - Take a ride in Ron Baird's pickup truck along the volcanic shore of Hawaii's Big Island and he'll show you an inventor's wonderland.
Darren Kimura, CEO of Sopogy, demonstrates how his company uses the Big Island's resources for its solar facility. Tiny Hawaii is gunning for the title of the nation's green energy capital. It's aiming to obtain 70 percent of its total energy needs from clean sources within 20 years. (Photo: Alana Semuels / MCT)
On one parcel of this government-created energy laboratory, rows of
mirrors shine white-hot in the sun, turning heat into energy. On
another, brown water tanks harbor strands of algae that will be made
into fuel. Nearby is a wind turbine whose blades spin parallel to the
ground.
"It's an awesome amount of things going on here," said Baird, chief executive of National Energy Research Laboratory of Hawaii Authority, which is helping to nurture 42 green private-sector businesses on 877 acres in Kona.
Watch out, California.
Tiny Hawaii is gunning for the title of the nation's green energy capital. It's aiming to obtain 70 percent of its total energy needs from clean sources within 20 years.
That ambitious target blows the solar panels off California's mandate to get one-third of its electricity from renewables by 2020. But Hawaiian officials have concluded their state has little choice.
This tropical paradise is an energy beggar that depends almost solely on oil to fuel its vehicles and stoke its power plants. That's left the state, which doesn't produce a drop of crude, vulnerable to spills, price swings and geopolitics. Hawaii residents already pay the highest pump prices and electricity rates in the country. The state imports around 51 million barrels of oil costing billions annually, according to government figures.
"We really are the canary in the coal mine," said Jeff Kissel, chief executive of the Gas Co. of Hawaii. "What's happening to us with oil is going to happen to the rest of the country as ... supplies diminish."
Global warming threat
More worrisome is global warming. The threat of rising seas and pounding storms linked to climate change has put Hawaii on a collision course with Mother Nature.
While Hawaii's efforts to green itself won't make much of dent in the world's carbon emissions, environmentalists hope the state can prove what's possible. The goal is to transform the nation's most energy-dependent state into its cleanest and most sustainable.
"We're adopting policies and technologies here that can serve as a model for the rest of the globe," said Jeff Mikulina, executive director of the Blue Planet Foundation, a Hawaii clean energy advocacy group.
The state this year began requiring all homes be built with solar water heaters. Hawaii is working with Palo Alto electric transport firm Better Place to build a network of recharging stations to jump-start mass use of electric vehicles on the islands. Meanwhile, the state's public utilities commission is devising a compensation system to encourage homeowners and businesses to go solar by paying them to generate green electricity.
The policies stem from an agreement Hawaii signed with the Department of Energy in 2008. The state pledged to obtain 70 percent of its total energy needs by 2030 - 40 percent from renewable electricity generation and the remaining 30 percent from energy efficiency. Known as the Hawaii Clean Energy Initiative, that agreement has since been strengthened with binding legislation that exceeds California's mandate to get 33 percent of its electricity from renewables by 2020 (though Hawaii has an extra decade to get there).
It lags California
About 6.5 percent of Hawaii's electricity came from renewable sources other than hydroelectric power in 2007, according to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. That's about half of what California - the nation's solar champion and a major player in wind and geothermal - has achieved so far.
But experts said Hawaii's small size and unique geography could prove advantageous in the race for energy independence. With just 1.3 million inhabitants, energy consumption is small. The islands are blessed with abundant solar, wind, geothermal and wave resources. And Hawaiians are less likely to object to the cost of renewables because they already pay high energy prices.
"It's easier for Hawaii to pull this off than anyone else," said Alison Silverstein, an independent consultant and one-time energy regulator. "They know how bad things can get, and they are highly motivated ... to take action."
- Posted in
Comments
Note: Disqus 2012 is best viewed on an up to date browser. Click here for information. Instructions for how to sign up to comment can be viewed here. Our Comment Policy can be viewed here. Please follow the guidelines. Note to Readers: Spam Filter May Capture Legitimate Comments...

11 Comments so far
Show AllPart of being green means means being sustainable and as long as Hawaii ships its garbage elsewhere it is neither green nor sustainable.
Pre-European Hawaii was sustainable. As long as Hawaii depends on imports, it is not sustainable or green.
The carbon footprint of so-called green enery sources includes their manufacture. The footprint of none of the energy sources listed is carbon neutral. As such, none of them are sustainable. Nature's accounting, not some Wall St. or other human construct must be used when designating an action as green or sustainable.
Thankfully, the Hawaiian government is not listening to such absolutist, anarcho-primitivist viewpoints, no one is calling for absolute, pure, carbon-neutrality, or we would literally have to return to the stone age.
But, having written the above, this article doesn't mention anything about how Hawaii will address fossil-fueled transportation dependence. Note that the tour of the facility was done on a pickup truck - plus all the aviation that Hawaii depends on.
I took Jack East's comment as a reminder to go slow on self-congratulation. What you call "absolutist" viewpoint is nothing more than a reminder about how far we have moved away from sustainability and how much work is required to get back to a sustainable lifestyle. The time for piecemeal attempts is long past. Perfect sustainability should be the goal, even if we don't achieve it right away.
I think it's a perfectly good opportunity to draw attention to Hawaii's shipping of garbage elsewhere - since the title gushes forth about some "greenest state" and all.
Jack East's -- Last paragraph, minus the last sentence which he himself violates, is a total falsehood.
Makes one suspect he has a vested interest in fossil fools or nukes.
Vested interests are by far the greatest reason we still use fossil fools and nukes and one is morally obligated to roundly condemn spokesmen for such propaganda.
OK, I agree - about the net carbon emission reduction of *most* green technologies. I should have pointed that out too, but I guess I was more focused on responding to an objection over "absolutist" viewpoints. Shipping out garbage is also an issue I think about quite a bit, and I have noticed the utter hypocrisy of communities and countries pretending to be "green" while transporting their trash to some faraway place. However, as someone who talks about life-cycle accounting from time to time, I could have made it clear which points I was supporting. Point taken.
As for suspicion about vested interest, I generally respond to posts on face value - unless I happen to remember a specific interaction - usually most recently. Saves a lot of misunderstanding and also less stuff to bother my brain with.
Also the algae slurry in the article, is very likely made from garbage as my county is begining to implement.
So since it is very likely that the algae for biofuels is from garbage, nothing Jack Frost... East posted is true.
Don't rag on Jack East...more than one conservative publication I have read confirms the accuracy of his statements.
I have read articles in the shipping trade journals each month for the past year about Hawaii shipping its garbage to an Eastern Oregon desert landfill while plasma technology currently exists to convert garbage to electrical power without any pollution and be cost-effective for anybody shipping garbage more than 500 miles.
The combination of 15 cents (or more) per kilowatt hour of power in Hawaii, hordes of tourists who produce twice the amount of garbage per day than a resident does, and a barge haul of thousands of miles makes this a no-brainer.
Ray 6:19 ------ Not sure what you are saying but Jack East is incorrect in that the algae is meant to solve the garbage problem, converting garbage into biofuels as we are doing in my county.
And photovoltaics do negate their manufacturing carbon footprint becoming carbon neutral after a decade.
I certainly did not claim Hawaii does not have garbage.
I still suspect Jack East is a fossil fool or nuke spokesperson, it would explain the misinformation.
The carbon footprint of solar thermal and photovoltaic manufacture is neutralized after about a decade of use, and so far photovotaics last forever.
Hawaii can help us organize (technology and systems) truly distributed power system. Where every neighborhood creates its own energy both for transport and household.
US mainland is unable to fathom this mainly because the population densities are so high.
I would like to be able to push for neighborhood based power generation. Organized around power co-op .
Are we approaching a time in which people en masse will decide to bring no more children into this world?